190017 KU BM 7 Angewandte Methodologie II (AHP+IP+SB) (2023W)
Policy Analysis as Method for Educational Research
Prüfungsimmanente Lehrveranstaltung
Labels
An/Abmeldung
Hinweis: Ihr Anmeldezeitpunkt innerhalb der Frist hat keine Auswirkungen auf die Platzvergabe (kein "first come, first served").
- Anmeldung von Fr 01.09.2023 06:30 bis Mi 20.09.2023 09:00
- Anmeldung von Mo 25.09.2023 06:30 bis Do 28.09.2023 09:00
- Abmeldung bis Mo 16.10.2023 09:00
Details
max. 20 Teilnehmer*innen
Sprache: Englisch
Lehrende
Termine (iCal) - nächster Termin ist mit N markiert
Dienstag
03.10.
11:30 - 13:00
Seminarraum 4 Sensengasse 3a 1.OG
Dienstag
10.10.
11:30 - 13:00
Seminarraum 4 Sensengasse 3a 1.OG
Dienstag
17.10.
11:30 - 13:00
Seminarraum 4 Sensengasse 3a 1.OG
Dienstag
24.10.
11:30 - 13:00
Seminarraum 4 Sensengasse 3a 1.OG
Dienstag
31.10.
11:30 - 13:00
Seminarraum 4 Sensengasse 3a 1.OG
Dienstag
07.11.
11:30 - 13:00
Seminarraum 4 Sensengasse 3a 1.OG
Dienstag
14.11.
11:30 - 13:00
Seminarraum 4 Sensengasse 3a 1.OG
Dienstag
21.11.
11:30 - 13:00
Seminarraum 4 Sensengasse 3a 1.OG
Dienstag
28.11.
11:30 - 13:00
Seminarraum 4 Sensengasse 3a 1.OG
Dienstag
05.12.
11:30 - 13:00
Seminarraum 4 Sensengasse 3a 1.OG
Dienstag
12.12.
11:30 - 13:00
Seminarraum 4 Sensengasse 3a 1.OG
Dienstag
09.01.
11:30 - 13:00
Seminarraum 4 Sensengasse 3a 1.OG
Dienstag
16.01.
11:30 - 13:00
Seminarraum 4 Sensengasse 3a 1.OG
Dienstag
23.01.
11:30 - 13:00
Seminarraum 4 Sensengasse 3a 1.OG
Dienstag
30.01.
11:30 - 13:00
Seminarraum 4 Sensengasse 3a 1.OG
Information
Ziele, Inhalte und Methode der Lehrveranstaltung
Art der Leistungskontrolle und erlaubte Hilfsmittel
- Instructor-led close reading of a policy text followed by individual policy analysis (written): 20 credits- Participation in group debate: 15 credits- Group work (oral) and peer review (written): 25 credits- Conversational discussion on key topics of individual student's interest: 15 credits- Final paper on reflections and how the course could influence individual students' BA thesis: 25 credits
Mindestanforderungen und Beurteilungsmaßstab
1 (sehr gut) 100-90 credits
2 (gut) 89-81 credits
3 (befriedigend) 80-71 credits
4 (genügend) 70-60 credits
5 (nicht genügend) 59-0 credits- Students' written submissions will undergo mandatory plagiarism check using Turnitin software.
- Maximum two missed units (unexcused) as attendance are mandatory in this seminar. Missing more than two units will need discussion with the instructor and will invite compensatory assignment (task will be assigned by the instructor depending upon the situation).
- The overall grade is made up of the seminar paper (40%) and several smaller assignments (60%). The positive assessment of the seminar paper is necessary but not sufficient for passing the seminar.
2 (gut) 89-81 credits
3 (befriedigend) 80-71 credits
4 (genügend) 70-60 credits
5 (nicht genügend) 59-0 credits- Students' written submissions will undergo mandatory plagiarism check using Turnitin software.
- Maximum two missed units (unexcused) as attendance are mandatory in this seminar. Missing more than two units will need discussion with the instructor and will invite compensatory assignment (task will be assigned by the instructor depending upon the situation).
- The overall grade is made up of the seminar paper (40%) and several smaller assignments (60%). The positive assessment of the seminar paper is necessary but not sufficient for passing the seminar.
Prüfungsstoff
Literatur
Bacchi, C. (2012). Introducing the ‘What’s the Problem Represented to be?’ approach. In A. Bletsas & C. Beasley (Eds.), Engaging with Carol Bacchi: Strategic Interventions and Exchanges (pp. 21–24). The University of Adelaide Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9780987171856.003Bartlett, L., & Vavrus, F. (n.d.). Transversing the Vertical Case Study: A Methodological Approach to Studies of Educational Policy as Practice—Bartlett—2014—Anthropology & Education Quarterly—Wiley Online Library. Retrieved September 13, 2023, from https://anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/aeq.12055Bridges, D., & Watts, M. (2008). Educational Research and Policy: Epistemological Considerations. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 42(s1), 41–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9752.2008.00628.xCherney, A., Povey, J., Head, B., Boreham, P., & Ferguson, M. (2012). What influences the utilisation of educational research by policy-makers and practitioners?: The perspectives of academic educational researchers. International Journal of Educational Research, 56, 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2012.08.001Grix, J. (2002). Introducing Students to the Generic Terminology of Social Research. Politics, 22(3), 175–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9256.00173Levinson, B. A. U., Sutton, M., & Winstead, T. (2009). Education Policy as a Practice of Power: Theoretical Tools, Ethnographic Methods, Democratic Options. Educational Policy, 23(6), 767–795. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904808320676Whitty, G. (2006). Education(al) Research and Education Policy Making: Is Conflict Inevitable? British Educational Research Journal, 32(2), 159–176.Yang, K. (2007). Quantitative Methods for Policy Analysis. In Handbook of Public Policy Analysis. Routledge.*Further literature will be developed through ongoing research during the seminar.*
Zuordnung im Vorlesungsverzeichnis
BM 7 II (AHP+IP+SB)
Letzte Änderung: Mo 02.10.2023 12:28
- interrogate how discourse, language, and text set the context for how policy problems and solutions are conceptualized
- how and why particular issues come to be framed as objects of concern.
- critique, interrogate the policy process, and the epistemological roots of policy work
- examine the players involved in the policy process