210134 SE M11: FOP Forschungspraktikum (2018W)
(engl.)
Prüfungsimmanente Lehrveranstaltung
Labels
Eine Anmeldung über u:space innerhalb der Anmeldephase ist erforderlich! Eine nachträgliche Anmeldung ist NICHT möglich.
Studierende, die der ersten Einheit unentschuldigt fern bleiben, verlieren ihren Platz in der Lehrveranstaltung.Beachten Sie die Standards guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis.Die Lehrveranstaltungsleitung kann Studierende zu einem notenrelevanten Gespräch über erbrachte Teilleistungen einladen.
Plagiierte und erschlichene Teilleistungen führen zur Nichtbewertung der Lehrveranstaltung (Eintragung eines 'X' im Sammelzeugnis). Ab WS 2018 kommt die Plagiatssoftware (‘Turnitin') bei prüfungsimmanenten Lehrveranstaltungen zum Einsatz.
Studierende, die der ersten Einheit unentschuldigt fern bleiben, verlieren ihren Platz in der Lehrveranstaltung.Beachten Sie die Standards guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis.Die Lehrveranstaltungsleitung kann Studierende zu einem notenrelevanten Gespräch über erbrachte Teilleistungen einladen.
Plagiierte und erschlichene Teilleistungen führen zur Nichtbewertung der Lehrveranstaltung (Eintragung eines 'X' im Sammelzeugnis). Ab WS 2018 kommt die Plagiatssoftware (‘Turnitin') bei prüfungsimmanenten Lehrveranstaltungen zum Einsatz.
An/Abmeldung
Hinweis: Ihr Anmeldezeitpunkt innerhalb der Frist hat keine Auswirkungen auf die Platzvergabe (kein "first come, first served").
- Anmeldung von Mo 03.09.2018 08:00 bis Mo 17.09.2018 08:00
- Anmeldung von Do 20.09.2018 08:00 bis Mi 26.09.2018 08:00
- Abmeldung bis So 14.10.2018 23:59
Details
max. 35 Teilnehmer*innen
Sprache: Englisch
Lehrende
Termine (iCal) - nächster Termin ist mit N markiert
Dienstag
09.10.
09:00 - 12:00
Seminarraum H10, Rathausstraße 19, Stiege 2, Hochparterre
Dienstag
16.10.
09:00 - 12:00
Seminarraum H10, Rathausstraße 19, Stiege 2, Hochparterre
Dienstag
23.10.
09:00 - 12:00
Seminarraum H10, Rathausstraße 19, Stiege 2, Hochparterre
Dienstag
30.10.
09:00 - 12:00
Seminarraum H10, Rathausstraße 19, Stiege 2, Hochparterre
Dienstag
06.11.
09:00 - 12:00
Seminarraum H10, Rathausstraße 19, Stiege 2, Hochparterre
Dienstag
13.11.
09:00 - 12:00
Seminarraum H10, Rathausstraße 19, Stiege 2, Hochparterre
Dienstag
20.11.
09:00 - 12:00
Seminarraum H10, Rathausstraße 19, Stiege 2, Hochparterre
Dienstag
27.11.
09:00 - 12:00
Seminarraum H10, Rathausstraße 19, Stiege 2, Hochparterre
Dienstag
04.12.
09:00 - 12:00
Seminarraum H10, Rathausstraße 19, Stiege 2, Hochparterre
Dienstag
11.12.
09:00 - 12:00
Seminarraum H10, Rathausstraße 19, Stiege 2, Hochparterre
Dienstag
08.01.
09:00 - 12:00
Seminarraum H10, Rathausstraße 19, Stiege 2, Hochparterre
Dienstag
15.01.
09:00 - 12:00
Seminarraum H10, Rathausstraße 19, Stiege 2, Hochparterre
Dienstag
22.01.
09:00 - 12:00
Seminarraum H10, Rathausstraße 19, Stiege 2, Hochparterre
Dienstag
29.01.
09:00 - 12:00
Seminarraum H10, Rathausstraße 19, Stiege 2, Hochparterre
Information
Ziele, Inhalte und Methode der Lehrveranstaltung
The goals of the research practice seminar are twofold. First, students will become acquainted with theories and recent research on social groups and party identification. Recent years have seen a resurgence of interest in social identity theory as well as group theories of democratic politics (e.g. Cramer 2016, Achen and Bartels 2017). This course discusses the impact of ingroup and outgroup identification on political behaviour. Identities addressed include class, race, gender, ethnicity, nation, and parties. Questions this class tackles include: When and why do individuals develop social identities? What is the difference between group membership and group identification? How do different types of identities differ? What happens when identities overlap? How do social identities affect vote choice and electoral participation?Second, students will become familiarized with empirical research methods in political science, either by using existing data and analysing those, or by collecting own data based on newly developed research instruments. Given the topic of the seminar, the emphasis will be on survey and experimental methods. Secondary data analysis will also be discussed. Students can then apply these methods to their own research proposal.
Art der Leistungskontrolle und erlaubte Hilfsmittel
Continuous assessment: class participation, group projects, class presentations and seminar paper (see below).
Mindestanforderungen und Beurteilungsmaßstab
- Attendance and active participation in class (10%)
- Presentation of readings in class (5 minutes) and developing discussion points for the following class discussion (10%)
- Assignment 1: Draft survey instrument (including class presentation and discussion) (15%)
- Assignment 2: Empirical analysis (including class presentation and discussion) (15%)
- Presentation on the research question and empirical tests in class and acting as discussant on other students’ research proposal (10%)
- Seminar Paper (4.000 to 5.000 words excluding the references, deadline: April 30, 2019) (40%)
Each component of the course assessment criteria needs to be attempted.
- Presentation of readings in class (5 minutes) and developing discussion points for the following class discussion (10%)
- Assignment 1: Draft survey instrument (including class presentation and discussion) (15%)
- Assignment 2: Empirical analysis (including class presentation and discussion) (15%)
- Presentation on the research question and empirical tests in class and acting as discussant on other students’ research proposal (10%)
- Seminar Paper (4.000 to 5.000 words excluding the references, deadline: April 30, 2019) (40%)
Each component of the course assessment criteria needs to be attempted.
Prüfungsstoff
not applicable
Literatur
A complete reference list will be provided in the final syllabus. Indicative readings are:Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual review of psychology, 33(1), 1-39.
Conover, P. J. (1984). The influence of group identifications on political perception and evaluation. The Journal of Politics, 46(3), 760-785.
Huddy, L. (2001). From social to political identity: A critical examination of social identity theory. Political psychology, 22(1), 127-156.
Achen, C. H., & Bartels, L. M. (2017). Democracy for realists: Why elections do not produce responsive government. Princeton University Press.
Greene, S. (1999). Understanding party identification: A social identity approach. Political Psychology, 20(2), 393-403.
Mason, L. (2018). Ideologues without Issues: The Polarizing Consequences of Ideological Identities. Public Opinion Quarterly, 82(S1), 280-301.
Cramer, K. J. (2016). The politics of resentment: Rural consciousness in Wisconsin and the rise of Scott Walker. University of Chicago Press.
Bittner, A., & Goodyear-Grant, E. (2017). Sex isn’t gender: Reforming concepts and measurements in the study of public opinion. Political Behavior, 39(4), 1019-1041.
Feldman, S., & Huddy, L. (2005). Racial resentment and white opposition to race‐conscious programs: Principles or prejudice?. American Journal of Political Science, 49(1), 168-183.
Tesler, M. (2012). The spillover of racialization into health care: How President Obama polarized public opinion by racial attitudes and race. American Journal of Political Science, 56(3), 690-704.
Conover, P. J. (1984). The influence of group identifications on political perception and evaluation. The Journal of Politics, 46(3), 760-785.
Huddy, L. (2001). From social to political identity: A critical examination of social identity theory. Political psychology, 22(1), 127-156.
Achen, C. H., & Bartels, L. M. (2017). Democracy for realists: Why elections do not produce responsive government. Princeton University Press.
Greene, S. (1999). Understanding party identification: A social identity approach. Political Psychology, 20(2), 393-403.
Mason, L. (2018). Ideologues without Issues: The Polarizing Consequences of Ideological Identities. Public Opinion Quarterly, 82(S1), 280-301.
Cramer, K. J. (2016). The politics of resentment: Rural consciousness in Wisconsin and the rise of Scott Walker. University of Chicago Press.
Bittner, A., & Goodyear-Grant, E. (2017). Sex isn’t gender: Reforming concepts and measurements in the study of public opinion. Political Behavior, 39(4), 1019-1041.
Feldman, S., & Huddy, L. (2005). Racial resentment and white opposition to race‐conscious programs: Principles or prejudice?. American Journal of Political Science, 49(1), 168-183.
Tesler, M. (2012). The spillover of racialization into health care: How President Obama polarized public opinion by racial attitudes and race. American Journal of Political Science, 56(3), 690-704.
Zuordnung im Vorlesungsverzeichnis
Letzte Änderung: Fr 01.10.2021 00:22