180166 SE The Dilemma of Legal Authority (2018W)
Prüfungsimmanente Lehrveranstaltung
Labels
An/Abmeldung
Hinweis: Ihr Anmeldezeitpunkt innerhalb der Frist hat keine Auswirkungen auf die Platzvergabe (kein "first come, first served").
- Anmeldung von Fr 14.09.2018 14:00 bis Fr 21.09.2018 09:00
- Anmeldung von Do 27.09.2018 14:00 bis Mi 03.10.2018 09:00
- Abmeldung bis Mi 31.10.2018 23:59
Details
max. 30 Teilnehmer*innen
Sprache: Englisch
Lehrende
Termine (iCal) - nächster Termin ist mit N markiert
- Freitag 12.10. 09:30 - 12:15 Hörsaal 2G, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/2.Stock, 1010 Wien
- Samstag 13.10. 09:30 - 12:15 Hörsaal 2G, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/2.Stock, 1010 Wien
-
Freitag
09.11.
09:30 - 12:15
Hörsaal 2G, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/2.Stock, 1010 Wien
Hörsaal 2G, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/2.Stock, 1010 Wien - Samstag 10.11. 09:30 - 12:15 Hörsaal 2G, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/2.Stock, 1010 Wien
- Freitag 16.11. 09:30 - 12:15 Hörsaal 2G, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/2.Stock, 1010 Wien
- Samstag 17.11. 09:30 - 12:15 Hörsaal 2G, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/2.Stock, 1010 Wien
- Freitag 23.11. 09:30 - 12:15 Hörsaal 2G, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/2.Stock, 1010 Wien
- Samstag 24.11. 09:30 - 12:15 Hörsaal 2G, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/2.Stock, 1010 Wien
Information
Ziele, Inhalte und Methode der Lehrveranstaltung
Art der Leistungskontrolle und erlaubte Hilfsmittel
The sessions require prior reading and comprehension of the texts. Each session will begin with one-hour lecture on the topic, followed by a presentation of the texts and a discussion to achieve both a deeper comprehension and a critical perspective of the arguments of the texts. You will require to read the material prior to the session and answer some questions which you will find on moodle. Each student will be asked to give a 20-30 minutes presentation of a selected material. In the first session, there will be no presentations. Active participation of all students is essential.
Mindestanforderungen und Beurteilungsmaßstab
The course will be assessed by a final essay (3 000 words, excluding bibliography and footnotes) and a presentation. The weight of each will be as follows:
Presentation: 15%
Essay: 85%
There will be a choice among different essay questions which will be given on Friday 25th May. You will be asked to submit the final essay on Monday 25th June.
Presentation: 15%
Essay: 85%
There will be a choice among different essay questions which will be given on Friday 25th May. You will be asked to submit the final essay on Monday 25th June.
Prüfungsstoff
Literatur
Anscombe, Elisabeth, Intention (Cambridge, Mass.: HUP, second edition 2000, first edition 1957), pp. 1-15; pp. 32-84.
Aquinas, Thomas, Summa Theologicae Ia2ae, Vol. 17, questions 6-17, translated by Thomas Gilby (Cambridge: CUP, corrected edition 2006).
Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, Book III.
Davidson, Donald, ‘Actions, Reasons and Causes’, Journal of Philosophy (1963) 60, pp. 685-700.
Hart, Herbert L.A., The Concept of Law (Oxford: OUP, 1994, 2nd edition).
Kant, Immanuel, Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (translated by Thomas Hill and Arnulf Zweig) (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 2002, some sections), or original text.
Pauer-Studer, Herlinde and Velleman, J. David, Distortions of Normativity. In: Ethical Theory and Moral Practice (2010):14, pp. 329-356.
Raz, Joseph, Practical Reason and Norms pp. 15-84 (Chapters 1 and 2) (Oxford, OUP, reprinted in 2001).
Raz, Joseph, The Morality of Freedom pp. 21-69, (Oxford: OUP, 1986).
Reath, Andrews, ‘Legislating the Moral Law’, 28 Noûs, 1994, pp. 435-464.
Rodriguez-Blanco, Veronica, Law and Authority Under the Guise of the Good (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2014).
Setiya, Kieran, Reasons Without Rationalism (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007), pp. 59-67.
Velleman, J. David, The Guise of the Good. In: Nous (1992):3, pp. 3-26.
Wolff, Robert P., In Defense of Anarchism (London: Harper Torch Books, 1970), chapters I, II and III.
Aquinas, Thomas, Summa Theologicae Ia2ae, Vol. 17, questions 6-17, translated by Thomas Gilby (Cambridge: CUP, corrected edition 2006).
Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, Book III.
Davidson, Donald, ‘Actions, Reasons and Causes’, Journal of Philosophy (1963) 60, pp. 685-700.
Hart, Herbert L.A., The Concept of Law (Oxford: OUP, 1994, 2nd edition).
Kant, Immanuel, Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (translated by Thomas Hill and Arnulf Zweig) (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 2002, some sections), or original text.
Pauer-Studer, Herlinde and Velleman, J. David, Distortions of Normativity. In: Ethical Theory and Moral Practice (2010):14, pp. 329-356.
Raz, Joseph, Practical Reason and Norms pp. 15-84 (Chapters 1 and 2) (Oxford, OUP, reprinted in 2001).
Raz, Joseph, The Morality of Freedom pp. 21-69, (Oxford: OUP, 1986).
Reath, Andrews, ‘Legislating the Moral Law’, 28 Noûs, 1994, pp. 435-464.
Rodriguez-Blanco, Veronica, Law and Authority Under the Guise of the Good (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2014).
Setiya, Kieran, Reasons Without Rationalism (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007), pp. 59-67.
Velleman, J. David, The Guise of the Good. In: Nous (1992):3, pp. 3-26.
Wolff, Robert P., In Defense of Anarchism (London: Harper Torch Books, 1970), chapters I, II and III.
Zuordnung im Vorlesungsverzeichnis
Letzte Änderung: Mo 07.09.2020 15:36
We will attempt to disentangle the dilemma of legal authority in light of theories of action and ancient and contemporary notions of practical reason. We will evaluate different texts to advance the sound conception of practical reason and action that would ground legal authority.
You will learn to evaluate and analyse in depth texts in legal philosophy, and develop a capacity to argue in a sophisticated manner. These are essential intellectual virtues for life. Education is the kindling of a flame, not the filling of a vessel (Socrates).