180123 VO-L Science and Society (2017W)
Labels
Details
Sprache: Englisch
Prüfungstermine
- Montag 29.01.2018 18:30 - 20:00 Hörsaal III NIG Erdgeschoß
- Montag 26.02.2018 18:30 - 20:00 Hörsaal 3D, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. III/3. Stock, 1010 Wien
- Montag 19.03.2018 11:30 - 13:00 Hörsaal 3B NIG 3.Stock
- Montag 30.04.2018 11:30 - 13:00 Hörsaal 3B NIG 3.Stock
Lehrende
Termine (iCal) - nächster Termin ist mit N markiert
Note that the first class is on *Monday 16th*, not Monday 9th. This is because I am away for a conference.
- Montag 16.10. 18:30 - 20:00 Hörsaal III NIG Erdgeschoß
- Montag 23.10. 18:30 - 20:00 Hörsaal III NIG Erdgeschoß
- Montag 30.10. 18:30 - 20:00 Hörsaal III NIG Erdgeschoß
- Montag 06.11. 18:30 - 20:00 Hörsaal III NIG Erdgeschoß
- Montag 13.11. 18:30 - 20:00 Hörsaal III NIG Erdgeschoß
- Montag 20.11. 18:30 - 20:00 Hörsaal III NIG Erdgeschoß
- Montag 27.11. 18:30 - 20:00 Hörsaal III NIG Erdgeschoß
- Montag 04.12. 18:30 - 20:00 Hörsaal III NIG Erdgeschoß
- Montag 11.12. 18:30 - 20:00 Hörsaal III NIG Erdgeschoß
- Montag 08.01. 18:30 - 20:00 Hörsaal III NIG Erdgeschoß
- Montag 15.01. 18:30 - 20:00 Hörsaal III NIG Erdgeschoß
- Dienstag 16.01. 18:30 - 20:00 Hörsaal III NIG Erdgeschoß
- Montag 22.01. 18:30 - 20:00 Hörsaal III NIG Erdgeschoß
Information
Ziele, Inhalte und Methode der Lehrveranstaltung
Art der Leistungskontrolle und erlaubte Hilfsmittel
The course will be assessed via a 90-minute exam. Students will need to answer a series of short 'comprehension' questions and then answer 1 essay question from a choice of 4 questions. Students will be permitted to bring a dictionary with them into the exam. The use of electronic devices will be prohibited.
Mindestanforderungen und Beurteilungsmaßstab
The exam contains both 'short answers' and an essay. A good 'short answer' will demonstrate a solid understanding of the relevant idea/issue/topic. An excellent essay will go beyond the explanation that was given in the lectures. A good essay will demonstrate a sound understanding of the relevant material and clearly state philosophical arguments. An excellent essay will demonstrate an ability to critically engage with those arguments. Beyond the minimum requirement of comprehensibility, linguistic issues (grammar, spelling) will not be taken into account.In order to prepare students for the exam I will offer a (non-compulsory) ‘practice exam’ prior to the real exam. Students will answer shorter questions and write an essay at home under exam conditions and submit it to me. I will provide constructive feedback. I will also discuss more general questions about how to write a good essay during class.
Prüfungsstoff
To be determined.
Literatur
Part 1: Trust in scienceWeek 1 (16th October): Mistrust of scienceCore reading:
Philip Kitcher, Science in a Democratic Society (Ch. 1)Additional:
Film based on the book Merchants of Doubt:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pRenGy0cg5s
Lecture by Erik Conway (co-author of Merchants of Doubt): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iV6A4CZkOXgWeek 2 (23rd October): Scientific expertiseCore reading:
Elizabeth Anderson, “Democracy, Public Policy, and Lay Assessments of Scientific Testimony”Additional:
Alvin Goldman, “Experts: Which Ones Should You Trust?”Week 3 (30th October): Trust between scientistsCore reading:
Karen Frost-Arnold, “Moral Trust and Scientific Collaboration”Additional:
John Hardwig, “The Role of Trust in Knowledge”
Kristina Rolin, “Gender and Trust in Science”Part 2: Values and risks in scienceWeek 4 (6th November): Inductive riskCore reading:
Heather Douglas, “Inductive Risk and Values in Science”Additional:
Kristen Intemann, “Distinguishing Between Legitimate and Illegitimate Values in Climate Modelling”Week 5 (13th December): The value-free idealCore reading:
Hugh Lacey, Is Science Value-Free? (introduction)Additional:
Hugh Lacey, Is Science Value-Free? (Ch. 4).
Gregor Betz, “In Defence of the Value-Free Ideal”Week 6 (20th December): Feminist approachesCore reading:
Janet Kourany, Philosophy of Science After Feminism (Ch. 3)Additional:
Anne Fausto-Sterling, “A Question of Genius”
Sandra Harding, “‘Strong Objectivity’”Part 3: Science in a democratic societyWeek 7 (27th November): Well-ordered scienceCore reading:
Philip Kitcher, Science, Truth and Democracy (Ch. 10)Additional:
Philip Kitcher, Science, Truth and Democracy (Ch. 11)Week 8 (4th December): Dis-ordered scienceCore reading:
Manuela Fernández Pinto, “Commercialization and the Limits of Well-Ordered Science”Additional:
Heather Douglas, “Inserting the Public into Science”Week 9 (11th December): Empirical challenges to democratic scienceCore reading:
Dan Kahan, “Making Climate Science Communication Evidence-Based”Additional:
Blog post by Dan Kahan on what drives our beliefs about climate change:
http://www.culturalcognition.net/blog/2014/4/23/what-you-believe-about-climate-change-doesnt-reflect-what-yo.html
Fishkin and Luskin, “Experimenting with a Democratic Ideal”Part 4: Ethical issues in scienceWeek 10 (8th January): Engineering usCore reading:
Julian Savulescu, “Genetic Interventions and the Ethics of Enhancement of Human Beings”Additional:
Article by Michael Sandel in the Atlantic: https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2004/04/the-case-against-perfection/302927/Week 11 (15th January): Engineering the planetCore reading:
Clive Hamilton, “The Ethical Foundations of Climate Engineering”Additional reading:
TBAWeek 12 (22nd January): Experimenting on animalsCore reading:
Tom Regan, “Empty Cages: Animal Rights and Vivisection”Additional reading:
TBA
Philip Kitcher, Science in a Democratic Society (Ch. 1)Additional:
Film based on the book Merchants of Doubt:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pRenGy0cg5s
Lecture by Erik Conway (co-author of Merchants of Doubt): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iV6A4CZkOXgWeek 2 (23rd October): Scientific expertiseCore reading:
Elizabeth Anderson, “Democracy, Public Policy, and Lay Assessments of Scientific Testimony”Additional:
Alvin Goldman, “Experts: Which Ones Should You Trust?”Week 3 (30th October): Trust between scientistsCore reading:
Karen Frost-Arnold, “Moral Trust and Scientific Collaboration”Additional:
John Hardwig, “The Role of Trust in Knowledge”
Kristina Rolin, “Gender and Trust in Science”Part 2: Values and risks in scienceWeek 4 (6th November): Inductive riskCore reading:
Heather Douglas, “Inductive Risk and Values in Science”Additional:
Kristen Intemann, “Distinguishing Between Legitimate and Illegitimate Values in Climate Modelling”Week 5 (13th December): The value-free idealCore reading:
Hugh Lacey, Is Science Value-Free? (introduction)Additional:
Hugh Lacey, Is Science Value-Free? (Ch. 4).
Gregor Betz, “In Defence of the Value-Free Ideal”Week 6 (20th December): Feminist approachesCore reading:
Janet Kourany, Philosophy of Science After Feminism (Ch. 3)Additional:
Anne Fausto-Sterling, “A Question of Genius”
Sandra Harding, “‘Strong Objectivity’”Part 3: Science in a democratic societyWeek 7 (27th November): Well-ordered scienceCore reading:
Philip Kitcher, Science, Truth and Democracy (Ch. 10)Additional:
Philip Kitcher, Science, Truth and Democracy (Ch. 11)Week 8 (4th December): Dis-ordered scienceCore reading:
Manuela Fernández Pinto, “Commercialization and the Limits of Well-Ordered Science”Additional:
Heather Douglas, “Inserting the Public into Science”Week 9 (11th December): Empirical challenges to democratic scienceCore reading:
Dan Kahan, “Making Climate Science Communication Evidence-Based”Additional:
Blog post by Dan Kahan on what drives our beliefs about climate change:
http://www.culturalcognition.net/blog/2014/4/23/what-you-believe-about-climate-change-doesnt-reflect-what-yo.html
Fishkin and Luskin, “Experimenting with a Democratic Ideal”Part 4: Ethical issues in scienceWeek 10 (8th January): Engineering usCore reading:
Julian Savulescu, “Genetic Interventions and the Ethics of Enhancement of Human Beings”Additional:
Article by Michael Sandel in the Atlantic: https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2004/04/the-case-against-perfection/302927/Week 11 (15th January): Engineering the planetCore reading:
Clive Hamilton, “The Ethical Foundations of Climate Engineering”Additional reading:
TBAWeek 12 (22nd January): Experimenting on animalsCore reading:
Tom Regan, “Empty Cages: Animal Rights and Vivisection”Additional reading:
TBA
Zuordnung im Vorlesungsverzeichnis
Letzte Änderung: Mo 07.09.2020 15:36
2. An appreciation that, while certain cherished ideas about science may fail to withstand critical scrutiny, this need not damage the authority of science.
3. A range of valuable skills and abilities (how to evaluate an argument; how to construct a valid argument; how to read a complicated text).
4. The ability to express complex philosophical ideas and views, with an emphasis on clarity, structure, precision, concision and dialectical effectiveness.Methods: I will explain and clarify various views about and arguments concerning the relationship between science and society through a series of lectures. The students will be expected to read a text before each lecture (sometimes there will be an additional ‘popular text’ taken from e.g. a newspaper). All of the readings are available on the Moodle page for the course.