Universität Wien

210057 SE BAK10 International Politics and Development (2016W)

Turkish Foreign and Security Policies

6.00 ECTS (2.00 SWS), SPL 21 - Politikwissenschaft
Prüfungsimmanente Lehrveranstaltung

Die selbstständige Anmeldung innerhalb der Anmeldephase zu Semesterbeginn ist für die Teilnahme an dieser Lehrveranstaltung verpflichtend! Eine nachträgliche Anmeldung ist NICHT möglich.
Anwesenheitspflicht in der ersten LV-Einheit: Studierende, die der ersten Einheit unentschuldigt fern bleiben, verlieren ihren Platz in der Lehrveranstaltung, und Studierende von der Warteliste können nachrücken.

Nach der ab Oktober 2015 geltenden Satzung der Universität Wien gibt es neue letztmögliche Abgabefristen für Seminararbeiten falls Lehrveranstaltungsleiter keine kürzeren Fristen bekannt geben.

Wintersemester der 30.April
Sommersemester der 30. September

Die Lehrveranstaltungsleitung kann im Einzelfall entscheiden, ob ein Gespräch zur Arbeit erforderlich ist. Das Gespräch ist notenrelevant und ist zu dokumentieren (Prüfungsprotokoll).
Stellt sich bei dem Gespräch heraus, dass der/die Studierende über die Inhalte des schriftlichen Beitrags keine oder ungenügend Auskünfte geben kann, ist die Seminararbeit (=Teilleistung) negativ zu bewerten. Gibt der/die Studierende zu, dass die Arbeit nicht selbst verfasst wurde, ist die Lehrveranstaltung mit einem "X" zu bewerten ("Nichtbeurteilung wegen unerlaubter Hilfsmittel").

Plagiate
Ein Plagiat ist die bewusste und unrechtmäßige Übernahme von fremdem geistigem Eigentum; der/die AutorIn verwendet ganz oder teilweisefremde Werke in einem eigenen Werk, ohne die Quelle anzugeben. Dies wird im Sammelzeugnis mit einem X gekennzeichnet und mit folgendem Zusatz versehen. Nicht beurteilte und nichtige Prüfungen: Gemäß § 74 ist die Beurteilung einer Prüfung für nichtig zu erklären, wenn diese Beurteilung oder die Anmeldung zu dieser Prüfung erschlichen wurde (N), Gemäß § 13 (7) des studienrechtlichen Satzungsteils der Universität Wien sind Prüfungen, bei denen unerlaubte Hilfsmittel mitgenommen oder verwendet werden, nicht zu beurteilen (X).

An/Abmeldung

Hinweis: Ihr Anmeldezeitpunkt innerhalb der Frist hat keine Auswirkungen auf die Platzvergabe (kein "first come, first served").

Details

max. 50 Teilnehmer*innen
Sprache: Englisch

Lehrende

Termine (iCal) - nächster Termin ist mit N markiert

Mittwoch 05.10. 15:00 - 16:30 Hörsaal 2 (H2), NIG 2.Stock
Mittwoch 12.10. 15:00 - 16:30 Hörsaal 2 (H2), NIG 2.Stock
Mittwoch 19.10. 15:00 - 16:30 Hörsaal 2 (H2), NIG 2.Stock
Mittwoch 09.11. 15:00 - 16:30 Hörsaal 2 (H2), NIG 2.Stock
Mittwoch 16.11. 15:00 - 16:30 Hörsaal 2 (H2), NIG 2.Stock
Mittwoch 23.11. 15:00 - 16:30 Hörsaal 2 (H2), NIG 2.Stock
Mittwoch 30.11. 15:00 - 16:30 Hörsaal 2 (H2), NIG 2.Stock
Mittwoch 07.12. 15:00 - 16:30 Hörsaal 2 (H2), NIG 2.Stock
Mittwoch 14.12. 15:00 - 16:30 Hörsaal 2 (H2), NIG 2.Stock
Mittwoch 11.01. 15:00 - 16:30 Hörsaal 2 (H2), NIG 2.Stock
Mittwoch 18.01. 15:00 - 16:30 Hörsaal 2 (H2), NIG 2.Stock
Mittwoch 25.01. 15:00 - 16:30 Hörsaal 2 (H2), NIG 2.Stock

Information

Ziele, Inhalte und Methode der Lehrveranstaltung

In the post-World War II era, the East-West antagonism widely defined the framework within which Turkish foreign and security policy choices were made and implemented. In the face of Soviet revisionism and on ideological grounds, from early on, Turkey sided with the West and sought integration in Western structures. The country closely aligned with the US, became a member in NATO, and inked an Association Agreement with the then European Community hoping full-membership would materialize in the end. In contrast, the country’s relations with its Middle Eastern neighbors remained limited and in many cases burdened by a number of disputes. The end of the Cold War eased relations with former Warsaw Pact countries, but the country’s security situation overall remained dire, which was reflected in the so-called “two-and-a-half-wars” paradigm according to which Turkey should be prepared two wage war against Greece, Syria, and the PKK simultaneously. Relations with two countries just mentioned as well as others (see the case of Iran), however, took a turn for the better after 1999, especially after the Justice and Development (AKP) came to power in 2002. In a changing context, Turkey worked to solve longstanding disputes with neighbors, expand relations with the countries of the Middle East, and reach out to Latin America or Africa. This time, Turkey promoted itself as a benign soft-power aspiring at a “zero problems policy” with its neighbors and pursuing greater levels of interdependence and, where necessary, acting as a mediator or facilitator to solve conflicts. Turkey’s growing relations with countries of the Middle East (see Iran or Syria), the simultaneous deterioration in relations with Israel, and some level of estrangement with the US and the EU, however, stimulated debates as to whether an axis shift was occurring in Turkey’s foreign policy orientation. The ushering in of the so-called Arab Spring, though, completely changed the realities on the ground. Especially the lengthy civil war in Syria along with the strengthening of the so-called Islamic State (IS) ultimately revitalized Turkey’s relations with actors such as the US, EU, and highlighted the relevance of NATO for deterrence and defense. Turkey’s relations with the Syrian regime, Iran, Iraq, or even Russia soured while fighting with the PKK flared up again and the IS allegedly committed two suicide attacks in the country. Overall, rather than the “zero problems” aspirations being met, Turkey once more found itself in a delicate position facing serious challenges and problems at home and abroad.
The proposed course will provide students with an opportunity to look into abovementioned issues and developments in greater detail. It will enhance their knowledge of a country - first and foremost of its foreign and security policies - which has been attracting continuous attention and debated intensely by pundits and the public. The students will analyze various aspects and issue areas (e. g. domestic factors leaving their imprint on foreign policy choices, the role of geo-economics, …), explore Turkey’s relations with a number of selected countries and institutions (US, Russia, NATO, EU, Iran, …), identify and examine problems and challenges faced by the country, elaborate on potential remedies, and discuss overall implications for European security and the course of relations between the EU and Turkey. Focusing on the case of Turkey, the course will also expand participants' knowledge of selected international institutions, issues as well as of relevant theories and academic debates.

Art der Leistungskontrolle und erlaubte Hilfsmittel

Active participation in class discussions, submission of a 15 page essay, oral presentation

Mindestanforderungen und Beurteilungsmaßstab

The proposed course will provide students with an opportunity to look into abovementioned issues and developments in greater detail. It will enhance their knowledge of a country (i.e. Turkey) - first and foremost of its foreign and security policies - which has been attracting continuous attention and debated intensely by pundits and the public. The students will analyze various aspects and issue areas (e. g. domestic factors leaving their imprint on foreign policy choices, the role of geo-economics, …), explore Turkey’s relations with a number of selected countries and institutions (US, Russia, NATO, EU, Iran, …), identify and examine problems and challenges faced by the country, elaborate on potential remedies, and discuss overall implications for European security and the course of relations between the EU and Turkey. Focusing on the case of Turkey, the course will also expand participants' knowledge of selected international institutions, issues as well as of relevant theories and academic debates.
Methodology: Lectures, presentations, class discussions

Prüfungsstoff

Literatur

Literature (preliminary):
Altunışık, Meliha Benli (2013): Turkey after the Arab Uprisings: Difficulties of Hanging on in there, ISPI Analysis No. 223, December 2013, http://www.ispionline.it/sites/default/files/pubblicazioni/analysis_223_2013_0.pdf [Accessed: 04 May 2014].
Altunışık, Meliha B.; Martin, Lenore G. (2011): Making Sense of Turkish Foreign Policy in the Middle East under AKP, in: Turkish Studies, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 569-587.
Aras, Bülent; Karakaya, Rabia P. (2008): From Conflict to Cooperation: Desecuritization of Turkey’s Relations with Syria and Iran, in: Security Dialogue, Vol. 39, No. 5, pp. 495-515.
Balcer, Adam (2014): Dances with the Bear: Turkey and Russia after Crimea, Working Paper 08, July 2014, http://www.iai.it/sites/default/files/gte_wp_08.pdf [Accessed: 5 December 2014].
Balcı, Ali; Kardaş, Tuncay (2012): The Changing Dynamics of Turkey’s Relations with Israel: An Analysis of ‘Securitization,’ in: Insight Turkey, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 99-120.
Davutoǧlu, Ahmet (2013a): Zero Problems in a New Era, in: Foreign Policy, 21 March 2013, http://foreignpolicy.com/2013/03/21/zero-problems-in-a-new-era/ [Accessed: 9 April 2013].
Demirtaş, Birgül (2012): Turkish Foreign Policy under the AKP Governments: An Interplay of Imperial Legacy, Neoliberal Interests and Pragmatism, in: Coşar, Simten; Yücesan-Özdemir, Gamze (eds.): Silent Violence. Neoliberalism, Islamist Politics and the AKP Years in Turkey, Ottawa: Red Quill Books, pp. 213-250.
Gencer, Özcan (2010): The Changing Role of Turkey’s Military in Foreign Policy Making, UNISCI Discussion Papers, No. 23, May 2010,
ICG [International Crisis Group] (2009): Turkey and Armenia: Opening Minds, Opening Borders, Europe Report No. 199, 14 April 2009, http://www.crisisgroup.org/~/media/Files/europe/199_turkey_and_armenia___opening_minds_opening_borders_2.pdf [Accessed: 12 July 2015].
ICG (2010): Turkey and the Middle East: Ambitions and Constraints, Europe Report No. 203, April 2010, http://www.crisisgroup.org/~/media/Files/europe/turkey-cyprus/turkey/203%20Turkey%20and%20the%20Middle%20East%20-%20Ambitions%20and%20Constraints.ashx [Accessed: 6 June 2010].
Karakullukçu, Memduh; Trenin, Dmitri (eds., 2014): Exploring the Prospects for Russian-Turkish Cooperation in a Turbulent Neighborhood, http://carnegieendowment.org/files/CP_Turkey2014_web_Eng.pdf [Accessed: 05 March 2015].
Kirişci, Kemal (2009): The Transformation of Turkish Foreign Policy: The Rise of the Trading State, in: New Perspectives on Turkey, No. 40, pp. 29-57.
Kirişci, Kemal (2015): Getting out of the ‘middle-income trap,’ http://www.brookings.edu/research/opinions/2015/02/18-getting-out-middle-income-trap-turkey-kirisci [Accessed: 17 March 2015].
Larrabee, Stephen F. (2011): The ‘New Turkey’ and American-Turkish Relations, Insight Turkey, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 1- 14.
Stein, Aaron (2015): Turkey's Evolving Syria Strategy. Why Ankara Backs Al-Nusra but Shuns ISIS, Foreign Policy, Snapshot, 9 February 2015, https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/turkey/2015-02-09/turkeys-evolving-syria-strategy [Accessed: 21 July 2015].
Stein, Aaron; Bleek, Philipp C. (2012): Turkish-Iranian Relations: From „Friends with Benefits“ to „It’s Complicated,“ in: Insight Turkey, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 137- 150.
Stein, Aaron; Udum Şebnem (2012): A Complicated Decision: Why Turkey is not Likely to Follow in Iran’s Nuclear Footsteps, in: Turkish Policy Quarterly, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 141-148.
Taşpınar, Ömer (2014): The End of the Turkish Model, in: Survival, Vol. 56, No. 2, pp. 49-64.

Zuordnung im Vorlesungsverzeichnis

Letzte Änderung: Mo 07.09.2020 15:38