160126 SE Seminar aus Psycho-, Patho- oder Neurolinguistik (2015S)
Psycholinguistik
Prüfungsimmanente Lehrveranstaltung
Labels
An/Abmeldung
Hinweis: Ihr Anmeldezeitpunkt innerhalb der Frist hat keine Auswirkungen auf die Platzvergabe (kein "first come, first served").
- Anmeldung von So 18.01.2015 09:00 bis So 01.03.2015 23:59
- Abmeldung bis So 15.03.2015 23:59
Details
max. 30 Teilnehmer*innen
Sprache: Deutsch
Lehrende
Termine (iCal) - nächster Termin ist mit N markiert
- Donnerstag 05.03. 13:15 - 14:45 Seminarraum 8 Sensengasse 3a 5.OG
- Donnerstag 19.03. 13:15 - 14:45 Seminarraum 8 Sensengasse 3a 5.OG
- Donnerstag 26.03. 13:15 - 14:45 Seminarraum 8 Sensengasse 3a 5.OG
- Donnerstag 16.04. 13:15 - 14:45 Seminarraum 8 Sensengasse 3a 5.OG
- Donnerstag 23.04. 13:15 - 14:45 Seminarraum 8 Sensengasse 3a 5.OG
- Donnerstag 30.04. 13:15 - 14:45 Seminarraum 8 Sensengasse 3a 5.OG
- Donnerstag 07.05. 13:15 - 14:45 Seminarraum 8 Sensengasse 3a 5.OG
- Donnerstag 21.05. 13:15 - 14:45 Seminarraum 8 Sensengasse 3a 5.OG
- Donnerstag 28.05. 13:15 - 14:45 Seminarraum 8 Sensengasse 3a 5.OG
- Donnerstag 11.06. 13:15 - 14:45 Seminarraum 8 Sensengasse 3a 5.OG
- Donnerstag 18.06. 13:15 - 14:45 Seminarraum 8 Sensengasse 3a 5.OG
- Donnerstag 25.06. 13:15 - 14:45 Seminarraum 8 Sensengasse 3a 5.OG
Information
Ziele, Inhalte und Methode der Lehrveranstaltung
This seminar on psycholinguistics will focus on sentence processing, which examines the combinatorial processes that follow word identification (syntactic analysis, semantic interpretation and pragmatic processing). Special attention will be paid to parsing complexity and (local and global) ambiguities and their resolution, but also to language comprehension theories (architectural issues and models) and various methods used in this field. The discussion of the topics spanned by the selected literature listed below will be further detailed in class.
Art der Leistungskontrolle und erlaubte Hilfsmittel
Students are expected to do the readings before coming to class, come to class, participate actively, take turns in protocoling the sessions, make a presentation with a handout, and write a paper analyzing some topic discussed in the seminar and giving arguments for preferring a proposed analysis or construal to alternatives from the literature. Details will be discussed in class.
Mindestanforderungen und Beurteilungsmaßstab
To deepen, consolidate and advance students' knowledge on foundational matters in psycholinguistics, as well as to encourage students to engage in and carry out independent research.
Prüfungsstoff
Handouts, slides, frontal teaching, discussion sections
Literatur
Selected literature:
Almor et al. 2001. Comprehension of long distance number agreement in probable Alzheimer's disease. Language and Cognitive Processes. Volume 16(1): 35-63.
Altmann, G. 1998. Ambiguity in sentence processing. Trends in Cognitive Science 2 (4): 146151.
Jun, Sun-Ah. 2003. Prosodic phrasing and attachment preferences. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 32:3.
Gibson, E. 1998. Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition 68(1): 1-76.
Koenig, J.-P. et al. 2003. Arguments for adjuncts. Cognition 89:2, 67-103.
MacDonald, M. 1993. The interaction of lexical and syntactic ambiguity. Journal of Memory and Language 32: 692-715.
Pickering, M. et al. 2000. Ambiguity resolution in sentence processing: Evidence against frequency-based accounts. Journal of Memory and Language 43(3): 447-475.
Snedeker, J. 2013. Childrens sentence processing. In van Gompel (ed) Sentence Processing. New York, New York: Psychology Press. 189-220.
Spivey, M. et al. 2002. Eye movements and spoken language comprehension: Effects of visual context on syntactic ambiguity resolution. Cognitive Psychology 45(4): 447-481.
Townsend, D. and T. Bever. Sentence Comprehension: The Integration of Habits and Rules. MIT Press. (Chapter 4.)
Traxler, M.J., Seely, R.E. & Morris, R.K. 2002. Processing subject and object relative clauses: Evidence from eye-movements. Journal of Memory and Language 47: 69-90.
Kintsch, W. 2001. Predication. Cognitive Science 25(2): 173-202.
Almor et al. 2001. Comprehension of long distance number agreement in probable Alzheimer's disease. Language and Cognitive Processes. Volume 16(1): 35-63.
Altmann, G. 1998. Ambiguity in sentence processing. Trends in Cognitive Science 2 (4): 146151.
Jun, Sun-Ah. 2003. Prosodic phrasing and attachment preferences. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 32:3.
Gibson, E. 1998. Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition 68(1): 1-76.
Koenig, J.-P. et al. 2003. Arguments for adjuncts. Cognition 89:2, 67-103.
MacDonald, M. 1993. The interaction of lexical and syntactic ambiguity. Journal of Memory and Language 32: 692-715.
Pickering, M. et al. 2000. Ambiguity resolution in sentence processing: Evidence against frequency-based accounts. Journal of Memory and Language 43(3): 447-475.
Snedeker, J. 2013. Childrens sentence processing. In van Gompel (ed) Sentence Processing. New York, New York: Psychology Press. 189-220.
Spivey, M. et al. 2002. Eye movements and spoken language comprehension: Effects of visual context on syntactic ambiguity resolution. Cognitive Psychology 45(4): 447-481.
Townsend, D. and T. Bever. Sentence Comprehension: The Integration of Habits and Rules. MIT Press. (Chapter 4.)
Traxler, M.J., Seely, R.E. & Morris, R.K. 2002. Processing subject and object relative clauses: Evidence from eye-movements. Journal of Memory and Language 47: 69-90.
Kintsch, W. 2001. Predication. Cognitive Science 25(2): 173-202.
Zuordnung im Vorlesungsverzeichnis
Master Allgemeine Linguistik: MA1-APM4A
Letzte Änderung: Mo 07.09.2020 15:35