200234 SE Theory and Empirical Research (Mind and Brain) 2 (2024W)
Continuous assessment of course work
Labels
Dieses TEWA kann für alle Schwerpunkte absolviert werden!Dieses TEWA ist Teil 2 vom TEWA im Sommersemester 2024. Die Teilnehmer*innen aus dem SoSe 2024 erhalten einen Fixplatz und wurden über die LV Leitung angemeldet. Eine Online-Anmeldung ist hier nicht vorgesehen. Alle 20 Plätze sind vergeben.
Registration/Deregistration
Note: The time of your registration within the registration period has no effect on the allocation of places (no first come, first served).
- Registration is open from Tu 03.09.2024 14:09 to Th 05.09.2024 14:03
- Deregistration possible until Th 05.09.2024 14:03
Details
max. 20 participants
Language: English
Lecturers
Classes (iCal) - next class is marked with N
- Thursday 03.10. 15:00 - 16:30 Hörsaal F Psychologie, Liebiggasse 5 1. Stock
- Thursday 03.10. 16:45 - 18:15 Hörsaal F Psychologie, Liebiggasse 5 1. Stock
- Thursday 10.10. 15:00 - 16:30 Hörsaal F Psychologie, Liebiggasse 5 1. Stock
- Thursday 10.10. 16:45 - 18:15 Hörsaal F Psychologie, Liebiggasse 5 1. Stock
- Thursday 17.10. 15:00 - 16:30 Hörsaal F Psychologie, Liebiggasse 5 1. Stock
- Thursday 17.10. 16:45 - 18:15 Hörsaal F Psychologie, Liebiggasse 5 1. Stock
- Thursday 24.10. 15:00 - 16:30 Hörsaal F Psychologie, Liebiggasse 5 1. Stock
- Thursday 24.10. 16:45 - 18:15 Hörsaal F Psychologie, Liebiggasse 5 1. Stock
- Thursday 31.10. 15:00 - 16:30 Hörsaal F Psychologie, Liebiggasse 5 1. Stock
- Thursday 31.10. 16:45 - 18:15 Hörsaal F Psychologie, Liebiggasse 5 1. Stock
- Thursday 07.11. 15:00 - 16:30 Hörsaal F Psychologie, Liebiggasse 5 1. Stock
- Thursday 07.11. 16:45 - 18:15 Hörsaal F Psychologie, Liebiggasse 5 1. Stock
- Thursday 14.11. 15:00 - 16:30 Hörsaal F Psychologie, Liebiggasse 5 1. Stock
- Thursday 14.11. 16:45 - 18:15 Hörsaal F Psychologie, Liebiggasse 5 1. Stock
- Thursday 21.11. 15:00 - 16:30 Hörsaal F Psychologie, Liebiggasse 5 1. Stock
- Thursday 21.11. 16:45 - 18:15 Hörsaal F Psychologie, Liebiggasse 5 1. Stock
- Thursday 28.11. 15:00 - 16:30 Hörsaal F Psychologie, Liebiggasse 5 1. Stock
- Thursday 28.11. 16:45 - 18:15 Hörsaal F Psychologie, Liebiggasse 5 1. Stock
- Thursday 05.12. 15:00 - 16:30 Hörsaal F Psychologie, Liebiggasse 5 1. Stock
- Thursday 05.12. 16:45 - 18:15 Hörsaal F Psychologie, Liebiggasse 5 1. Stock
- Thursday 12.12. 15:00 - 16:30 Hörsaal F Psychologie, Liebiggasse 5 1. Stock
- Thursday 12.12. 16:45 - 18:15 Hörsaal F Psychologie, Liebiggasse 5 1. Stock
- Thursday 09.01. 15:00 - 16:30 Hörsaal F Psychologie, Liebiggasse 5 1. Stock
- Thursday 09.01. 16:45 - 18:15 Hörsaal F Psychologie, Liebiggasse 5 1. Stock
- Thursday 16.01. 15:00 - 16:30 Hörsaal F Psychologie, Liebiggasse 5 1. Stock
- Thursday 16.01. 16:45 - 18:15 Hörsaal F Psychologie, Liebiggasse 5 1. Stock
- Thursday 23.01. 15:00 - 16:30 Hörsaal F Psychologie, Liebiggasse 5 1. Stock
- Thursday 23.01. 16:45 - 18:15 Hörsaal F Psychologie, Liebiggasse 5 1. Stock
- Thursday 30.01. 15:00 - 16:30 Hörsaal F Psychologie, Liebiggasse 5 1. Stock
- Thursday 30.01. 16:45 - 18:15 Hörsaal F Psychologie, Liebiggasse 5 1. Stock
Information
Aims, contents and method of the course
Stress and resilience. Stress is an inevitable part of life. Some stressors are very personal (e.g. health problems) while others can be social (e.g. difficult colleagues) or environmental (e.g. street noise). Stressors can also be exogenous, i.e. external/outside of the person (e.g. noise), or endogenous, i.e. internal/within the person (e.g. fears and anxieties). How we cope with stress is strongly related to our mental health and well-being. Many psychological interventions such as Cognitive Behavioural Therapies or Mindfulness Training try to support people cope with stressors they may face. The number of psychological (and other) resources we have that help us cope with stress is referred to as resilience.Nature and resilience. Despite the many benefits of modern societies (e.g. longer life expectancy), the busy urban environments most people live in are also sources of stress. A growing body of research demonstrates that living near, spending time in, and even thinking about, natural spaces such as parks, gardens, mountains, lakes and the sea can help people cope better with these and other stressors. This was highlighted in many countries during the COVID pandemic. Put simply natural environments can build resilience. Moreover, as well as building psychological resilience (i.e. helping emotional coping) nature can also build biological resilience (e.g. through better immune systems) and social resilience (e.g. stronger local communities ties). In other words, nature can build ‘biopsychosocial resilience’ resources.The data and end goal. The course is linked to an ongoing multi-country EU research project looking at nature-based resilience (https://resonate-horizon.eu/) that we are running from the University of Vienna. Using existing (secondary) data from an ongoing large survey (n < 20,000) run by the UK government, the aim of this course is for you to explore the relationships between various types of nature exposure (e.g. neighbourhood parks/gardens) for different groups (e.g. adults/children) and their beliefs about the biological, psychological and social resilience potential of these nature exposures. Although the UK government produces regular reports on these data, their summaries are largely descriptive and lack psychological insight, theory, or methods. Therefore, the aim of this course is for you (with weekly support) to produce genuinely novel analyses and results that, if all goes well, you could publish in the academic literature as a peer-reviewed paper. The course leader has already done this with earlier waves of the data so we know this is possible if you are up for it. Although we can make no promise at this stage, hopefully at the end of the course you will not only have an excellent course grade but also be a named co-author on a real-world psychology paper to add to your CV.Feeling comfortable working with data and in teams. Participants should feel comfortable with basic descriptive data analysis (e.g. extracting means, SDs etc) as well as have some familiarity with inferential statistics (e.g. linear regression models). This doesn’t have to be perfect, we will offer extensive support to develop your skills, but an interest and willingness to analyse large datasets is essential. Analyses will be conducted in ‘R’ (with support from the team) so prior knowledge of R is an advantage but not essential. The statistical models we will develop together could theoretically be done in SPSS of JASP. Teams of 2-5 people will work together to develop the analysis plan and pre-registration, conduct presentations and write up the final report/paper. We realise group work can present challenges (e.g. social loafing) and not everyone loves it but this is how real papers with complex data like this are analysed and written up and we will be asking for a clear Author Contribution Statement outlining what each team member contributed to the report/paper (as happens with real papers).
Assessment and permitted materials
Element 1: 2 x team presentations (2 x 10% = 20%)Teams will be expected to do two 15-minute presentations. The first presentation will outline your research ideas and questions based on a) theory and literature and b) the data available in the PANS (i.e. the core of the pre-registration). The second presentation will outline descriptive and modelling results based on the planned analysis of the selected part of the PANS data (i.e. the core of the final paper).Team talk 1: 14th November 2024
Team talk 2: 16th January 2025Each team talk will be scored 1-10 (with 10% of the final grade assigned to each talk).
All team members are expected to attend and be part of the presentation (unless sick etc.).Element 2: Pre-registration protocol (20%)The Pre-registration protocol is a detailed research plan of what you will do in your research project. It will include: a) a brief rationale – what are you are looking at and why is what you are doing new and original (based on a brief review of the literature), b) specific research hypotheses and/or research questions; c) planned method – including approximate sample (based on the available PANS data), overview of the PANS data collection methods, and materials you will be looking at (i.e. survey questions etc.); and d) a statistics/analysis plan – how will you analyze the PANS data to answer your Hypotheses & Research Questions. To structure the Pre-registration protocol, we will use the Open Science Framework’s pre-registration template.Pre-registrations are increasingly important in psychology (and science more generally) because they aid open science and reduces the chances of subsequent data manipulation (intentional or unintentional) to support specific hypotheses. For more details see here: https://www.cos.io/initiatives/prereg.Each team will write a pre-registration protocol and submit it as a team. The pre-registration protocol should be APA style, maximum 2,000 words long, and can include up to 2 Tables and 2 Figures, and a maximum of 20 references. It will also contain an Author Contribution Statement outlining who did which aspects of the pre-registration (examples will be discussed in class).The grade for the pre-registration protocol will count 25% towards your final grade for the course.Draft pre-registration (one per team)
Submit via Moodle by 8th Nov, 23:59
Element 3: Research report/paper (50%)The final report will be in the form of a draft research paper formatted in the same style as would be expected for a peer-reviewed journal. The paper should be APA style, maximum 5,000 words long (remember the intro and methods will already be largely written as part of the pre-reg), and can include up to 4 Tables and 4 Figures, and a maximum of 60 references. It will also contain an Author Contribution Statement outlining who did which aspects of the research report.The grade for the final report will count 50% towards your final grade for the course.Submit via Moodle by 14th Feb, 23:59One member of the team will submit 1) the pre-reg, and 2) the final report as a .doc or .docx file via Moodle. The marking rubric for the reports will be available via Moodle.Element 4: Class participation (10%)
Your in-class participation including active discussion, feedback, and paper reading will count towards 10% of your final grade for this course.NOTE. Replicating what happens with real research papers, each team will deliver two presentations together and will submit one pre-registration and one final report as a team and so will receive the same grade. The Author Contribution Statement will be used to follow up any issues regarding unequal contribution. In cases of doubt, students may be asked to undergo an oral interview to explain the project and their contribution. Weekly sessions with the teaching team should mean this does not become a problem as we will work with each team from the start to ensure equity and fairness.
Team talk 2: 16th January 2025Each team talk will be scored 1-10 (with 10% of the final grade assigned to each talk).
All team members are expected to attend and be part of the presentation (unless sick etc.).Element 2: Pre-registration protocol (20%)The Pre-registration protocol is a detailed research plan of what you will do in your research project. It will include: a) a brief rationale – what are you are looking at and why is what you are doing new and original (based on a brief review of the literature), b) specific research hypotheses and/or research questions; c) planned method – including approximate sample (based on the available PANS data), overview of the PANS data collection methods, and materials you will be looking at (i.e. survey questions etc.); and d) a statistics/analysis plan – how will you analyze the PANS data to answer your Hypotheses & Research Questions. To structure the Pre-registration protocol, we will use the Open Science Framework’s pre-registration template.Pre-registrations are increasingly important in psychology (and science more generally) because they aid open science and reduces the chances of subsequent data manipulation (intentional or unintentional) to support specific hypotheses. For more details see here: https://www.cos.io/initiatives/prereg.Each team will write a pre-registration protocol and submit it as a team. The pre-registration protocol should be APA style, maximum 2,000 words long, and can include up to 2 Tables and 2 Figures, and a maximum of 20 references. It will also contain an Author Contribution Statement outlining who did which aspects of the pre-registration (examples will be discussed in class).The grade for the pre-registration protocol will count 25% towards your final grade for the course.Draft pre-registration (one per team)
Submit via Moodle by 8th Nov, 23:59
Element 3: Research report/paper (50%)The final report will be in the form of a draft research paper formatted in the same style as would be expected for a peer-reviewed journal. The paper should be APA style, maximum 5,000 words long (remember the intro and methods will already be largely written as part of the pre-reg), and can include up to 4 Tables and 4 Figures, and a maximum of 60 references. It will also contain an Author Contribution Statement outlining who did which aspects of the research report.The grade for the final report will count 50% towards your final grade for the course.Submit via Moodle by 14th Feb, 23:59One member of the team will submit 1) the pre-reg, and 2) the final report as a .doc or .docx file via Moodle. The marking rubric for the reports will be available via Moodle.Element 4: Class participation (10%)
Your in-class participation including active discussion, feedback, and paper reading will count towards 10% of your final grade for this course.NOTE. Replicating what happens with real research papers, each team will deliver two presentations together and will submit one pre-registration and one final report as a team and so will receive the same grade. The Author Contribution Statement will be used to follow up any issues regarding unequal contribution. In cases of doubt, students may be asked to undergo an oral interview to explain the project and their contribution. Weekly sessions with the teaching team should mean this does not become a problem as we will work with each team from the start to ensure equity and fairness.
Minimum requirements and assessment criteria
Grading
The grade for this course consists of 4 elements (see page 13-15 for more information).
- Element 1: 2 x team presentations (2 x 10% = 20%)
- Element 2: Pre-registration protocol (20%)
- Element 3: Research report/paper (50%)
- Element 4: Class participation (10%)We will use the following (UK-based) marking system. The total sum of above assessments will constitute the final grade. Passing grade (4) = 40%.70 - 100%: Grade 1
60 - 69 %: Grade 2
50 - 59%: Grade 3
40 - 49 %: Grade 4
0 - 39%: FailNOTE. Replicating what happens with real research papers, each team will deliver two presentations together and will submit one pre-registration and one final report as a team and so will receive the same grade. The Author Contribution Statement will be used to follow up any issues regarding unequal contribution. In cases of doubt, students may be asked to undergo an oral interview to explain the project and their contribution. Weekly sessions with the teaching team should mean this does not become a problem as we will work with each team from the start to ensure equity and fairness.
The grade for this course consists of 4 elements (see page 13-15 for more information).
- Element 1: 2 x team presentations (2 x 10% = 20%)
- Element 2: Pre-registration protocol (20%)
- Element 3: Research report/paper (50%)
- Element 4: Class participation (10%)We will use the following (UK-based) marking system. The total sum of above assessments will constitute the final grade. Passing grade (4) = 40%.70 - 100%: Grade 1
60 - 69 %: Grade 2
50 - 59%: Grade 3
40 - 49 %: Grade 4
0 - 39%: FailNOTE. Replicating what happens with real research papers, each team will deliver two presentations together and will submit one pre-registration and one final report as a team and so will receive the same grade. The Author Contribution Statement will be used to follow up any issues regarding unequal contribution. In cases of doubt, students may be asked to undergo an oral interview to explain the project and their contribution. Weekly sessions with the teaching team should mean this does not become a problem as we will work with each team from the start to ensure equity and fairness.
Examination topics
No Exam.
Reading list
Nature & resilience
Dzhambov, A. M., et al. (2019). Residential greenspace is associated with mental health via intertwined capacity-building and capacity-restoring pathways. Environmental Research, 178, 108708.
Wells, N. M. (2021). The natural environment as a resilience factor: Nature’s role as a buffer of the effects of risk and adversity. Nature and psychology: Biological, cognitive, developmental, and social pathways to well-being, 195-233.
White, M.P, et al. (2023). Nature-based biopsychosocial resilience: A theoretical framework for the nature and health field. Environment International, 108234.Perceptions of local green spaces, nature use & mental health
De Jong, K., et al. (2012). Perceived green qualities were associated with neighborhood satisfaction, physical activity, and general health: Results from a cross-sectional study in suburban and rural Scania, southern Sweden. Health & place, 18(6), 1374-1380.
Hadavi, S., et al. (2018). How does perception of nearby nature affect multiple aspects of neighbourhood satisfaction and use patterns?. Landscape research, 43(3), 360-379.
Fian, L., et al.. (2024). Nature visits, but not residential greenness, are associated with reduced income-related inequalities in subjective well-being. Health & Place, 85, 103175.
Gomm, S., & Bernauer, T. (2023). Are actual and perceived environmental conditions associated with variation in mental health?. Environmental Research, 223, 115398.Gardens & mental health
Collins, R. M., et al. (2023). The relative effects of access to public greenspace and private gardens on mental health. Landscape and Urban Planning, 240, 104902.
Corley, J., et al. (2021). Home garden use during COVID-19: Associations with physical and mental wellbeing in older adults. Journal of environmental psychology, 73, 101545.
de Bell, S., et al. (2020). Spending time in the garden is positively associated with health and wellbeing: Results from a national survey in England. Landscape & Urban Planning, 103836.
.Children, nature and mental health
Wells, N. M., & Evans, G. W. (2003). Nearby nature: A buffer of life stress among rural children. Environment and behavior, 35(3), 311-330.
Wells, N. M. (2000). At home with nature: Effects of “greenness” on children’s cognitive functioning. Environment and behavior, 32(6), 775-795.
Mygind, L., et al. . (2019). Mental, physical and social health benefits of immersive nature-experience for children and adolescents: A systematic review and quality assessment of the evidence. Health & place, 58, 102136.
Preuß, M., et al. (2019). Low childhood nature exposure is associated with worse mental health in adulthood. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(10), 1809.
Tillmann, S., et al. (2018). Mental health benefits of interactions with nature in children and teenagers: A systematic review. J Epidemiol Community Health, 72(10), 958-966.People and Nature Survey
Lots of information about the People and Nature Survey (PANS) can be found here:
https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/people-and-nature-survey-for-englandThe adult survey (Teams 1-3) can be found here. Note that this also contains adult perceptions of benefits to children:
https://publications.naturalengland.org.uk/publication/6382837173583872The child survey (Team 4) can be found here:
https://publications.naturalengland.org.uk/publication/5077459990216704
Dzhambov, A. M., et al. (2019). Residential greenspace is associated with mental health via intertwined capacity-building and capacity-restoring pathways. Environmental Research, 178, 108708.
Wells, N. M. (2021). The natural environment as a resilience factor: Nature’s role as a buffer of the effects of risk and adversity. Nature and psychology: Biological, cognitive, developmental, and social pathways to well-being, 195-233.
White, M.P, et al. (2023). Nature-based biopsychosocial resilience: A theoretical framework for the nature and health field. Environment International, 108234.Perceptions of local green spaces, nature use & mental health
De Jong, K., et al. (2012). Perceived green qualities were associated with neighborhood satisfaction, physical activity, and general health: Results from a cross-sectional study in suburban and rural Scania, southern Sweden. Health & place, 18(6), 1374-1380.
Hadavi, S., et al. (2018). How does perception of nearby nature affect multiple aspects of neighbourhood satisfaction and use patterns?. Landscape research, 43(3), 360-379.
Fian, L., et al.. (2024). Nature visits, but not residential greenness, are associated with reduced income-related inequalities in subjective well-being. Health & Place, 85, 103175.
Gomm, S., & Bernauer, T. (2023). Are actual and perceived environmental conditions associated with variation in mental health?. Environmental Research, 223, 115398.Gardens & mental health
Collins, R. M., et al. (2023). The relative effects of access to public greenspace and private gardens on mental health. Landscape and Urban Planning, 240, 104902.
Corley, J., et al. (2021). Home garden use during COVID-19: Associations with physical and mental wellbeing in older adults. Journal of environmental psychology, 73, 101545.
de Bell, S., et al. (2020). Spending time in the garden is positively associated with health and wellbeing: Results from a national survey in England. Landscape & Urban Planning, 103836.
.Children, nature and mental health
Wells, N. M., & Evans, G. W. (2003). Nearby nature: A buffer of life stress among rural children. Environment and behavior, 35(3), 311-330.
Wells, N. M. (2000). At home with nature: Effects of “greenness” on children’s cognitive functioning. Environment and behavior, 32(6), 775-795.
Mygind, L., et al. . (2019). Mental, physical and social health benefits of immersive nature-experience for children and adolescents: A systematic review and quality assessment of the evidence. Health & place, 58, 102136.
Preuß, M., et al. (2019). Low childhood nature exposure is associated with worse mental health in adulthood. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(10), 1809.
Tillmann, S., et al. (2018). Mental health benefits of interactions with nature in children and teenagers: A systematic review. J Epidemiol Community Health, 72(10), 958-966.People and Nature Survey
Lots of information about the People and Nature Survey (PANS) can be found here:
https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/people-and-nature-survey-for-englandThe adult survey (Teams 1-3) can be found here. Note that this also contains adult perceptions of benefits to children:
https://publications.naturalengland.org.uk/publication/6382837173583872The child survey (Team 4) can be found here:
https://publications.naturalengland.org.uk/publication/5077459990216704
Association in the course directory
Last modified: Tu 01.10.2024 15:06