040062 UK Behavioral Economics (MA) (2020S)
Track in Behavioral Economics and Experiments
Prüfungsimmanente Lehrveranstaltung
Labels
An/Abmeldung
Hinweis: Ihr Anmeldezeitpunkt innerhalb der Frist hat keine Auswirkungen auf die Platzvergabe (kein "first come, first served").
- Anmeldung von Mo 10.02.2020 09:00 bis Mi 19.02.2020 12:00
- Anmeldung von Di 25.02.2020 09:00 bis Mi 26.02.2020 12:00
- Abmeldung bis Do 30.04.2020 23:59
Details
max. 50 Teilnehmer*innen
Sprache: Englisch
Lehrende
Termine (iCal) - nächster Termin ist mit N markiert
- Donnerstag 05.03. 08:00 - 09:30 Hörsaal 8 Oskar-Morgenstern-Platz 1 1.Stock
- Freitag 06.03. 15:00 - 16:30 Hörsaal 9 Oskar-Morgenstern-Platz 1 1.Stock
- Freitag 13.03. 15:00 - 16:30 Hörsaal 9 Oskar-Morgenstern-Platz 1 1.Stock
- Donnerstag 19.03. 08:00 - 09:30 Hörsaal 8 Oskar-Morgenstern-Platz 1 1.Stock
- Freitag 20.03. 15:00 - 16:30 Hörsaal 9 Oskar-Morgenstern-Platz 1 1.Stock
- Donnerstag 26.03. 08:00 - 09:30 Hörsaal 8 Oskar-Morgenstern-Platz 1 1.Stock
- Freitag 27.03. 15:00 - 16:30 Hörsaal 9 Oskar-Morgenstern-Platz 1 1.Stock
- Donnerstag 02.04. 08:00 - 09:30 Hörsaal 8 Oskar-Morgenstern-Platz 1 1.Stock
- Freitag 03.04. 15:00 - 16:30 Hörsaal 9 Oskar-Morgenstern-Platz 1 1.Stock
- Donnerstag 23.04. 08:00 - 09:30 Hörsaal 8 Oskar-Morgenstern-Platz 1 1.Stock
- Freitag 24.04. 15:00 - 16:30 Hörsaal 9 Oskar-Morgenstern-Platz 1 1.Stock
- Donnerstag 30.04. 08:00 - 09:30 Hörsaal 8 Oskar-Morgenstern-Platz 1 1.Stock
- Donnerstag 07.05. 08:00 - 09:30 Hörsaal 8 Oskar-Morgenstern-Platz 1 1.Stock
- Freitag 08.05. 15:00 - 16:30 Hörsaal 9 Oskar-Morgenstern-Platz 1 1.Stock
- Donnerstag 14.05. 08:00 - 09:30 Hörsaal 8 Oskar-Morgenstern-Platz 1 1.Stock
- Freitag 15.05. 15:00 - 16:30 Hörsaal 9 Oskar-Morgenstern-Platz 1 1.Stock
- Freitag 22.05. 15:00 - 16:30 Hörsaal 9 Oskar-Morgenstern-Platz 1 1.Stock
- Donnerstag 28.05. 08:00 - 09:30 Hörsaal 8 Oskar-Morgenstern-Platz 1 1.Stock
- Freitag 29.05. 15:00 - 16:30 Hörsaal 9 Oskar-Morgenstern-Platz 1 1.Stock
- Donnerstag 04.06. 08:00 - 09:30 Hörsaal 8 Oskar-Morgenstern-Platz 1 1.Stock
- Freitag 05.06. 15:00 - 16:30 Hörsaal 9 Oskar-Morgenstern-Platz 1 1.Stock
- Freitag 12.06. 15:00 - 16:30 Hörsaal 9 Oskar-Morgenstern-Platz 1 1.Stock
- Donnerstag 18.06. 08:00 - 09:30 Hörsaal 8 Oskar-Morgenstern-Platz 1 1.Stock
- Freitag 19.06. 15:00 - 16:30 Hörsaal 9 Oskar-Morgenstern-Platz 1 1.Stock
- Donnerstag 25.06. 08:00 - 09:30 Hörsaal 8 Oskar-Morgenstern-Platz 1 1.Stock
- Freitag 26.06. 15:00 - 16:30 Hörsaal 9 Oskar-Morgenstern-Platz 1 1.Stock
Information
Ziele, Inhalte und Methode der Lehrveranstaltung
This course is designed to make you familiar with the most relevant concepts from behavioral economics. After following this course, you will be able to answer the following paradoxes:- Why do people pay more for a diamond than for a month’s water consumption even though water is more useful?- Why are people willing to pay only a modest fee for a lottery of infinite value?-How could the same individual gamble and buy insurance at the same time?- Under standard economic theory rejecting a lottery offering -1.0 Euro with 50% chance and 1.1 Euro with 50% chance implies rejecting a lottery offering infinity Euros with 50% chance.-Why do people exhibit a preference for known risks over unknown risks?-Why do people make plans that they cannot fulfill?-Why aren't there more tragedy of the commons?To explain these paradoxes, you are going to get acquainted with the most relevant theories in the field. Namely rank-dependent utility theory, cumulative prospect theory, hyperbolic discounting, inequity aversion, level-k theory, and quantal response equilibrium.To understand these alternative theories, we will also review and understand their standard economics counterparts: expected value, expected utility theory, exponential discounting utility, and Nash equilibrium.Rather than only introducing and reviewing these models through mathematical formulae, I also focus on their behavioral foundations, i.e. their axioms. For the first couple of models we will see how these foundations of preference translate into the mathematical formulae you might be familiar with. This process makes clear that abstract concepts such as utility and (subjective) probability have an intuitive behavioral foundation.Finally, note that my job is to convince you that the alternative theories that I present are better descriptive approximations than their standard counterparts with the support of data from experiments, data from surveys, data from economic phenomena, and your own decisions!
Art der Leistungskontrolle und erlaubte Hilfsmittel
The grade of the course will be assessed using these criteria:
-Midterm Exam ( weighting 35% of the total grade): tests the student's knowledge of the first half of the course.
-Final Exam (weighting 35% of the total grade): tests the student's knowledge of the course.
-Problem Sets (weighting 30% of the total grade): A total of three problem sets throughout the course that serve as a training for the exams.In each of these criteria students can attain a maximum total of 100 points. To guarantee consistency, each of these criteria, as well as the final note of the course, can be converted to the University grading scheme according to the following scale:-1: 100 points-86 points
-2: 85 points-70 points
-3: 69 points-60 points
-4: 59 points-50 points
-5: less than 50 points.This means that to pass the course the student needs to attain at least 50% of all available points.
-Midterm Exam ( weighting 35% of the total grade): tests the student's knowledge of the first half of the course.
-Final Exam (weighting 35% of the total grade): tests the student's knowledge of the course.
-Problem Sets (weighting 30% of the total grade): A total of three problem sets throughout the course that serve as a training for the exams.In each of these criteria students can attain a maximum total of 100 points. To guarantee consistency, each of these criteria, as well as the final note of the course, can be converted to the University grading scheme according to the following scale:-1: 100 points-86 points
-2: 85 points-70 points
-3: 69 points-60 points
-4: 59 points-50 points
-5: less than 50 points.This means that to pass the course the student needs to attain at least 50% of all available points.
Mindestanforderungen und Beurteilungsmaßstab
Students should have completed an intermediate microeconomics course, where they gained basic knowledge on consumer theory and game theory.
Prüfungsstoff
Week 1: Motivation (of the course) and Utility
Week 2: Expected Value and Expected Utility Theory.
Week 3: Anomalies of Expected Utility and Rank-Dependence.
Week 4: Cumulative Prospect theory.
Week 5: Ambiguity Aversion and Source Dependence.
Week 6: Exponential Discounted Utility.
Week 7: Midterm week.
Week 8: Anomalies of Exponential Discounted Utility and Hyperbolic Discounting.
Week 9: Tools of game theory and anomalies of strategic interaction.
Week 10: Anomalies of strategic interaction and level k-theory.
Week 11: Inequity aversion and other theories of social preferences.
Week 12: Final exam week.
Week 2: Expected Value and Expected Utility Theory.
Week 3: Anomalies of Expected Utility and Rank-Dependence.
Week 4: Cumulative Prospect theory.
Week 5: Ambiguity Aversion and Source Dependence.
Week 6: Exponential Discounted Utility.
Week 7: Midterm week.
Week 8: Anomalies of Exponential Discounted Utility and Hyperbolic Discounting.
Week 9: Tools of game theory and anomalies of strategic interaction.
Week 10: Anomalies of strategic interaction and level k-theory.
Week 11: Inequity aversion and other theories of social preferences.
Week 12: Final exam week.
Literatur
Wakker, P. P. (2010). Prospect theory: For risk and ambiguity. Cambridge university press.Dhami, S. (2016). The foundations of behavioral economic analysis. Oxford University Press.Gilboa, I. (2009). Theory of decision under uncertainty (Vol. 45). Cambridge university press.
Zuordnung im Vorlesungsverzeichnis
Letzte Änderung: Mo 07.09.2020 15:19