210111 SE M5: Europäische Union und Europäisierung (2020W)
EU Foreign Policy and Conflict Resolution: Institutions, Instruments, and Case Studies (engl.)
Prüfungsimmanente Lehrveranstaltung
Labels
Die Lehrformate für das WS (digital, hybrid, vor Ort) befinden sich in Entwicklung. Die Lehrenden werden die geplante Organisationsform und Lehrmethodik auf ufind und Moodle bekannt geben. Aufgrund von Covid19 muss mit kurzfristigen Änderungen in Richtung digitaler Lehre gerechnet werden.Nicht-prüfungsimmanente (n-pi) Lehrveranstaltung. Eine Anmeldung über u:space ist erforderlich. Mit der Anmeldung werden Sie automatisch für die entsprechende Moodle-Plattform freigeschaltet. Vorlesungen unterliegen keinen Zugangsbeschränkungen.VO-Prüfungstermine erfordern eine gesonderte Anmeldung.
Mit der Teilnahme an der Lehrveranstaltung verpflichten Sie sich zur Einhaltung der Standards guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis. Schummelversuche und erschlichene Prüfungsleistungen führen zur Nichtbewertung der Lehrveranstaltung (Eintragung eines 'X' im Sammelzeugnis).
Mit der Teilnahme an der Lehrveranstaltung verpflichten Sie sich zur Einhaltung der Standards guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis. Schummelversuche und erschlichene Prüfungsleistungen führen zur Nichtbewertung der Lehrveranstaltung (Eintragung eines 'X' im Sammelzeugnis).
An/Abmeldung
Hinweis: Ihr Anmeldezeitpunkt innerhalb der Frist hat keine Auswirkungen auf die Platzvergabe (kein "first come, first served").
- Anmeldung von Mo 07.09.2020 08:00 bis Mo 21.09.2020 08:00
- Anmeldung von Do 24.09.2020 08:00 bis Do 01.10.2020 08:00
- Abmeldung bis Mo 19.10.2020 08:00
Details
max. 40 Teilnehmer*innen
Sprache: Englisch
Lehrende
Termine (iCal) - nächster Termin ist mit N markiert
-
Mittwoch
07.10.
16:45 - 18:15
Digital
Hörsaal 3 (H3), NIG 2. Stock -
Mittwoch
14.10.
16:45 - 18:15
Digital
Hörsaal 3 (H3), NIG 2. Stock -
Mittwoch
21.10.
16:45 - 18:15
Digital
Hörsaal 3 (H3), NIG 2. Stock -
Mittwoch
28.10.
16:45 - 18:15
Digital
Hörsaal 3 (H3), NIG 2. Stock -
Mittwoch
04.11.
16:45 - 18:15
Digital
Hörsaal 3 (H3), NIG 2. Stock -
Mittwoch
11.11.
16:45 - 18:15
Digital
Hörsaal 3 (H3), NIG 2. Stock -
Mittwoch
18.11.
16:45 - 18:15
Digital
Hörsaal 3 (H3), NIG 2. Stock -
Mittwoch
25.11.
16:45 - 18:15
Digital
Hörsaal 3 (H3), NIG 2. Stock -
Mittwoch
02.12.
16:45 - 18:15
Digital
Hörsaal 3 (H3), NIG 2. Stock -
Mittwoch
09.12.
16:45 - 18:15
Digital
Hörsaal 3 (H3), NIG 2. Stock -
Mittwoch
16.12.
16:45 - 18:15
Digital
Hörsaal 3 (H3), NIG 2. Stock -
Mittwoch
13.01.
16:45 - 18:15
Digital
Hörsaal 3 (H3), NIG 2. Stock -
Mittwoch
20.01.
16:45 - 18:15
Digital
Hörsaal 3 (H3), NIG 2. Stock -
Mittwoch
27.01.
16:45 - 18:15
Digital
Hörsaal 3 (H3), NIG 2. Stock
Information
Ziele, Inhalte und Methode der Lehrveranstaltung
Art der Leistungskontrolle und erlaubte Hilfsmittel
Course requirements include regular attendance and active participation. In phase one students will provide short discussion papers on central arguments of selected course texts. Students may also participate in a short student-debate that takes place at the beginnign of each session. Alternatively to participating in a debate, students can present their seminar paper during phase two. Furthermore, students may be asked to attend relevant public events. Students will write a seminar paper of 12-15 pages.
Mindestanforderungen und Beurteilungsmaßstab
Regular and active participation in the seminar is indispensable. Written assignments 25%, active participation (including in debate or oral presentation of the seminar paper) 25% , seminar paper 50%. Delivery of all partial assignments is mandatory for a positive grade.
Prüfungsstoff
Literatur
• Kriesberg, L. (2007). The conflict resolution field: Origins, growth and differentiation. In I. W. Zartman (Ed.), Peacemaking in international conflict: Methods & techniques (pp. 25-60). Washington, DC: U.S. Institute of Peace Press.
• Ramsbotham, O., Woodhouse T., & Miall, H. (2005). Contemporary conflict resolution. Malden, MA: Polity Press (Ch. 2: Conflict resolution: Origins, foundations and development of the field, pp. 35-62).
• Mueller, Patrick. "Europe's foreign policy and the Middle East peace process: The construction of EU actorness in conflict resolution." Perspectives on European Politics and Society 14, no. 1 (2013): 20-35.
• Diez, T., Stetter, S., & Albert, M. (2006). The European Union and border conflicts: the transformative power of integration. International organization, 563-593.
• Hayward, K. (2006). Reiterating national identities: The European Union conception of conflict resolution in Northern Ireland. Cooperation and Conflict, 41(3), 261-284.
• Tocci, N. (2008). The EU and conflict resolution in Turkey and Georgia: Hindering EU potential through the political management of contractual relations. J. Common Mkt. Stud., 46, 875.• Diez, T., & Pace, M. (2011). Normative power Europe and conflict transformation. In Normative Power Europe (pp. 210-225). Palgrave Macmillan, London.
• Chandler, David. "EU statebuilding: securing the liberal peace through EU enlargement." Global Society 21, no. 4 (2007): 593-607.
• Richmond, O., Björkdahl, A., & Kappler, S. (2011). The emerging EU peacebuilding framework: confirming or transcending liberal peacebuilding?. Cambridge review of international affairs, 24(3), 449-469.
Bossong, Raphael. "EU civilian crisis management and organizational learning." European security 22, no. 1 (2013): 94-112.
• Juncos, A. E. (2018). Civilian CSDP missions:‘the good, the bad and the ugly’. In Research Handbook on the EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy. Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Bercovitch, J. (2007). Mediation in international conflicts: Theory, practice and development. In I. W. Zartman (Ed.), Peacemaking in international conflict: Methods & techniques (pp. 163-194). Washington, DC: U.S. Institute of Peace Press.
• Bergmann, Julian, and Arne Niemann. "Mediating international conflicts: the European Union as an effective peacemaker?." JCMS: journal of common market studies 53, no. 5 (2015): 957-975
• Müller, P., & Bergmann, J. (2020). Orchestrating peace in South Sudan: exploring the effectiveness of the European Union’s mediation support. European Security, 29(2), 149-169.
• Mac Ginty, R., & Richmond, O. P. (2013). The local turn in peace building: A critical agenda for peace. Third world quarterly, 34(5), 763-783.
• Ejdus, Filip, and Ana E. Juncos. "Reclaiming the local in EU peacebuilding: Effectiveness, ownership, and resistance." Contemporary Security Policy 39, no. 1 (2018): 4-27.
• Müller, P., & Zahda, Y. (2018). Local perceptions of the EU’s role in peacebuilding: The case of security sector reform in Palestine. Contemporary security policy, 39(1), 119-141.
• Tocci, Nathalie, ed. The European Union, civil society and conflict. Vol. 19. Taylor & Francis, 2011 (pp. 1-28).
• Hanafi, S., & Tabar, L. (2003). The Intifada and the aid industry: The impact of the new liberal agenda on the Palestinian NGOs. Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East, 23(1), 205-214.
• Biton, Y., & Salomon, G. (2006). Peace in the eyes of Israeli and Palestinian youths: Effects of collective narratives and peace education program. Journal of Peace Research, 43(2), 167-180.
• Shepherd, Laura J., and Caitlin Hamilton. "Gender and peacebuilding." In Handbook on Gender and War. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2016.
• Deiana, M. A., & McDonagh, K. (2018). Translating the Women, Peace and Security Agenda into EU Common Security and Defence Policy: Reflections from EU Peacebuilding. Global Society, 32(4), 415-435.
• O'Reilly, M. (2012). Muscular interventionism: gender, power and liberal p
• Ramsbotham, O., Woodhouse T., & Miall, H. (2005). Contemporary conflict resolution. Malden, MA: Polity Press (Ch. 2: Conflict resolution: Origins, foundations and development of the field, pp. 35-62).
• Mueller, Patrick. "Europe's foreign policy and the Middle East peace process: The construction of EU actorness in conflict resolution." Perspectives on European Politics and Society 14, no. 1 (2013): 20-35.
• Diez, T., Stetter, S., & Albert, M. (2006). The European Union and border conflicts: the transformative power of integration. International organization, 563-593.
• Hayward, K. (2006). Reiterating national identities: The European Union conception of conflict resolution in Northern Ireland. Cooperation and Conflict, 41(3), 261-284.
• Tocci, N. (2008). The EU and conflict resolution in Turkey and Georgia: Hindering EU potential through the political management of contractual relations. J. Common Mkt. Stud., 46, 875.• Diez, T., & Pace, M. (2011). Normative power Europe and conflict transformation. In Normative Power Europe (pp. 210-225). Palgrave Macmillan, London.
• Chandler, David. "EU statebuilding: securing the liberal peace through EU enlargement." Global Society 21, no. 4 (2007): 593-607.
• Richmond, O., Björkdahl, A., & Kappler, S. (2011). The emerging EU peacebuilding framework: confirming or transcending liberal peacebuilding?. Cambridge review of international affairs, 24(3), 449-469.
Bossong, Raphael. "EU civilian crisis management and organizational learning." European security 22, no. 1 (2013): 94-112.
• Juncos, A. E. (2018). Civilian CSDP missions:‘the good, the bad and the ugly’. In Research Handbook on the EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy. Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Bercovitch, J. (2007). Mediation in international conflicts: Theory, practice and development. In I. W. Zartman (Ed.), Peacemaking in international conflict: Methods & techniques (pp. 163-194). Washington, DC: U.S. Institute of Peace Press.
• Bergmann, Julian, and Arne Niemann. "Mediating international conflicts: the European Union as an effective peacemaker?." JCMS: journal of common market studies 53, no. 5 (2015): 957-975
• Müller, P., & Bergmann, J. (2020). Orchestrating peace in South Sudan: exploring the effectiveness of the European Union’s mediation support. European Security, 29(2), 149-169.
• Mac Ginty, R., & Richmond, O. P. (2013). The local turn in peace building: A critical agenda for peace. Third world quarterly, 34(5), 763-783.
• Ejdus, Filip, and Ana E. Juncos. "Reclaiming the local in EU peacebuilding: Effectiveness, ownership, and resistance." Contemporary Security Policy 39, no. 1 (2018): 4-27.
• Müller, P., & Zahda, Y. (2018). Local perceptions of the EU’s role in peacebuilding: The case of security sector reform in Palestine. Contemporary security policy, 39(1), 119-141.
• Tocci, Nathalie, ed. The European Union, civil society and conflict. Vol. 19. Taylor & Francis, 2011 (pp. 1-28).
• Hanafi, S., & Tabar, L. (2003). The Intifada and the aid industry: The impact of the new liberal agenda on the Palestinian NGOs. Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East, 23(1), 205-214.
• Biton, Y., & Salomon, G. (2006). Peace in the eyes of Israeli and Palestinian youths: Effects of collective narratives and peace education program. Journal of Peace Research, 43(2), 167-180.
• Shepherd, Laura J., and Caitlin Hamilton. "Gender and peacebuilding." In Handbook on Gender and War. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2016.
• Deiana, M. A., & McDonagh, K. (2018). Translating the Women, Peace and Security Agenda into EU Common Security and Defence Policy: Reflections from EU Peacebuilding. Global Society, 32(4), 415-435.
• O'Reilly, M. (2012). Muscular interventionism: gender, power and liberal p
Zuordnung im Vorlesungsverzeichnis
Letzte Änderung: Fr 12.05.2023 00:19
• The second phase consists of plenary sessions to hold and discuss student presentations on their seminar papers. Students will be divided into groups in line with their selected topics and guided in developing the research design of their seminar paper. The sessions will allow for in-depth debt debate of individual topics, and student-only meetings in each group. Methods include individual work, peer feedback, presentations, and debate (the online presence of students is required for their individual presentations/meetings).