Universität Wien

240533 SE MM3 Race and Genetics: American Biopolitics (2023W)

Prüfungsimmanente Lehrveranstaltung

Participation at first session is obligatory!

The lecturer can invite students to a grade-relevant discussion about partial achievements. Partial achievements that are obtained by fraud or plagiarized result in the non-evaluation of the course (entry 'X' in certificate). The plagiarism software 'Turnitin' will be used.

The use of AI tools (e.g. ChatGPT) for the attainment of partial achievements is only allowed if explicitly requested by the course instructor.

An/Abmeldung

Hinweis: Ihr Anmeldezeitpunkt innerhalb der Frist hat keine Auswirkungen auf die Platzvergabe (kein "first come, first served").

Details

max. 25 Teilnehmer*innen
Sprache: Englisch

Lehrende

Termine (iCal) - nächster Termin ist mit N markiert

Students who were registered for the course in summer semester will be given priority in the allocation of places.

Montag 27.11. 09:45 - 11:15 Seminarraum D, NIG 4. Stock
Dienstag 28.11. 09:45 - 11:15 Seminarraum D, NIG 4. Stock
Mittwoch 29.11. 09:45 - 11:15 Übungsraum (A414) NIG 4. Stock
Donnerstag 30.11. 09:45 - 11:15 Übungsraum (A414) NIG 4. Stock
Montag 04.12. 09:45 - 13:00 Seminarraum D, NIG 4. Stock
Dienstag 05.12. 09:45 - 13:00 Übungsraum (A414) NIG 4. Stock

Information

Ziele, Inhalte und Methode der Lehrveranstaltung

This seminar examines the increasingly convoluted relationship between genetics and race in the United States. In this contemporary moment, geneticists are debating definitions or “locations” of race on the human genome. Some draw on older racial classifications, others claim that the complexities of human ancestry cannot be captured by race. In this course, we will read social scientific studies of race categories in genetics and genomics, as well as scholarship on the meanings of race as identity category in American society. Rather than define what race really is or pass judgments on biology, our goal will be to understand a) the historically and culturally specific relationship between race and genetics, and b) the political stakes and charged conditions and implications of the current entanglements of genomic science and race categories in U.S. society.
The seminar has two larger goals:
1) To understand that race is never neutral. This is a realist perspective on American society, given what is known from history. The term race has a deep history in hierarchical thinking and oppressive practices. Even if we are speaking of “difference” today, and claim that this is neutral, these histories of violence and oppression are mobilized. Mundane human practices stand at the beginning of this word that has so much significance in US society today, that confronts everywhere from the doctor’s office to college applications to tailored website recommendations. Because race has its origins in human practices, in the things people did, talked about and instituted, one could say that the conditions of possibility for something like racial identity to exist here and now lie in socio-historical circumstances. The first goal is to gain a deeper understanding of an (American) reality in which race in essence marks difference from an invisible white norm.
2) To indicate research horizons beyond the ubiquitous question: is race real or socially constructed? Nature and society have never been separate realms “out there.” Material processes and the processes by which we make sense of things are not neatly separable. Instead, matter and meaning are entwined, literally, from the womb. This class will not land on one side of a false binary between real vs. constructed. Instead, you will learn about ways to think about race as real and constructed, in constant intersections with other identity categories haunted by biology, such as gender. I view this approach as a key transdisciplinary bridge in the current impasse where the much too divided natural and social sciences tend to sit on either side of this binary. It is my hope that exposure to these different, in particular feminist epistemologies – ways of knowing – will prove productive for your anthropological, inter- or transdisciplinary research trajectories.
• Attendance of each session is mandatory.
• Students will be required to read books and research articles from a range of disciplines, including anthropology, sociology, science and technology studies, history of science, and others. Students will need to complete assigned readings in advance of each session. In addition, the readings below are to be completed before the first seminar in May.
• During the course, I will provide short lectures in each session. Students will read materials together, watch pertinent materials, discuss assigned topics in groups, and participate in general seminar discussion that tackles these problems in a broader perspective.

Art der Leistungskontrolle und erlaubte Hilfsmittel

The course participants will be asked to prepare a group presentation. Active participation in the whole course will be also assessed.

Mindestanforderungen und Beurteilungsmaßstab

Attendance in all units is mandatory.
Group presentations (60%) and active attendance (40%).
Both the proactive attendance in each unit and the group presentation have to be fulfilled in a satisfactory way to pass the course.
Grades:
• 91-100 points - 1 (excellent)
• 81-90 points - 2 (good)
• 71-80 points - 3 (satisfactory)
• 61-70 points - 4 (sufficient)

Prüfungsstoff

The topics of group presentations have to be agreed on with the lecturer.

Literatur

• Abu El-Haj, Nadia. 2012. The Genealogical Science: The Search for Jewish Origins and the Politics of Epistemology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press (Introduction, Chapters 1, 4 & 6).
• Barad, Karen. 2003. “Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28(3):801-831
• Fields, Karen and Fields, Barbara. 2012. Racecraft: The Soul of Inequality in American Life. London & New York: Verso (Introduction, Chapters 1, 3 , 5 & 7).
• Gilroy, Paul. 2003. “After the Great White Error… the Great Black Mirage” in Race, Nature, and the Politics of Difference. Eds. D. Moore, J. Kosek, and A. Pandian. Durham: Duke University Press, p. 73-98.
• Jabloner, Anna. 2019. “A Tale of Two Molecular Californias.” Science as Culture 24(1): 1-24.
• Keller, Evelyn-Fox. 2002. The Century of the Gene. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (“Introduction,” p. 1-10, & “Motors of Stasis and Change: The Regulation of Genetic Stability,” p. 11-43).
• Lee, Sandra S. 2008. “Racial Realism and the Discourse of Responsibility for Health Disparities in a Genomic Age” in Revisiting Race in a Genomic Age, Eds. B. Koenig, S. Lee & S. Richardson, p. 342-358.
• M’charek, Amade. 2013. “Beyond Fact or Fiction: On the Materiality of Race in Practice.” Cultural Anthropology 28(3): 420-442.
• Nelson, Alondra. 2016. The Social Life of DNA: Race, Reparations, and Reconciliation after the Genome. Boston: Beacon Press (p. ix-xiii, 1-94, 157-166).
• TallBear, Kim. 2013. Native American DNA: Tribal Belonging and the False Promise of Genetic Science. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press (p.1-103, 177-203).
• Wiegman, Robyn. 1995. American Anatomies: Theorizing Race and Gender. Durham: Duke University Press (“Visual Modernity,” p. 21-42).

Zuordnung im Vorlesungsverzeichnis

Letzte Änderung: Di 03.10.2023 16:28