030238 SE Seminar aus Völkerrecht: Internationales Investitionsrecht und Rechtsstaatlichkeit (2019S)
(für DiplomandInnen und DissertantInnen)
Prüfungsimmanente Lehrveranstaltung
Labels
Anmeldung per E-Mail von Ihrer u:account-E-Mailadresse aus an martina.mittermayer@univie.ac.at bis 1.3.2019 16:00 Uhr.
Details
max. 25 Teilnehmer*innen
Sprache: Deutsch, Englisch
Lehrende
Termine (iCal) - nächster Termin ist mit N markiert
- Freitag 08.03. 15:00 - 16:30 Seminarraum SEM62 Schottenbastei 10-16, Juridicum 6.OG (Vorbesprechung)
- Mittwoch 12.06. 09:00 - 18:00 Seminarraum SEM63 Schottenbastei 10-16, Juridicum 6.OG
- Donnerstag 13.06. 09:00 - 15:00 Seminarraum SEM61 Schottenbastei 10-16, Juridicum 6.OG
Information
Ziele, Inhalte und Methode der Lehrveranstaltung
Art der Leistungskontrolle und erlaubte Hilfsmittel
Seminararbeit, mündliche Präsentation und Diskussionsteilnahme
Mindestanforderungen und Beurteilungsmaßstab
Prüfungsstoff
• Independence and Impartiality of Arbitrators
• Procedural fairness in investment arbitration
• Transparency in investment arbitration
• Persuasive authority, predictability and consistency in arbitral decision making
• Review of arbitral awards; appeals mechanism?
• Host State (counter)-claims – equality of access to investment arbitration?
• The rule of law component inherent in the non-discrimination standards of MFN and national treatment
• Fair and Equitable Treatment – rule of law components
- Denial of Justice/Due Process
- Transparency
- Proportionality
- Reasonableness
- Stability and predictability
- Legitimate expectations
• Full Protection and Security – rule of law components
• Expropriation – rule of law components (Non-discrimination and due process)
• Judicial Expropriation
• Investment protection standards and the “right to regulate” (threat to regulatory powers of host states)
• Procedural fairness in investment arbitration
• Transparency in investment arbitration
• Persuasive authority, predictability and consistency in arbitral decision making
• Review of arbitral awards; appeals mechanism?
• Host State (counter)-claims – equality of access to investment arbitration?
• The rule of law component inherent in the non-discrimination standards of MFN and national treatment
• Fair and Equitable Treatment – rule of law components
- Denial of Justice/Due Process
- Transparency
- Proportionality
- Reasonableness
- Stability and predictability
- Legitimate expectations
• Full Protection and Security – rule of law components
• Expropriation – rule of law components (Non-discrimination and due process)
• Judicial Expropriation
• Investment protection standards and the “right to regulate” (threat to regulatory powers of host states)
Literatur
F. Baetens, ‘Discrimination on the Basis of Nationality: Determining Likeness in Human Rights and Investment Law’, in S Schill (ed.), International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2010) 279-315.
J. Bonnitcha, L. Poulsen and M. Waibel, The Political Economy of the Investment Treaty Regime (2017 OUP);
S. Chesterman, ‘An International Rule of Law’ (2008) 56 American Journal of Comparative Law 331Franceso Francioni, ‘Access to Justice, Denial of Justice and International Investment Law’, 20 EJIL (2009) 729;
D. Gaukrodger and K. Gordon, ‘Investor-State Dispute Settlement: A Scoping Paper for the Investment Policy Community’, OECD Working Papers on International Investment, No. 3 (OECD Publishing 2012).V. Heiskanen, ‘Arbitrary and Unreasonable Measures’, in A. Reinisch (ed.), Standards of Investment Protection (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008), 87;
M. Jacob and St. W. Schill, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment: Content, Practice, Method’, in M. Bungenberg, J. Griebel, S. Hobe and A. Reinisch (eds), International Investment Law. A Handbook (Beck – Nomos – Hart 2015) 700-763.R. Kläger, Fair and Equitable Treatment in International Investment Law (CUP 2011).D. Krishan, ‘Thinking about BITS and BIT Arbitration: The Legitimacy Crisis that Never was’, in T. Weiler and F. Baetens (eds.), New Directions in International Economic Law: in memoriam Thomas Wälde (Nijhoff 2011) 107-150.A. Kulick (ed.), Reassertion of Control over the Investment Treaty Regime, (Cambridge University Press, 2017).Abul F.M. Maniruzzaman, ‘Expropriation of Alien Property and the Principle of Non-Discrimination in International Law of Foreign Investment: An Overview’ (1998) 8 Journal of Transnational Law and Policy 57;
Jan Paulsson, Denial of Justice in International Law (2005);
L. Poulsen, Bounded Rationality and Economic Diplomacy: The Politics of Investment Treaties in Developing Countries (2015 CUP).
A. Reinisch, ‘The Rule of Law in International Investment Arbitration’ in P. Pazartzis and M. Gavouneli et al. (eds.), Reconceptualising the Rule of Law in Global Governance, Resources, Investment and Trade, (Oxford and Portland Oregon: Hart, 2016) 291-307.B. Sabahi, ‘National Treatment: is Discriminatory Intent Relevant?’ in T Weiler (ed), Investment Treaty Arbitration and International Law (2008/1) 269-297.
M. Sattorova, The Impact of Investment Treaty Law on Host States: Enabling Good Governance? (2018 Oxford: Hart Publishing);
M. Sattorova, ‘International Investment Treaties and the Promise of Good Governance: Norm and Institutional Design, Internalisation, and Domestic Rule-Making’, in A. Reinisch, M. Footer and C. Binder (eds.), International Law and… Select Proceedings of the European Society of International Law (Oxford and Portland Oregon: Hart, 2016), 131-47.St. W. Schill, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment, the Rule of Law and Comparative Public Law’ in Stephan W. Schill (ed), International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law (Oxford University Press, 2010) 151-182.S. W. Schill, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment under Investment Treaties as an Embodiment of the Rule of Law’ (2006) 3(5) Transnational Dispute Management available at www.transnational-dispute-management.com.United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), Fair and Equitable Treatment: A Sequel (United Nations, 2012).G. van Harten, Investment Treaty Arbitration and Public Law, (Oxford University Press, 2007),M. Waibel et al (eds.), The Backlash against Investment Arbitration: Perceptions and Reality, (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2010).
J. Bonnitcha, L. Poulsen and M. Waibel, The Political Economy of the Investment Treaty Regime (2017 OUP);
S. Chesterman, ‘An International Rule of Law’ (2008) 56 American Journal of Comparative Law 331Franceso Francioni, ‘Access to Justice, Denial of Justice and International Investment Law’, 20 EJIL (2009) 729;
D. Gaukrodger and K. Gordon, ‘Investor-State Dispute Settlement: A Scoping Paper for the Investment Policy Community’, OECD Working Papers on International Investment, No. 3 (OECD Publishing 2012).V. Heiskanen, ‘Arbitrary and Unreasonable Measures’, in A. Reinisch (ed.), Standards of Investment Protection (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008), 87;
M. Jacob and St. W. Schill, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment: Content, Practice, Method’, in M. Bungenberg, J. Griebel, S. Hobe and A. Reinisch (eds), International Investment Law. A Handbook (Beck – Nomos – Hart 2015) 700-763.R. Kläger, Fair and Equitable Treatment in International Investment Law (CUP 2011).D. Krishan, ‘Thinking about BITS and BIT Arbitration: The Legitimacy Crisis that Never was’, in T. Weiler and F. Baetens (eds.), New Directions in International Economic Law: in memoriam Thomas Wälde (Nijhoff 2011) 107-150.A. Kulick (ed.), Reassertion of Control over the Investment Treaty Regime, (Cambridge University Press, 2017).Abul F.M. Maniruzzaman, ‘Expropriation of Alien Property and the Principle of Non-Discrimination in International Law of Foreign Investment: An Overview’ (1998) 8 Journal of Transnational Law and Policy 57;
Jan Paulsson, Denial of Justice in International Law (2005);
L. Poulsen, Bounded Rationality and Economic Diplomacy: The Politics of Investment Treaties in Developing Countries (2015 CUP).
A. Reinisch, ‘The Rule of Law in International Investment Arbitration’ in P. Pazartzis and M. Gavouneli et al. (eds.), Reconceptualising the Rule of Law in Global Governance, Resources, Investment and Trade, (Oxford and Portland Oregon: Hart, 2016) 291-307.B. Sabahi, ‘National Treatment: is Discriminatory Intent Relevant?’ in T Weiler (ed), Investment Treaty Arbitration and International Law (2008/1) 269-297.
M. Sattorova, The Impact of Investment Treaty Law on Host States: Enabling Good Governance? (2018 Oxford: Hart Publishing);
M. Sattorova, ‘International Investment Treaties and the Promise of Good Governance: Norm and Institutional Design, Internalisation, and Domestic Rule-Making’, in A. Reinisch, M. Footer and C. Binder (eds.), International Law and… Select Proceedings of the European Society of International Law (Oxford and Portland Oregon: Hart, 2016), 131-47.St. W. Schill, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment, the Rule of Law and Comparative Public Law’ in Stephan W. Schill (ed), International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law (Oxford University Press, 2010) 151-182.S. W. Schill, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment under Investment Treaties as an Embodiment of the Rule of Law’ (2006) 3(5) Transnational Dispute Management available at www.transnational-dispute-management.com.United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), Fair and Equitable Treatment: A Sequel (United Nations, 2012).G. van Harten, Investment Treaty Arbitration and Public Law, (Oxford University Press, 2007),M. Waibel et al (eds.), The Backlash against Investment Arbitration: Perceptions and Reality, (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2010).
Zuordnung im Vorlesungsverzeichnis
Letzte Änderung: Fr 06.05.2022 00:15
Dabei geht es einerseits um die Frage inwieweit Schutzstandards wie die gerechte und billige Behandlung (Fair and Equitable Treatment), die Gewährleistung von vollen und ständigen Schutz, die Nichtdiskriminierungsstandards sowie der Schutz gegen entschädigungslose Enteignungen Elemente der Rechtsstaatlichkeit widerspiegeln. Ebenso sollen die in der aktuellen Debatte um Investitionsschutzkapitel (wie etwa in CETA, TTIP) aufgeworfenen Fragen, ob das derzeitige System der Investitionsschiedsgerichtsbarkeit Kriterien der Rechtsstaatlichkeit entspricht, untersucht werden.Die Teilnehmenden werden ersucht ein Thema aus der untern stehenden Liste zu wählen.