180004 SE Values in Science (2020S)
Continuous assessment of course work
Labels
Registration/Deregistration
Note: The time of your registration within the registration period has no effect on the allocation of places (no first come, first served).
- Registration is open from Fr 14.02.2020 09:00 to Mo 24.02.2020 10:00
- Registration is open from We 26.02.2020 09:00 to Mo 02.03.2020 10:00
- Deregistration possible until Th 30.04.2020 23:59
Details
max. 30 participants
Language: English
Lecturers
Classes (iCal) - next class is marked with N
- Tuesday 05.05. 09:45 - 13:00 Hörsaal 3F NIG 3.Stock
- Thursday 07.05. 09:45 - 13:00 Hörsaal 3F NIG 3.Stock
- Friday 05.06. 09:45 - 14:00 Hörsaal 3F NIG 3.Stock
- Friday 12.06. 09:45 - 14:00 Hörsaal 3F NIG 3.Stock
- Friday 19.06. 09:45 - 14:00 Hörsaal 3F NIG 3.Stock
- Friday 26.06. 09:45 - 14:00 Hörsaal 3F NIG 3.Stock
Information
Aims, contents and method of the course
Assessment and permitted materials
The seminar consists of lectures (6 full hours) and seminar work (16 full hours). Evaluation is based on
- 10%: Participation in lectures and seminars (including required readings)
- 40%: Seminar presentation and discussion (20 + 10 minutes)
- 50%: Seminar paper (10-15 pages) due July 20th
Absences policy: One absence is allowed. Other absences should be adequately motivated. Unjustified absences will impact one’s final grade.
- 10%: Participation in lectures and seminars (including required readings)
- 40%: Seminar presentation and discussion (20 + 10 minutes)
- 50%: Seminar paper (10-15 pages) due July 20th
Absences policy: One absence is allowed. Other absences should be adequately motivated. Unjustified absences will impact one’s final grade.
Minimum requirements and assessment criteria
Examination topics
Reading list
Elliott, Kevin C., and Steel, Daniel (Eds.) (2017). Current Controversies in Values and Science. New York and Oxon: Routledge.
Association in the course directory
Last modified: Mo 07.09.2020 15:20
Learning Outcomes: The participants understand what is meant by the value-free ideal of science, and they are prepared to discuss arguments against and for the value-free ideal. They are familiar with normative approaches that are meant to replace the value-free ideal, such as Helen Longino’s social value management ideal, Miriam Solomon’s social empiricism, Philip Kitcher’s well-ordered science and Janet Kourany’s ideal of socially responsible science