240512 SE MM3 Toxicity, chemosociality and alterlife (2023W)
Prüfungsimmanente Lehrveranstaltung
Labels
Participation at first session is obligatory!The lecturer can invite students to a grade-relevant discussion about partial achievements. Partial achievements that are obtained by fraud or plagiarized result in the non-evaluation of the course (entry 'X' in certificate). The plagiarism software 'Turnitin' will be used.The use of AI tools (e.g. ChatGPT) for the attainment of partial achievements is only allowed if explicitly requested by the course instructor.
An/Abmeldung
Hinweis: Ihr Anmeldezeitpunkt innerhalb der Frist hat keine Auswirkungen auf die Platzvergabe (kein "first come, first served").
- Anmeldung von Fr 01.09.2023 00:01 bis Mo 25.09.2023 23:59
- Abmeldung bis Mo 16.10.2023 23:59
Details
max. 25 Teilnehmer*innen
Sprache: Englisch
Lehrende
Termine (iCal) - nächster Termin ist mit N markiert
- Dienstag 03.10. 16:45 - 20:00 Übungsraum (A414) NIG 4. Stock
- Dienstag 10.10. 16:45 - 20:00 Übungsraum (A414) NIG 4. Stock
- Dienstag 17.10. 16:45 - 20:00 Übungsraum (A414) NIG 4. Stock
- Dienstag 24.10. 16:45 - 20:00 Übungsraum (A414) NIG 4. Stock
- Dienstag 31.10. 16:45 - 20:00 Übungsraum (A414) NIG 4. Stock
- Dienstag 07.11. 16:45 - 20:00 Übungsraum (A414) NIG 4. Stock
- Dienstag 14.11. 16:45 - 20:00 Hörsaal C, NIG 4. Stock
- Dienstag 21.11. 16:45 - 20:00 Übungsraum (A414) NIG 4. Stock
- Dienstag 28.11. 16:45 - 20:00 Übungsraum (A414) NIG 4. Stock
Information
Ziele, Inhalte und Methode der Lehrveranstaltung
Art der Leistungskontrolle und erlaubte Hilfsmittel
Regular participation in class debates/discussion, oral presentation of the results of research on an agreed topic and drafting of a seminar paper of about 3.000 words constitute the course requirements. Course classes can be based on either active and regular participation only or on active and regular participation with a final examination/assignment. The seminar is based on class discussions and analysis of reading materials or other sources, written or oral presentations. Students should also note that no late assignments will be accepted. They are therefore asked to complete all written works on time and make sure to see the lecturer in his office hours with any questions or issues that may arise during seminar classes.
Mindestanforderungen und Beurteilungsmaßstab
For the grade of this seminar students should try to attend the lessons, take actively part in them and prepare a presentation of about 15 min. plus 10 min. of questions and discussions. Furthermore, the examination modality entails a written assignment of 3000 words. Therefore, 80 % attendance is required. If one session is missed an additional assignment must be completed. The grade is therefore defined as follows: seminar paper 40%, presentation 40%, and contribution to discussion in class 20%. In other words, for the required passing grade of the course, students must:
1. not exceed two absences without an excuse. Exceeding this maximum means that the minimum requirements for a passing grade have not been met;
2. achieve a passing final grade based on their performance.The points of the individual performances are added together and the total is translated into a grade according to the following grading scale.Grading scale
91-100 points = 1 (very good)
81-90 points = 2 (good)
71-80 points = 3 (satisfactory)
61-70 points = 4 (sufficient)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
0-60 points = 5 (not sufficient)
1. not exceed two absences without an excuse. Exceeding this maximum means that the minimum requirements for a passing grade have not been met;
2. achieve a passing final grade based on their performance.The points of the individual performances are added together and the total is translated into a grade according to the following grading scale.Grading scale
91-100 points = 1 (very good)
81-90 points = 2 (good)
71-80 points = 3 (satisfactory)
61-70 points = 4 (sufficient)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
0-60 points = 5 (not sufficient)
Prüfungsstoff
The seminar is based on presentations, engagements in discussions and works in small groups. Additionally, students will work out individual seminar papers on topics that are related to their presentation or are of their personal interest.
Literatur
Shapiro, N, and E. Kirksey. 2017. Chemo-Ethnography: An Introduction. Cultural Anthropology 32 (4): 481–93.
Roberts, Elizabeth F. S. 2017. “What Gets Inside: Violent Entanglements and Toxic Boundaries in Mexico City.” Cultural Anthropology 32(4): 592–619.
Vanessa Agard-Jones (2014). Spray Somatosphere.org
http://somatosphere.net/2014/spray.html/
Agard-Jones, Vanessa. 2013. “Bodies in the System.” Small Axe (17)3: 182–92.
Katherine A. Thomas, James R. Elliott & Sergio Chavez (2019). "Community Perceptions of Industrial Risks Before and After a Toxic Flood: The Case of Houston and Hurricane Harvey," Sociological Spectrum 38(6): 371-386.
Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 2009. “The Climate of History: Four Theses.” Critical Inquiry 35(2): 197-222.
Haraway, Donna. 2015. “Anthropocene, Capitalocene, Plantationocene, Chthulucene: Making Kin.” Environmental Humanities 6(1): 159–165.
Hecht, Gabrielle. 2018. “Interscalar Vehicles for an African Anthropocene: On Waste, Temporality, and Violence.” Cultural Anthropology 33(1): 109-141.
Davis, Heather, and Zoe Todd. 2017. “On the Importance of a Date, or, Decolonizing the Anthropocene.” ACME 16, no. 4: 761–80.
Roberts, Elizabeth F. S. 2017. “What Gets Inside: Violent Entanglements and Toxic Boundaries in Mexico City.” Cultural Anthropology 32(4): 592–619.
Vanessa Agard-Jones (2014). Spray Somatosphere.org
http://somatosphere.net/2014/spray.html/
Agard-Jones, Vanessa. 2013. “Bodies in the System.” Small Axe (17)3: 182–92.
Katherine A. Thomas, James R. Elliott & Sergio Chavez (2019). "Community Perceptions of Industrial Risks Before and After a Toxic Flood: The Case of Houston and Hurricane Harvey," Sociological Spectrum 38(6): 371-386.
Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 2009. “The Climate of History: Four Theses.” Critical Inquiry 35(2): 197-222.
Haraway, Donna. 2015. “Anthropocene, Capitalocene, Plantationocene, Chthulucene: Making Kin.” Environmental Humanities 6(1): 159–165.
Hecht, Gabrielle. 2018. “Interscalar Vehicles for an African Anthropocene: On Waste, Temporality, and Violence.” Cultural Anthropology 33(1): 109-141.
Davis, Heather, and Zoe Todd. 2017. “On the Importance of a Date, or, Decolonizing the Anthropocene.” ACME 16, no. 4: 761–80.
Zuordnung im Vorlesungsverzeichnis
Letzte Änderung: Di 03.10.2023 16:28
The goal of this course is therefore to expand students’ capacities to reckon with near and deep futures during a historical moment of ecological turmoil, as well as to support a sustained reflection on the art of living wisely on a damaged planet. Therefore, students will take toxicity in all its contradictions as both an object and an analytic that helps us ask new questions and gain new perspectives on the materialities of social difference, the politics of evidence, the nature of health, and the nature of nature. The papers in the course will trace how toxicity connects humans to histories, to processes and to other positioned otherwises. In so doing, the topics taken into account will explore how alternative notions and metaphors for describe the Anthropocene and toxicity rely on and unsettle familiar geographies of colonialism and state sovereignty. In this regard, students will engage with various questions and issues. Therefore, they will be able to: (1) critically evaluate debates about environmental justice in various world settings and contexts; (2) understand key features and problems of toxicity in both the Global South and North; (3) relate health environmental toxicity and pollution with health issues and socio-economic and political vulnerability; comprehend the multiple ways that the production of scientific/biomedical expertise entails the management of race, gender, disability, class and other categories of social difference and how such expertise are driven by wider socio-political and economic interests. Finally, students will be able to look at the politics of scientific evidence and the way authoritative knowledge is tied to various forms of discursive practices.