040201 KU Advanced Economic Sociology (MA) (2023W)
Continuous assessment of course work
Labels
ON-SITE
Registration/Deregistration
Note: The time of your registration within the registration period has no effect on the allocation of places (no first come, first served).
- Registration is open from Mo 11.09.2023 09:00 to Fr 22.09.2023 12:00
- Registration is open from Tu 26.09.2023 09:00 to We 27.09.2023 12:00
- Deregistration possible until Fr 20.10.2023 23:59
Details
max. 50 participants
Language: German
Lecturers
Classes (iCal) - next class is marked with N
- Tuesday 03.10. 16:45 - 18:15 Hörsaal 7 Oskar-Morgenstern-Platz 1 1.Stock
- Tuesday 10.10. 16:45 - 18:15 Hörsaal 7 Oskar-Morgenstern-Platz 1 1.Stock
- Tuesday 17.10. 16:45 - 18:15 Hörsaal 7 Oskar-Morgenstern-Platz 1 1.Stock
- Tuesday 24.10. 16:45 - 18:15 Hörsaal 7 Oskar-Morgenstern-Platz 1 1.Stock
- Tuesday 31.10. 16:45 - 18:15 Hörsaal 7 Oskar-Morgenstern-Platz 1 1.Stock
- Tuesday 07.11. 16:45 - 18:15 Hörsaal 7 Oskar-Morgenstern-Platz 1 1.Stock
- Tuesday 14.11. 16:45 - 18:15 Hörsaal 7 Oskar-Morgenstern-Platz 1 1.Stock
- Tuesday 21.11. 16:45 - 18:15 Hörsaal 7 Oskar-Morgenstern-Platz 1 1.Stock
- Tuesday 28.11. 16:45 - 18:15 Hörsaal 7 Oskar-Morgenstern-Platz 1 1.Stock
- Tuesday 05.12. 16:45 - 18:15 Hörsaal 7 Oskar-Morgenstern-Platz 1 1.Stock
- Tuesday 12.12. 16:45 - 18:15 Hörsaal 7 Oskar-Morgenstern-Platz 1 1.Stock
- Tuesday 09.01. 16:45 - 18:15 Hörsaal 7 Oskar-Morgenstern-Platz 1 1.Stock
- Tuesday 16.01. 16:45 - 18:15 Hörsaal 7 Oskar-Morgenstern-Platz 1 1.Stock
- Tuesday 23.01. 16:45 - 18:15 Hörsaal 7 Oskar-Morgenstern-Platz 1 1.Stock
- Tuesday 30.01. 16:45 - 18:15 Hörsaal 7 Oskar-Morgenstern-Platz 1 1.Stock
Information
Aims, contents and method of the course
Assessment and permitted materials
Preparation and discussion of the literature,
essay and presentation,
participation
essay and presentation,
participation
Minimum requirements and assessment criteria
The minimum requirement for receiving a positive grade includes the attendance of the course (max. 2
absences), the duly upload of the statements on the compulsory readings, the presentation, and the delivery
of a complete research proposal, in line with the specifications provided in the lectures.
• 2 discussion preparations (30%)
• Presentation (30%)
• Research Proposal (40%)For the essays, all rules and academic principles to ensure scientific quality need to be fulfilled.
absences), the duly upload of the statements on the compulsory readings, the presentation, and the delivery
of a complete research proposal, in line with the specifications provided in the lectures.
• 2 discussion preparations (30%)
• Presentation (30%)
• Research Proposal (40%)For the essays, all rules and academic principles to ensure scientific quality need to be fulfilled.
Examination topics
Work based on literature, which will be fully introduced in the first session.
Reading list
Complete list will be communicated in the first session:
Carruthers, B.G. & Kim, J.C. 2011. The sociology of finance. Annual review of Sociology, 37, 239-259
Fligstein, N. & Dauter, L. 2007. The sociology of markets. Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 105-128
Knorr Cetina, K. 2009. What is a Financial Market? in Beckert, J. & Deutschmann, C. (eds): Wirtschaftssoziologie, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, Sonderheft 49/2009, 326-344.
MacKenzie, D. & Millo, Y. 2003. Constructing a market, performing theory: The historical sociology of a financial derivatives exchange. Annual journal of sociology, 109(1), 107-145.
MacKenzie, D. 2011. The credit crisis as a problem in the sociology of knowledge. American Journal of Sociology, 116(6), 1778-1841
Coombs, N. 2016. What is an algorithm? Financial regulation in the high-frequency trading. Economy and society, 45(2), 278-302.
Krippner, G. 2011. Capitalizing on Crisis.
Ho, K. 2009. Liquidated.
Fourcade, M. & Healy, K. 2013. Classification situations: Life-chances in the neoliberal era. Accounting, Organizations and Society 38(8):559-572.
Poon, M. 2009. From new deal institutions to capital markets: Commercial consumer risk scores and the making of subprime mortgage finance. Accounting, Organizations and Society 34(5):654-674.
Zingales, L. 2015. Does Finance Benefit Society? NBER Working Paper.
Carruthers, B.G. & Kim, J.C. 2011. The sociology of finance. Annual review of Sociology, 37, 239-259
Fligstein, N. & Dauter, L. 2007. The sociology of markets. Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 105-128
Knorr Cetina, K. 2009. What is a Financial Market? in Beckert, J. & Deutschmann, C. (eds): Wirtschaftssoziologie, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, Sonderheft 49/2009, 326-344.
MacKenzie, D. & Millo, Y. 2003. Constructing a market, performing theory: The historical sociology of a financial derivatives exchange. Annual journal of sociology, 109(1), 107-145.
MacKenzie, D. 2011. The credit crisis as a problem in the sociology of knowledge. American Journal of Sociology, 116(6), 1778-1841
Coombs, N. 2016. What is an algorithm? Financial regulation in the high-frequency trading. Economy and society, 45(2), 278-302.
Krippner, G. 2011. Capitalizing on Crisis.
Ho, K. 2009. Liquidated.
Fourcade, M. & Healy, K. 2013. Classification situations: Life-chances in the neoliberal era. Accounting, Organizations and Society 38(8):559-572.
Poon, M. 2009. From new deal institutions to capital markets: Commercial consumer risk scores and the making of subprime mortgage finance. Accounting, Organizations and Society 34(5):654-674.
Zingales, L. 2015. Does Finance Benefit Society? NBER Working Paper.
Association in the course directory
Last modified: Mo 02.10.2023 12:07
Aims are:
1. deepening the understanding of interdependencies between economy and society
2. the development of concepts in writing social scientific essays as critically evaluating the field
The content of the course will be delivered based on presentations and discussions of the literature. In addition, students will produce an essay, based on this literature. Students will present their ideas for the essay in the course for in-depth discussions and receiving feedback from both, peers and instructor.