Achtung! Das Lehrangebot ist noch nicht vollständig und wird bis Semesterbeginn laufend ergänzt.
210058 SE BAK8: Contemporary threats to democracy (2026S)
Prüfungsimmanente Lehrveranstaltung
Labels
An/Abmeldung
Hinweis: Ihr Anmeldezeitpunkt innerhalb der Frist hat keine Auswirkungen auf die Platzvergabe (kein "first come, first served").
- Anmeldung von Mo 02.02.2026 08:00 bis Di 17.02.2026 08:00
- Anmeldung von Do 19.02.2026 08:00 bis Mi 25.02.2026 08:00
- Abmeldung bis Mo 23.03.2026 23:59
Details
max. 25 Teilnehmer*innen
Sprache: Englisch
Lehrende
Termine (iCal) - nächster Termin ist mit N markiert
- Dienstag 10.03. 15:00 - 16:30 Multifunktionsraum, NIG 2.Stock
- Dienstag 17.03. 15:00 - 16:30 Multifunktionsraum, NIG 2.Stock
- Dienstag 24.03. 15:00 - 16:30 Multifunktionsraum, NIG 2.Stock
- Dienstag 14.04. 15:00 - 16:30 Multifunktionsraum, NIG 2.Stock
- Dienstag 21.04. 15:00 - 16:30 Multifunktionsraum, NIG 2.Stock
- Dienstag 28.04. 15:00 - 16:30 Multifunktionsraum, NIG 2.Stock
- Dienstag 05.05. 15:00 - 16:30 Multifunktionsraum, NIG 2.Stock
- Dienstag 12.05. 15:00 - 16:30 Multifunktionsraum, NIG 2.Stock
- Dienstag 19.05. 15:00 - 16:30 Multifunktionsraum, NIG 2.Stock
- Dienstag 26.05. 15:00 - 16:30 Multifunktionsraum, NIG 2.Stock
- Dienstag 02.06. 15:00 - 16:30 Multifunktionsraum, NIG 2.Stock
- Dienstag 09.06. 15:00 - 16:30 Multifunktionsraum, NIG 2.Stock
- Dienstag 16.06. 15:00 - 16:30 Multifunktionsraum, NIG 2.Stock
- Dienstag 23.06. 15:00 - 16:30 Multifunktionsraum, NIG 2.Stock
- Dienstag 30.06. 15:00 - 16:30 Multifunktionsraum, NIG 2.Stock
Information
Ziele, Inhalte und Methode der Lehrveranstaltung
There is widespread agreement, both within and outside the academic community, that democracy is under severe threat. New authoritarian and 'illiberal' forces are said to be attacking democratic institutions across the world and gradually eroding them when in power. While Samuel Huntington charted a 'third wave of democratisation' in the early 1990s, political scientists have recently spoken of a 'third wave of autocratisation'. The 2023 report by the Swedish Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Institute — the organisation behind the most widely used democracy index — indeed observes that 'In a decade, the level of democracy enjoyed by the average global citizen has deteriorated to levels last seen in 1986 — more than 35 years ago'.How can we make sense of these developments? This seminar addresses this important and urgent question by equipping students with a solid understanding of the key debates and controversies in the field. The seminar is divided into four parts. The first part, 'Foundational Texts and Critical Reflections', engages with the foundational texts in this emerging field of study and critically reflects on some of the core concepts used, notably the notion of 'democratic backsliding'. The second part, 'Measurement', deals extensively with the V-Dem index, the most influential index for measuring the quality of democracy, exploring its conceptual foundations, coding strategy, and use of empirical indicators. The third part ('Cases, Actors and Mechanisms') examines various explanations for de-democratisation, including authoritarian parties' hegemonic strategies, citizens' attitudes towards democracy, and the influence of supranational and international agents on domestic democratic development. The fourth part, 'Remedies', considers how de-democratisation might be halted, examining proposals such as strengthening 'democratic resilience' in fragile political systems. Throughout, the seminar connects cutting-edge comparative political science scholarship with related debates in legal studies and political theory, taking a distinctly interdisciplinary approach to de-democratisation.
Art der Leistungskontrolle und erlaubte Hilfsmittel
Coursework and assessment
• Attendance and active participation (students must not miss more than one session)
• Final paper on a set topic (3000 words)
• Attendance and active participation (students must not miss more than one session)
• Final paper on a set topic (3000 words)
Mindestanforderungen und Beurteilungsmaßstab
You can achieve 100 points. 60 points are required to pass the seminar:– Active participation in the seminar: 50 points
– Final seminar paper: 50 pointsGrading scheme:
1 (excellent) 100 – 90 points
2 (good) 89 – 81 points
3 (satisfactory) 80 – 71 points
4 (sufficient) 70 - 61 points
5 (insufficient) 60 – 0 points
– Final seminar paper: 50 pointsGrading scheme:
1 (excellent) 100 – 90 points
2 (good) 89 – 81 points
3 (satisfactory) 80 – 71 points
4 (sufficient) 70 - 61 points
5 (insufficient) 60 – 0 points
Prüfungsstoff
In class and in their final paper, students are expected to demonstrate a sound understanding of the seminar's main texts and topics.
Literatur
Indicative readings:
– Cianetti, Licia and Séan Hanley. 2021. “The End of the Backsliding Paradigm.” Journal of Democracy 32 (1): 66-80.
– Khaitan, Tarunabh. 2019. “Executive aggrandizement in established democracies: A crisis of liberal democratic constitutionalism.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 17 (1): 342-56.
– Levitsky, Steven and Daniel Ziblatt 2018. How Democracies Die, New York, NY: Crown.
– Little, Andrew T. and Anne Meng. 2024. "Measuring Democratic Backsliding." PS: Political Science & Politics 57 (2): 149-161.
– Samuels, David J. (2023) “The International Context of Democratic Backsliding: Rethinking the Role of Third Wave ‘Prodemocracy’ Global Actors.” Perspectives on Politics 21 (3): 1001-1012.
– Scholtes, Julian. 2023. “Constitutionalising the end of history? Pitfalls of a non-regression principle for Article 2 TEU.” European Constitutional Law Review 19 (1): 59-87.
– Wagrandl, Ulrich. 2021. “A Theory of Illiberal Democracy.” In Routledge Handbook of Illiberalism, eds. András Sajó, Renáta Uitz, Stephen Holmes (New York, NY: Routledge), pp. 94-117.
– Wolkenstein, Fabio. 2023. “What is Democratic Backsliding?” Constellations 30 (3): 261-75.
– Cianetti, Licia and Séan Hanley. 2021. “The End of the Backsliding Paradigm.” Journal of Democracy 32 (1): 66-80.
– Khaitan, Tarunabh. 2019. “Executive aggrandizement in established democracies: A crisis of liberal democratic constitutionalism.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 17 (1): 342-56.
– Levitsky, Steven and Daniel Ziblatt 2018. How Democracies Die, New York, NY: Crown.
– Little, Andrew T. and Anne Meng. 2024. "Measuring Democratic Backsliding." PS: Political Science & Politics 57 (2): 149-161.
– Samuels, David J. (2023) “The International Context of Democratic Backsliding: Rethinking the Role of Third Wave ‘Prodemocracy’ Global Actors.” Perspectives on Politics 21 (3): 1001-1012.
– Scholtes, Julian. 2023. “Constitutionalising the end of history? Pitfalls of a non-regression principle for Article 2 TEU.” European Constitutional Law Review 19 (1): 59-87.
– Wagrandl, Ulrich. 2021. “A Theory of Illiberal Democracy.” In Routledge Handbook of Illiberalism, eds. András Sajó, Renáta Uitz, Stephen Holmes (New York, NY: Routledge), pp. 94-117.
– Wolkenstein, Fabio. 2023. “What is Democratic Backsliding?” Constellations 30 (3): 261-75.
Zuordnung im Vorlesungsverzeichnis
Letzte Änderung: Mo 27.07.2026 09:27