210125 SE M7: Staatstätigkeit, Policy- und Governanceanalysen (2017W)
Inter-Election Democracy (engl.)
Prüfungsimmanente Lehrveranstaltung
Labels
Eine Anmeldung über u:space innerhalb der Anmeldephase ist erforderlich! Eine nachträgliche Anmeldung ist NICHT möglich.
Studierende, die der ersten Einheit unentschuldigt fern bleiben, verlieren ihren Platz in der Lehrveranstaltung.Beachten Sie die Standards guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis.Die Lehrveranstaltungsleitung kann Studierende zu einem notenrelevanten Gespräch über erbrachte Teilleistungen einladen.
Plagiierte und erschlichene Teilleistungen führen zur Nichtbewertung der Lehrveranstaltung (Eintragung eines 'X' im Sammelzeugnis).
Studierende, die der ersten Einheit unentschuldigt fern bleiben, verlieren ihren Platz in der Lehrveranstaltung.Beachten Sie die Standards guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis.Die Lehrveranstaltungsleitung kann Studierende zu einem notenrelevanten Gespräch über erbrachte Teilleistungen einladen.
Plagiierte und erschlichene Teilleistungen führen zur Nichtbewertung der Lehrveranstaltung (Eintragung eines 'X' im Sammelzeugnis).
An/Abmeldung
Hinweis: Ihr Anmeldezeitpunkt innerhalb der Frist hat keine Auswirkungen auf die Platzvergabe (kein "first come, first served").
- Anmeldung von Mo 11.09.2017 08:00 bis Mo 25.09.2017 08:00
- Anmeldung von Do 28.09.2017 08:00 bis Di 03.10.2017 08:00
- Abmeldung bis Fr 13.10.2017 23:59
Details
max. 50 Teilnehmer*innen
Sprache: Englisch
Lehrende
Termine (iCal) - nächster Termin ist mit N markiert
Dienstag
10.10.
09:45 - 11:15
Seminarraum 1 (S1), NIG 2. Stock
Dienstag
17.10.
09:45 - 11:15
Seminarraum 1 (S1), NIG 2. Stock
Dienstag
24.10.
09:45 - 11:15
Seminarraum 1 (S1), NIG 2. Stock
Dienstag
31.10.
09:45 - 11:15
Seminarraum 1 (S1), NIG 2. Stock
Dienstag
07.11.
09:45 - 11:15
Seminarraum 1 (S1), NIG 2. Stock
Dienstag
14.11.
09:45 - 11:15
Seminarraum 1 (S1), NIG 2. Stock
Dienstag
21.11.
09:45 - 11:15
Seminarraum 1 (S1), NIG 2. Stock
Dienstag
28.11.
09:45 - 11:15
Seminarraum 1 (S1), NIG 2. Stock
Dienstag
05.12.
09:45 - 11:15
Seminarraum 1 (S1), NIG 2. Stock
Dienstag
12.12.
09:45 - 11:15
Seminarraum 1 (S1), NIG 2. Stock
Dienstag
09.01.
09:45 - 11:15
Seminarraum 1 (S1), NIG 2. Stock
Dienstag
16.01.
09:45 - 11:15
Seminarraum 1 (S1), NIG 2. Stock
Dienstag
23.01.
09:45 - 11:15
Seminarraum 1 (S1), NIG 2. Stock
Dienstag
30.01.
09:45 - 11:15
Seminarraum 1 (S1), NIG 2. Stock
Information
Ziele, Inhalte und Methode der Lehrveranstaltung
Art der Leistungskontrolle und erlaubte Hilfsmittel
Mitarbeit, Referate, schriftliche Abschlussarbeit
Mindestanforderungen und Beurteilungsmaßstab
(1) Regelmäßige Anwesenheit (maximal 2 entschuldigte Fehleinheiten) und aktive Mitarbeit (Voraussetzung ist die Lektüre der jeweiligen Literatur) (15 % der Leistungsbeurteilung)
(2) Referate im Seminar (15 %)
(3) Schriftliche Seminararbeit im Umfang von 6000–7000 Worte ohne Literaturangaben, (70%)
(2) Referate im Seminar (15 %)
(3) Schriftliche Seminararbeit im Umfang von 6000–7000 Worte ohne Literaturangaben, (70%)
Prüfungsstoff
Literatur
Arndt, Christoph (2017). An Empirical Model of Issue Evolution and Partisan Realignment in a Multiparty System. Political Research Quarterly, online first.
Bertelli, Anthony & Peter John (2012). Public Policy Investment: Risk and Return in British Politics. British Journal of Political Science, 43(4): 741–773.
Bevern, Simona (2013). Party Communication in Routine Times of Politics. Issue Dynamics, Party Competition, Agenda-Setting, and Representation in Germany. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Carmines, Edward G. & James A. Stimson (1986). On the Structure and Sequence of Issue Evolution. American Political Science Review, 80(3): 901–920.
Christensen, Love, Stefan Dahlberg & Johan Martinsson (2015). Changes and Fluctuations in Issue Ownership: The Case of Sweden, 1979–2010. Scandinavian Political Studies, 38(2): 137–157.
Christiansen, Flemming Juul & Henrik Bech Seeberg (2016). Cooperation between Counterparts in Parliament from an Agenda-Setting Perspective: Legislative Coalitions as a Trade of Criticism and Policy. West European Politics, 39(6): 1160–1180
Dalton, Russell J., Ian McAllister & David M. Farrell (2011). Political Parties and Democratic Linkage: How Parties Organize Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
De Bruycker, Iskander & Stafaan Walgrave (2014). How A New Issue becomes an Owned Issue. Media Coverage and the Financial Crisis in Belgium (2008–2009). International Journal of Public Opinion, 26(1): 86–97.
De Vries, Cathrine E. & Sara B. Hobolt (2015). Issue Entrepreneurship and Multiparty Competition. Comparative Political Studies, 48(9): 1159–1185.
Esaiasson, Peter & Hanne M. Narud (eds.) (2013). Between-election Democracy: The Rrepresentative Relationship after Election Day. Colchester: ECPR Press.
Esaiasson, Peter, Mikael Gilljam & Mikael Persson (2017). Responsiveness Beyond Policy Satisfaction: Does It Matter to Citizens? Comparative Political Studies, 50(6): 739–765.
Fagerholm, Andreas (2016). Why Do Political Parties Change their Policy Positions? A Review. Political Studies Review, 14(4): 501–511.
Fisher, Stephen D. & Sara B. Hobolt (2010). Coalition Government and Electoral Accountability. Electoral Studies 29(3): 358–69.
Fortunato, David & Randolph T. Stevenson (2013). Perceptions of Partisan Ideologies: The Effect of Coalition Participation. American Journal of Political Science, 57(2): 459–477.
Froio, Caterina, Shaun Bevan & Will Jennings (2016). Party Mandates and the Policy of Attention: Party Platforms, Public Priorities and the Policy Agenda in Britain. Party Politics, online first.
Green-Pedersen, Christopher, and Stefaan Walgrave (eds.) (2014). Agenda Setting, Policies, and Political Systems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gutman, Amy & Dennis Thomson (2012). The Sprit of Compromise. When Governing Demands It and Campaigning Undermines It. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Hobolt, Sara B. & Robert Klemmensen (2008). Government responsiveness and political competition in comparative perspective. Comparative Political Studies 41(3):309–37.
Jennings, Will & Christopher Wlezien (2015). Preferences, Problems and Representation. Political Science Research and Methods 3(3): 659–81.
Jones, Bryan D. & Frank R. Baumgartner (2005). The Politics of Attention. How Governments Prioritizes Problems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kleinnijenhuis, Jan & Annemarie S. Walter (2014). News, Discussion, and Associative Issue Ownership: Instability at the Micro Level versus Stability at the Macro Level. International Journal of Press/Politics, 19(2): 226–245.
Klüver, Heike & Jae-Jae Spoon (2014). Who Responds? Voters, Parties and Issue Attention. British Journal of Political Science, 46(3): 633–654.
Lubbert, Gregory M. (1996). Comparative Democracy. Policymaking and Governing Coalitions in Europe and Israel. New York: Columbia University Press.
Manin, Bernard, Adam Przeworski & Susan C. Stokes (1999) Elections and Representation. In Democracy, Accountability, and Representation, ed.
Bertelli, Anthony & Peter John (2012). Public Policy Investment: Risk and Return in British Politics. British Journal of Political Science, 43(4): 741–773.
Bevern, Simona (2013). Party Communication in Routine Times of Politics. Issue Dynamics, Party Competition, Agenda-Setting, and Representation in Germany. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Carmines, Edward G. & James A. Stimson (1986). On the Structure and Sequence of Issue Evolution. American Political Science Review, 80(3): 901–920.
Christensen, Love, Stefan Dahlberg & Johan Martinsson (2015). Changes and Fluctuations in Issue Ownership: The Case of Sweden, 1979–2010. Scandinavian Political Studies, 38(2): 137–157.
Christiansen, Flemming Juul & Henrik Bech Seeberg (2016). Cooperation between Counterparts in Parliament from an Agenda-Setting Perspective: Legislative Coalitions as a Trade of Criticism and Policy. West European Politics, 39(6): 1160–1180
Dalton, Russell J., Ian McAllister & David M. Farrell (2011). Political Parties and Democratic Linkage: How Parties Organize Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
De Bruycker, Iskander & Stafaan Walgrave (2014). How A New Issue becomes an Owned Issue. Media Coverage and the Financial Crisis in Belgium (2008–2009). International Journal of Public Opinion, 26(1): 86–97.
De Vries, Cathrine E. & Sara B. Hobolt (2015). Issue Entrepreneurship and Multiparty Competition. Comparative Political Studies, 48(9): 1159–1185.
Esaiasson, Peter & Hanne M. Narud (eds.) (2013). Between-election Democracy: The Rrepresentative Relationship after Election Day. Colchester: ECPR Press.
Esaiasson, Peter, Mikael Gilljam & Mikael Persson (2017). Responsiveness Beyond Policy Satisfaction: Does It Matter to Citizens? Comparative Political Studies, 50(6): 739–765.
Fagerholm, Andreas (2016). Why Do Political Parties Change their Policy Positions? A Review. Political Studies Review, 14(4): 501–511.
Fisher, Stephen D. & Sara B. Hobolt (2010). Coalition Government and Electoral Accountability. Electoral Studies 29(3): 358–69.
Fortunato, David & Randolph T. Stevenson (2013). Perceptions of Partisan Ideologies: The Effect of Coalition Participation. American Journal of Political Science, 57(2): 459–477.
Froio, Caterina, Shaun Bevan & Will Jennings (2016). Party Mandates and the Policy of Attention: Party Platforms, Public Priorities and the Policy Agenda in Britain. Party Politics, online first.
Green-Pedersen, Christopher, and Stefaan Walgrave (eds.) (2014). Agenda Setting, Policies, and Political Systems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gutman, Amy & Dennis Thomson (2012). The Sprit of Compromise. When Governing Demands It and Campaigning Undermines It. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Hobolt, Sara B. & Robert Klemmensen (2008). Government responsiveness and political competition in comparative perspective. Comparative Political Studies 41(3):309–37.
Jennings, Will & Christopher Wlezien (2015). Preferences, Problems and Representation. Political Science Research and Methods 3(3): 659–81.
Jones, Bryan D. & Frank R. Baumgartner (2005). The Politics of Attention. How Governments Prioritizes Problems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kleinnijenhuis, Jan & Annemarie S. Walter (2014). News, Discussion, and Associative Issue Ownership: Instability at the Micro Level versus Stability at the Macro Level. International Journal of Press/Politics, 19(2): 226–245.
Klüver, Heike & Jae-Jae Spoon (2014). Who Responds? Voters, Parties and Issue Attention. British Journal of Political Science, 46(3): 633–654.
Lubbert, Gregory M. (1996). Comparative Democracy. Policymaking and Governing Coalitions in Europe and Israel. New York: Columbia University Press.
Manin, Bernard, Adam Przeworski & Susan C. Stokes (1999) Elections and Representation. In Democracy, Accountability, and Representation, ed.
Zuordnung im Vorlesungsverzeichnis
Letzte Änderung: Mo 07.09.2020 15:38
* How is the election result interpreted by political actors and the public and what follows from there?
* How does the process of coalition formation relate to the parties’ substantive campaign stances and the way the parties conducted their campaigns?
* How do parties’ choices of coalition partners influence voters’ party perceptions?
* How do the parties’ electoral pledges influence government policy – to what extent do parties fulfil their electoral mandate? How do parties “invest” in public policy with a view on the next election?
* To what extent is conflict in the electoral arena from the campaign period reproduced in the legislative arena? And how do patterns of government–opposition relation inform the next campaign?
* How do changes in coalition behaviour – new partners, new coalitions – relate to patterns of parliamentary voting and the conduct of parliamentary processes?
* What influence do changes in party strength in public opinion polls have on intra-coalition politics? What is their influence on the relations between government and opposition parties? And how do they influence intra-party politics?
* How do parties communicate with the electorate in the “long campaign” – the period from after the election until the setting in of the “hot campaign” immediately before elections?
* How do voters balance retrospective evaluations of the parties’ records in relation to prospective evaluations of their promises and programs?