130199 PS Sozialgeschichte der Lit. (PS): South African Apartheid Literature (2016W)
Prüfungsimmanente Lehrveranstaltung
Labels
An/Abmeldung
Hinweis: Ihr Anmeldezeitpunkt innerhalb der Frist hat keine Auswirkungen auf die Platzvergabe (kein "first come, first served").
- Anmeldung von Do 01.09.2016 01:00 bis Fr 23.09.2016 23:59
- Abmeldung bis Mo 31.10.2016 23:59
Details
max. 30 Teilnehmer*innen
Sprache: Englisch
Lehrende
Termine (iCal) - nächster Termin ist mit N markiert
- Dienstag 11.10. 12:30 - 14:00 Seminarraum 2 Sensengasse 3a 1.OG
- Dienstag 18.10. 12:30 - 14:00 Seminarraum 2 Sensengasse 3a 1.OG
- Dienstag 25.10. 12:30 - 14:00 Seminarraum 2 Sensengasse 3a 1.OG
- Dienstag 08.11. 12:30 - 14:00 Seminarraum 2 Sensengasse 3a 1.OG
- Dienstag 15.11. 12:30 - 14:00 Seminarraum 2 Sensengasse 3a 1.OG
- Dienstag 22.11. 12:30 - 14:00 Seminarraum 2 Sensengasse 3a 1.OG
- Dienstag 29.11. 12:30 - 14:00 Seminarraum 2 Sensengasse 3a 1.OG
- Dienstag 06.12. 12:30 - 14:00 Seminarraum 2 Sensengasse 3a 1.OG
- Dienstag 13.12. 12:30 - 14:00 Seminarraum 2 Sensengasse 3a 1.OG
- Dienstag 10.01. 12:30 - 14:00 Seminarraum 2 Sensengasse 3a 1.OG
- Dienstag 17.01. 12:30 - 14:00 Seminarraum 2 Sensengasse 3a 1.OG
- Dienstag 24.01. 12:30 - 14:00 Seminarraum 2 Sensengasse 3a 1.OG
- Dienstag 31.01. 12:30 - 14:00 Seminarraum 2 Sensengasse 3a 1.OG
Information
Ziele, Inhalte und Methode der Lehrveranstaltung
Art der Leistungskontrolle und erlaubte Hilfsmittel
1) Participation and homework (40%): Homework will be given every week. You must submit at least 6 homeworks (2-page essays, app. 500 words, double-spaced) to receive full credit. Each missing homework will lower your final mark by ½ point. You are also expected to participate in class discussions. 3 absences are allowed in order to get credit.
2) oral presentation (20%): 20 minutes long. If you fail to do oral presentation your final mark will be lowered by a point.
3) argumentative essay, 3, 500 words (40%) due March 30, 2017: There will be at least 7 different topics to choose from. The essay must be supported with evidence from primary texts and engagement with secondary sources. The essay tests the knowledge of the text and context, close reading skills, inference (deduction), ability to think critically, make connections, and express own opinions. Original observations or arguments are not required to pass but are required to earn the highest mark. There are 3 attempts at correction until June 30, 2017.
2) oral presentation (20%): 20 minutes long. If you fail to do oral presentation your final mark will be lowered by a point.
3) argumentative essay, 3, 500 words (40%) due March 30, 2017: There will be at least 7 different topics to choose from. The essay must be supported with evidence from primary texts and engagement with secondary sources. The essay tests the knowledge of the text and context, close reading skills, inference (deduction), ability to think critically, make connections, and express own opinions. Original observations or arguments are not required to pass but are required to earn the highest mark. There are 3 attempts at correction until June 30, 2017.
Mindestanforderungen und Beurteilungsmaßstab
Assessment criteria for written work:-Conditions (timely delivery, correct extent, presentable shape, presence of all components of a written work): Here no points can be awarded, but might be deducted!-Contents (in particular the soundness of the argument, supported with evidence from primary and secondary sources; the ability to read text closely and interpret both form and content; the ability to identify, analyse and understand the context and make connections; the ability to reflect critically on the relations between primary texts and relevant secondary texts, instead of just citing secondary texts as a source of authority and interpretation; clear formulation, structure and organization of the argument; detection of the central points; correctness of methodology; originality; creativity; scope or relevance of the secondary literature used and their methodologically consistent incorporation): Here about 60% of the points will be awarded.-Format (esp. layout and clarity of presentation; formatting; citation practice; consistency and care): Here about 20% of the points will be awarded.-Language (particularly scholarly terminology and correct use of technical terms; clear and understandable language; correct spelling, grammar, and composition; care about style): Here about 20% of the points will be awarded.In all three areas at least 50% of the points must be achieved in order to obtain credit. The mark breakdown is as follows:Excellent (1) 90-100 %
Good (2) 80-89 %
Satisfactory enough (3) 65-79 %
Unsatisfactory (4) 50-64 %
Fail ( 5) 50 -0 %
Good (2) 80-89 %
Satisfactory enough (3) 65-79 %
Unsatisfactory (4) 50-64 %
Fail ( 5) 50 -0 %
Prüfungsstoff
Topic 1: White colonial writing
Sarah Gertrude Millin, Gods Step Children (1924)Topic 2: Black protest literature in the 1950s
Peter Abrahams, Tell Freedom (1954)Topic 3: Black protest literature in the 1970s
Miriam Tlali, Muriel at Metropolitan (1979)
Mtutuzeli Matshoba, Call Me Not a Man (1979)Topic 4: Black Consciousness Movement in the 1970s and 1980s
Mongane Serote, Mafika Gwala, Sipho Sepamla, Christopher van Wyk (selected poetry)
Steve Biko, I Write What I Like (essays from 1969)Topic 5: Black womens writing
Lauretta Ngcobo, And They Didnt Die (1990)Topic 6: White anti-apartheid writing
André Brink, A Dry White Season (1979)
J.M. Coetzee, Waiting for the Barbarians (1980)Topic 7: Apartheid and Sexuality
Lewis Nkosi, Mating Birds (1986)
Sarah Gertrude Millin, Gods Step Children (1924)Topic 2: Black protest literature in the 1950s
Peter Abrahams, Tell Freedom (1954)Topic 3: Black protest literature in the 1970s
Miriam Tlali, Muriel at Metropolitan (1979)
Mtutuzeli Matshoba, Call Me Not a Man (1979)Topic 4: Black Consciousness Movement in the 1970s and 1980s
Mongane Serote, Mafika Gwala, Sipho Sepamla, Christopher van Wyk (selected poetry)
Steve Biko, I Write What I Like (essays from 1969)Topic 5: Black womens writing
Lauretta Ngcobo, And They Didnt Die (1990)Topic 6: White anti-apartheid writing
André Brink, A Dry White Season (1979)
J.M. Coetzee, Waiting for the Barbarians (1980)Topic 7: Apartheid and Sexuality
Lewis Nkosi, Mating Birds (1986)
Literatur
Topic 1: White colonial writing
Sarah Gertrude Millin, Gods Step Children (1924)Topic 2: Black protest literature in the 1950s
Peter Abrahams, Tell Freedom (1954)Topic 3: Black protest literature in the 1970s
Miriam Tlali, Muriel at Metropolitan (1979)
Mtutuzeli Matshoba, Call Me Not a Man (1979)Topic 4: Black Consciousness Movement in the 1970s and 1980s
Mongane Serote, Mafika Gwala, Sipho Sepamla, Christopher van Wyk (selected poetry)
Steve Biko, I Write What I Like (essays from 1969)Topic 5: Black womens writing
Lauretta Ngcobo, And They Didnt Die (1990)Topic 6: White anti-apartheid writing
André Brink, A Dry White Season (1979)
J.M. Coetzee, Waiting for the Barbarians (1980)Topic 7: Apartheid and Sexuality
Lewis Nkosi, Mating Birds (1986)
Sarah Gertrude Millin, Gods Step Children (1924)Topic 2: Black protest literature in the 1950s
Peter Abrahams, Tell Freedom (1954)Topic 3: Black protest literature in the 1970s
Miriam Tlali, Muriel at Metropolitan (1979)
Mtutuzeli Matshoba, Call Me Not a Man (1979)Topic 4: Black Consciousness Movement in the 1970s and 1980s
Mongane Serote, Mafika Gwala, Sipho Sepamla, Christopher van Wyk (selected poetry)
Steve Biko, I Write What I Like (essays from 1969)Topic 5: Black womens writing
Lauretta Ngcobo, And They Didnt Die (1990)Topic 6: White anti-apartheid writing
André Brink, A Dry White Season (1979)
J.M. Coetzee, Waiting for the Barbarians (1980)Topic 7: Apartheid and Sexuality
Lewis Nkosi, Mating Birds (1986)
Zuordnung im Vorlesungsverzeichnis
BA M5
Letzte Änderung: Do 04.07.2024 00:13
Method: lecture, discussion and homework
Aims:
identify, analyse and understand the key historical, political, philosophical and aesthetic issues in South African apartheid literature
apply close reading skills and critical thinking to a variety of literary texts
reflect critically on the relations between primary texts and relevant secondary texts
discriminate between ideas and justify personal positions
produce well-structured, relevant arguments with an appropriate intellectual framework