040158 UK Quantitative Assessment of Public and Non-Profit Strategies II (2018S)
(Technology Assessment)
Prüfungsimmanente Lehrveranstaltung
Labels
An/Abmeldung
Hinweis: Ihr Anmeldezeitpunkt innerhalb der Frist hat keine Auswirkungen auf die Platzvergabe (kein "first come, first served").
- Anmeldung von Mi 14.02.2018 09:00 bis Mi 21.02.2018 12:00
- Abmeldung bis Mi 14.03.2018 23:59
Details
max. 50 Teilnehmer*innen
Sprache: Englisch
Lehrende
Termine
DO 01.03.2018, 08.30-12.30 Ort: Seminarraum 2 OMP 1, 1.Stock
DO 08.03.2018, 08.30-12.30 Ort: Seminarraum 2 OMP 1, 1.Stock
DO 15.03.2018, 08.30-12.30 Ort: Seminarraum 2 OMP 1, 1.Stock
DO 12.04.2018, 08.30-12.30 Ort: Seminarraum 2 OMP 1, 1.Stock
DO 26.04.2018, 08.30-12.30 Ort: Seminarraum 2 OMP 1, 1.Stock
DO 03.05.2018, 08.30-12.30 Ort: Seminarraum 2 OMP 1, 1.Stock
Bitte beachten Sie stets die Hinweise der Lehrenden ! Danke !
Information
Ziele, Inhalte und Methode der Lehrveranstaltung
Art der Leistungskontrolle und erlaubte Hilfsmittel
http://pnpm.univie.ac.at/berufsfeld-pnpm/Written Assignment
The written assignment shall follow the rules of the department regarding the writing of scientific papers. The written slides must be turned in on the day of the presentation (via e-mail: doc-file, ppt-file, pdf-file; in class: printed version). The written assignment is part of the final grade (see checklist for oral presentation).Presentation
• The presentation should last up to 40 minutes (first, second, and third homework)
• There will be a discussion with the auditorium following the presentation.
• The use of the beamer is expected (legible slides).
• The quality of the presentation is part of the final grade (see checklist for oral presentation).
The written assignment shall follow the rules of the department regarding the writing of scientific papers. The written slides must be turned in on the day of the presentation (via e-mail: doc-file, ppt-file, pdf-file; in class: printed version). The written assignment is part of the final grade (see checklist for oral presentation).Presentation
• The presentation should last up to 40 minutes (first, second, and third homework)
• There will be a discussion with the auditorium following the presentation.
• The use of the beamer is expected (legible slides).
• The quality of the presentation is part of the final grade (see checklist for oral presentation).
Mindestanforderungen und Beurteilungsmaßstab
http://pnpm.univie.ac.at/berufsfeld-pnpm/Requirements for a positive grade (min. 50%)
• Positive collaboration during the blocked classes and workshops (max. 30%)
• First homework (oral: 10%; written slides: 20%)
• Second homework (oral: 5%; written slides: 5%)
• Third homework (oral: 10%; written slides: 20%)Registration and acceptance criteria
Online registration via points assignment in the beginning of the semester. There is a limit of 50 people per class (class capacity). The people with the highest amount of assigned points will be accepted. In case someone is absent during the first preliminary discussion he/she will lose their place and the course so that people from the waiting list may be accommodated.
• Positive collaboration during the blocked classes and workshops (max. 30%)
• First homework (oral: 10%; written slides: 20%)
• Second homework (oral: 5%; written slides: 5%)
• Third homework (oral: 10%; written slides: 20%)Registration and acceptance criteria
Online registration via points assignment in the beginning of the semester. There is a limit of 50 people per class (class capacity). The people with the highest amount of assigned points will be accepted. In case someone is absent during the first preliminary discussion he/she will lose their place and the course so that people from the waiting list may be accommodated.
Prüfungsstoff
http://pnpm.univie.ac.at/berufsfeld-pnpm/Course Materials
All course materials are available on the E-Learning-Platform Moodle.
All course materials are available on the E-Learning-Platform Moodle.
Literatur
http://pnpm.univie.ac.at/berufsfeld-pnpm/Main literature:
Gold et al. (1996) Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine, Oxford University Press, New York/Oxford.Levin and McEwan (2001) Cost-effectiveness analysis: methods and applications, Sage.Hunink, M. M., Weinstein, M. C., Wittenberg, E., Drummond, M. F., Pliskin, J. S., Wong, J. B., & Glasziou, P. P. (2014). Decision making in health and medicine: integrating evidence and values. Cambridge University Press.
Gold et al. (1996) Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine, Oxford University Press, New York/Oxford.Levin and McEwan (2001) Cost-effectiveness analysis: methods and applications, Sage.Hunink, M. M., Weinstein, M. C., Wittenberg, E., Drummond, M. F., Pliskin, J. S., Wong, J. B., & Glasziou, P. P. (2014). Decision making in health and medicine: integrating evidence and values. Cambridge University Press.
Zuordnung im Vorlesungsverzeichnis
Letzte Änderung: Fr 31.08.2018 08:42
Please open this website to obtain further information regarding in which Bachelor study plans this course can be selected (e.g., Business Administration, International Business Administration, Economics, Statistics, Business Informatics).A short introduction on general technology management is given (first session, workshop 1). The different types of technologies are explained and their relevance for policy makers and practitioners is illustrated. Next, the concept of multi-attribute utility analysis is discussed (second session, workshop 2). Then, we contrast two main technology assessment methodologies: 1) cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) and 2) cost benefit analysis (CBA) (third/forth session, workshop 3). In the fourth session, students present special issues of CEA/CBA (first homework). In the fifth session, students discuss implications of CEA/CBA for special sectors of the public and non-profit management (second homework). In the sixth session, students critically analyze a CEA/CBA study of the literature for special sectors of the public and non-profit management (third homework).