Universität Wien

180146 SE Philosophy and Economics Thesis Colloquium (2026S)

5.00 ECTS (2.00 SWS), SPL 18 - Philosophie
Prüfungsimmanente Lehrveranstaltung

Hinweis der SPL Philosophie:

Das Abgeben von ganz oder teilweise von einem KI-tool (z.B. ChatGPT) verfassten Texten als Leistungsnachweis (z.B. Seminararbeit) ist nur dann erlaubt, wenn dies von der Lehrveranstaltungsleitung ausdrücklich als mögliche Arbeitsweise genehmigt wurde. Auch hierbei müssen direkt oder indirekt zitierte Textstellen wie immer klar mit Quellenangabe ausgewiesen werden.

Die Lehrveranstaltungsleitung kann zur Überprüfung der Autorenschaft einer abgegebenen schriftlichen Arbeit ein notenrelevantes Gespräch (Plausibilitätsprüfung) vorsehen, das erfolgreich zu absolvieren ist.
Di 21.04. 08:00-09:30 Hörsaal 2i NIG 2.Stock C0228

An/Abmeldung

Hinweis: Ihr Anmeldezeitpunkt innerhalb der Frist hat keine Auswirkungen auf die Platzvergabe (kein "first come, first served").

Details

max. 25 Teilnehmer*innen
Sprache: Englisch

Lehrende

Termine (iCal) - nächster Termin ist mit N markiert

  • Dienstag 10.03. 08:00 - 09:30 Hörsaal 2i NIG 2.Stock C0228
  • Dienstag 17.03. 08:00 - 09:30 Hörsaal 2i NIG 2.Stock C0228
  • Dienstag 24.03. 08:00 - 09:30 Hörsaal 2i NIG 2.Stock C0228
  • Dienstag 28.04. 08:00 - 09:30 Hörsaal 2i NIG 2.Stock C0228
  • Dienstag 05.05. 08:00 - 09:30 Hörsaal 2i NIG 2.Stock C0228
  • Dienstag 12.05. 08:00 - 09:30 Hörsaal 2i NIG 2.Stock C0228
  • Dienstag 19.05. 08:00 - 09:30 Hörsaal 2i NIG 2.Stock C0228
  • Dienstag 26.05. 08:00 - 09:30 Hörsaal 2i NIG 2.Stock C0228
  • Dienstag 02.06. 08:00 - 09:30 Hörsaal 2i NIG 2.Stock C0228
  • Dienstag 09.06. 08:00 - 09:30 Hörsaal 2i NIG 2.Stock C0228
  • Dienstag 16.06. 08:00 - 09:30 Hörsaal 2i NIG 2.Stock C0228
  • Dienstag 23.06. 08:00 - 09:30 Hörsaal 2i NIG 2.Stock C0228
  • Dienstag 30.06. 08:00 - 09:30 Hörsaal 2i NIG 2.Stock C0228

Information

Ziele, Inhalte und Methode der Lehrveranstaltung

In this colloquium, students present, discuss, and reflect upon their independent research work towards their MA thesis. The colloquium aims to support your research, help you improve your research process, and practice research skills such as presenting your research (which is also intended as preparation of your thesis defensio), responding to others' research, and chairing conference/workshop discussions.

At the end of the colloquium, you will have practised and developed your skills in
- presenting your own research, to an audience not familiar with your project, in oral communications and in writing,
- engaging with questions about your research on the spot,
- asking constructive questions about other's research projects,
- chairing group discussions, and
- structuring your research process and dealing with difficulties in independent research.

The colloquium is taught and assessed in English, and requires everyone's preparation and contribution to succeed.

Art der Leistungskontrolle und erlaubte Hilfsmittel

The colloquium is assessed through the following components:

1) Practical exercises, reading questions, and reflection tasks on skills and methods concerning self-management as a researcher: The colloquium intermittently presents you with different tools for and texts about writing and research self-management, and assignments to read these texts and try out these tools in your thesis writing or research process. Your documentation of these tasks is marked for completeness, not for "correctness". What matters here is that you give the respective method a try, and reflect on whether and how you will implement it in your work. Weight: 15%. Deadline: as specified on the Moodle page for each respective task.
2) Short overview persentation of your research project, of about 3-5 minutes (precise time frame is detailed on Moodle), delivered live during the colloquium. The presentation should include slides or a handout that your respondent can use to prepare for the response. Weight: 15%. Deadline: These materials need to be uploaded by 12 noon the day before the presentation.
3) Presentation of a selected detail from your research project, of about 10-15 minutes (precise time frame is detailed on Moodle), live during the colloquium. The presentation should include slides or a handout that your respondent can use to prepare for the response. Weight: 20%. Deadline: These materials need to be uploaded by 12 noon the day before the presentation.
4) One response each of an overview and a detail presentation. The response consists in the first question to be asked in the discussion of the respective presentation. The question can be slightly longer than usual Q&A question, but should not exceed 3 minutes. Weight of both responses combined: 15%.
5) Chairing a presentation and discussion: The chair presides over the presentation, response, and discussion, attending to time keeping of the presenter and discussant, managing the queue of audience questions, and keeping within the overall time allocated to the presentation, response, and discussion. Weight: 15%.
6) Thesis proposal: A two-page thesis abstract that explains the research question and its background, the methods and arguments you will use, any preliminary hypotheses, as well as the project structure. The abstract must follow a set template that will be provided in class. Weight: 15%. Deadline: June 15, 23:59.
7) Peer feedback on thesis abstract. Deadline: June 30 30, 23:59. A brief peer feedback that answers a few questions about a given abstract. Weight: 5%.
Thesis proposals and peer feedbacks can be submitted at any earlier time as well, as is most helpful for your thesis progress.

For the thesis proposal, you are permitted to use generative AI such as chatGPT as a supplementary tool to aid you in your writing. e.g. to clarify style. If you use such a tool in any step of the writing process, then you must append to your submission a brief explanation of how the technology was used. You are not permitted to use generative AI in any of the weekly tasks, unless this is explicitly stated otherwise.

You are permitted to use generative AI in creating the layout of your slides, but not of the overall content of the presentation. If you use AI for creating slides, you must declare this at the end of your presentation.

Undeclared use of the technology is not permitted and is considered academic misconduct. Use of such technology can and must not replace your understanding and well thought-through argumentative engagement. If I am in doubt about the authorship and tools used in a submission, then I may request of any student that they come to an additional oral examination on their research, in which they need to explain their work and demonstrate their own understanding of all materials they presented and submitted.

Mindestanforderungen und Beurteilungsmaßstab

Each of the assignments is evaluated on a scale from 1 (“Very Good”) to 5 (“Unsatisfactory”). A positive evaluation requires that you achieve a pass grade (4) in all assessment components, and that you actively attend the seminar. Two unauthorized absences will be excused.

Conditional on fulfilling the necessary requirements just mentioned, the final grade, comprised between 1 (“Very good”) and 4 (“Adequate”), is a rounded weighted average of the separate assessment grades. The presenters, chairs, and respondents of the first one to two weeks of presentations can be awarded a discretionary grading bonus to the overall seminar grade, to account for the fact that they have less feedback on these assignments to draw on than subsequent presenters, chairs, and respondents.

A failure to achieve a pass grade in one of the necessary requirements yields a 5 ("Insufficient").

By registering for this course/seminar, you tacitly agree to having all your electronic submissions checked by the plagiarism detection software Turnitin.

Detailed assessment criteria for each assignment are posted on Moodle. Note that for the presentation and response, keeping within the allocated time is part of the assessment and exceeding the times incurs significant marking penalties. This reflects the fact that for conferences and workshops to run smoothly, it is essential that all contributors strictly adhere to their allocated time windows.

Prüfungsstoff

Your presentation and weekly tasks must concern independent research towards an MA thesis in philosophy and economics (which may be a thesis you write for a programme other than the Vienna MA in Philosophy and Economics).

Literatur

As the colloquium is about students' work in progress, there is no reading list. Students work with the literature which they find in the course of their thesis research.

I recommend David Allen's "Getting Things Done" for helpful impulses for a general project management framework, and Joli Jensen's "Write No Matter What: Advice for Academics" for academia-specific advice.

Zuordnung im Vorlesungsverzeichnis

Letzte Änderung: Di 17.02.2026 15:47