Universität Wien

230213 SE Engaging with the IVF complex: Biomedicine, power, and governance (2017S)

5.00 ECTS (2.00 SWS), SPL 23 - Soziologie
Prüfungsimmanente Lehrveranstaltung

An/Abmeldung

Hinweis: Ihr Anmeldezeitpunkt innerhalb der Frist hat keine Auswirkungen auf die Platzvergabe (kein "first come, first served").

Details

max. 25 Teilnehmer*innen
Sprache: Englisch

Lehrende

Termine (iCal) - nächster Termin ist mit N markiert

Dienstag 07.03. 11:30 - 13:30 Seminarraum STS, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/6. Stock, 1010 Wien (Vorbesprechung)
Dienstag 14.03. 11:30 - 13:30 Seminarraum STS, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/6. Stock, 1010 Wien
Dienstag 21.03. 11:30 - 13:30 Seminarraum STS, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/6. Stock, 1010 Wien
Dienstag 28.03. 11:30 - 13:30 Seminarraum STS, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/6. Stock, 1010 Wien
Dienstag 04.04. 11:30 - 13:30 Seminarraum STS, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/6. Stock, 1010 Wien
Dienstag 25.04. 11:30 - 13:30 Seminarraum STS, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/6. Stock, 1010 Wien
Dienstag 02.05. 11:30 - 13:30 Seminarraum STS, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/6. Stock, 1010 Wien
Dienstag 16.05. 11:30 - 13:30 Seminarraum STS, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/6. Stock, 1010 Wien
Dienstag 23.05. 11:30 - 13:30 Seminarraum STS, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/6. Stock, 1010 Wien
Dienstag 30.05. 11:30 - 13:30 Seminarraum STS, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/6. Stock, 1010 Wien
Dienstag 13.06. 11:30 - 13:30 Seminarraum STS, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/6. Stock, 1010 Wien
Dienstag 20.06. 11:30 - 14:00 Seminarraum STS, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/6. Stock, 1010 Wien

Information

Ziele, Inhalte und Methode der Lehrveranstaltung

In 1978 the globe’s first 'test tube baby' was born, proving that in vitro fertilization (IVF) could successfully be applied to human beings. A little less than four decades later, in 2016, bioethics committees discussed about the technical feasibility and moral desirability of what some referred to as practices of 'mitrochondial donation' while others wrote about 'three parent embryos'. Arguably, these debates prove that IVF technologies have developed considerably since the early days of IVF in the 1970s, shifting from the making of human life in laboratories to interventions on human life in laboratories. But how can we make sense of these debates? What are bioethics committess? And what does it mean to refer to such entities as 'three parent embryos'?

In this seminar, we will revisit moments of the history of IVF and related technologies, such as pre-implantation genetic diagnosis or human embryonic stem cell research, to discuss and probe conceptual tools and STS lenses that help us think through these questions. Both, IVF technologies and debates on them are, by now, old enough to have histories. Inscribed into new modes of reproduction, they have challenged, transformed, and at times also reified understandings of kinship, parenthood, families, and nationhood. Moreover, IVF technologies have also enabled research on IVF embryos, at times leading to intense debates on humanness and personhood. Biomedical professionals, state authorities, as well as international organizations have paid considerable attention to these fields, puzzling through how to govern them. Therewith, the 'IVF complex' has become an area of dense interactions between biomedicine, power and governance, at times leading to classical modes of political interventions into biomedicine through law, at other times giving rise to new modes of governance, such as through 'bioethics', a new form of expertise, or 'participatory' forms of engagement. In this seminar, we will capitalize on this history so as to study a) the ways in which biomedicine, power, and governance enter into conversation, and b) how STS and related fields have made sense of these interactions.
The aim of this seminar is twofold: On the one hand, we will deepen our understanding of the governance of biomedicine in Western democracies and the ways in which scholars have engaged with biomedicine, power, and governance by reading and discussing scholarly texts. On the other hand, we will also put STS tools and lenses into action, working collectively with documents in small 'ateliers' during class, and performing small-scale 'research projects' either individually or in small groups.

Art der Leistungskontrolle und erlaubte Hilfsmittel

To pass the seminar, students are expected to complete the following tasks:
Read the texts for each week (max. 2) and hand in 5 'reading responses' (individual work; length: one page):
o Almost every week, we will work with texts that you are expected to read in advance. You have to hand in 'reading responses' in which you briefly report on:
a) one thing that you liked in the text;
b) one thing that you found disturbing;
c) a message that you 'take away' with you from the text (which may, or may not, overlap with a)), and
d) a question that you ended up with (the question may be directed to the author and the text; the question can also be related to your effort to use parts of the text to think
of a real life phenomenon in different ways).
o These are working documents. I do not expect you to submit publishable papers. Please try to be as concise as possible: the length of these reports should not exceed one page! Please
send your documents in the evening before the class, so as to enable me to read all your documents in advance.
o You are expected to hand in a total of 5 reading responses. (This implies that you are allowed to miss reading responses without sanctions as long as you submit 5 responses.)

Joining with colleagues, you are expected to provide an 'input' (based on the obligatory course
literature) for one class in an oral presentation (group work):
o Your input will be based on a discussion of the texts. Your task is to unpack the perspective of the
text(s) and to connect the text(s) with other texts that you have read in this seminar or,perhaps, read before as well as with phenomena that you deem interesting.
o This input should not be longer than 15 minutes.
o You should support your input either with a handout or with a short power point presentation.
o The challenge for this input is to prepare it in such a way as to open up spaces for discussions.

During the seminar, you are also expected to perform your own small-scale research project. This
can be performed individually or in small groups (maximum number of 3). This means that you are expected to:
o Find a topic.
o Develop a research question and an approach that allows you to answer this question.
o Gather materials to answer your question.
o Give a short presentation in one of the last sessions of the seminar in June 2017 (depending on the number of students who attend this course, the length of this presentation will be between 10 and 15 minutes).
Write a final seminar paper of 3,500-4,000 words, submitting this by September 3, 2017

Mindestanforderungen und Beurteilungsmaßstab

Grading Scheme
The grading scheme is based on a total of 100 points. These points will be awarded in relation to students’
performance in meeting the course learning aims in the different obligatory tasks.
The maximum number of points to be acquired for each task is:

participation in class (includes 'writing responses'): 30, assessed individually, feedback on request
group input: 20, assessed as group work, feedback by lecturer
presentation of project: 10, assessed group work, individually/as, feedback by lecturer
seminar paper: 40, assessed group work, individually/as, feedback by lecturer

Minimum requirements
A minimum of 50 points is necessary to successfully complete the course. Failure to meet the attendance
regulations, to deliver course assignments on time or to adhere to standards of academic work may result in a
deduction of points.

Grades
100-87 points Excellent (1)
86-75 points Good (2)
74-63 points Satisfactory (3)
62-50 points Sufficient (4)
49-0 points Unsatisfactory (5) (fail)

Attendance
Presence and participation is compulsory. Absences of four hours at maximum are tolerated, provided that the
lecturer is informed about the absence. Absences of up to eight hours in total may be compensated by either a
deduction of grading points or/and extra work agreed with the lecturer. Whether compensation is possible is
decided by the lecturer.
Absences of more than eight hours in total cannot be compensated. In this case, or if the lecturer does not
allow a student to compensate absences of more than four hours, the course cannot be completed and is
graded as a ‘fail’ (5), unless there is a major and unpredictable reason for not being able to fulfil the attendance
requirements on the student’s side (e.g. a longer illness). In such a case, the student may be de-registered from
the course without grading. It is the student’s responsibility to communicate this in a timely manner, and to
provide relevant evidence to their claims if necessary. Whether this exception applies is decided by the lecturer.

Important Grading Information
If not explicitly noted otherwise, all requirements mentioned in the grading scheme and the attendance regulations must be met. If a required task is not fulfilled, e.g. a required assignment is not handed in or if the student does not meet the attendance requirements, this will be considered as a discontinuation of the course.
In that case, the course will be graded as ‘fail’ (5), unless there is a major and unpredictable reason for not being able to fulfill the task on the student's side (e.g. a longer illness). In such a case, the student may be de-registered from the course without grading. It is the student’s responsibility to communicate this in a timely manner, and to provide relevant evidence to their claims if necessary. Whether this exception applies is decided by the lecturer.
If any requirement of the course has been fulfilled by fraudulent means, be it for example by cheating at an exam, plagiarizing parts of a written assignment or by faking signatures on an attendance sheet, the student's participation in the course will be discontinued, the entire course will be graded as ‘not assessed’ and will be
entered into the electronic exam record as ‘fraudulently obtained’. Self-plagiarism, particularly re-using own work handed in for other courses, will be treated likewise.

Prüfungsstoff

Literatur


Zuordnung im Vorlesungsverzeichnis

Letzte Änderung: Mo 07.09.2020 15:39