180079 SE Master Thesis Seminar in Cognitive Science, Philosophy of Science and Knowledge Technologies (2017S)
Continuous assessment of course work
Labels
First Meeting (Vorbesprechung): March 2, 2017 | 11:00 - 13:00 | HS 2i, NIG, Universitätsstr. 7, 1010 WienFurther dates:
9.3., 30.3., 6.4., 27.4., 4.5., 11.5. and 22.5.2017
9:30 - 13:00, HS 2i, NIG, Universitätsstr. 7, 1010 Wien
9.3., 30.3., 6.4., 27.4., 4.5., 11.5. and 22.5.2017
9:30 - 13:00, HS 2i, NIG, Universitätsstr. 7, 1010 Wien
Registration/Deregistration
Note: The time of your registration within the registration period has no effect on the allocation of places (no first come, first served).
- Registration is open from Mo 06.02.2017 12:00 to Mo 20.02.2017 12:00
- Registration is open from We 22.02.2017 12:00 to Mo 27.02.2017 12:00
- Deregistration possible until Fr 31.03.2017 12:00
Details
max. 25 participants
Language: English
Lecturers
Classes
First Meeting (Vorbesprechung): March 2, 2017 | 11:00 - 13:00 | HS 2i, NIG, Universitätsstr. 7, 1010 Wien
Further dates:9.3., 30.3., 6.4., 27.4., 4.5., 11.5. and 22.5.2017
9:30 - 13:00, HS 2i, NIG, Universitätsstr. 7, 1010 Wien
Information
Aims, contents and method of the course
Assessment and permitted materials
Active participation in the seminar, teamwork sessions and MEi:CogSci Conference, oral presentation of your thesis in the seminar sessions, writing your Master’s thesis concept, extended abstract (1 page, max. 3000 characters) of your Master’s thesis research for the review process, 2 reviews of colleagues' abstracts, final abstract for the conference proceedings, talk at the MEi:CogSci Conference
Minimum requirements and assessment criteria
Minimum requirements for passing the course:
- Active participation in the seminar and teamwork sessions (you may miss max. 2 sessions)
- Active participation in the MEi:CogSci Conference (presenting your Master’s Thesis in a talk) and in the peer-review process (writing an extended abstract (max. 3000 characters), 2 reviews of colleagues' abstracts, final abstract for the conference proceedings)
- oral presentation of your thesis in the seminar sessions
- Master’s thesis concept (following template provided)Assessment criteria:
- oral presentation of your thesis in the seminar sessions (30 % of final grade)
- Master’s thesis concept (following template provided; deadline of upload April 30) (55 % of final grade);
- Active participation in the seminar (giving feedback, discussing) (15 % of final grade)
- Active participation in the seminar and teamwork sessions (you may miss max. 2 sessions)
- Active participation in the MEi:CogSci Conference (presenting your Master’s Thesis in a talk) and in the peer-review process (writing an extended abstract (max. 3000 characters), 2 reviews of colleagues' abstracts, final abstract for the conference proceedings)
- oral presentation of your thesis in the seminar sessions
- Master’s thesis concept (following template provided)Assessment criteria:
- oral presentation of your thesis in the seminar sessions (30 % of final grade)
- Master’s thesis concept (following template provided; deadline of upload April 30) (55 % of final grade);
- Active participation in the seminar (giving feedback, discussing) (15 % of final grade)
Examination topics
Reading list
Association in the course directory
MA M5
Last modified: Mo 07.09.2020 15:36
The seminar includes participation in the MEi:CogSci conference (writing an extended abstract, peer-review-process, talk) as a compulsory requirement.Learning Outcomes:
- Ability to pose and follow a scientific question relevant to cognitive science
- Ability to plan, conduct, and document scientific work
- Ability to write an extended scientific abstract
- Ability to defend one’s research and constructively deal with critical commentary
- Ability to participate in a peer-review process
- Ability to present your research/thesis to an interdisciplinary audience/cognitive science community
- Collaborative work in physical and virtual environments
- Ability to engage in an interdisciplinary scientific discourse
- Ability to communicate one’s expertise in order to contribute constructive criticism to the work of others