122054 PS PS Linguistics (2021W)
Syntax
Continuous assessment of course work
Labels
ON-SITE
Registration/Deregistration
Note: The time of your registration within the registration period has no effect on the allocation of places (no first come, first served).
- Registration is open from We 01.09.2021 00:00 to We 15.09.2021 11:59
- Deregistration possible until Su 31.10.2021 23:59
Details
max. 20 participants
Language: English
Lecturers
Classes (iCal) - next class is marked with N
In addition to the regular classes, students are expected to attend two individual feedback meetings (30 minutes each).
New from 22 Nov: all classes will be online (Zoom, via the classes moodle platform) until further notice.- Friday 08.10. 10:15 - 11:45 Raum 1 Anglistik UniCampus Hof 8 3E-EG-05
- Friday 15.10. 10:15 - 11:45 Raum 1 Anglistik UniCampus Hof 8 3E-EG-05
- Friday 22.10. 10:15 - 11:45 Raum 1 Anglistik UniCampus Hof 8 3E-EG-05
- Friday 29.10. 10:15 - 11:45 Raum 1 Anglistik UniCampus Hof 8 3E-EG-05
- Friday 05.11. 10:15 - 11:45 Raum 1 Anglistik UniCampus Hof 8 3E-EG-05
- Friday 12.11. 10:15 - 11:45 Raum 1 Anglistik UniCampus Hof 8 3E-EG-05
- Friday 19.11. 10:15 - 11:45 Raum 1 Anglistik UniCampus Hof 8 3E-EG-05
- Friday 26.11. 10:15 - 11:45 Raum 1 Anglistik UniCampus Hof 8 3E-EG-05
- Friday 03.12. 10:15 - 11:45 Raum 1 Anglistik UniCampus Hof 8 3E-EG-05
- Friday 10.12. 10:15 - 11:45 Raum 1 Anglistik UniCampus Hof 8 3E-EG-05
- Friday 17.12. 10:15 - 11:45 Raum 1 Anglistik UniCampus Hof 8 3E-EG-05
- Friday 07.01. 10:15 - 11:45 Raum 1 Anglistik UniCampus Hof 8 3E-EG-05
- Friday 14.01. 10:15 - 11:45 Raum 1 Anglistik UniCampus Hof 8 3E-EG-05
- Friday 21.01. 10:15 - 11:45 Raum 1 Anglistik UniCampus Hof 8 3E-EG-05
- Friday 28.01. 10:15 - 11:45 Raum 1 Anglistik UniCampus Hof 8 3E-EG-05
Information
Aims, contents and method of the course
"Grammar is a piano I play by ear, since I seem to have been out of school the year the rules were mentioned. All I know about grammar is its infinite power. To shift the structure of a sentence alters the meaning of that sentence, as definitely and inflexibly as the position of a camera alters the meaning of the object photographed. Many people know about camera angles now, but not so many know about sentences. " Joan DidionThis course has as its core goal the training of future teachers who, while aware of many of the syntactic restrictions of the English language, nonetheless to a large extent speak English intuitively, but will need to be able to quickly analyze and explain their intuitive assessment of 'right' and 'wrong' to future students. In other words, it aims at raising their awareness for and equipping them with the tools for syntactic analysis.Taking the area of English grammar in general and syntax in particular as an example, this course provides students with more detailed insights into one area of linguistics - namely syntax - and prepares them for their first small-scale research project in this area.After revisiting concepts from the introductory lectures ‘Grammar in Use’ and ‘English Linguistics’, we will explore the topic from different angles, looking at, for instance, tense & aspect and the genitive alternation.In addition, we will discuss the process of empirical research and look at data elicitation and corpus linguistic methods. Participants will learn how to find relevant literature on a specific research topic/question, critically analyse and reflect on existing research in the field and collect first experience in planning, conducting and writing up a small-scale linguistic research project, as well as presenting their results in the form of a poster presentation.
Assessment and permitted materials
Mandatory attendance
Active participation in class
Online homework assignments
2 peer reviews of student papers
2 project proposals (one short one, one extended one)
1 oral poster presentation
1 proseminar paper (two drafts)
no examFor the paper, each students will choose one aspect related to English syntax, explore it in more detail and conduct an empirical (mini-)study.
Active participation in class
Online homework assignments
2 peer reviews of student papers
2 project proposals (one short one, one extended one)
1 oral poster presentation
1 proseminar paper (two drafts)
no examFor the paper, each students will choose one aspect related to English syntax, explore it in more detail and conduct an empirical (mini-)study.
Minimum requirements and assessment criteria
Attendance (max. 2 absences)Part 1: Participation, readings, smaller assignments, discussions etc. 15%
Part 2: Paper proposal: 20% (including study proposal)
Part 3: Poster presentation: 20%
Part 4: PS paper (3,500 words +/-10%): 45%All parts (1, 2, 3 and 4) must be completed and at least three out of four parts must be positive.The overall pass mark is 60%.
Grading scale:
1 (sehr gut) 100-90%;
2 (gut) 89-80%;
3 (befriedigend) 79-70%;
4 (genügend) 69-60%;
5 (nicht genügend) 59-0%.
Part 2: Paper proposal: 20% (including study proposal)
Part 3: Poster presentation: 20%
Part 4: PS paper (3,500 words +/-10%): 45%All parts (1, 2, 3 and 4) must be completed and at least three out of four parts must be positive.The overall pass mark is 60%.
Grading scale:
1 (sehr gut) 100-90%;
2 (gut) 89-80%;
3 (befriedigend) 79-70%;
4 (genügend) 69-60%;
5 (nicht genügend) 59-0%.
Examination topics
Course evaluation is based on
- active participation, discussions/online activities, regular readings
- poster presentation
- on-time submission of PS paper and paper proposalPlease note that the project report will be checked with anti-plagiarism software (TurnItIn).
- active participation, discussions/online activities, regular readings
- poster presentation
- on-time submission of PS paper and paper proposalPlease note that the project report will be checked with anti-plagiarism software (TurnItIn).
Reading list
Bauer, Laurie. 1989. “The verb have in New Zealand English”. English World-Wide 10, 169-83.Burton-Roberts, Noel. 2016. Analysing sentences: an introduction to English syntax. Abingdon: Routledge. Pages 1-3Dörney, Zoltán. 2007. Research methods in applied linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press. Pages 15-18; 277-289Kuiper, Koenraad; Nokes, Jacqui. 2014. Theories of syntax: concepts and case studies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Pages 3-13Macaulay, Monica. 2006. Surviving Linguistics: a guide for graduate students. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla. Pages 25-29Rosenbach, Anette. 2011. “Aspects of iconicity and economy in the choice between the s- genitive and the of-genitive in English.” In Rohdenburg, Günter; Mondort, Britta (eds). Determinants of grammatical variation in English. Berlin: De Gruyter, 379-411.Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. 2003. "Be going to versus will/shall: does syntax matter?". Journal of English Linguistics 31(4), 295-323.Van Herk, Gerard. 2010. “Aspect and the English Present Perfect: what can be coded?“. In Walker, James A. Aspect in grammatical variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 49-64.These readings will be made available via the moodle platform.Additionally, students will be expected to independently find and read literature on their selected proseminar paper topic, and on the methodology they choose.
Association in the course directory
Studium: BEd 046 / 407
Code/Modul: BEd 09.1
Lehrinhalt: 12-2045
Code/Modul: BEd 09.1
Lehrinhalt: 12-2045
Last modified: Mo 13.12.2021 15:08