Universität Wien

180123 VO-L Science and Society (2017W)

5.00 ECTS (2.00 SWS), SPL 18 - Philosophie

Details

Sprache: Englisch

Prüfungstermine

Lehrende

Termine (iCal) - nächster Termin ist mit N markiert

Note that the first class is on *Monday 16th*, not Monday 9th. This is because I am away for a conference.

  • Montag 16.10. 18:30 - 20:00 Hörsaal III NIG Erdgeschoß
  • Montag 23.10. 18:30 - 20:00 Hörsaal III NIG Erdgeschoß
  • Montag 30.10. 18:30 - 20:00 Hörsaal III NIG Erdgeschoß
  • Montag 06.11. 18:30 - 20:00 Hörsaal III NIG Erdgeschoß
  • Montag 13.11. 18:30 - 20:00 Hörsaal III NIG Erdgeschoß
  • Montag 20.11. 18:30 - 20:00 Hörsaal III NIG Erdgeschoß
  • Montag 27.11. 18:30 - 20:00 Hörsaal III NIG Erdgeschoß
  • Montag 04.12. 18:30 - 20:00 Hörsaal III NIG Erdgeschoß
  • Montag 11.12. 18:30 - 20:00 Hörsaal III NIG Erdgeschoß
  • Montag 08.01. 18:30 - 20:00 Hörsaal III NIG Erdgeschoß
  • Montag 15.01. 18:30 - 20:00 Hörsaal III NIG Erdgeschoß
  • Dienstag 16.01. 18:30 - 20:00 Hörsaal III NIG Erdgeschoß
  • Montag 22.01. 18:30 - 20:00 Hörsaal III NIG Erdgeschoß

Information

Ziele, Inhalte und Methode der Lehrveranstaltung

Contents: In this course we will look at philosophical work on the relationship between science and society. The course will be split into four parts. In the first part we will look at public (dis)trust in science, scientific expertise and the role of trust in science itself. Questions we will consider include: what is the source of public distrust in science? How can we identify scientific experts? What role does trust play in the internal workings of science.

In the second part we will take a broader look at the role of science in society. One view of this role is that science is somehow separate (or should be kept separate) from the broader society in which it is embedded: science is a disinterested quest for the truth, and it should be pursued irrespective of its social benefits (or costs). Another view that science is just ‘politics by another means’. We will consider whether either of these ‘extreme’ views is plausible, and look at attempts to articulate a more nuanced role for science in society.

In the third part we will take a closer look at one of the issues raised in the first two parts. One source of public distrust in science is the recognition that scientists are not in fact ‘disinterested inquirers’: they have their values, they have views about political and ethical debates, and sometimes they comment on these debates. Because this clashes with a popular but naïve view about what science is, many conclude that scientists are not to be trusted. In this part of the course we will look at attempts to get clear on the role that value judgements play in science.

In the fourth and final part we will look at the kinds of broader ethical and societal questions raised by scientific work. We will focus on a number of concrete issues including genetic engineering and animal testing. Our aim in this part of the course will be to think through some of the difficult ethical and societal questions prompted by advances in science.

Aims: This course is designed for students with no prior knowledge of the philosophy of science. By the end of the course students will have acquired and developed:

1. An understanding of the complexity of the relationship between science and society.
2. An appreciation that, while certain cherished ideas about science may fail to withstand critical scrutiny, this need not damage the authority of science.
3. A range of valuable skills and abilities (how to evaluate an argument; how to construct a valid argument; how to read a complicated text).
4. The ability to express complex philosophical ideas and views, with an emphasis on clarity, structure, precision, concision and dialectical effectiveness.

Methods: I will explain and clarify various views about and arguments concerning the relationship between science and society through a series of lectures. The students will be expected to read a text before each lecture (sometimes there will be an additional ‘popular text’ taken from e.g. a newspaper). All of the readings are available on the Moodle page for the course.

Art der Leistungskontrolle und erlaubte Hilfsmittel

The course will be assessed via a 90-minute exam. Students will need to answer a series of short 'comprehension' questions and then answer 1 essay question from a choice of 4 questions. Students will be permitted to bring a dictionary with them into the exam. The use of electronic devices will be prohibited.

Mindestanforderungen und Beurteilungsmaßstab

The exam contains both 'short answers' and an essay. A good 'short answer' will demonstrate a solid understanding of the relevant idea/issue/topic. An excellent essay will go beyond the explanation that was given in the lectures. A good essay will demonstrate a sound understanding of the relevant material and clearly state philosophical arguments. An excellent essay will demonstrate an ability to critically engage with those arguments. Beyond the minimum requirement of comprehensibility, linguistic issues (grammar, spelling) will not be taken into account.

In order to prepare students for the exam I will offer a (non-compulsory) ‘practice exam’ prior to the real exam. Students will answer shorter questions and write an essay at home under exam conditions and submit it to me. I will provide constructive feedback. I will also discuss more general questions about how to write a good essay during class.

Prüfungsstoff

To be determined.

Literatur

Part 1: Trust in science

Week 1 (16th October): Mistrust of science

Core reading:
Philip Kitcher, Science in a Democratic Society (Ch. 1)

Additional:
Film based on the book Merchants of Doubt:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pRenGy0cg5s
Lecture by Erik Conway (co-author of Merchants of Doubt): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iV6A4CZkOXg

Week 2 (23rd October): Scientific expertise

Core reading:
Elizabeth Anderson, “Democracy, Public Policy, and Lay Assessments of Scientific Testimony”

Additional:
Alvin Goldman, “Experts: Which Ones Should You Trust?”

Week 3 (30th October): Trust between scientists

Core reading:
Karen Frost-Arnold, “Moral Trust and Scientific Collaboration”

Additional:
John Hardwig, “The Role of Trust in Knowledge”
Kristina Rolin, “Gender and Trust in Science”

Part 2: Values and risks in science

Week 4 (6th November): Inductive risk

Core reading:
Heather Douglas, “Inductive Risk and Values in Science”

Additional:
Kristen Intemann, “Distinguishing Between Legitimate and Illegitimate Values in Climate Modelling”

Week 5 (13th December): The value-free ideal

Core reading:
Hugh Lacey, Is Science Value-Free? (introduction)

Additional:
Hugh Lacey, Is Science Value-Free? (Ch. 4).
Gregor Betz, “In Defence of the Value-Free Ideal”

Week 6 (20th December): Feminist approaches

Core reading:
Janet Kourany, Philosophy of Science After Feminism (Ch. 3)

Additional:
Anne Fausto-Sterling, “A Question of Genius”
Sandra Harding, “‘Strong Objectivity’”

Part 3: Science in a democratic society

Week 7 (27th November): Well-ordered science

Core reading:
Philip Kitcher, Science, Truth and Democracy (Ch. 10)

Additional:
Philip Kitcher, Science, Truth and Democracy (Ch. 11)

Week 8 (4th December): Dis-ordered science

Core reading:
Manuela Fernández Pinto, “Commercialization and the Limits of Well-Ordered Science”

Additional:
Heather Douglas, “Inserting the Public into Science”

Week 9 (11th December): Empirical challenges to democratic science

Core reading:
Dan Kahan, “Making Climate Science Communication Evidence-Based”

Additional:
Blog post by Dan Kahan on what drives our beliefs about climate change:
http://www.culturalcognition.net/blog/2014/4/23/what-you-believe-about-climate-change-doesnt-reflect-what-yo.html
Fishkin and Luskin, “Experimenting with a Democratic Ideal”

Part 4: Ethical issues in science

Week 10 (8th January): Engineering us

Core reading:
Julian Savulescu, “Genetic Interventions and the Ethics of Enhancement of Human Beings”

Additional:
Article by Michael Sandel in the Atlantic: https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2004/04/the-case-against-perfection/302927/

Week 11 (15th January): Engineering the planet

Core reading:
Clive Hamilton, “The Ethical Foundations of Climate Engineering”

Additional reading:
TBA

Week 12 (22nd January): Experimenting on animals

Core reading:
Tom Regan, “Empty Cages: Animal Rights and Vivisection”

Additional reading:
TBA

Zuordnung im Vorlesungsverzeichnis

Letzte Änderung: Mo 07.09.2020 15:36