Achtung! Das Lehrangebot ist noch nicht vollständig und wird bis Semesterbeginn laufend ergänzt.
230128 WS Diagnosis of Society: Governance systems (2020W)
Prüfungsimmanente Lehrveranstaltung
Labels
An/Abmeldung
Hinweis: Ihr Anmeldezeitpunkt innerhalb der Frist hat keine Auswirkungen auf die Platzvergabe (kein "first come, first served").
- Anmeldung von Fr 04.09.2020 13:00 bis Mo 21.09.2020 13:00
- Anmeldung von Fr 25.09.2020 13:00 bis Mo 28.09.2020 13:00
- Abmeldung bis Di 20.10.2020 23:59
Details
max. 35 Teilnehmer*innen
Sprache: Englisch
Lehrende
Termine (iCal) - nächster Termin ist mit N markiert
- Dienstag 13.10. 10:00 - 13:45 Digital
- Dienstag 27.10. 10:00 - 13:45 Digital
- Dienstag 10.11. 10:00 - 13:45 Digital
- Dienstag 24.11. 10:00 - 13:45 Digital
- Dienstag 12.01. 10:00 - 13:45 Digital
- Dienstag 26.01. 10:00 - 13:45 Digital
Information
Ziele, Inhalte und Methode der Lehrveranstaltung
Art der Leistungskontrolle und erlaubte Hilfsmittel
Important Grading Information:
If not explicitly noted otherwise, all requirements mentioned in the grading scheme must be met.
If a required task is not fulfilled, this will be considered as a discontinuation of the course. In that case, the course will be graded as ‘fail’ (5), unless there is a major and unpredictable reason for not being able to fulfill the task on the student's side (e.g. a longer illness).
In such a case, the student may be de-registered from the course without grading.
Whether this exception applies is decided by the lecturer.If any requirement of the course has been fulfilled by fraudulent means, be it for example by cheating at an exam, plagiarizing parts of a written assignment or by faking signatures on an attendance sheet, the student's participation in the course will be discontinued, the entire course will be graded as ‘not assessed’ and will be entered into the electronic exam record as ‘fraudulently obtained’.
The plagiarism-detection service (Turnitin in Moodle) can be used in course of the grading: Details will be announced by the lecturer.
If not explicitly noted otherwise, all requirements mentioned in the grading scheme must be met.
If a required task is not fulfilled, this will be considered as a discontinuation of the course. In that case, the course will be graded as ‘fail’ (5), unless there is a major and unpredictable reason for not being able to fulfill the task on the student's side (e.g. a longer illness).
In such a case, the student may be de-registered from the course without grading.
Whether this exception applies is decided by the lecturer.If any requirement of the course has been fulfilled by fraudulent means, be it for example by cheating at an exam, plagiarizing parts of a written assignment or by faking signatures on an attendance sheet, the student's participation in the course will be discontinued, the entire course will be graded as ‘not assessed’ and will be entered into the electronic exam record as ‘fraudulently obtained’.
The plagiarism-detection service (Turnitin in Moodle) can be used in course of the grading: Details will be announced by the lecturer.
Mindestanforderungen und Beurteilungsmaßstab
Knowledge of general sociological theory is desirable.
Students will be evaluated as follows:
- 20% online participation,
- 30% presentation of an article/chapter for online discussion,
50% essay (approx. 3000 words) based on the topic of the presentation.
Students will be evaluated as follows:
- 20% online participation,
- 30% presentation of an article/chapter for online discussion,
50% essay (approx. 3000 words) based on the topic of the presentation.
Prüfungsstoff
The final assessment will draw on the topics presented in class.
Literatur
Andonova, L. B., Betsill, M. M., & Bulkeley, H. (2009). Transnational climate governance. Global environmental politics, 9(2), 52-73.
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of public administration research and theory, 18(4), 543-571.
Bache, I., Bartle, I., & Flinders, M. (2016). Multi-level governance. In Handbook on theories of governance. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Bevir, M. (2007). Encyclopedia of governance (Vol. 1). Sage.
Bevir, M. (2009). Key concepts in governance (1. publ.. ed., Sage key concepts). Los Angeles, Calif. [u.a.]: SAGE.
Dryzek, J. S. (2012). Foundations and frontiers of deliberative governance. Oxford University Press, Chapters 1 and 6.
Fung, A. (2006). Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public administration review, 66, 66-75.
Fung, A., & Wright, E. O. (2001). Deepening democracy: Innovations in empowered participatory governance. Politics & Society, 29(1), 5-41.
Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2003). Unraveling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance. American political science review, 233-243.
Huxham, C., Vangen, S., Huxham, C., & Eden, C. (2000). The challenge of collaborative governance. Public Management an International Journal of Research and Theory, 2(3), 337-358.
Kohler-Koch, B., & Rittberger, B. (2006). The governance turn in EU studies. J. Common Mkt. Stud., 44, 27.
Lemos, M. C., & Agrawal, A. (2006). Environmental governance. Annual review of environment and resources, 31.
Marks, G., Hooghe, L., & Blank, K. (1996). European integration from the 1980s: State-centric v. multi-level governance. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 34(3), 341-378.
Newig, J., & Fritsch, O. (2009). Environmental governance: participatory, multi-leveland effective?. Environmental policy and governance, 19(3), 197-214.
Pierre, J., & Peters, B. G. (2019). Governance, politics and the state. Red Globe Press.
Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of public administration research and theory, 18(2), 229-252.
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). The new governance: governing without government. Political studies, 44(4), 652-667.
Rhodes, R. A. (2007). Understanding governance: Ten years on. Organization studies, 28(8), 1243-1264.
Sørensen, E. and Torfing, J. (2005), The Democratic Anchorage of Governance Networks. Scandinavian Political Studies, 28: 195-218.
Stoker, G. (1998). Governance as theory: five propositions. International social science journal, 50(155), 17-28.
Swyngedouw, E. (2005). Governance innovation and the citizen: The Janus face of governance-beyond-the-state. Urban studies, 42(11), 1991-2006.
Weiss, T. G. (2000). Governance, good governance and global governance: conceptual and actual challenges. Third world quarterly, 21(5), 795-814.
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of public administration research and theory, 18(4), 543-571.
Bache, I., Bartle, I., & Flinders, M. (2016). Multi-level governance. In Handbook on theories of governance. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Bevir, M. (2007). Encyclopedia of governance (Vol. 1). Sage.
Bevir, M. (2009). Key concepts in governance (1. publ.. ed., Sage key concepts). Los Angeles, Calif. [u.a.]: SAGE.
Dryzek, J. S. (2012). Foundations and frontiers of deliberative governance. Oxford University Press, Chapters 1 and 6.
Fung, A. (2006). Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public administration review, 66, 66-75.
Fung, A., & Wright, E. O. (2001). Deepening democracy: Innovations in empowered participatory governance. Politics & Society, 29(1), 5-41.
Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2003). Unraveling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance. American political science review, 233-243.
Huxham, C., Vangen, S., Huxham, C., & Eden, C. (2000). The challenge of collaborative governance. Public Management an International Journal of Research and Theory, 2(3), 337-358.
Kohler-Koch, B., & Rittberger, B. (2006). The governance turn in EU studies. J. Common Mkt. Stud., 44, 27.
Lemos, M. C., & Agrawal, A. (2006). Environmental governance. Annual review of environment and resources, 31.
Marks, G., Hooghe, L., & Blank, K. (1996). European integration from the 1980s: State-centric v. multi-level governance. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 34(3), 341-378.
Newig, J., & Fritsch, O. (2009). Environmental governance: participatory, multi-leveland effective?. Environmental policy and governance, 19(3), 197-214.
Pierre, J., & Peters, B. G. (2019). Governance, politics and the state. Red Globe Press.
Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of public administration research and theory, 18(2), 229-252.
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). The new governance: governing without government. Political studies, 44(4), 652-667.
Rhodes, R. A. (2007). Understanding governance: Ten years on. Organization studies, 28(8), 1243-1264.
Sørensen, E. and Torfing, J. (2005), The Democratic Anchorage of Governance Networks. Scandinavian Political Studies, 28: 195-218.
Stoker, G. (1998). Governance as theory: five propositions. International social science journal, 50(155), 17-28.
Swyngedouw, E. (2005). Governance innovation and the citizen: The Janus face of governance-beyond-the-state. Urban studies, 42(11), 1991-2006.
Weiss, T. G. (2000). Governance, good governance and global governance: conceptual and actual challenges. Third world quarterly, 21(5), 795-814.
Zuordnung im Vorlesungsverzeichnis
in 505: BA T2 Workshop Gesellschaftsdiagnosen
Letzte Änderung: Fr 12.05.2023 00:20
- Provide the theoretical foundations on governance,
- Provide students with the conceptual tools to critically approach urban research,
Engage students in online presentations on selected readings.