040946 SE IM/KFK PÖ: Advanced Personnel Economics (2010S)
Continuous assessment of course work
Labels
Am Montag, 7. Juni 2010, wird das Seminar von 9.00-18.00 im Besprechungsraum der LK Fabel gelesen.
Registration/Deregistration
Note: The time of your registration within the registration period has no effect on the allocation of places (no first come, first served).
- Registration is open from Mo 08.02.2010 06:00 to Th 18.02.2010 16:00
- Registration is open from We 24.02.2010 13:00 to Mo 08.03.2010 16:00
- Deregistration possible until Su 14.03.2010 23:59
Details
max. 24 participants
Language: English
Lecturers
Classes (iCal) - next class is marked with N
- Thursday 04.03. 14:00 - 16:00 Seminarraum 2
- Friday 04.06. 15:00 - 20:00 Hörsaal 7
- Saturday 05.06. 08:00 - 14:00 Hörsaal 7
Information
Aims, contents and method of the course
Assessment and permitted materials
The final grade will be calculated as the weighted average of the grades for the seminar paper (40 %), for the presentation (40 %), and for classroom participation (20 %).
Minimum requirements and assessment criteria
Examination topics
General information:(1) Each topic listed below can be assigned to groups of up to three students. Until March 4, 2010, 12 noon, (potential) participants may send an email containing a priority list that provides a ranking of up to three preferred topics to the Chair's office: elke.pendl@univie.ac.at.
(2) There will be an introductory meeting of the seminar on March 4, 2010. During this meeting, we will check the topic assignments. Thus, attendance is absolutely necessary. No-show-students will be replaced by students registered on the waiting list who attend the preparatory meeting and agree to comply with the seminar rules below.
(3) Seminar papers must not exceed 15 pages (minimum 11 pica letter size; double-spaced typing; 3 cm margins all around; including all figures, tables, and references). Papers can be written either in English or German. They must use appropriate citation and reference rules and obey the general ethical principles of scientific work. (Please, consult the chair's homepage to find additional information on this issue.) All seminar papers are due on June 30, 2009. By 3 p.m. (latest) on that day, every student must provide two hard copies to the chair's secretarial office. Every student is additionally required to send a PDF-File containing the seminar paper to the chair's office: elke.pendl@univie.ac.at.
(4) The maximum time per presentation is 45 minutes. The language of presentation is English. Presenters are expected to prepare supporting slides and/or hand-outs and to speak "freely" during their presentations. One week before the day of the seminar presentations, students are required to send a PDF-file containing their presentation slides to be posted on the net for their fellow seminar participants. The presentation will be followed by class-room discussion. Presenters are expected to moderate this discussion.
(5) The presentation will be followed by class-room discussion. All students are expected to prepare for class by reading through the material provided. They are required to actively participate in the classroom discussions and should be aware that the lecturers can call upon them for comments at any time during the seminar.
(6) In preparing both seminar papers and seminar presentation, students should be aware that the journal articles provided in the topics list below only constitute introductory reading material. Thus, they are required to engage in their own literature research. Apart from the university library, the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) and EconLit may provide appropriate search engines.
(7) Complete attendance of each session of the seminar is obligatory. Absolutely no exceptions apply. If a student should miss more than 10% of class-time and can document valid reason for this (sickness documented by a medical certificate, leave agreement by the university or faculty, etc.), he or she will not be graded. If no valid reason can be claimed, he or she will receive the no-pass grade "5".
Reading list
Association in the course directory
Last modified: Mo 07.09.2020 15:29
or: Nobel Laureate contributions to science and business practiceIt is actually unclear what Sir Isaac Newton Had in mind when he wrote the now-famous sentence that provides our seminar theme in a letter to Robert Hooke on February 5, 1676. Yet, it makes a great opening to introduce our seminars mission: we want to stand on the shoulders of giants and inquire into the implications of the work of (admittedly, a select group of) Nobel laureates for our every-day problem-solving task as business economists. Merely to provide first clues and, thus, to demonstrate that this is not an impossible task, we added some recent business papers to our reading list below. However, the assignment groups may actually discover more characteristic business applications.Thus, each group should address the following questions:What are the key contributions (is the main theme) of the distinguished work?
How has the work affected science and academic research?
Why is the work relevant for business practice and/or applications?OrganizationTopic 1: Gary Becker"for having extended the domain of microeconomic analysis to a wide range of human behaviour and interaction, including nonmarket behaviour."Rita Almeida and Pedro Carneiro (2009). The Return to Firm investments in Human Capital, Labour Economics, vol. 16, p. 97-106.Topic 2: Oliver Williamson"for his analysis of economic governance, especially the boundaries of the firm."Luis Garicano and Thomas N. Hubbard (2009). Specialization, Firms, and Markets: The Division of Labor within and between Law Firms. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, vol. 25, p. 339-371.Topic 3: Ronald Coase"for his discovery and clarification of the significance of transaction costs and property rights for the institutional structure and functioning of the economy."Christophe Depres, Gilles Grolleau and Naoufel Mzoughi (2008). Contracting for Environmental Property Rights: The Case of Vittel. Economica, vol. 75, p. 412-434.Incentive Theory:Topic 4: Vernon Smith"for having established laboratory experiments as a tool in empirical economic analysis, especially in the study of alternative market mechanisms."Gary Bolton, Claudia Loebbecke and Axel Ockenfels (2008). Does Competition Promote Trust and Trustworthiness in Online Trading? An Experimental Study. Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 25, p. 145-170.Topic 5: George Akerlof, Joseph Siglitz"for their analyses of markets with asymmetric information."Stiglitz, J.E.: Too Big to Fail or Too Big to Save? Examining the Systemic Threats of Large Financial Institutions. Testimony before the Joint Economic Committee, Washington, D.C.: April 21, 2009.Topic 6: James Mirrlees, William Vickrey"for their fundamental contributions to the economic theory of incentives under asymmetric information."Shibo Li , Kannan Srinivasan and Baohong Sun (2009). Internet Auction Features as Quality Signals. Journal of Marketing, vol. 73, p. 75-92.Business/Economic Ethics:Topic 7: Mohammad Yunus and Grameen Bank,"for their efforts to create economic and social development from below."Nicolas Krauss and Ingo Walter (2009). Can Microfinance Reduce Portfolio Volatility? Economic Development and Cultural Change, vol. 58, p. 85-110.Topic 8: Wangari Maathai"for her contribution to sustainable development, democracy and peace."Paul C. Godfrey, Craig B. Merrill, and Jared M. Hansen (2009). The Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Shareholder Value: An Empirical Test of the Risk Management Hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal, vol. 30, p. 425-445.Topic 9: Shirin Ebadi"for her efforts for democracy and human rights. She has focused especially on the struggle for the rights of women and children."Magnus Lofstrom and Timothy Bates