Warning! The directory is not yet complete and will be amended until the beginning of the term.
340239 UE Dialogue Interpreting: Education, Health and Social Service Settings French / Russian (2025W)
Continuous assessment of course work
Labels
Registration/Deregistration
Note: The time of your registration within the registration period has no effect on the allocation of places (no first come, first served).
- Registration is open from Mo 15.09.2025 09:00 to Fr 26.09.2025 17:00
- Registration is open from Mo 13.10.2025 09:00 to Fr 17.10.2025 17:00
- Deregistration possible until Fr 24.10.2025 23:59
Details
max. 25 participants
Language: French, Russian
Lecturers
Classes (iCal) - next class is marked with N
- Tuesday 14.10. 16:45 - 18:15 Seminarraum 8 ZfT Philippovichgasse 11, 2.OG
- Tuesday 21.10. 16:45 - 18:15 Seminarraum 8 ZfT Philippovichgasse 11, 2.OG
- Tuesday 28.10. 16:45 - 18:15 Seminarraum 8 ZfT Philippovichgasse 11, 2.OG
- Tuesday 04.11. 16:45 - 18:15 Seminarraum 8 ZfT Philippovichgasse 11, 2.OG
- Tuesday 11.11. 16:45 - 18:15 Seminarraum 8 ZfT Philippovichgasse 11, 2.OG
- Tuesday 18.11. 16:45 - 18:15 Seminarraum 8 ZfT Philippovichgasse 11, 2.OG
- Tuesday 02.12. 16:45 - 18:15 Seminarraum 8 ZfT Philippovichgasse 11, 2.OG
- Tuesday 09.12. 16:45 - 18:15 Seminarraum 8 ZfT Philippovichgasse 11, 2.OG
- Tuesday 16.12. 16:45 - 18:15 Seminarraum 8 ZfT Philippovichgasse 11, 2.OG
- Tuesday 13.01. 16:45 - 18:15 Seminarraum 8 ZfT Philippovichgasse 11, 2.OG
- Tuesday 20.01. 16:45 - 18:15 Seminarraum 8 ZfT Philippovichgasse 11, 2.OG
Information
Aims, contents and method of the course
Assessment and permitted materials
The course is a continuous assessment course. All oral and written performances in classes (both online and face-to-face), homework and assignments on Moodle will be taken into consideration in the grading process.
Presence is required.
Presence is required.
Minimum requirements and assessment criteria
After completing the course, students should be able to:
- prepare for a topic and conduct the necessary research work;
- analyse the roles and communication relationships in a dialogue communication situation and develop and apply interpreting strategies accordingly;
- interpret a contribution in a dialogue interpreting setting in a way that is appropriate to the situation, content-related and terminologically correct;
- critically reflect on and evaluate one's own interpreting performance or that of others.
Assessment of the performances
- Analysis of your own or your peers' interpreting performance 10 %.
- Active participation (glossaries, research, own speeches, etc.) 30 %.
- Interpreting performance in face-to-face classes 60 %.
Interpreting is assessed according to the assessment criteria for dialogue interpreting: https://transvienna.univie.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/z_translationswiss/Studium/Masterstudium/BEURTEILUNGSKRITERIEN_DD-Studierende.pdf
Grading key:
1 (very good) 90 - 100 %
2 (good) 80 - <90 %
3 (satisfactory) 70 - <80 %
4 (sufficient) 60 - <70 %
5 (failed) <60 %
- prepare for a topic and conduct the necessary research work;
- analyse the roles and communication relationships in a dialogue communication situation and develop and apply interpreting strategies accordingly;
- interpret a contribution in a dialogue interpreting setting in a way that is appropriate to the situation, content-related and terminologically correct;
- critically reflect on and evaluate one's own interpreting performance or that of others.
Assessment of the performances
- Analysis of your own or your peers' interpreting performance 10 %.
- Active participation (glossaries, research, own speeches, etc.) 30 %.
- Interpreting performance in face-to-face classes 60 %.
Interpreting is assessed according to the assessment criteria for dialogue interpreting: https://transvienna.univie.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/z_translationswiss/Studium/Masterstudium/BEURTEILUNGSKRITERIEN_DD-Studierende.pdf
Grading key:
1 (very good) 90 - 100 %
2 (good) 80 - <90 %
3 (satisfactory) 70 - <80 %
4 (sufficient) 60 - <70 %
5 (failed) <60 %
Examination topics
- Analysis of your own or your peers' interpreting performance 10 %.
- Active participation (glossaries, research, own speeches, etc.) 30 %.
- Interpreting performance in face-to-face classes 60 %.
Interpreting is assessed according to the assessment criteria for dialogue interpreting: https://transvienna.univie.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/z_translationswiss/Studium/Masterstudium/BEURTEILUNGSKRITERIEN_DD-Studierende.pdf
Grading key:
1 (very good) 90 - 100 %
2 (good) 80 - <90 %
3 (satisfactory) 70 - <80 %
4 (sufficient) 60 - <70 %
5 (failed) <60 %
- Active participation (glossaries, research, own speeches, etc.) 30 %.
- Interpreting performance in face-to-face classes 60 %.
Interpreting is assessed according to the assessment criteria for dialogue interpreting: https://transvienna.univie.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/z_translationswiss/Studium/Masterstudium/BEURTEILUNGSKRITERIEN_DD-Studierende.pdf
Grading key:
1 (very good) 90 - 100 %
2 (good) 80 - <90 %
3 (satisfactory) 70 - <80 %
4 (sufficient) 60 - <70 %
5 (failed) <60 %
Reading list
Will be announced via Moodle.
Recommended reading:
- DABIĆ, Mascha (2021) Dolmetschen in der Psychotherapie. Prekäres Gleichgewicht. Tübingen: Narr Francke Attemtpo
- GRBIĆ, Nadja, PÖLLABAUER, Sonja (Hg.) (2006) "Ich habe mich ganz peinlich gefühlt." Forschung zum Kommunaldolmetschen in Österreich: Problemstellungen, Perspektiven und Potenziale. Graz: Institut für Translationswissenschaft Universität Graz
- KADRIĆ, Mira (2011) Dialog als Prinzip. Für eine emanzipatorische Praxis und Didaktik des Dolmetschens. Tübingen: Narr Verlag
- KADRIĆ, Mira (2016) Dolmetschen als Dienst am Menschen, In.: Kadrić, M., Kaindl, K. (Hg.) Berufsziel Übersetzen und Dolmetschen. Tübingen: Narr Francke Attempto, 103-119
- MASON, Ian (Hg.) (2001) Triadic Exchanges. Studies in Dialogue Interpreting. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing
- PÖLLABAUER, Sonja, PRUNČ, Erich (Hg.) (2003) Brücken bauen statt Barrieren. Sprach- und Kulturmittlung im sozialen, medizinischen und therapeutischen Bereich. Graz: Institut für Translationswissenschaft Universität Graz
- UNHCR-Trainingshandbuch für DolmetscherInnen im Asylverfahren (2015) Linz: Trauner Verlag. Online-Version unter: https://www.unhcr.org/dach/wp-content/uploads/sites/27/2017/04/AUT_UNHCR_Trainingshandbuch_fuer_DolmetscherInnen_im_Asylverfahren.pdf
Recommended reading:
- DABIĆ, Mascha (2021) Dolmetschen in der Psychotherapie. Prekäres Gleichgewicht. Tübingen: Narr Francke Attemtpo
- GRBIĆ, Nadja, PÖLLABAUER, Sonja (Hg.) (2006) "Ich habe mich ganz peinlich gefühlt." Forschung zum Kommunaldolmetschen in Österreich: Problemstellungen, Perspektiven und Potenziale. Graz: Institut für Translationswissenschaft Universität Graz
- KADRIĆ, Mira (2011) Dialog als Prinzip. Für eine emanzipatorische Praxis und Didaktik des Dolmetschens. Tübingen: Narr Verlag
- KADRIĆ, Mira (2016) Dolmetschen als Dienst am Menschen, In.: Kadrić, M., Kaindl, K. (Hg.) Berufsziel Übersetzen und Dolmetschen. Tübingen: Narr Francke Attempto, 103-119
- MASON, Ian (Hg.) (2001) Triadic Exchanges. Studies in Dialogue Interpreting. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing
- PÖLLABAUER, Sonja, PRUNČ, Erich (Hg.) (2003) Brücken bauen statt Barrieren. Sprach- und Kulturmittlung im sozialen, medizinischen und therapeutischen Bereich. Graz: Institut für Translationswissenschaft Universität Graz
- UNHCR-Trainingshandbuch für DolmetscherInnen im Asylverfahren (2015) Linz: Trauner Verlag. Online-Version unter: https://www.unhcr.org/dach/wp-content/uploads/sites/27/2017/04/AUT_UNHCR_Trainingshandbuch_fuer_DolmetscherInnen_im_Asylverfahren.pdf
Association in the course directory
Last modified: We 03.12.2025 08:47
- Preparing practical and challenging dialogue interpreting situations (e.g. hospital, police, school, trade fairs and events ...);
- topic-related research and preparation for interpreting;
- improving interpreting strategies in different settings (consecutive interpreting, chuchotage, sight-reading interpreting)
- Developing and applying soft skills: cooperative preparation for interpreting assignments; working in a team of interpreters, etc.
- Analysis of the interpreting: Self- and peer-evaluation
- Analysis of quality criteria in dialogue interpreting
- Optimising the output and presentation