200221 SE Fachliteraturseminar (2020W)
- Anmeldung von Fr 25.09.2020 09:00 bis Mi 30.09.2020 09:00
- Abmeldung bis Mo 05.10.2020 09:00
Termine (iCal) - nächster Termin ist mit N markiert
Ziele, Inhalte und Methode der Lehrveranstaltung
Art der Leistungskontrolle und erlaubte Hilfsmittel
Except the peer review assignment which will count for 10%.When given in person, 10% of the grade is class participation. This is because a lot of the class requires active participation and also that you come prepared (e.g. that you have read the literature if you were supposed to do so).If given digital, the digital version of the in-class assignments will be handled the same as the small assignments to do before class. I.e. that you have to do them but you do not get a grade.Final paper forms the introduction to the following Bachelorthesis. It specifies a research question and provides a literature review. Paper has to be APA style and 1600-2400 words. This will then be combined in the Bachelorthesisseminar with a paper of 2400-3600 words to form a final Bachelorthesis of between 4000 and 6000 words.
Mindestanforderungen und Beurteilungsmaßstab
Pelowski, M., Markey, P. S., Forster, M., Gerger, G., & Leder, H. (2017). Move me, astonish me… delight my eyes and brain: The Vienna integrated model of top-down and bottom-up processes in art perception (VIMAP) and corresponding affective, evaluative, and neurophysiological correlates. Physics of Life Reviews, 21, 80-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2017.02.003Art and Emotion:
Pelowski, M., Specker, E., Gerger, G., Leder, H., & Weingarden, L. S. (2018). Do you feel like I do? A study of spontaneous and deliberate emotion sharing and understanding between artists and perceivers of installation art. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000201Art and Cognition:
Augustin, M. D., Leder, H., Hutzler, F., & Carbon, C. C. (2008). Style follows content: On the microgenesis of art perception. Acta Psychologica, 128(1), 127–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.11.006Art and Brain:
Markey, P. S., Jakesch, M., & Leder, H. (2019). Art looks different – Semantic and syntactic processing of paintings and associated neurophysiological brain responses. Brain and Cognition, 134, 58–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2019.05.008Art and Field:
Specker, E., Stamkou, E., Pelowski, M., & Leder, H. (accepted). Radically revolutionary or pretty flowers? An experimental museum study of the impact of curatorial narrative highlighting artistic deviance on the visitor’s assessment of artist influence. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3434578%0A---Cognitive Psychology ---Deception detection:1. Verschuere, B., Ben-Shakhar, G., & Meijer, E. (2011). Memory detection: Theory and application of the concealed information test. Cambridge University Press.
2. Lukács, G., Kleinberg, B., & Verschuere, B. (2017). Familiarity-related fillers improve the validity of reaction time-based memory detection. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6(3), 295–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.01.013
3. Lukács, G. (2019). CITapp - A response time-based Concealed Information Test lie detector web application. Journal of Open Source Software, 4(34), 1179. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01179Cognitive biases: