200013 PS Proseminar General Psychology (2023S)
Aesthetics, Emotions, and the Brain
Continuous assessment of course work
Labels
Registration/Deregistration
Note: The time of your registration within the registration period has no effect on the allocation of places (no first come, first served).
- Registration is open from Th 02.02.2023 09:00 to Th 23.02.2023 09:00
- Deregistration possible until Fr 03.03.2023 09:00
Details
max. 40 participants
Language: English
Lecturers
Classes (iCal) - next class is marked with N
- Thursday 09.03. 09:45 - 11:15 Hörsaal G Psychologie, Liebiggasse 5, 2. Stock
- Thursday 16.03. 09:45 - 11:15 Hörsaal G Psychologie, Liebiggasse 5, 2. Stock
- Thursday 23.03. 09:45 - 11:15 Hörsaal G Psychologie, Liebiggasse 5, 2. Stock
- Thursday 30.03. 09:45 - 11:15 Hörsaal G Psychologie, Liebiggasse 5, 2. Stock
- Thursday 20.04. 09:45 - 11:15 Hörsaal G Psychologie, Liebiggasse 5, 2. Stock
- Thursday 27.04. 09:45 - 11:15 Hörsaal G Psychologie, Liebiggasse 5, 2. Stock
- Thursday 04.05. 09:45 - 11:15 Hörsaal G Psychologie, Liebiggasse 5, 2. Stock
- Thursday 11.05. 09:45 - 11:15 Hörsaal G Psychologie, Liebiggasse 5, 2. Stock
- Thursday 25.05. 09:45 - 11:15 Hörsaal G Psychologie, Liebiggasse 5, 2. Stock
- Thursday 01.06. 09:45 - 11:15 Hörsaal G Psychologie, Liebiggasse 5, 2. Stock
- Thursday 15.06. 09:45 - 11:15 Hörsaal G Psychologie, Liebiggasse 5, 2. Stock
- Thursday 22.06. 09:45 - 11:15 Hörsaal G Psychologie, Liebiggasse 5, 2. Stock
- Thursday 29.06. 09:45 - 11:15 Hörsaal G Psychologie, Liebiggasse 5, 2. Stock
Information
Aims, contents and method of the course
Assessment and permitted materials
• Credit: 6 ECTS (150 class/coursework hours (1 ECTS = 25 hours))
• Active participation = 29%
• 1.75 ECTS (~ 44 hours)
• Group work / presentation = 26%
• 1.55 ECTS (~ 39 hours)
• Written paper = 35%
• 2.1 ECTS (~ 52 hours)
• Peer-review feedback = 10%
• 0.6 ECTS (~ 15 hours)The total sum of above assessments will constitute the final grade. Passing grade (4) = 60%.
• Active participation = 29%
• 1.75 ECTS (~ 44 hours)
• Group work / presentation = 26%
• 1.55 ECTS (~ 39 hours)
• Written paper = 35%
• 2.1 ECTS (~ 52 hours)
• Peer-review feedback = 10%
• 0.6 ECTS (~ 15 hours)The total sum of above assessments will constitute the final grade. Passing grade (4) = 60%.
Minimum requirements and assessment criteria
• The basic requirement for a passing grade: Attendance in class with a maximum of two (2) missed dates and a minimum of 60% of total points.If you do not attend the first class, without contacting us before class start, we reserve the right to give your spot to another student on the waiting list.• Note that you have to reach a minimum of 40% of each grading components (active participation, group work/presentation, peer-review feedback, written paper) in order to pass the course
Examination topics
Reading list
Reading List and Presentation Topics (please note that we will not cover all topics):1. Beauty:
• Lorand, R. (1994). https://doi.org/10.2307/432027
• Tsukiura, T., & Cabeza, R. (2010). https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsq0252. Empirical Aesthetics:
• Jacobsen, T. (2010). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7580.2009.01164.x
• Leder, H., Carbon, C.-C., & Ripsas, A.-L. (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.08.0053. Preference for Symmetry:
• Bertamini, M., & Makin, A. (2014). https://doi.org/10.3390/sym6040975
• Bertamini, M., Rampone, G., Makin, A. D. J., & Jessop, A. (2019). https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.70784. Attractiveness and Faces:
• Little, A. C. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1316
• Van Den Abbeele, J., Penton-Voak, I. S., Attwood, A. S., Stephen, I. D., & Munafò, M. R. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/agv0105. Perception Disorders:
• Simner, J., Mulvenna, C., Sagiv, N., Tsakanikos, E., Witherby, S. A., Fraser, C., Scott, K., & Ward, J. (2006). https://doi.org/10.1068/p5469
• Rouw, R., & Scholte, H. S. (2010). https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3444-09.20106. Brain Damage and Art:
• Gretton, C., & ffytche, D. H. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.3975
• Lauring, J. O., Pelowski, M., Specker, E., Ishizu, T., Haugbøl, S., Hollunder, B., … Kupers, R. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2019.1035977. Music:
• Panksepp, J., & Bernatzky, G. (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-6357(02)00080-3
• Linnemann, A., Ditzen, B., Strahler, J., Doerr, J. M., & Nater, U. M. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2015.06.0088. Stress, Healing and Art:
• Stuckey, H. L., & Nobel, J. (2010). https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2008.156497
• Clow, A., & Fredhoi, C. (2006).9. Well-being and Art:
• Mastandrea, S., Fagioli, S., & Biasi, V. (2019). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00739
• Tommaso, M. de, Sardaro, M., & Livrea, P. (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2008.07.00210. Emotion Theories:
• Moors, A. (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930802645739
• Fontaine, J. R. J., Scherer, K. R., Roesch, E. B., & Ellsworth, P. C. (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02024.x11. Aesthetic Emotions:
• Silvia, P. J. (2005). https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.9.4.342
• Cupchik, G. C., & Wroblewski-Raya, V. (1998).12. Psychology of New Media:
• Kuss, D. J., & Griffiths, M. D. (2011). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph8093528
• Ryan, T., & Xenos, S. (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.02.00413. Context in Empirical Aesthetic Research:
• Greenaway, K. H., Kalokerinos, E. K., & Williams, L. A. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12393
• Gerger, G., Leder, H., & Kremer, A. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.06.00814. Priming and Context:
• Pelowski, M., Forster, M., Tinio, P. P., Scholl, M., & Leder, H. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000141
• Lauring, J. O., Pelowski, M., Forster, M., Gondan, M., Ptito, M., & Kupers, R. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1037/aca000006315. Neuroaesthetics:
• Pearce, M. T., Zaidel, D. W., Vartanian, O., Skov, M., Leder, H., Chatterjee, A., & Nadal, M. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615621274
Ishizu, T., & Zeki, S. (2011). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.002185216. Creativity:
• Zaidel, D. W. (2014). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00389
• Hawley-Dolan, A., & Winner, E. (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/095679761140091517. Art and Artificial Intelligence:
• Casini, L., & Roccetti, M. (2018). https://doi.org/10.7413/18258646064
• Chamberlain, R., Mullin, C., Scheerlinck, B., & Wagemans, J. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000136
• Lorand, R. (1994). https://doi.org/10.2307/432027
• Tsukiura, T., & Cabeza, R. (2010). https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsq0252. Empirical Aesthetics:
• Jacobsen, T. (2010). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7580.2009.01164.x
• Leder, H., Carbon, C.-C., & Ripsas, A.-L. (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.08.0053. Preference for Symmetry:
• Bertamini, M., & Makin, A. (2014). https://doi.org/10.3390/sym6040975
• Bertamini, M., Rampone, G., Makin, A. D. J., & Jessop, A. (2019). https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.70784. Attractiveness and Faces:
• Little, A. C. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1316
• Van Den Abbeele, J., Penton-Voak, I. S., Attwood, A. S., Stephen, I. D., & Munafò, M. R. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/agv0105. Perception Disorders:
• Simner, J., Mulvenna, C., Sagiv, N., Tsakanikos, E., Witherby, S. A., Fraser, C., Scott, K., & Ward, J. (2006). https://doi.org/10.1068/p5469
• Rouw, R., & Scholte, H. S. (2010). https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3444-09.20106. Brain Damage and Art:
• Gretton, C., & ffytche, D. H. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.3975
• Lauring, J. O., Pelowski, M., Specker, E., Ishizu, T., Haugbøl, S., Hollunder, B., … Kupers, R. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2019.1035977. Music:
• Panksepp, J., & Bernatzky, G. (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-6357(02)00080-3
• Linnemann, A., Ditzen, B., Strahler, J., Doerr, J. M., & Nater, U. M. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2015.06.0088. Stress, Healing and Art:
• Stuckey, H. L., & Nobel, J. (2010). https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2008.156497
• Clow, A., & Fredhoi, C. (2006).9. Well-being and Art:
• Mastandrea, S., Fagioli, S., & Biasi, V. (2019). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00739
• Tommaso, M. de, Sardaro, M., & Livrea, P. (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2008.07.00210. Emotion Theories:
• Moors, A. (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930802645739
• Fontaine, J. R. J., Scherer, K. R., Roesch, E. B., & Ellsworth, P. C. (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02024.x11. Aesthetic Emotions:
• Silvia, P. J. (2005). https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.9.4.342
• Cupchik, G. C., & Wroblewski-Raya, V. (1998).12. Psychology of New Media:
• Kuss, D. J., & Griffiths, M. D. (2011). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph8093528
• Ryan, T., & Xenos, S. (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.02.00413. Context in Empirical Aesthetic Research:
• Greenaway, K. H., Kalokerinos, E. K., & Williams, L. A. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12393
• Gerger, G., Leder, H., & Kremer, A. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.06.00814. Priming and Context:
• Pelowski, M., Forster, M., Tinio, P. P., Scholl, M., & Leder, H. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000141
• Lauring, J. O., Pelowski, M., Forster, M., Gondan, M., Ptito, M., & Kupers, R. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1037/aca000006315. Neuroaesthetics:
• Pearce, M. T., Zaidel, D. W., Vartanian, O., Skov, M., Leder, H., Chatterjee, A., & Nadal, M. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615621274
Ishizu, T., & Zeki, S. (2011). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.002185216. Creativity:
• Zaidel, D. W. (2014). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00389
• Hawley-Dolan, A., & Winner, E. (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/095679761140091517. Art and Artificial Intelligence:
• Casini, L., & Roccetti, M. (2018). https://doi.org/10.7413/18258646064
• Chamberlain, R., Mullin, C., Scheerlinck, B., & Wagemans, J. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000136
Association in the course directory
70231
Last modified: Th 23.02.2023 13:48
• Discuss, explain about several topics in aesthetics, perception, and beauty
• Summarize, evaluate research papers
• Read papers critically (what is missing? What could be next steps?)
• Give academic presentation
- Work with others in a group
- Structuralize presentation content
• Construct a short academic paper
- find, compare different research papers
- prioritize arguments
- discuss previous findings, and criticize their methods
- formulate new research question, hypotheses
- address you research question with empirical methods
- use scientific reference style (APA 7th)Class plan:Two main parts:
1. Weeks 2-4: Lecture/class discussion: fundamentals of Science. Critical reading, scientific texts, writing/arguing, methodological basics, academic presentation
2. Weeks 5-14: Student-led design and small group presentation of selected topic/empirical study (from provided articles). Information on Moodle. Active class discussion.Schedule:
09.03.2023. Introduction, Course Info
16.03.2023. Scientific life; Academic presentation
23.03.2023. Science papers; reading and writing, Peer review
30.03.2023. Methods; Analysis; Current issues---- EASTER BREAK —20.04.2023. Presentation 1-2
27.04.2023. Presentation 3-4 (Deadline: TURN in WRITTEN PAPER)
04.05.2023. Presentation 5 (Deadline: Peer-review- Discussion of peer review on class)
11.05.2023. Presentation 6-7
25.05.2023. Presentation 8-9 (Deadline: TURN in revised WRITTEN PAPER)
01.06.2023. Presentation 10-11
15.06.2023. Presentation 12-13 (you receive our comments on the written paper)
22.06.2023. Presentation 14-15
29.06.2023. Feedback session, closing (Deadline: TURN in revised WRITTEN PAPER)