Achtung! Das Lehrangebot ist noch nicht vollständig und wird bis Semesterbeginn laufend ergänzt.
210092 UE M2: Politikwissenschaftliche Methoden qualitativ (2025W)
(engl.)
Prüfungsimmanente Lehrveranstaltung
Labels
An/Abmeldung
Hinweis: Ihr Anmeldezeitpunkt innerhalb der Frist hat keine Auswirkungen auf die Platzvergabe (kein "first come, first served").
- Anmeldung von Do 04.09.2025 08:00 bis Mo 22.09.2025 08:00
- Anmeldung von Do 25.09.2025 08:00 bis Di 30.09.2025 08:00
- Abmeldung bis Mo 20.10.2025 23:59
Details
max. 35 Teilnehmer*innen
Sprache: Englisch
Lehrende
Termine (iCal) - nächster Termin ist mit N markiert
- Donnerstag 09.10. 16:45 - 20:00 Hörsaal 1 (H1), NIG 2.Stock
- Donnerstag 16.10. 16:45 - 20:00 Hörsaal 1 (H1), NIG 2.Stock
- Donnerstag 23.10. 16:45 - 20:00 Hörsaal 1 (H1), NIG 2.Stock
- Donnerstag 30.10. 16:45 - 20:00 Hörsaal 1 (H1), NIG 2.Stock
- Donnerstag 06.11. 16:45 - 20:00 Hörsaal 1 (H1), NIG 2.Stock
- Donnerstag 13.11. 16:45 - 20:00 Hörsaal 1 (H1), NIG 2.Stock
- Donnerstag 20.11. 16:45 - 20:00 Hörsaal 1 (H1), NIG 2.Stock
- Donnerstag 27.11. 16:45 - 20:00 Hörsaal 1 (H1), NIG 2.Stock
- Donnerstag 04.12. 16:45 - 20:00 Hörsaal 1 (H1), NIG 2.Stock
- Donnerstag 11.12. 16:45 - 20:00 Hörsaal 1 (H1), NIG 2.Stock
- Donnerstag 18.12. 16:45 - 20:00 Hörsaal 1 (H1), NIG 2.Stock
- Donnerstag 08.01. 16:45 - 20:00 Hörsaal 1 (H1), NIG 2.Stock
- Donnerstag 15.01. 16:45 - 20:00 Hörsaal 1 (H1), NIG 2.Stock
- N Donnerstag 22.01. 16:45 - 20:00 Hörsaal 1 (H1), NIG 2.Stock
- Donnerstag 29.01. 16:45 - 20:00 Hörsaal 1 (H1), NIG 2.Stock
Information
Ziele, Inhalte und Methode der Lehrveranstaltung
Art der Leistungskontrolle und erlaubte Hilfsmittel
Minimum attendance, in-class presentations, short written assignments and final term paper.
Mindestanforderungen und Beurteilungsmaßstab
The course is designed as interactive lecturing style, which means that regular attendance and active participation are of great importance. Missing more than two classes will result in failing the course (=grade 5). In exceptional cases, such as illness or an accident, a positive grade is possible. Proof of the reason must be provided and a compensation assignment must be arranged with the course instructor. Absence due to paid employment is not compensable.In addition to minimum attendance, All the below three components need to be fulfilled for a positive grade:1. Six short assignments/tasks (students who do more than six assignments will have the six best grades entered); 30%
2. In-class presentation and active participation: 20%
3. Final approx. 6,000 words term paper: 50%For the term paper, it is necessary to collect new data through interviews, focus groups, or observation. Analysis of existing data (including document analysis) is not sufficient.The paper should focus on issues related to inequity and/or solidarity and human health and well-being in the broadest sense. It should not exceed 6,000 words in length, including footnotes but excluding the bibliography and annexes. The following elements must be included:1. Introduction: What is the problem this paper contributes to solving? What is the research question? What have others said about this topic so far (brief review of existing literature), and what is unexplored? What are the relevant policies, if any? [20 points]2. Methods: Explain why the method of your choice is particularly well suited to address the research question. How did you collect and analyse the data? [20 points].3. Research ethics: Which ethical aspects have been taken into consideration in your research and how did you ensure that they were executed? [10 Points]4. Findings: What are the results of your data analysis. What is the answer to your research question? What kind of themes constitute your findings or theory? What kind of theory could you develop from your findings? [15 points]5. Discussion*: Here you situate your findings in the context of relevant literature. How does your finding correspond to, contradicts or add to existing literature? What are the strength and limitation of your research? Reflect on any issues that might have influenced your analysis and findings (ex. your gender, ethnicity, position as a student etc.,) [15 points]6. Conclusion/Summary: What is the conclusion and contribution of your work to the state of the art in research or existing theory? [10 points]Structure and formal aspects: readability, proper language, spellcheck, formatting, proper and consistent reference style, etc., [10 points]*Findings and discussion sections could be combined into one, if preferredMaximum 100 points. For a positive final grade, one needs minimum 45 points on the term paper.
2. In-class presentation and active participation: 20%
3. Final approx. 6,000 words term paper: 50%For the term paper, it is necessary to collect new data through interviews, focus groups, or observation. Analysis of existing data (including document analysis) is not sufficient.The paper should focus on issues related to inequity and/or solidarity and human health and well-being in the broadest sense. It should not exceed 6,000 words in length, including footnotes but excluding the bibliography and annexes. The following elements must be included:1. Introduction: What is the problem this paper contributes to solving? What is the research question? What have others said about this topic so far (brief review of existing literature), and what is unexplored? What are the relevant policies, if any? [20 points]2. Methods: Explain why the method of your choice is particularly well suited to address the research question. How did you collect and analyse the data? [20 points].3. Research ethics: Which ethical aspects have been taken into consideration in your research and how did you ensure that they were executed? [10 Points]4. Findings: What are the results of your data analysis. What is the answer to your research question? What kind of themes constitute your findings or theory? What kind of theory could you develop from your findings? [15 points]5. Discussion*: Here you situate your findings in the context of relevant literature. How does your finding correspond to, contradicts or add to existing literature? What are the strength and limitation of your research? Reflect on any issues that might have influenced your analysis and findings (ex. your gender, ethnicity, position as a student etc.,) [15 points]6. Conclusion/Summary: What is the conclusion and contribution of your work to the state of the art in research or existing theory? [10 points]Structure and formal aspects: readability, proper language, spellcheck, formatting, proper and consistent reference style, etc., [10 points]*Findings and discussion sections could be combined into one, if preferredMaximum 100 points. For a positive final grade, one needs minimum 45 points on the term paper.
Prüfungsstoff
All content of the course.
Literatur
Charmaz, K. 2014. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. Second edition. London: Sage Publications (selected chapters).Green, J., & Thorogood, N. 2018. Qualitative methods for health research. 4th Edition. London: Sage Publications (selected chapters).Prainsack B. and Pot M. 2021. Qualitative Methoden in der Politikwissenschaft. Vienna: Facultas Verlags- und Buchhandels AG. ISBN: 978-3-8252-5584-8
The book can be purchased from: https://www.facultas.at/item/Qualitative_und_interpretative_Methoden_/Barbara_Prainsack/Mirjam_Pot/48346170?back=3200e346b4289a1b2ba4a3b1af8daece
or is available as an eBook via u:search.Wagenaar, H. 2011. Meaning in Action: Interpretation and Dialogue in Policy Analysis. 1st edition. New York: Routledge.Bartels, K. P., & Wagenaar, H. 2025. Doing Interpretive Research: Learning and Teaching Imagination in Social Research. Oxford: Oxford University press.Other literature will be made available on Moodle.
The book can be purchased from: https://www.facultas.at/item/Qualitative_und_interpretative_Methoden_/Barbara_Prainsack/Mirjam_Pot/48346170?back=3200e346b4289a1b2ba4a3b1af8daece
or is available as an eBook via u:search.Wagenaar, H. 2011. Meaning in Action: Interpretation and Dialogue in Policy Analysis. 1st edition. New York: Routledge.Bartels, K. P., & Wagenaar, H. 2025. Doing Interpretive Research: Learning and Teaching Imagination in Social Research. Oxford: Oxford University press.Other literature will be made available on Moodle.
Zuordnung im Vorlesungsverzeichnis
Letzte Änderung: Mo 08.09.2025 09:27
1) formulate good qualitative research questions;
2) design qualitative research;
3) collect and analyse qualitative data;
4) present findings of qualitative research.