210105 VO M4: SpezialVO Internationale Politik und Entwicklung (2022W)
international Biodiversity Politics: Institutions, Actors, Power Relations (engl.)
Labels
VOR-ORT
Nicht-prüfungsimmanente (n-pi) Lehrveranstaltung. Eine Anmeldung über u:space ist erforderlich. Mit der Anmeldung werden Sie automatisch für die entsprechende Moodle-Plattform freigeschaltet. Vorlesungen unterliegen keinen Zugangsbeschränkungen.VO-Prüfungstermine erfordern eine gesonderte Anmeldung.
Mit der Teilnahme an der Lehrveranstaltung verpflichten Sie sich zur Einhaltung der Standards guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis. Schummelversuche und erschlichene Prüfungsleistungen führen zur Nichtbewertung der Lehrveranstaltung (Eintragung eines 'X' im Sammelzeugnis).
Mit der Teilnahme an der Lehrveranstaltung verpflichten Sie sich zur Einhaltung der Standards guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis. Schummelversuche und erschlichene Prüfungsleistungen führen zur Nichtbewertung der Lehrveranstaltung (Eintragung eines 'X' im Sammelzeugnis).
An/Abmeldung
Hinweis: Ihr Anmeldezeitpunkt innerhalb der Frist hat keine Auswirkungen auf die Platzvergabe (kein "first come, first served").
Details
Sprache: Englisch
Prüfungstermine
- Dienstag 24.01.2023 09:45 - 11:15 Hörsaal 50 Hauptgebäude, 2.Stock, Stiege 8
- Dienstag 21.02.2023 13:15 - 14:45 Hörsaal II NIG Erdgeschoß
- Dienstag 09.05.2023 09:45 - 11:15 Hörsaal 34 Hauptgebäude, Hochparterre, Stiege 6
- Donnerstag 22.06.2023 09:45 - 11:15 Hörsaal II NIG Erdgeschoß
Lehrende
Termine (iCal) - nächster Termin ist mit N markiert
- Freitag 07.10. 09:45 - 11:15 Hörsaal II NIG Erdgeschoß
- Freitag 14.10. 09:45 - 11:15 Hörsaal II NIG Erdgeschoß
- Freitag 21.10. 09:45 - 11:15 Hörsaal II NIG Erdgeschoß
- Freitag 04.11. 09:45 - 11:15 Hörsaal II NIG Erdgeschoß
- Freitag 25.11. 09:45 - 11:15 Hörsaal II NIG Erdgeschoß
- Freitag 16.12. 09:45 - 13:00 Hörsaal II NIG Erdgeschoß
- Freitag 13.01. 09:45 - 13:00 Hörsaal II NIG Erdgeschoß
- Freitag 27.01. 09:45 - 11:15 Hörsaal II NIG Erdgeschoß
Information
Ziele, Inhalte und Methode der Lehrveranstaltung
Art der Leistungskontrolle und erlaubte Hilfsmittel
• Knowledge about the content of all lectures
• Familiarity with key principles, concepts, and terminology
• Knowledge about the content of the background literature
• Familiarity with key principles, concepts, and terminology
• Knowledge about the content of the background literature
Mindestanforderungen und Beurteilungsmaßstab
Written exam composed of 10 multiple choice questions (20 Points in total), including questions on the definitions of terms, clarifications of principles and comprehension questions, 2 open questions (20 points each) and one opinion question/Essay (40 points).100 to 90 Points: Very good (1)
89 to 80 Points: Good (2)
79 to 70 Points: Satisfactory (3)
69 to 60 Points: Sufficient (4)
>60 Points: Poor (5)
89 to 80 Points: Good (2)
79 to 70 Points: Satisfactory (3)
69 to 60 Points: Sufficient (4)
>60 Points: Poor (5)
Prüfungsstoff
The examination will be based on:
1) The contents given in all lectures: PowerPoints and lecture contents
2) Obligatory readings of the class (A final list of readings will be distributed by October 7th)
1) The contents given in all lectures: PowerPoints and lecture contents
2) Obligatory readings of the class (A final list of readings will be distributed by October 7th)
Literatur
The final list will be available on Moodle (October 7th)Brand, U. and Vadrot, A.B.M. 2013. Epistemic selectivities towards the valorization of nature in the Nagoya Protocol and the making of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). LEAD – Law, Environment and Development Journal, 9 (2), 202-222.
Escobar, A. 1998. Whose Knowledge, Whose nature? Biodiversity, Conservation, and the Political Ecology of Social Movements
Stevenson, H. et al. 2021. The Practical Fit of Concepts: Ecosystem Services and the Value of Nature. Global Environmental Politics 2021; 21 (2): 3–22.
Hughes, H. and Vadrot, A.B.M. 2019. Weighting the World: IPBES and the Struggle over Biocultural Diversity. Global Environmental Politics , 19 (2), 14–37.
Reynolds J.L. 2020. Governing New Biotechnologies for Biodiversity Conservation: Gene Drives, International Law, and Emerging Politics. Global Environmental Politics 2020; 20 (3): 28–48. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00567
Tessnow-von Wysocki, I. and Vadrot, A. 2020. The Voice of Science on Marine Biodiversity Negotiations: A Systematic Literature Review. Frontiers in Marine Science 7: 614282.
Vadrot, Alice B.M.2014. The Politics of Knowledge and Global Biodiversity. London: Routledge.
Vadrot, Alice B.M. Langlet, Arne. Tessnow-von Wysocki, Ina. 2021. Who owns marine biodiversity? Contesting the world order through the `common heritage of humankind´ principle. Environmental Politics
Vadrot, Alice B.M. 2018. Endangered species, biodiversity and the politics of conservation. In Global Environmental Politics. Concepts, Theories and Case Studies, edited by Gabriela Kütting and Kyle Herman, 198-226. London & New York: Routledge.
Vadrot, A.B.M. 2018. Endangered species, biodiversity and the politics of conservation. In: Kütting, G. (Ed.). Global Environmental Politics. Concepts, Theories and Case Studies. London & New York, 198-226.
Escobar, A. 1998. Whose Knowledge, Whose nature? Biodiversity, Conservation, and the Political Ecology of Social Movements
Stevenson, H. et al. 2021. The Practical Fit of Concepts: Ecosystem Services and the Value of Nature. Global Environmental Politics 2021; 21 (2): 3–22.
Hughes, H. and Vadrot, A.B.M. 2019. Weighting the World: IPBES and the Struggle over Biocultural Diversity. Global Environmental Politics , 19 (2), 14–37.
Reynolds J.L. 2020. Governing New Biotechnologies for Biodiversity Conservation: Gene Drives, International Law, and Emerging Politics. Global Environmental Politics 2020; 20 (3): 28–48. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00567
Tessnow-von Wysocki, I. and Vadrot, A. 2020. The Voice of Science on Marine Biodiversity Negotiations: A Systematic Literature Review. Frontiers in Marine Science 7: 614282.
Vadrot, Alice B.M.2014. The Politics of Knowledge and Global Biodiversity. London: Routledge.
Vadrot, Alice B.M. Langlet, Arne. Tessnow-von Wysocki, Ina. 2021. Who owns marine biodiversity? Contesting the world order through the `common heritage of humankind´ principle. Environmental Politics
Vadrot, Alice B.M. 2018. Endangered species, biodiversity and the politics of conservation. In Global Environmental Politics. Concepts, Theories and Case Studies, edited by Gabriela Kütting and Kyle Herman, 198-226. London & New York: Routledge.
Vadrot, A.B.M. 2018. Endangered species, biodiversity and the politics of conservation. In: Kütting, G. (Ed.). Global Environmental Politics. Concepts, Theories and Case Studies. London & New York, 198-226.
Zuordnung im Vorlesungsverzeichnis
Letzte Änderung: Fr 03.02.2023 14:09
Compared to climate change, the loss of biological diversity is less visible and popular in global environmental politics. However, for the last decade, the study of international biodiversity politics has received new impetus, inter alia because of 1) the increased recognition that biodiversity and climate change must be tackled together, 2) the establishment of new international institutions, and, 3) explicit conflicts over the conceptual and political frameworks that should guide international biodiversity politics. Another important factor – and this is one focus of the lecture – is the role economic reasoning and epistemic selectivity have played in reconfiguring biodiversity conservation as a relevant parameter for economic development and human well-being; a development increasingly contested by Indigenous People and local communities, many state actors of the global South, non-state actors, activists, and scientists advocating for new concepts, including “Pachamama”, “Buen Vivir”, and “Nature’s contribution to people” (NCPs) (Stevenson et al., 2021, Vadrot, 2014, 2020; Brand and Vadrot 2013; Borie and Hulme 2015). In this vein, biodiversity politics is increasingly characterized by the struggle over the kinds of values attributed to nature, the forms of knowledge suitable to understand the drivers and causes of biodiversity loss, and the appropriate regulatory frameworks for the equal distribution of the costs and benefits related to biodiversity loss and conservation (Escobar, 1998; Brand and Vadrot, 2013).Starting from the premise that international biodiversity politics is an increasingly important and contested field of global environmental politics this lecture aims:1) to introduce students to key actors, institutions, and power relations constituting the field of international biodiversity politics,2) to familiarize students with historical, institutional, and epistemic developments in the field of international biodiversity politics, illustrating how power relations have shaped
- the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD),
- the establishment of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), and
- ongoing negotiations on a new Treaty to protect marine biodiversity beyond national jurisdiction (BBNJ),3) to critically discuss recent developments in international biodiversity politics including negotiations on the Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF), transformative change, and struggle over digital sequence information and access and benefit sharing to (marine) genetic resources.The course targets Master students interested in the various themes of international biodiversity politics, and global environmental politics more broadly. The course combines theory and practice and is therefore interesting for students that wish to increase their knowledge and skills on how to study the sites, actors, and processes of global environmental agreement-making (Hughes et al., 2021, Vadrot, 2020).