Achtung! Das Lehrangebot ist noch nicht vollständig und wird bis Semesterbeginn laufend ergänzt.
233041 SE Addressing the law from an STS perspective (2026S)
Materiality, Power, Politics
Prüfungsimmanente Lehrveranstaltung
Labels
An/Abmeldung
Hinweis: Ihr Anmeldezeitpunkt innerhalb der Frist hat keine Auswirkungen auf die Platzvergabe (kein "first come, first served").
- Anmeldung von Mo 02.02.2026 09:00 bis So 22.02.2026 23:59
- Abmeldung bis Mi 06.05.2026 23:59
Details
max. 25 Teilnehmer*innen
Sprache: Englisch
Lehrende
Termine (iCal) - nächster Termin ist mit N markiert
- Dienstag 05.05. 12:00 - 15:00 Seminarraum STS, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/6. Stock, 1010 Wien
- Freitag 08.05. 09:30 - 12:30 Seminarraum STS, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/6. Stock, 1010 Wien
- Montag 11.05. 11:30 - 14:30 Seminarraum STS, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/6. Stock, 1010 Wien
- Mittwoch 13.05. 14:15 - 17:15 Seminarraum STS, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/6. Stock, 1010 Wien
- Montag 18.05. 11:30 - 14:30 Seminarraum STS, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/6. Stock, 1010 Wien
- Dienstag 19.05. 13:45 - 16:45 Seminarraum STS, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/6. Stock, 1010 Wien
- Freitag 22.05. 09:30 - 12:30 Seminarraum STS, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/6. Stock, 1010 Wien
Information
Ziele, Inhalte und Methode der Lehrveranstaltung
Art der Leistungskontrolle und erlaubte Hilfsmittel
To pass the seminar, students are expected to complete the following tasks:
- Attendance and participation to all sessions- Oral assessment
o For each of the four topics of the course, two or three articles will be discussed in class (obligatory readings are listed in the seminar schedule). For each article, one student will be requested to provide an oral 15-minute summary, and three students will be asked to offer an oral 5-minute comment each. This will be followed by a 15-minute class discussion.
o The summary of each article will include the following items:
What are the research questions addressed by the article?
What methodological approaches do the author(s) rely upon?
What empirical material do the author(s) mobilize?
What are the author(s)’ main arguments?
What notions/concepts do the author(s) propose or discuss?
How does the article relate to a specific experience, observation, or concern of your own?
o The comment on each article will point to questions that the article raises for the student-commentator.- Written assessment
o Each student will be attributed one article (the lecturer will list the articles for the written assessment at the end of the first session). The student is expected to write a 5-page summary and discussion of the article.
o The summary will include the following items:
What are the research questions addressed by the article?
What methodological approaches do the author(s) rely upon?
What empirical material do the author(s) mobilize?
What are the author(s)’ main arguments?
What notions/concepts do the author(s) propose or discuss?
How does the article relate to a specific experience, observation, or concern of your own?
o The discussion will consider how the article relates to the lectures and to the class discussion.
- Attendance and participation to all sessions- Oral assessment
o For each of the four topics of the course, two or three articles will be discussed in class (obligatory readings are listed in the seminar schedule). For each article, one student will be requested to provide an oral 15-minute summary, and three students will be asked to offer an oral 5-minute comment each. This will be followed by a 15-minute class discussion.
o The summary of each article will include the following items:
What are the research questions addressed by the article?
What methodological approaches do the author(s) rely upon?
What empirical material do the author(s) mobilize?
What are the author(s)’ main arguments?
What notions/concepts do the author(s) propose or discuss?
How does the article relate to a specific experience, observation, or concern of your own?
o The comment on each article will point to questions that the article raises for the student-commentator.- Written assessment
o Each student will be attributed one article (the lecturer will list the articles for the written assessment at the end of the first session). The student is expected to write a 5-page summary and discussion of the article.
o The summary will include the following items:
What are the research questions addressed by the article?
What methodological approaches do the author(s) rely upon?
What empirical material do the author(s) mobilize?
What are the author(s)’ main arguments?
What notions/concepts do the author(s) propose or discuss?
How does the article relate to a specific experience, observation, or concern of your own?
o The discussion will consider how the article relates to the lectures and to the class discussion.
Mindestanforderungen und Beurteilungsmaßstab
The grading scheme is based on a total of 100 points. These points will be awarded in relation to students’ performance in meeting the course learning aims in the different obligatory tasks.
The grading of the course is based on the separate assessment of different tasks on a scale of 1-5.Participation in class, 10%, assessed individually, no feedback
Oral assignment, 30%, assessed individually, feedback by lecturer
Clarity of oral presentation, 10%, assessed individually, feedback by lecturer
Written assignment 40%, assessed individually, feedback by lecturer
Formal correctness of written work, including punctual delivery, 10%, assessed individually, feedback by lecturerMinimum requirements
A minimum of 50 points is necessary to successfully complete the course. Failure to meet the attendance regulations, to deliver course assignments on time or to adhere to standards of academic work may result in a deduction of points.Grades
100-89 points Excellent (1)
88-76 points Good (2)
75-63 points Satisfactory (3)
62-50 points Sufficient (4)
49-0 points Unsatisfactory (5) (fail)If not explicitly noted otherwise, all requirements mentioned in the grading scheme and the attendance regulations must be met. For more important information on grading, please see the handout.Attendance
Please note: If you miss the first session of the course unexcused, you will be automatically de-registered. Presence and participation is compulsory (both for the seminar units & for the tutorials stated) - for details, see course regulation in the handout.Guidelines for the use of AI tools
Students are expected NOT TO USE AI tools. If students use AI (e.g., Chat GPT or similar software) as a supporting tool in their assignments, this should be acknowledged openly and clearly, so that the instructor is aware of where and to what extent the AI tool was used. For details, see regulation in the handout.
The grading of the course is based on the separate assessment of different tasks on a scale of 1-5.Participation in class, 10%, assessed individually, no feedback
Oral assignment, 30%, assessed individually, feedback by lecturer
Clarity of oral presentation, 10%, assessed individually, feedback by lecturer
Written assignment 40%, assessed individually, feedback by lecturer
Formal correctness of written work, including punctual delivery, 10%, assessed individually, feedback by lecturerMinimum requirements
A minimum of 50 points is necessary to successfully complete the course. Failure to meet the attendance regulations, to deliver course assignments on time or to adhere to standards of academic work may result in a deduction of points.Grades
100-89 points Excellent (1)
88-76 points Good (2)
75-63 points Satisfactory (3)
62-50 points Sufficient (4)
49-0 points Unsatisfactory (5) (fail)If not explicitly noted otherwise, all requirements mentioned in the grading scheme and the attendance regulations must be met. For more important information on grading, please see the handout.Attendance
Please note: If you miss the first session of the course unexcused, you will be automatically de-registered. Presence and participation is compulsory (both for the seminar units & for the tutorials stated) - for details, see course regulation in the handout.Guidelines for the use of AI tools
Students are expected NOT TO USE AI tools. If students use AI (e.g., Chat GPT or similar software) as a supporting tool in their assignments, this should be acknowledged openly and clearly, so that the instructor is aware of where and to what extent the AI tool was used. For details, see regulation in the handout.
Prüfungsstoff
Literatur
Zuordnung im Vorlesungsverzeichnis
Letzte Änderung: Do 09.04.2026 10:46
- The first topic is the making of law. How are legal facts established and enunciated? STS notably emphasizes the material work underlying the fabrication of legal writings (corpus of jurisprudence, legal documents…). Questions arise at the intersection of STS and SLS: what is this materiality about, and how does this focus on materiality capture the specificity and the power of law?
- The second topic is about the modes of presence of the law in the social world. STS notably brings attention to the passage of law through a variety of objects, some mundane, like road signs, others less, like material references to pollutants prohibited by the law. STS thus brings in an understanding of how the law materializes in, and contributes to the shaping of, social life.
- The third topic is the relation between science and the law, for instance when science is mobilized in lawsuits. STS explores the material production of scientific evidence like DNA profiles in criminal justice, or scientific data in toxic tort cases. What is at stake here is the truth power of science and the law, two major institutions in contemporary liberal societies.
- The fourth topic is the legal status of natural entities (a river, a mountain, a forest). This topic resonates with current political and ontological debates on the protection of the “environment” and biodiversity, and triggers dialogue between STS and legal studies.Aims
The course has two main objectives:
1. To examine how STS contributes to understanding of the law as a socio-material construct, and reflection on the crucial, yet sometimes contested, power of the law in contemporary liberal societies.
2. To explore how STS sheds light on the intersection of science and the law, in the current context where the law is often called upon for regulating science, and conversely, where science increasingly puts the law to trial.Methods
The course alternates reading of STS and SLS articles relating to the four topics, and lectures. The course will have a strong interactive dimension. On each topic, students are expected to read, present, comment, and discuss a few pre-circulated articles. After these reading sessions, the lecturer will wrap-up the main lessons from the articles and the discussion in class and raise broader questions relating to the topic.