Universität Wien FIND

180160 SE New Trends in Cognitive Science (2019W)

The predictive coding approach to mind/cognition

6.00 ECTS (2.00 SWS), SPL 18 - Philosophie
Continuous assessment of course work

1.Termin (Vorbesprechung): Mo 30. September 2019, 13:00 - 16:00
HS 2i d. Inst. f. Philosophie, NIG, 2. Stock

Moodle; Tu 15.10. 16:45-18:15 Hörsaal 2i NIG 2.Stock

Registration/Deregistration

Details

max. 25 participants
Language: English

Lecturers

Classes (iCal) - next class is marked with N

Tuesday 08.10. 16:45 - 18:15 Hörsaal 2i NIG 2.Stock
Tuesday 22.10. 16:45 - 18:15 Hörsaal 2i NIG 2.Stock
Tuesday 29.10. 16:45 - 18:15 Hörsaal 2i NIG 2.Stock
Tuesday 05.11. 16:45 - 18:15 Hörsaal 2i NIG 2.Stock
Tuesday 12.11. 16:45 - 18:15 Hörsaal 2i NIG 2.Stock
Tuesday 19.11. 16:45 - 18:15 Hörsaal 2i NIG 2.Stock
Tuesday 26.11. 16:45 - 18:15 Hörsaal 2i NIG 2.Stock
Tuesday 03.12. 16:45 - 18:15 Hörsaal 2i NIG 2.Stock
Tuesday 10.12. 16:45 - 18:15 Hörsaal 2i NIG 2.Stock
Tuesday 17.12. 16:45 - 18:15 Hörsaal 2i NIG 2.Stock
Tuesday 07.01. 16:45 - 18:15 Hörsaal 2i NIG 2.Stock
Tuesday 14.01. 16:45 - 18:15 Hörsaal 2i NIG 2.Stock
Tuesday 21.01. 16:45 - 18:15 Hörsaal 2i NIG 2.Stock
Tuesday 28.01. 16:45 - 18:15 Hörsaal 2i NIG 2.Stock

Information

Aims, contents and method of the course

The brain as a phantastic organ: The predictive processing approach in Cognitive Science

In a recent publication, Karl Friston, one of world’s leading pioneers and authorities on human brain imaging, has called the brain a phantastic organ – derived from the Greek word phantastikos, the ability to create mental images. Contrary to the concept that the brain is more or less a passive stimulus-response system, the first and foremost function of the brain is that it constantly generates fantasies, or hypotheses, that are tested against sensory evidence. In doing so, it creates models that try to predict the sensory evidence.

In this seminar we will explore how this and related concepts (e.g., Bayesian brain hypothesis, free energy principle, active inference) can be applied to topics in Cognitive Science and other disciplines.

Assessment and permitted materials

The following deliverables are requirements for final grading:
- Presenting a topic of a module in a group presentation with 1-3 other students in the first session of one selected module and providing useful handouts (submitted to the eLearning platform)
(final grade: 30% individual performance, 20% group performance, 10% quality of the slides and hand outs)
- One review of a presentation (submitted to the eLearning plattform)
(final grade: 20%)
- Active participation (questions, statements, summaries) in the discussion sessions and the eLearning platform of the course (comments)
(final grade: 20%)

Grades: >93% 1, >81% 2, >71% 3, >61% 4, <61% 5.

Minimum requirements and assessment criteria

A positive score (>61%) is required for passing the course.
Regular participation in at least 80% of seminar sessions is obligatory.

Additional Goals:
- Deeper understanding of a current approach in cognitive science and its influence on the field
- Awareness and understanding of current relevant topics and discussions in the field of cognitive science
- Ability to follow scientific developments in the field of cognitive science in a reflective manner
- Ability to write and present according to scientific standards
- Ability to interpret and evaluate results of primary scientific literature at an advanced level
- Ability to choose autonomously and give a condensed account on primary scientific literature
- Ability to communicate one’s expertise in order to contribute constructive criticism in the context of scientific debate
- Ability to work collaboratively within an interdisciplinary intercultural team in physical and virtual environments
- Ability to moderate dicussion on current topics in cognitive science
- Ability to deal with different points of view in an intercultural context

Examination topics

Each module consists of two sessions. In the first session, one group is asked to present their topic within 75 minutes. A short discussion session is mainly intended to give a short feedback, for clarification questions, and to name issues and questions that might be of additional interest. At the end of the first session the presenters have to provide a handout version of their presentation and the reference of an interesting (and maybe controversial) paper they stumbled upon during their preparation. Then two or three reviewers are assigned to review the presenters' individual and group performance and note what they have been missing.

The second session of the module will be used for interdisciplinary discussion. All participants are expected to read the provided paper and, optionally, use additional literature if needed. The discussion session should be used to find answers for open questions, integrating knowledge and compare different perspectives on the topic.

Reading list

Larissa MacFarquhar. The Mind-Expanding Ideas of Andy Clark. The tools we use to help us think—from language to smartphones—may be part of thought itself.
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/04/02/the-mind-expanding-ideas-of-andy-clark

Andy Clark. Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science.
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences/article/whatever-next-predictive-brains-situated-agents-and-the-future-of-cognitive-science/33542C736E17E3D1D44E8D03BE5F4CD9

Wanja Wiese & Thomas Metzinger. Vanilla PP for Philosophers: A Primer on Predictive Processing.
https://predictive-mind.net/papers/vanilla-pp-for-philosophers-a-primer-on-predictive-processing

Scott Alexander. God Help Us, Let's try to understand Friston on Free Energy
http://slatestarcodex.com/2018/03/04/god-help-us-lets-try-to-understand-friston-on-free-energy/
(and links provided)

and additional literature announced in the seminar.

Association in the course directory

Last modified: We 02.10.2019 11:48