128141 FS FS Research Seminar I / II (2022W)
Rethinking the speaker-language relation
Continuous assessment of course work
Labels
Registration/Deregistration
Note: The time of your registration within the registration period has no effect on the allocation of places (no first come, first served).
- Registration is open from Mo 05.09.2022 00:00 to Mo 19.09.2022 08:00
- Deregistration possible until Mo 31.10.2022 23:59
Details
max. 20 participants
Language: English
Lecturers
Classes (iCal) - next class is marked with N
- Tuesday 11.10. 12:15 - 13:45 Raum 2 Anglistik UniCampus Hof 8 3E-EG-09
- Tuesday 18.10. 12:15 - 13:45 Raum 2 Anglistik UniCampus Hof 8 3E-EG-09
- Tuesday 25.10. 12:15 - 13:45 Raum 2 Anglistik UniCampus Hof 8 3E-EG-09
- Tuesday 08.11. 12:15 - 13:45 Raum 2 Anglistik UniCampus Hof 8 3E-EG-09
- Tuesday 15.11. 12:15 - 13:45 Raum 2 Anglistik UniCampus Hof 8 3E-EG-09
- Tuesday 22.11. 12:15 - 13:45 Raum 2 Anglistik UniCampus Hof 8 3E-EG-09
- Tuesday 29.11. 12:15 - 13:45 Raum 2 Anglistik UniCampus Hof 8 3E-EG-09
- Tuesday 06.12. 12:15 - 13:45 Raum 2 Anglistik UniCampus Hof 8 3E-EG-09
- Tuesday 13.12. 12:15 - 13:45 Raum 2 Anglistik UniCampus Hof 8 3E-EG-09
- Tuesday 10.01. 12:15 - 13:45 Raum 2 Anglistik UniCampus Hof 8 3E-EG-09
- Tuesday 17.01. 12:15 - 13:45 Raum 2 Anglistik UniCampus Hof 8 3E-EG-09
- Tuesday 24.01. 12:15 - 13:45 Raum 2 Anglistik UniCampus Hof 8 3E-EG-09
- Tuesday 31.01. 12:15 - 13:45 Raum 2 Anglistik UniCampus Hof 8 3E-EG-09
Information
Aims, contents and method of the course
Assessment and permitted materials
Classroom participation, participation in oral debate, written final essay.
Minimum requirements and assessment criteria
Regular class attendance (max. two absences) and active participation are required. Grade schema: >= 90% for 1, >=80% for 2, >=70% for 3, >=60% for 4.Grade components:
classroom participation throughout the semester (20%)
Performance in oral one-on-one debate (30%)
Written comments on positions taken in one-on-one debates (10%)
Written final position paper (30%)
classroom participation throughout the semester (20%)
Performance in oral one-on-one debate (30%)
Written comments on positions taken in one-on-one debates (10%)
Written final position paper (30%)
Examination topics
see "Minimal requirements and grading schema", grade components
Reading list
Finkelstein, Robert (compiler). 2008. Memetics Compendium. https://1drv.ms/b/s!AjtFnTf0R_X_gtsHEBvuOK67VkD-jg?e=Uh2memMcMahon, April & Robert McMahon. 2012. Evolutionary Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://web-p-ebscohost-com.uaccess.univie.ac.at/ehost/detail/detail?nobk=y&vid=1&sid=40df0a53-9bef-4848-b8fe-7467afcbd30b@redis&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ==#AN=490502&db=nlebk
Association in the course directory
Studium: MA 812 (2)
Code/Modul: M04 FS. M05
Lehrinhalt: 12-8143
Code/Modul: M04 FS. M05
Lehrinhalt: 12-8143
Last modified: Mo 10.10.2022 14:08
In this seminar, we will consider a variety of language-related phenomena to assess the relative plausibility of the ‘tool’ view and the ‘virus’ view. Among these phenomena will be (a) linguistic diversity (impeding communication and motivating language based ‘othering’), (b) the pressure on people to conform to linguistic norms, (c) the dynamics underlying language change, (d) biased and discriminating language, or (e) the fact that much of what we consider reality is linguistically constructed, sometimes imposing roles on us that we accept as natural even though they seriously constrain our pursuit of happiness or even harm us.
The seminar will begin with an introductory phase, in which current arguments for the ‘tool’ view and the ‘virus’ view will be presented. It will be followed by a phase of joint brainstorming in which we reflect on such basic questions as how one should at all determine whether something is good or bad for people, or what it might even mean that something is good or bad for language or their constituents. Next, participants will choose topic areas for in depth exploration, and try to derive arguments – either from extant literature or from empirical investigations – for dealing with the question to what extent speakers control their own languages and to what extent they are controlled by them. The idea is that we form pairs of participants one of whom tries to defend the ‘tool’ view, and the other the ‘virus’ view. Oral presentations will then assume the form of a debate, and also written final papers may be written jointly, with ‘opponents’ commenting on one another’s positions and arguments.