Universität Wien

200139 SE Vertiefungsseminar: Geist und Gehirn (2021W)

meta-psychology

4.00 ECTS (2.00 SWS), SPL 20 - Psychologie
Prüfungsimmanente Lehrveranstaltung
DIGITAL

Dieses Vertiefungsseminar kann für alle Schwerpunkte absolviert werden.

Vertiefungsseminare können nur fürs Pflichtmodul B verwendet werden! Eine Verwendung fürs Modul A4 Freie Fächer ist nicht möglich.

An/Abmeldung

Hinweis: Ihr Anmeldezeitpunkt innerhalb der Frist hat keine Auswirkungen auf die Platzvergabe (kein "first come, first served").

Details

max. 20 Teilnehmer*innen
Sprache: Englisch

Lehrende

Termine (iCal) - nächster Termin ist mit N markiert

  • Dienstag 05.10. 09:45 - 11:15 Digital
  • Dienstag 12.10. 09:45 - 11:15 Digital
  • Dienstag 19.10. 09:45 - 11:15 Digital
  • Dienstag 09.11. 09:45 - 11:15 Digital
  • Dienstag 16.11. 09:45 - 11:15 Digital
  • Dienstag 23.11. 09:45 - 11:15 Digital
  • Dienstag 30.11. 09:45 - 11:15 Digital
  • Dienstag 07.12. 09:45 - 11:15 Digital
  • Dienstag 14.12. 09:45 - 11:15 Digital
  • Dienstag 11.01. 09:45 - 11:15 Digital
  • Dienstag 18.01. 09:45 - 11:15 Digital
  • Dienstag 25.01. 09:45 - 11:15 Digital

Information

Ziele, Inhalte und Methode der Lehrveranstaltung

The reproducibility crisis - spurred by the empirical discovery of low replication rates for psychological studies - has marked the last decade of psychological research, and given rise to the emerging discipline of meta-psychology. Meta-psychology, as a sub-field of meta-science, takes an inter-disciplinary view of psychological methodology, mainly relying on statistical, historical, philosophical, and computational perspectives. In this seminar, we will first cover the recent history of the reproducibility crisis. Then we will discuss the emerging ideas and norms - such as the Open Science movement - that are intended to improve psychological methodology. Moreover, we will trace the historical lineages, and philosophical underpinnings of these methodological proposals. Finally, we will discuss recent efforts to computationally model the effects of novel methodologies on the scientific enterprise.

The seminar will specifically address the following questions:
– What were the causes of the reproducibility crisis and how did it give rise to meta-science and meta-psychology?
– What were the effects of the reproducibility crisis in terms of novel methodological proposals (e.g., stricter statistical standards, increased demands for transparency)?
– What is the historical lineage and philosophical underpinning of these methodological proposals?
– Can emerging computational models of science (“computational meta-science”) help us understand what effect methodological proposals will have, before we implement them in scale?

This seminar is open to students from all fields (all Schwerpunkte).

Art der Leistungskontrolle und erlaubte Hilfsmittel

- attendance
- active participation in discussions
- presentation of a scientific paper

Mindestanforderungen und Beurteilungsmaßstab

- missing 2 classes max
- active participation in discussions: 50% (up to 5% bonus points may be earned through short in-class quizzes)
- presentation of a scientific paper (approx. 15min): 50%

Prüfungsstoff

Active participation in discussions of literature covered in the seminar, critical thinking, sharing knowledge, asking relevant questions.

The presentation of the scientific paper will cover a concise summary of its content, provide context, and stimulates discussion of open questions.

There won’t be a written exam.

Literatur

The reading list will be announced in the seminar. Here are some references that can be consulted to get a sense of the course topics:

Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716

Munafò, M. R., Nosek, B. A., Bishop, D. V. M., Button, K. S., Chambers, C. D., Percie Du Sert, N., Simonsohn, U., Wagenmakers, E. J., Ware, J. J., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2017). A manifesto for reproducible science. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-016-0021

Vazire, S. (2018). Implications of the credibility revolution for productivity, creativity, and progress. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(4), 411-417. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617751884

Meehl, P. E. (1967). Theory-testing in psychology and physics: A methodological paradox. Philosophy of science, 34(2), 103-115. https://doi.org/10.1086/288135

Smaldino, P. E., & McElreath, R. (2016). The natural selection of bad science. Royal Society open science, 3(9), 160384. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160384

Zuordnung im Vorlesungsverzeichnis

Letzte Änderung: Fr 12.05.2023 00:19