Universität Wien

210154 SE EC: EU Institutions and Decision-Making (2023S)

(engl.)

5.00 ECTS (2.00 SWS), SPL 21 - Politikwissenschaft
Prüfungsimmanente Lehrveranstaltung

Eine Anmeldung über u:space innerhalb der Anmeldephase ist erforderlich! Eine nachträgliche Anmeldung ist NICHT möglich.
Studierende, die der ersten Einheit unentschuldigt fern bleiben, verlieren ihren Platz in der Lehrveranstaltung.

Achten Sie auf die Einhaltung der Standards guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis und die korrekte Anwendung der Techniken wissenschaftlichen Arbeitens und Schreibens.
Plagiierte und erschlichene Teilleistungen führen zur Nichtbewertung der Lehrveranstaltung (Eintragung eines 'X' im Sammelzeugnis).
Die Lehrveranstaltungsleitung kann Studierende zu einem notenrelevanten Gespräch über erbrachte Teilleistungen einladen.

An/Abmeldung

Hinweis: Ihr Anmeldezeitpunkt innerhalb der Frist hat keine Auswirkungen auf die Platzvergabe (kein "first come, first served").

Details

max. 50 Teilnehmer*innen
Sprache: Englisch

Lehrende

    Termine (iCal) - nächster Termin ist mit N markiert

    Donnerstag 09.03. 09:45 - 11:15 Seminarraum 1 (S1), NIG 2. Stock
    Donnerstag 16.03. 09:45 - 11:15 Seminarraum 1 (S1), NIG 2. Stock
    Donnerstag 23.03. 09:45 - 11:15 Seminarraum 1 (S1), NIG 2. Stock
    Donnerstag 30.03. 09:45 - 11:15 Seminarraum 1 (S1), NIG 2. Stock
    Donnerstag 20.04. 09:45 - 11:15 Seminarraum 1 (S1), NIG 2. Stock
    Donnerstag 27.04. 09:45 - 11:15 Seminarraum 1 (S1), NIG 2. Stock
    Donnerstag 04.05. 09:45 - 11:15 Seminarraum 1 (S1), NIG 2. Stock
    Donnerstag 11.05. 09:45 - 11:15 Seminarraum 1 (S1), NIG 2. Stock
    Donnerstag 25.05. 09:45 - 11:15 Seminarraum 1 (S1), NIG 2. Stock
    Donnerstag 01.06. 09:45 - 11:15 Seminarraum 1 (S1), NIG 2. Stock
    Donnerstag 15.06. 09:45 - 11:15 Seminarraum 1 (S1), NIG 2. Stock
    Donnerstag 22.06. 09:45 - 11:15 Seminarraum 1 (S1), NIG 2. Stock
    Donnerstag 29.06. 09:45 - 11:15 Seminarraum 1 (S1), NIG 2. Stock

    Information

    Ziele, Inhalte und Methode der Lehrveranstaltung

    Does the EU have a democratic deficit? Has the EU become too large? Is Brexit good or bad for European integration? Should the EU have a common army? Are business lobbyists too powerful in Europe? Is the EU’s agricultural policy as bad as its reputation? These and other questions are intensely debated among scholars, policymakers, as well as the wider public. In this course, we will use these ‘key controversies in European integration’ as a lens through which to look at the political science research on European integration. In other words, instead of talking about abstract theories or policy fields, we will - after having covered some foundations - try to better understand these important theories and policy fields through engaging with central debates in European integration.

    The course aims to familiarize students with key debates on the merits and flaws of European integration. At the end of the course, students should be able to

    • identify and describe the nature and dynamics of key controversies in European integration;

    • summarize and critically assess central theoretical and empirical insights of the political science research on various aspects of these controversies;

    • have the ability to independently formulate their own thoughts on and criticisms of different sides of key controversies of European integration.

    Art der Leistungskontrolle und erlaubte Hilfsmittel

    Students are required to attend classes and come prepared (i.e., having done and thought a bit about the readings). In addition, there will be three types of assignments that together make up the final grade.

    • First, students need to deliver a very short presentation, either summarizing key points of the text (in Part I) or making the case for one side of a key controversy (in Part II). The point is not to comprehensively summarize the reading; this is usually boring for most people involved. Rather, it is to identify key points of the reading and spin them further, for example by connecting them to other things you’ve read, real-world examples, or something you’ve seen in the news recently. For the presentations in Part 2 it is particularly important to actually make the case for whichever side of a controversy you were assigned to - a bit like in a debating class. 1 Presentations can be really short, perhaps 4 and not longer than 6 minutes per person. It’s more important that you independently think about the reading and about how to make it interesting for the class. For example, when we discuss whether the EU should have a common army, maybe you find a survey about what Europeans actually think about this topic. Students are required to kick off the discussion after their presentations. This can, for example, be a controversial claim or a discussion question (not too broad, not too specific). The presentation will make up 30% of your grade.

    • Second, there is a short exam towards the end of the seminar that tests whether students remember key arguments from the readings and the sessions. The test ensures that students actually do the readings and pay attention in class. It will consist of around 15 short questions, most of them in multiple choice format. The test will take place in the first 10-15 minutes of our session in week 10 so you enough time over the break to go over slides and readings again. This will make up 20% of your grade.

    • Lastly, you need to write a relatively short term paper, which will make up 50% of your grade. The term paper is actually a collection of two short papers of around 1000-1500 words each, held together by a short introduction. The two papers will focus on one key controversy of European integration (not necessarily one covered in the course). One paper is supposed to use the scientific (and policy) literature to make the case for one side of such a controversy (e.g. the Euro is good for Europe); the other paper is meant to take the opposing side on the same controversy. The idea is to encourage you to think as hard as you can about both sides of an issue, even if you have a personal preference. If you just make good arguments for your favored side, but bad ones for the ‘other side’, this will be reflected in your overall grade. The deadline for the term paper will be Sunday, Feb 19 2023.

    Mindestanforderungen und Beurteilungsmaßstab

    You need to submit all the required assignments to pass the course. Your final grade will be the weighted average of these assignments. What is important to me when it comes to grading are two things. First, stick to the task at hand. If your presentation is meant to be 5 minutes, make it no more than 6. It’s almost a dad thing to say, but these skills are important not just at a university, but pretty much everywhere you want to end up at. Second, put a bit of effort into it, or at least make it look that way. Have some decent formatting on papers, but also and more importantly: try to be clear and crisp, which is often harder than writing long and convoluted sentences. Try to prepare a presentation that you yourself would like to listen to. Short, simple points, and make it clear when you found something unclear. You don’t need to understand everything, have read a ton of additional literature, or write in a fancy way to get a very good grade. Just stick to the task and try to make sense. I have also collected general advise for how to write a good term paper on my website - check it out if you want to improve your chances of getting a very good grade.

    Prüfungsstoff

    Literatur

    The course reading will largely draw on Zimmermann, H. and Dür, A. (2021) Key controversies in European integration. London: Macmillan. Third Edition. I made sure the book is available online through the library, but to save you the trouble, I also uploaded the required chapters on moodle. If you’re interested in buying the book, make sure to buy the third edition.

    For more details, see the Syllabus.

    Zuordnung im Vorlesungsverzeichnis

    Letzte Änderung: Di 14.03.2023 12:09