233060 UE Science in Society Laboratories (2025W)
Prüfungsimmanente Lehrveranstaltung
Labels
An/Abmeldung
Hinweis: Ihr Anmeldezeitpunkt innerhalb der Frist hat keine Auswirkungen auf die Platzvergabe (kein "first come, first served").
- Anmeldung von Mo 01.09.2025 09:00 bis So 21.09.2025 23:59
- Abmeldung bis Mi 15.10.2025 23:59
Details
max. 15 Teilnehmer*innen
Sprache: Englisch
Lehrende
Termine (iCal) - nächster Termin ist mit N markiert
06. Oct Kick Off session
13. Oct Introduction
20. Oct Tutorial 1
27. Oct Mapping debates
03. Nov Tutorial 2
10. Nov Risk Governance and Expertise
17. Nov Tutorial 3
24. Nov Knowledge & Knowledge Production
01. Dec Regulating under uncertainty
15. Dec Tutorial 4
19. Jan Panel Discussions
26. Jan Policy Briefs/wrapping up
- Montag 06.10. 13:15 - 16:30 Seminarraum 17, Kolingasse 14-16, OG02 (Vorbesprechung)
- Montag 13.10. 13:15 - 16:30 Seminarraum 17, Kolingasse 14-16, OG02
- Montag 20.10. 13:15 - 16:30 Seminarraum 17, Kolingasse 14-16, OG02
- Montag 27.10. 13:15 - 16:30 Seminarraum 17, Kolingasse 14-16, OG02
- Montag 03.11. 13:15 - 16:30 Seminarraum 17, Kolingasse 14-16, OG02
- Montag 10.11. 13:15 - 16:30 Seminarraum 17, Kolingasse 14-16, OG02
- Montag 17.11. 13:15 - 16:30 Seminarraum 17, Kolingasse 14-16, OG02
- Montag 24.11. 13:15 - 16:30 Seminarraum 17, Kolingasse 14-16, OG02
- Montag 01.12. 13:15 - 16:30 Seminarraum 17, Kolingasse 14-16, OG02
- Montag 15.12. 13:15 - 16:30 Seminarraum 17, Kolingasse 14-16, OG02
- Montag 12.01. 13:15 - 16:30 Seminarraum 17, Kolingasse 14-16, OG02
- Montag 19.01. 13:15 - 16:30 Seminarraum 17, Kolingasse 14-16, OG02
- Montag 26.01. 13:15 - 16:30 Seminarraum 17, Kolingasse 14-16, OG02
Information
Ziele, Inhalte und Methode der Lehrveranstaltung
Art der Leistungskontrolle und erlaubte Hilfsmittel
To pass the seminar, students are expected to complete the following tasks:
- Preparation of the readings and active participation in class
- Mapping and documentation of a debate along specific work assignments (group work)
- Writing of a contribution for a larger public audience
- Keeping a research diaryThis course uses the plagiarism-detection service Turnitin for larger assignments.
- Preparation of the readings and active participation in class
- Mapping and documentation of a debate along specific work assignments (group work)
- Writing of a contribution for a larger public audience
- Keeping a research diaryThis course uses the plagiarism-detection service Turnitin for larger assignments.
Mindestanforderungen und Beurteilungsmaßstab
The grading of the course is based on the separate assessment of different tasks on a scale of 1-5.- Preparation of the readings and active participation in class: 20 percent, assessed individually, Feedback on demand;
- Mapping and documentation of a debate along specific work assignments (group work), regular presentation of work progress in class: 45 percent, assessed as group work, Feedback by lecturer;
- Writing of a contribution for a larger public audience: 20 percent, assessed individually, Feedback on demand;
- Keeping a research diary: 15 percent, assessed individually, Feedback on demand;Minimum requirements
To successfully complete the course, a weighted average of at least 4,5 is required. Failure to meet the attendance regulations, to deliver course assignments on time or to adhere to standards of academic work may also be considered in the course assessment.If not explicitly noted otherwise, all requirements mentioned in the grading scheme and the attendance regulations must be met. For more important information on grading, please see the handout.Attendance
Please note: If you miss the first session of the course unexcused, you will be automatically de-registered. Presence and participation is compulsory (both for the course units & for the tutorials stated) - for details, see course regulation in the handout.Guidelines for the use of AI tools
If you use AI (e.g. Chat GPT or similar software) as a supporting tool in your assignments, this should be acknowledged openly and clearly, so that the instructor is aware of where and to what extent the AI tool was used. For details, see regulation in the handout.
- Mapping and documentation of a debate along specific work assignments (group work), regular presentation of work progress in class: 45 percent, assessed as group work, Feedback by lecturer;
- Writing of a contribution for a larger public audience: 20 percent, assessed individually, Feedback on demand;
- Keeping a research diary: 15 percent, assessed individually, Feedback on demand;Minimum requirements
To successfully complete the course, a weighted average of at least 4,5 is required. Failure to meet the attendance regulations, to deliver course assignments on time or to adhere to standards of academic work may also be considered in the course assessment.If not explicitly noted otherwise, all requirements mentioned in the grading scheme and the attendance regulations must be met. For more important information on grading, please see the handout.Attendance
Please note: If you miss the first session of the course unexcused, you will be automatically de-registered. Presence and participation is compulsory (both for the course units & for the tutorials stated) - for details, see course regulation in the handout.Guidelines for the use of AI tools
If you use AI (e.g. Chat GPT or similar software) as a supporting tool in your assignments, this should be acknowledged openly and clearly, so that the instructor is aware of where and to what extent the AI tool was used. For details, see regulation in the handout.
Prüfungsstoff
Literatur
Zuordnung im Vorlesungsverzeichnis
Letzte Änderung: Fr 07.11.2025 09:07
- Concepts and tools to analyze the interplay of science, technology and society.
- The application of the newly gained skills in working on specific debates at the intersection of science, technology and society.
- The techniques of research as well as the assessment and preparation of information.
- Thinking and collaborating in interdisciplinary contexts.
- Developing the ability to reflect on one’s own disciplinary perspective.
- Developing the ability to understand and judge the entanglement of societal values and scientific expertise in the debates as well as the implications for questions of responsibility.