122052 PS PS Linguistics (BEd) (2024S)
Pragmatics
Prüfungsimmanente Lehrveranstaltung
Labels
An/Abmeldung
Hinweis: Ihr Anmeldezeitpunkt innerhalb der Frist hat keine Auswirkungen auf die Platzvergabe (kein "first come, first served").
- Anmeldung von Mo 12.02.2024 00:00 bis Mo 19.02.2024 12:00
- Abmeldung bis So 31.03.2024 23:59
Details
max. 25 Teilnehmer*innen
Sprache: Englisch
Lehrende
Termine (iCal) - nächster Termin ist mit N markiert
Freitag
08.03.
16:15 - 17:45
Helene-Richter-Saal UniCampus Hof 8 3G-EG-21
Freitag
15.03.
16:15 - 17:45
Helene-Richter-Saal UniCampus Hof 8 3G-EG-21
Freitag
22.03.
16:15 - 17:45
Helene-Richter-Saal UniCampus Hof 8 3G-EG-21
Freitag
12.04.
16:15 - 17:45
Helene-Richter-Saal UniCampus Hof 8 3G-EG-21
Freitag
19.04.
16:15 - 17:45
Helene-Richter-Saal UniCampus Hof 8 3G-EG-21
Freitag
26.04.
16:15 - 17:45
Helene-Richter-Saal UniCampus Hof 8 3G-EG-21
Freitag
03.05.
16:15 - 17:45
Helene-Richter-Saal UniCampus Hof 8 3G-EG-21
Freitag
10.05.
16:15 - 17:45
Helene-Richter-Saal UniCampus Hof 8 3G-EG-21
Freitag
17.05.
16:15 - 17:45
Helene-Richter-Saal UniCampus Hof 8 3G-EG-21
N
Freitag
24.05.
16:15 - 17:45
Helene-Richter-Saal UniCampus Hof 8 3G-EG-21
Freitag
31.05.
16:15 - 17:45
Helene-Richter-Saal UniCampus Hof 8 3G-EG-21
Freitag
07.06.
16:15 - 17:45
Helene-Richter-Saal UniCampus Hof 8 3G-EG-21
Freitag
14.06.
16:15 - 17:45
Helene-Richter-Saal UniCampus Hof 8 3G-EG-21
Freitag
21.06.
16:15 - 17:45
Helene-Richter-Saal UniCampus Hof 8 3G-EG-21
Freitag
28.06.
16:15 - 17:45
Helene-Richter-Saal UniCampus Hof 8 3G-EG-21
Information
Ziele, Inhalte und Methode der Lehrveranstaltung
Art der Leistungskontrolle und erlaubte Hilfsmittel
Student assessment is based on active participation in class, online assignments, regular readings, an oral poster presentation, and the PS paper.
For the paper, each student will choose one aspect related to pragmatics, explore it in more detail, and conduct a study. Further information will be provided in class.
For the paper, each student will choose one aspect related to pragmatics, explore it in more detail, and conduct a study. Further information will be provided in class.
Mindestanforderungen und Beurteilungsmaßstab
Regular attendance (max. 2 absences)
Part 1: Class participation, readings, smaller (online) assignments, discussions (f2f, online): 10%
Part 2: Poster presentation in class: 25%
Part 3: Paper proposal: 20%
Part 4: PS paper (3,500 words +/-10%): 45%All parts (1, 2, 3 and 4) must be completed and at least three out of four parts must be positive. The overall pass mark is 60%
Grading scale: 1 (sehr gut) 100-90%; 2 (gut) 89-80%; 3 (befriedigend), 79-70%; 4 (genügend) 69-60%; 5 (nicht genügend) 59-0%.
Part 1: Class participation, readings, smaller (online) assignments, discussions (f2f, online): 10%
Part 2: Poster presentation in class: 25%
Part 3: Paper proposal: 20%
Part 4: PS paper (3,500 words +/-10%): 45%All parts (1, 2, 3 and 4) must be completed and at least three out of four parts must be positive. The overall pass mark is 60%
Grading scale: 1 (sehr gut) 100-90%; 2 (gut) 89-80%; 3 (befriedigend), 79-70%; 4 (genügend) 69-60%; 5 (nicht genügend) 59-0%.
Prüfungsstoff
Continuous assessment is based on:
- active participation, discussions/online activities, regular readings
- poster presentation
- on-time submission of paper proposals
- on-time submission of PS paperYour paper will be checked with anti-plagiarism software (TurnItIn).
- active participation, discussions/online activities, regular readings
- poster presentation
- on-time submission of paper proposals
- on-time submission of PS paperYour paper will be checked with anti-plagiarism software (TurnItIn).
Literatur
Auer, P. (1992). Introduction: John Gumperz’ approach to contextualization’, in Peter Auer and Aldo Di Luzio (eds.) The Contextualization of Language. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 1–37.
Cutting, J. (2015). Pragmatics: a resource book for students. (3rd edition). London/New York: Routledge.
Gumperz, J. J. (1992). Contextualization revisited. In P. Auer and A. di Luzio (Eds.), The contextualization of language (pp. 39-53). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
Cutting, J. (2015). Pragmatics: a resource book for students. (3rd edition). London/New York: Routledge.
Gumperz, J. J. (1992). Contextualization revisited. In P. Auer and A. di Luzio (Eds.), The contextualization of language (pp. 39-53). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
Zuordnung im Vorlesungsverzeichnis
Studium: BEd 046 / 407
Code/Modul: BEd 09.1
Lehrinhalt: 12-2045
Code/Modul: BEd 09.1
Lehrinhalt: 12-2045
Letzte Änderung: Fr 02.02.2024 13:45
For example, when the speaker utters "Nice job" with a warm and enthusiastic tone, accompanied by a genuine smile, relaxed posture, and open body language, it signals positive reinforcement, where the speaker genuinely praises the effort or achievement. On the other hand, when the speaker utters "Nice job" with a flat and sarcastic tone, accompanied by a raised eyebrow, a smirk, or closed body language like crossed arms, it signals a discrepancy between the verbal message and the speaker’s true sentiment. These contextualization cues suggest that the speaker does not genuinely believe the job was well done.By the end of the course, students will:
• develop a comprehensive understanding of Pragmatics, exploring the dynamics of language in use
• analyze and interpret verbal contextualization cues (e.g., deixis, discourse markers) and nonverbal contextualization cues (e.g., proxemics, gestures, facial expressions, eye contact, posture)
• explore the role of indexicality in language and its implications for interpretation
• apply the knowledge gained to real-world examples and case studiesAdditionally, the students will learn how to find relevant literature on a specific research topic/question, critically analyze and reflect on existing research in the field, and gain first experience in planning, conducting, and writing up a small-scale linguistic research project