Warning! The directory is not yet complete and will be amended until the beginning of the term.
122250 AR Advanced Course in Linguistics (2021S)
Indentifying gender bias in diachronic corpora
Continuous assessment of course work
Labels
REMOTE
Registration/Deregistration
Note: The time of your registration within the registration period has no effect on the allocation of places (no first come, first served).
- Registration is open from Th 18.02.2021 00:00 to Th 25.02.2021 12:00
- Deregistration possible until We 31.03.2021 23:59
Details
max. 25 participants
Language: English
Lecturers
Classes
Vorläufig online
Dienstag 12:15-13:45
Beginn: 09.03.2021
Information
Aims, contents and method of the course
Assessment and permitted materials
Classroom participation, quantitative corpus study, oral presentation of results and interpretation, submission of analysed data, final 10-page essay.
Minimum requirements and assessment criteria
(a) regular and active participation in meetings (online or in-person) (max. 2 absences). (10%)
(b) methodologically impeccable quantitative corpus study (30%)
(c) oral presentation and interpretation of results (20%)
(d) submission of analysed data and written 10-page essay (40%)
(b) methodologically impeccable quantitative corpus study (30%)
(c) oral presentation and interpretation of results (20%)
(d) submission of analysed data and written 10-page essay (40%)
Examination topics
See 'minimum requirements'.
Reading list
Baker, Paul. 2010. Will Ms ever be as frequent as Mr? A corpus-based comparison of gendered terms across four diachronic corpora of British English. Gender and Language 4(1).
Baker, Paul. 2014. Using Corpora to Analyze Gender. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Baker, Paul. 2015. Language and masculinities: Performances, intersections, dislocations. London: Routledge.
Cameron, Deborah. 1998. Feminism and linguistic theory, 2nd edn. Basingstoke [u.a.]: Macmillan.
Cameron, Deborah. 1998. The feminist critique of language: A reader, 2nd edn. London [u.a.]: Routledge.
Henley, Nany M. 1987. This new species that seeks a new language: on sexism in language and language change. In Joyce Penfield (ed.), Women and Language in Transition, 3–27: SUNY Press.
Konnelly, Lex. 2020. “The woman in the background”: Gendered Nouns in CNN and FOX Media Discourse. Journal of English Linguistics 48(3). 233–257.
Lakoff, Robin. 1973. Language and woman's place. Language in Society 2(1). 45–79.
Motschenbacher, Heiko. 2010. Language, Gender and Sexual Identity (IMPACT: Studies in Language and Society): John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Norberg, Cathrine. 2016. Naughty Boys and Sexy Girls. Journal of English Linguistics 44(4). 291–317.
Pearce, Michael. 2008. Investigating the collocational behaviour of man and woman in the BNC using Sketch Engine. Corpora 3(1). 1–29.
Romaine, Suzanne. 1999. Communicating gender. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Spender Dale. 1980. Man-made language.
Baker, Paul. 2014. Using Corpora to Analyze Gender. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Baker, Paul. 2015. Language and masculinities: Performances, intersections, dislocations. London: Routledge.
Cameron, Deborah. 1998. Feminism and linguistic theory, 2nd edn. Basingstoke [u.a.]: Macmillan.
Cameron, Deborah. 1998. The feminist critique of language: A reader, 2nd edn. London [u.a.]: Routledge.
Henley, Nany M. 1987. This new species that seeks a new language: on sexism in language and language change. In Joyce Penfield (ed.), Women and Language in Transition, 3–27: SUNY Press.
Konnelly, Lex. 2020. “The woman in the background”: Gendered Nouns in CNN and FOX Media Discourse. Journal of English Linguistics 48(3). 233–257.
Lakoff, Robin. 1973. Language and woman's place. Language in Society 2(1). 45–79.
Motschenbacher, Heiko. 2010. Language, Gender and Sexual Identity (IMPACT: Studies in Language and Society): John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Norberg, Cathrine. 2016. Naughty Boys and Sexy Girls. Journal of English Linguistics 44(4). 291–317.
Pearce, Michael. 2008. Investigating the collocational behaviour of man and woman in the BNC using Sketch Engine. Corpora 3(1). 1–29.
Romaine, Suzanne. 1999. Communicating gender. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Spender Dale. 1980. Man-made language.
Association in the course directory
Studium: MA 812 [2]; UF MA 046/507; UF 344
Code/Modul: MA M04, MA M05, UF MA 4B; 4.2.3
Lehrinhalt: 12-0260
Code/Modul: MA M04, MA M05, UF MA 4B; 4.2.3
Lehrinhalt: 12-0260
Last modified: We 21.04.2021 11:26
less gender-biased during the last 200 years. For example, the nouns _colleague_ and _job_ were hardly ever preceded by _her_ in the nineteenth century. Since the 1960ies, however, _her job_, and _her colleagues_ are about as common as _his job_, and _his colleagues_.In this course, we investigate the development of gender bias in large diachronic corpora. Each participant will take a set of nouns, verbs, or adjectives and investigate their co-occurrence with gendered 3rd person pronouns and/or nouns that refer to female and male humans.Our primary goal is to quantify changes in gender bias during the last two hundred years. At the same time, however, we shall also look at our data also qualitatively, in order to avoid being misled by the evidence of mere numbers. For example, the mere frequencies of the phrases _he manages_ and _she manages_ may tell us very little, unless we know what it is that is managed by him or by her. Also, we shall have to discuss what asymmetric frequency distributions mean in each particular case. For example, the fact that the phrase _working mom_ is more frequent than the phrase _working dad_ does certainly not imply that it is considered more normal for mothers than for fathers to be working. Rather, the opposite is more likely.Thus, the goal of this course is twofold: on the one hand, we try to find out if language use has become more or less gender-biased over time, and on the other hand, we try to find out if corpus evidence is useful for addressing this question.