Universität Wien

180222 SE Knowledge and Imagination (2023W)

5.00 ECTS (2.00 SWS), SPL 18 - Philosophie
Continuous assessment of course work

Hinweis der SPL Philosophie:

Das Abgeben von ganz oder teilweise von einem KI-tool (z.B. ChatGPT) verfassten Texten als Leistungsnachweis (z.B. Seminararbeit) ist nur dann erlaubt, wenn dies von der Lehrveranstaltungsleitung ausdrücklich als mögliche Arbeitsweise genehmigt wurde. Auch hierbei müssen direkt oder indirekt zitierte Textstellen wie immer klar mit Quellenangabe ausgewiesen werden.

Die Lehrveranstaltungsleitung kann zur Überprüfung der Autorenschaft einer abgegebenen schriftlichen Arbeit ein notenrelevantes Gespräch (Plausibilitätsprüfung) vorsehen, das erfolgreich zu absolvieren ist.

Registration/Deregistration

Note: The time of your registration within the registration period has no effect on the allocation of places (no first come, first served).

Details

Language: English

Lecturers

Classes (iCal) - next class is marked with N

Wednesday 11.10. 13:15 - 14:45 Hörsaal. 2H NIG 2.Stock
Wednesday 18.10. 13:15 - 14:45 Hörsaal. 2H NIG 2.Stock
Wednesday 25.10. 13:15 - 14:45 Hörsaal. 2H NIG 2.Stock
Wednesday 08.11. 13:15 - 14:45 Hörsaal. 2H NIG 2.Stock
Wednesday 15.11. 13:15 - 14:45 Hörsaal. 2H NIG 2.Stock
Wednesday 22.11. 13:15 - 14:45 Hörsaal. 2H NIG 2.Stock
Wednesday 29.11. 13:15 - 14:45 Hörsaal. 2H NIG 2.Stock
Wednesday 06.12. 13:15 - 14:45 Hörsaal. 2H NIG 2.Stock
Wednesday 13.12. 13:15 - 14:45 Hörsaal. 2H NIG 2.Stock
Wednesday 10.01. 13:15 - 14:45 Hörsaal. 2H NIG 2.Stock
Wednesday 17.01. 13:15 - 14:45 Hörsaal. 2H NIG 2.Stock
Wednesday 24.01. 13:15 - 14:45 Hörsaal. 2H NIG 2.Stock
Wednesday 31.01. 13:15 - 14:45 Hörsaal. 2H NIG 2.Stock

Information

Aims, contents and method of the course

Goals: This seminar aims to explore the role of imagining in contemporary epistemology. In particular, it addresses the question of whether and how we can gain knowledge via imagination. It is often thought that imagination can somehow serve as an epistemological guide to possibility and impossibility. Indeed, it seems crucial for philosophical and scientific thought experiments, as well as for our abilities to plan and make predictions about the future. But does the instructive use of imagination extend beyond the domain of modal epistemology? Our imaginative projections seem to play a key role in mindreading: at providing us with knowledge of other people’s minds, explaining their actions, and making predictions about their future behaviour. Moreover, even our ability to acquire moral and aesthetic knowledge seems to depend to some extent on our capacity for learning via imagination. But to what extent can imagination provide new knowledge about contingent matters of fact and enable us to learn about the world as it is? Throughout the seminar, we will attempt to address these thorny issues by discussing some relevant contributions across various contemporary philosophical contexts and perspectives, paying special attention to the limitations (or lack thereof) that each of them imposes on the epistemic significance of our imaginings.

Content: Imagination’s nature is surprisingly mysterious. In addition to those in the philosophy of mind and the philosophy of psychology, imagination also invites certain central questions in epistemology. In this seminar, we will mainly focus on one of them: Can imaginings be sources of justification? Or rather, should imagination be dismissed as insufficient to generate knowledge and hence epistemologically insignificant?However, the seminar’s content will cover various aspects related to the relationship between imagination and knowledge within different domains, including the role of the former in thought experiments, mindreading, acquiring moral and aesthetic knowledge, as well as contingent matters of fact. Throughout the seminar, we will critically examine different perspectives on this topic and explore the constraints and possibilities of learning about the world via imagination.

Method: In each seminar session, we shall analyse a seminal text in contemporary epistemology devoted to the relationship between imagination and knowledge within a specific domain. These domains include but are not limited to modal, moral, psychological, aesthetic, or scientific inquiry. Students will work on the assigned papers in small groups and present them in the seminar. We will collectively discuss each view and argument in the light of traditional epistemological theories, such as foundationalism, coherentism, and reliabilism (of which students are expected to have some background). Students will then select one of the discussed issues or research questions and, incorporating the literature presented, address it in their final seminar essay. Alternatively, they may opt for a final oral exam, if required.

Assessment and permitted materials

Text presentation; active participation in seminar discussions; final seminar essay (or final oral exam, if required).

Minimum requirements and assessment criteria

Seminar outcomes: text presentation 30%, participation 20%, final seminar essay/oral exam 50%.

Examination topics

• Balcerak Jackson, M. (2016). “On the Epistemic Value of Imagining, Supposing, and Conceiving”, in A. Kind & P. Kung (ed.), Knowledge Through Imagination, Oxford: OUP.
• Gregory, D. (2016). “Imagination and mental imagery”, in A. Kind (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Imagination, London: Routledge.
• Brown, D. H. (2018). “Infusing Perception with Imagination”, in F. Macpherson & F. Dorsch (ed.), Perceptual Imagination and Perceptual Memory, Oxford: OUP.
• Currie, G. (2018). “Visually Attending to Fictional Things”, in F. Macpherson & F. Dorsch (ed.), Perceptual Imagination and Perceptual Memory, Oxford: OUP.
• Hill, C.S. (2006). “Modality, modal epistemology, and the metaphysics of consciousness”, in S. Nichols (ed.), The architecture of the imagination, Oxford: OUP.
• Toon, A. (2016). “Imagination in scientific modeling”, in A. Kind (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Imagination, London: Routledge.
• Kind, A. (2016). “Imagining Under Constraints”, in A. Kind & P. Kung (ed.), Knowledge Through Imagination, Oxford: OUP.
• Williamson, T. (2016). “Knowing by Imagining,” in A. Kind & P. Kung (ed.), Knowledge Through Imagination, Oxford: OUP.
• Church, J. (2016). “Perceiving People as People: An Overlooked Role for the Imagination”, in A. Kind & P. Kung (ed.), Knowledge Through Imagination, Oxford: OUP.
• Maibom, H. L. (2016). “Knowing Me, Knowing You: Failure to Forecast and the Empathic Imagination”, in A. Kind & P. Kung (ed.), Knowledge Through Imagination, Oxford: OUP.
• Spaulding, S. (2016). “Imagination Through Knowledge”, in A. Kind & P. Kung (ed.), Knowledge Through Imagination, Oxford: OUP.
• Walton, K. (2006). “On the (So-called) Puzzle of Imaginative Resistance”, in S. Nichols (ed.), The architecture of the imagination, Oxford: OUP.

Reading list

There is no mandatory textbook for this module. However, a basic background in epistemology is required. Some of the introductions to epistemology that students can usefully consult are the following:
• Steup, M., (2008). Epistemology in the Twentieth Century, in: Moran, D. (ed.), The Routledge Companion to Twentieth-Century Philosophy, Routledge, New York, pp. 469-521.
• Williams, M. (2001). Problems of knowledge: A critical introduction to epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Zagzebski, L. (2009). On Epistemology. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Less recent ones include the following:
• Audi, R. (1997). Epistemology: A Contemporary Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge, New York: Routledge.
• Dancy, J. (1985). Introduction to Contemporary Epistemology, Blackwell.
• Everitt, N. & Fisher, A. (1994). Modern Epistemology, McGraw-Hill.

If you are looking for a collection of classic papers, I would suggest the following anthology:
• Sosa, E, Kim, J., Fantl, J., & McGrath, M. (2008). Epistemology: An Anthology ed., Oxford: Blackwell.

Association in the course directory

Last modified: We 11.10.2023 15:47