210027 UE BAK4.1: UE Empirical research using qualitative methods (2018S)
(engl.)
Continuous assessment of course work
Labels
A registration via u:space during the registration phase is required. Late registrations are NOT possible.
Students who miss the first lesson without prior notification will lose their seat in the course.Follow the principles of good scientific practice.The course instructor may invite students to an oral exam about the student’s written contributions in the course. Plagiarized contributions have the consequence that the course won’t be graded (instead the course will be marked with an ‘X’ in the transcript of records).
Students who miss the first lesson without prior notification will lose their seat in the course.Follow the principles of good scientific practice.The course instructor may invite students to an oral exam about the student’s written contributions in the course. Plagiarized contributions have the consequence that the course won’t be graded (instead the course will be marked with an ‘X’ in the transcript of records).
Registration/Deregistration
Note: The time of your registration within the registration period has no effect on the allocation of places (no first come, first served).
- Registration is open from Mo 05.02.2018 08:00 to Mo 19.02.2018 08:00
- Registration is open from We 21.02.2018 08:00 to Mo 26.02.2018 08:00
- Deregistration possible until Fr 16.03.2018 23:59
Details
max. 40 participants
Language: English
Lecturers
Classes (iCal) - next class is marked with N
- Wednesday 21.03. 13:15 - 14:45 Hörsaal 3 (H3), NIG 2. Stock
- Friday 23.03. 13:15 - 16:30 Hörsaal 3 (H3), NIG 2. Stock
- Wednesday 11.04. 13:15 - 14:45 Hörsaal 3 (H3), NIG 2. Stock
- Wednesday 18.04. 13:15 - 14:45 Hörsaal 3 (H3), NIG 2. Stock
- Wednesday 25.04. 13:15 - 14:45 Hörsaal 3 (H3), NIG 2. Stock
- Wednesday 02.05. 13:15 - 14:45 Hörsaal 3 (H3), NIG 2. Stock
- Wednesday 09.05. 13:15 - 14:45 Hörsaal 3 (H3), NIG 2. Stock
- Wednesday 16.05. 13:15 - 14:45 Hörsaal 3 (H3), NIG 2. Stock
- Wednesday 23.05. 13:15 - 14:45 Hörsaal 3 (H3), NIG 2. Stock
- Wednesday 06.06. 13:15 - 14:45 Hörsaal 3 (H3), NIG 2. Stock
- Wednesday 13.06. 13:15 - 14:45 Hörsaal 3 (H3), NIG 2. Stock
- Wednesday 20.06. 13:15 - 14:45 Hörsaal 3 (H3), NIG 2. Stock
- Friday 22.06. 13:15 - 16:30 Hörsaal 3 (H3), NIG 2. Stock
- Wednesday 27.06. 13:15 - 14:45 Hörsaal 3 (H3), NIG 2. Stock
Information
Aims, contents and method of the course
Assessment and permitted materials
Art der Leistungskontrolle/Assessment method: a paper of 3500 words (including footnotes, excluding references) that contains the following 5 sections:
1. Research problem, goals of the paper and contribution to the literature. In this section you provide a concise and convincing answer why the reader should read your report. (20 points)
2. Research Question, Design, Methods, and Analysis In this section you explain the design of your project. The design should enable you to provide an answer to your research question (20 points).
3. Explanation of relevant research ethics as they apply to your project (10 points)
4. Presentation and discussion of your empirical results. The results of your study are related tot the relevant literature. This section provides an answer to your research question (30 points)
5. Summary and Conclusions. Here you discuss your contribution to the literature and the societal significance of your results (20 points).The final paper can be written in English or German. The paper must be grammatically correct and well presented. The references must be correctly structured according to the Harvard method. Failure in any of these formal characteristics will result in a lowering of points. The maximums score is 100 points; you need 50 points to pass the seminar.The deadline for the paper is ........
1. Research problem, goals of the paper and contribution to the literature. In this section you provide a concise and convincing answer why the reader should read your report. (20 points)
2. Research Question, Design, Methods, and Analysis In this section you explain the design of your project. The design should enable you to provide an answer to your research question (20 points).
3. Explanation of relevant research ethics as they apply to your project (10 points)
4. Presentation and discussion of your empirical results. The results of your study are related tot the relevant literature. This section provides an answer to your research question (30 points)
5. Summary and Conclusions. Here you discuss your contribution to the literature and the societal significance of your results (20 points).The final paper can be written in English or German. The paper must be grammatically correct and well presented. The references must be correctly structured according to the Harvard method. Failure in any of these formal characteristics will result in a lowering of points. The maximums score is 100 points; you need 50 points to pass the seminar.The deadline for the paper is ........
Minimum requirements and assessment criteria
Examination topics
Reading list
Mandatory Literature:
Bryman, A. 1984. The debate about quantitative and qualitative research: A question of method or epistemology? British Journal of Sociology 35(1), 75-92.
Booth, W.C., Colomb, G.G., und Williams, J.M. 2008. The craft of research (3. Edition). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Chapter 3: From topics to questions. S.36-50., chapter 4: From questions to a problem
Weiss, R.S. 1995. Learning from Strangers: The art and method of qualitative interview studies. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Wagenaar, H (2011), Meaning in Action: Interpretation and Dialogue in Policy Analysis, ch. 9 From methods to heuristics.
Schulz, M. 2012. Quick and easy!? Fokusgruppen in der angewandten Sozialwissenschaft. In: Schulz, M., Mack, B., und Renn, O. (Hg). Fokusgruppen in der empirischen Sozialwissenschaft. Von der Konzeption bis zur Auswertung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. S. 9-22.
Kerchner, B. 2006. Diskursanalyse in der Politikwissenschaft. Ein Forschungsüberblick. In: Kerchner B, Schneider S. (Hg). Foucault: Diskursanalyse der Politik: eine Einführung. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. S. 33-67.
Abbot, A. (2004), Methods of Discovery. Heuristics for the Social Sciences, Norton
Charmaz, K. (2013) Constructing Grounded Theory, Sage, chapter 5 (coding), ch. 7 (memo-writing)
Bartels, K. & Wagenaar H., (2017) Doubt and Excitement: An Experiential Learning Approach to Teaching the Practice of Qualitative Research, Qualitative Research, DOI: 10.1177/1468794117713056
Bryman, A. 1984. The debate about quantitative and qualitative research: A question of method or epistemology? British Journal of Sociology 35(1), 75-92.
Booth, W.C., Colomb, G.G., und Williams, J.M. 2008. The craft of research (3. Edition). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Chapter 3: From topics to questions. S.36-50., chapter 4: From questions to a problem
Weiss, R.S. 1995. Learning from Strangers: The art and method of qualitative interview studies. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Wagenaar, H (2011), Meaning in Action: Interpretation and Dialogue in Policy Analysis, ch. 9 From methods to heuristics.
Schulz, M. 2012. Quick and easy!? Fokusgruppen in der angewandten Sozialwissenschaft. In: Schulz, M., Mack, B., und Renn, O. (Hg). Fokusgruppen in der empirischen Sozialwissenschaft. Von der Konzeption bis zur Auswertung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. S. 9-22.
Kerchner, B. 2006. Diskursanalyse in der Politikwissenschaft. Ein Forschungsüberblick. In: Kerchner B, Schneider S. (Hg). Foucault: Diskursanalyse der Politik: eine Einführung. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. S. 33-67.
Abbot, A. (2004), Methods of Discovery. Heuristics for the Social Sciences, Norton
Charmaz, K. (2013) Constructing Grounded Theory, Sage, chapter 5 (coding), ch. 7 (memo-writing)
Bartels, K. & Wagenaar H., (2017) Doubt and Excitement: An Experiential Learning Approach to Teaching the Practice of Qualitative Research, Qualitative Research, DOI: 10.1177/1468794117713056
Association in the course directory
Last modified: Mo 07.09.2020 15:38
Know the difference between quantitative and qualitative research;
Be able to formulate a workable and productive research question;
Have knowledge of and some practical experience with the most common methods of qualitative data collection;
Have knowledge of and some practical experience with the analysis of qualitative data;
Have some experience with writing research memos;
Have some experience with writing a research report;
Heave learned to turn worries and anxieties about your research (which are entirely normal) into something productive and enjoy doing research.