240511 SE Reflexivity and Positionality in Fieldwork Practices (P2) (2023S)
Prüfungsimmanente Lehrveranstaltung
Labels
Participation at first session is obligatory!The lecturer can invite students to a grade-relevant discussion about partial achievements. Partial achievements that are obtained by fraud or plagiarized result in the non-evaluation of the course (entry 'X' in certificate). The plagiarism software 'Turnitin' will be used for courses with continuous assessment.
An/Abmeldung
Hinweis: Ihr Anmeldezeitpunkt innerhalb der Frist hat keine Auswirkungen auf die Platzvergabe (kein "first come, first served").
- Anmeldung von Mi 01.02.2023 00:01 bis Mo 20.02.2023 23:59
- Abmeldung bis Mo 13.03.2023 23:59
Details
max. 25 Teilnehmer*innen
Sprache: Englisch
Lehrende
Termine (iCal) - nächster Termin ist mit N markiert
If possible, the course is to be conducted in presence. Due to the respective applicable distance regulations and other measures, adjustments may be made.
- Dienstag 07.03. 18:30 - 20:00 Hörsaal C, NIG 4. Stock
- Dienstag 14.03. 18:30 - 20:00 Hörsaal C, NIG 4. Stock
- Dienstag 21.03. 18:30 - 20:00 Hörsaal C, NIG 4. Stock
- Dienstag 28.03. 18:30 - 20:00 Hörsaal C, NIG 4. Stock
- Dienstag 18.04. 18:30 - 20:00 Hörsaal C, NIG 4. Stock
- Dienstag 25.04. 18:30 - 20:00 Seminarraum A, NIG 4. Stock
- Dienstag 02.05. 18:30 - 20:00 Hörsaal C, NIG 4. Stock
- Dienstag 09.05. 18:30 - 20:00 Hörsaal C, NIG 4. Stock
- Dienstag 16.05. 18:30 - 20:00 Hörsaal C, NIG 4. Stock
- Dienstag 23.05. 18:30 - 20:00 Übungsraum (A414) NIG 4. Stock
- Dienstag 06.06. 18:30 - 20:00 Hörsaal C, NIG 4. Stock
- Dienstag 13.06. 18:30 - 20:00 Hörsaal C, NIG 4. Stock
- Dienstag 20.06. 18:30 - 20:00 Hörsaal C, NIG 4. Stock
- Dienstag 27.06. 18:30 - 20:00 Hörsaal C, NIG 4. Stock
Information
Ziele, Inhalte und Methode der Lehrveranstaltung
How precisely do we practice ethnography today at a moment of transnational migration, mobile lifestyles, consumer citizenship, and deterritorialized subjectivities? And what are the parameters of ethnographic critique when the dynamics of us/them, elsewhere/home are so contested, contradictory, and complex? And, finally, what are the analytical works conducted by anthropologists around matters of positionality and reflexivity in regard to their role in the field? This course is an introduction to ethnographic field methods and the questions above constitute relevant entry points through which we can examine what ethnography is and how it is conceived within the discipline of socio-cultural anthropology: an investigatory method, a writing practice, or a social/political critique, a discipline? In terms of positionality, we will ponder on the question if “being there” is still a foundational expectation of our work as well as what precisely the anthropologist is intending to “capture” and what are the dynamics (and ethics and politics) of the anthropological relationship. The goal of the seminar is therefore to demystify ethnographic fieldwork and to gain hands-on experience in a broad range of methods for collecting and analyzing ethnographic data. Special attention will be dedicated to the potentialities and issues related to carrying out ethnographic research. In other words, students will explore problems and positive aspects connected to the multiple research positionalities as well as the process of conducting reflexive analysis by the researcher on his/her/their role in the field. In doing so, we will begin by considering foundational debates about the aims and ethics of ethnography as well as the debates around postitionality and reflexivity of anthropologists. We then turn our attention to essential methods of data collection and analysis that cut across epistemological traditions, approaches to fieldwork, and even disciplines. By the end of the course, students could articulate the aims of their ethnography and defend their approach to ethnographic fieldwork. They will analyze issues connected to their socio-economic, political and symbolic positions during research and will be able to discuss the ethical implications of ethnographic research through the use of various reflexive approach.
Art der Leistungskontrolle und erlaubte Hilfsmittel
Regular participation in class debates/discussion, oral presentation of the results of research on an agreed topic and drafting of a seminar paper of about 3.000 words constitute the course requirements. Course classes can be based on either active and regular participation only or on active and regular participation with a final examination/assignment. The seminar is based on class discussions and analysis of reading materials or other sources, written or oral presentations. Students should also note that no late assignments will be accepted. They are therefore asked to complete all written works on time and make sure to see the lecturer in his office hours with any questions or issues that may arise during seminar classes.
Mindestanforderungen und Beurteilungsmaßstab
For the grade of this seminar students should try to attend the lessons, take actively part in them and prepare a presentation of about 15 min. plus 10 min. of questions and discussions. Furthermore, the examination modality entails a written assignment of 3000 words. Therefore, 80 % attendance is required. If one session is missed an additional assignment must be completed. The grade is therefore defined as follows: seminar paper 40%, presentation 40%, and contribution to discussion in class 20%. In other words, for the required passing grade of the course, students must:
1. not exceed two absences without an excuse. Exceeding this maximum means that the minimum requirements for a passing grade have not been met;
2. achieve a passing final grade based on their performance.The points of the individual performances are added together and the total is translated into a grade according to the following grading scale.Grading scale
91-100 points = 1 (very good)
81-90 points = 2 (good)
71-80 points = 3 (satisfactory)
61-70 points = 4 (sufficient)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
0-60 points = 5 (not sufficient)
1. not exceed two absences without an excuse. Exceeding this maximum means that the minimum requirements for a passing grade have not been met;
2. achieve a passing final grade based on their performance.The points of the individual performances are added together and the total is translated into a grade according to the following grading scale.Grading scale
91-100 points = 1 (very good)
81-90 points = 2 (good)
71-80 points = 3 (satisfactory)
61-70 points = 4 (sufficient)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
0-60 points = 5 (not sufficient)
Prüfungsstoff
The seminar is based on presentations, engagements in discussions and works in small groups. Additionally, students will work out individual seminar papers on topics that are related to their presentation or are of their personal interest.
Literatur
- Tim Ingold, “Anthropology contra Ethnography,” HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory vol. 7(1):21-6 (2017) (http://dx/doi.org/10.14328/hau7.1.005)
- Daniel Miller, “Anthropology is the Discipline but the Goal is Ethnography,” HAU vol. 7(1):27-31 (2017) (http://dx/doi.org/10.14318/hau7.1.006)
- Alpa Shah, “Ethnography? Participation Observation, a Potentially Revolutionary Praxis,” in Hau 7(1):45-59 (2017) (http://dx.doi.org/10.14318/hau7.1.008)
- Abu-Lughod, Lila. 1991. “Writing Against Culture” in Richard G. Fox, ed. Recapturing Anthropology: Working in the Present. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.
- Ruby, Jay. 1980. “Exposing Yourself: Reflexivity, Anthropology and Film.” Semiotica 30 ó: 153-179.
- Daniel Miller, “Anthropology is the Discipline but the Goal is Ethnography,” HAU vol. 7(1):27-31 (2017) (http://dx/doi.org/10.14318/hau7.1.006)
- Alpa Shah, “Ethnography? Participation Observation, a Potentially Revolutionary Praxis,” in Hau 7(1):45-59 (2017) (http://dx.doi.org/10.14318/hau7.1.008)
- Abu-Lughod, Lila. 1991. “Writing Against Culture” in Richard G. Fox, ed. Recapturing Anthropology: Working in the Present. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.
- Ruby, Jay. 1980. “Exposing Yourself: Reflexivity, Anthropology and Film.” Semiotica 30 ó: 153-179.
Zuordnung im Vorlesungsverzeichnis
Letzte Änderung: Do 02.03.2023 00:06