230077 VO Risk and Society (2009S)
Labels
Details
max. 35 Teilnehmer*innen
Sprache: Englisch
Lehrende
Termine (iCal) - nächster Termin ist mit N markiert
- Dienstag 26.05. 17:00 - 18:30 Inst. f. Soziologie, Seminarraum 2, Rooseveltplatz 2, 1.Stock
- Dienstag 26.05. 19:00 - 20:30 Inst. f. Soziologie, Seminarraum 2, Rooseveltplatz 2, 1.Stock
- Mittwoch 27.05. 17:00 - 18:30 Inst. f. Soziologie, Seminarraum 2, Rooseveltplatz 2, 1.Stock
- Mittwoch 27.05. 19:00 - 20:30 Inst. f. Soziologie, Seminarraum 2, Rooseveltplatz 2, 1.Stock
- Donnerstag 28.05. 17:00 - 18:30 Inst. f. Soziologie, Seminarraum 2, Rooseveltplatz 2, 1.Stock
- Donnerstag 28.05. 19:00 - 20:30 Inst. f. Soziologie, Seminarraum 2, Rooseveltplatz 2, 1.Stock
- Freitag 29.05. 10:00 - 11:30 Inst. f. Soziologie, Seminarraum 2, Rooseveltplatz 2, 1.Stock
Information
Ziele, Inhalte und Methode der Lehrveranstaltung
Art der Leistungskontrolle und erlaubte Hilfsmittel
Mindestanforderungen und Beurteilungsmaßstab
To critically examine the social construction of risk from a number of theoretical perspectivesExamine the ways in which ideas about risk are related to daily life in advanced capitalist societies.
Prüfungsstoff
Lectures and discussion
Literatur
Denney, D. (2005) Risk and Society, London Sage.
Beck, U. (1992) The Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, London ,Sage.
Lupton, D. (1999) Risk , London, Routledge.
Furedi, F. (1998) Culture of Fear, London, Cassel.
Mythen, G. and Walklate, S. (eds) (2006) Beyond the Risk Society-critical reflections on risk and human security, Maidenhead, Open University Press.
Beck, U. (1992) The Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, London ,Sage.
Lupton, D. (1999) Risk , London, Routledge.
Furedi, F. (1998) Culture of Fear, London, Cassel.
Mythen, G. and Walklate, S. (eds) (2006) Beyond the Risk Society-critical reflections on risk and human security, Maidenhead, Open University Press.
Zuordnung im Vorlesungsverzeichnis
Letzte Änderung: Mo 07.09.2020 15:39
The relationship between risk, terrorism, human rights and international law post 9/11 will also be examined. It will be argued that there is no consensus as to what constitutes risk and that a new model citizenship has emerged based upon the ability of individual citizens to engage with risk constructively.