Warning! The directory is not yet complete and will be amended until the beginning of the term.
210088 SE BAK14 Bachelor’s Seminar and Bachelor’s Thesis (2025S)
Continuous assessment of course work
Labels
Details
Language: English
Lecturers
Classes (iCal) - next class is marked with N
Note that only sessions 1-5 (i.e., 10.03., 17.03, 24.03., 31.03., 07.04.) + 7 (i.e., 05.05.) will be conducted in class. For all other weeks, you’re expected to independently work on your thesis project and meet with me for 1:1 supervision sessions of your thesis.
- N Monday 10.03. 15:00 - 18:15 Hörsaal 2 (H2), NIG 2.Stock
- Monday 17.03. 15:00 - 18:15 Hörsaal 2 (H2), NIG 2.Stock
- Monday 24.03. 15:00 - 18:15 Hörsaal 2 (H2), NIG 2.Stock
- Monday 31.03. 15:00 - 18:15 Hörsaal 2 (H2), NIG 2.Stock
- Monday 07.04. 15:00 - 18:15 Hörsaal 2 (H2), NIG 2.Stock
- Monday 28.04. 15:00 - 18:15 Hörsaal 2 (H2), NIG 2.Stock
- Monday 05.05. 15:00 - 18:15 Hörsaal 2 (H2), NIG 2.Stock
- Monday 12.05. 15:00 - 18:15 Hörsaal 2 (H2), NIG 2.Stock
- Monday 19.05. 15:00 - 18:15 Hörsaal 2 (H2), NIG 2.Stock
- Monday 26.05. 15:00 - 18:15 Hörsaal 2 (H2), NIG 2.Stock
- Monday 02.06. 15:00 - 18:15 Hörsaal 2 (H2), NIG 2.Stock
- Monday 16.06. 15:00 - 18:15 Hörsaal 2 (H2), NIG 2.Stock
- Monday 23.06. 15:00 - 18:15 Hörsaal 2 (H2), NIG 2.Stock
- Monday 30.06. 15:00 - 18:15 Hörsaal 2 (H2), NIG 2.Stock
Information
Aims, contents and method of the course
Assessment and permitted materials
ASSIGNMENTS:
You will be assessed based on five course components:
1. Abstract (10% of the final grade, due April 10th): Please write a short abstract of your planned thesis project. The abstract should closely resemble abstracts published in academic journals (i.e., it should include the problem, possibly previous knowledge, the gap, the research question, the theory/argument, the methods, expected results, and relevance).2. Written Proposal (15%, due April 30th): Please write a proposal of your planned Bachelor’s project. A proposal contains the same parts as an abstract (i.e., the problem, previous knowledge (e.g., theory and/or evidence), the gap, the research question, the theory/argument, the methods, expected results, and relevance). However, while you basically had only one sentence for each of these aspects in the abstract, you should spell each idea out in more detail. You decide on how much detail you want and can provide for the single sections, but I urge you to think ahead, make some progress, and avoid trouble and workload later. The proposal should be between 1,000 and 4,000 words long.3. Discussing a proposal (10%, due May 5th): In the session on May 5th, you’ll be asked to have closely read your assigned proposal and discuss it.
It should start with a brief and clear summary of the project’s idea, question, argument, and methods. However, the main focus of your discussion should be to critically evaluate the proposal: For example, is the question relevant, is it well motivated, is the gap sufficiently large (or too vague?), is the argument novel and reasonable, can the methods provide an adequate response to the RQ, are the planned methods and analyses reasonable, is the project feasible, is this project relevant? Do not use these points as a checklist but discuss the points you find most relevant in the proposal.4. Official 1:1 meetings (5%, due during the scheduled meetings): You are required to schedule at least two “official 1:1 meetings” with me. It is your responsibility to prepare these meetings and decide what you want to discuss. In these sessions, we discuss any thesis problems you may face, including clarifying the gap or RQ, finding relevant literature, clarifying contributions, developing your argument, writing and layout struggles, deciding for a method, conducting your analyses, deciding how to present your results, etc. Obviously, you can also discuss several issues in one meeting. I strongly encourage you to email me some materials (e.g., a single session of your thesis) before the session, given that this always makes these meetings more efficient and helpful for you.5. Bachelor’s Thesis (60%, due July 27th): Please write your Bachelor’s Thesis. This includes all aspects of an academic paper (e.g., a research gap, research question, novel contributions, a literature review and theory section, methods, results, a discussion, references, and appendix). Max 12,000 words long.
You will be assessed based on five course components:
1. Abstract (10% of the final grade, due April 10th): Please write a short abstract of your planned thesis project. The abstract should closely resemble abstracts published in academic journals (i.e., it should include the problem, possibly previous knowledge, the gap, the research question, the theory/argument, the methods, expected results, and relevance).2. Written Proposal (15%, due April 30th): Please write a proposal of your planned Bachelor’s project. A proposal contains the same parts as an abstract (i.e., the problem, previous knowledge (e.g., theory and/or evidence), the gap, the research question, the theory/argument, the methods, expected results, and relevance). However, while you basically had only one sentence for each of these aspects in the abstract, you should spell each idea out in more detail. You decide on how much detail you want and can provide for the single sections, but I urge you to think ahead, make some progress, and avoid trouble and workload later. The proposal should be between 1,000 and 4,000 words long.3. Discussing a proposal (10%, due May 5th): In the session on May 5th, you’ll be asked to have closely read your assigned proposal and discuss it.
It should start with a brief and clear summary of the project’s idea, question, argument, and methods. However, the main focus of your discussion should be to critically evaluate the proposal: For example, is the question relevant, is it well motivated, is the gap sufficiently large (or too vague?), is the argument novel and reasonable, can the methods provide an adequate response to the RQ, are the planned methods and analyses reasonable, is the project feasible, is this project relevant? Do not use these points as a checklist but discuss the points you find most relevant in the proposal.4. Official 1:1 meetings (5%, due during the scheduled meetings): You are required to schedule at least two “official 1:1 meetings” with me. It is your responsibility to prepare these meetings and decide what you want to discuss. In these sessions, we discuss any thesis problems you may face, including clarifying the gap or RQ, finding relevant literature, clarifying contributions, developing your argument, writing and layout struggles, deciding for a method, conducting your analyses, deciding how to present your results, etc. Obviously, you can also discuss several issues in one meeting. I strongly encourage you to email me some materials (e.g., a single session of your thesis) before the session, given that this always makes these meetings more efficient and helpful for you.5. Bachelor’s Thesis (60%, due July 27th): Please write your Bachelor’s Thesis. This includes all aspects of an academic paper (e.g., a research gap, research question, novel contributions, a literature review and theory section, methods, results, a discussion, references, and appendix). Max 12,000 words long.
Minimum requirements and assessment criteria
ASSIGNMENTS:
Course components: You will be assessed based on five course components:
1. Abstract (10% of the final grade, due April 10th)
2. Written Proposal (15%, due April 30th)
3. Discussing a proposal (10%, due May 5th)
4. Official 1:1 meetings (5%, due during the scheduled meetings)
5. Bachelor’s Thesis (60%, due July 27th)ASSESSMENT:
Assessment scale: For each assignment, you can get the grades: 1 (Excellent), 2 (Good), 3 (Satisfactory), 4 (Sufficient), 5 (Insufficient/fail). I’ll round the grades (e.g., 3.0-3.4 or lower will become a 3, 3.5-3.9 will become a 4). To receive the final course grade, I’ll weight the rounded grades for the four course components.
This will result in the following final course grades:
1 (Excellent),
2 (Good),
3 (Satisfactory),
4 (Sufficient),
5 (Insufficient/fail).NOTE:
- To pass the course, you must pass all the single components. That is, if you fail on one of the assignments, you will fail the entire course.
- Moreover, I expect everyone to attend each session, be punctual, and be active in class.
Course components: You will be assessed based on five course components:
1. Abstract (10% of the final grade, due April 10th)
2. Written Proposal (15%, due April 30th)
3. Discussing a proposal (10%, due May 5th)
4. Official 1:1 meetings (5%, due during the scheduled meetings)
5. Bachelor’s Thesis (60%, due July 27th)ASSESSMENT:
Assessment scale: For each assignment, you can get the grades: 1 (Excellent), 2 (Good), 3 (Satisfactory), 4 (Sufficient), 5 (Insufficient/fail). I’ll round the grades (e.g., 3.0-3.4 or lower will become a 3, 3.5-3.9 will become a 4). To receive the final course grade, I’ll weight the rounded grades for the four course components.
This will result in the following final course grades:
1 (Excellent),
2 (Good),
3 (Satisfactory),
4 (Sufficient),
5 (Insufficient/fail).NOTE:
- To pass the course, you must pass all the single components. That is, if you fail on one of the assignments, you will fail the entire course.
- Moreover, I expect everyone to attend each session, be punctual, and be active in class.
Examination topics
Again, note that I can primarily teach and supervise in the following fields: political psychology (e.g., identities, emotions, citizens’ apolitical life) and public opinion and political behavior research (e.g., radical right voting, polarization, prosocial behavior) with an empirical focus (i.e., (natural and online) experiments, survey research, text analyses, but also positivist qualitative methods).
See my website for more information: https://lucaversteegen.comIf you’re unsure whether I am the right person to supervise your thesis, please email me: peter.luca.versteegen@univie.ac.atSee the course syllabus for more information.
See my website for more information: https://lucaversteegen.comIf you’re unsure whether I am the right person to supervise your thesis, please email me: peter.luca.versteegen@univie.ac.atSee the course syllabus for more information.
Reading list
See the course syllabus for more information.
Association in the course directory
Last modified: Fr 10.01.2025 00:02
This course will guide and support you in writing your Bachelor’s Thesis. The first sessions will tackle some foundations of academic practice (e.g., developing a research question, making a scientific argument, open science practices, academic writing), reestablish some methodological basics (e.g., ranging from causality, to survey methodology, experiments, or qualitative interviews), and share inspiration (e.g., what are cool topics, why do we do this at all?). The later sessions will be 1:1 sessions (on Zoom), focusing on your thesis. This course aims to assist you in producing a high-quality Bachelor’s thesis, provide you with skills for your career, and to be insightful and fun.For you to make the most of your thesis, it’s vital to register for a course where your interests align with the teacher’s expertise. My expertise is in political psychology (e.g., identities, emotions, citizens’ apolitical life) and public opinion and political behavior research (e.g., radical right voting, polarization, prosocial behavior) with an empirical focus (i.e., (natural and online) experiments, survey research, text analyses, but also positivist qualitative methods). See my website for more information: https://lucaversteegen.com
Please only register for this course if you think that our interests align.CONTENTS:
This course comes in two parts.
In the first part of the course, we will have class meetings. During these meetings, we’ll discuss some general questions of academic practice (e.g., developing a research question, making a scientific argument, open science practices, academic writing), reiterate some methodological foundations (e.g., ranging from causality, to survey methodology, experiments, or qualitative interviews), and collect ideas for thesis topics. Each of these sessions will be a combination of lectured materials and group or individual exercises. Even in these early sessions, the focus will be on getting you to work independently on your research projects. Therefore, for sessions 2-5, you’ll be asked to read and summarize two academic (preferably empirical) papers. I will not grade these summaries but they are mandatory and to be uploaded in a shared folder on moodle. These summaries are very helpful for you a.) as a practice to quickly understand papers and b.) get an overview of a vast body of literature without having to read too much. Moreover, I expect everyone to be active in class, helping your fellow students to develop their project. While I will not grade participation, Table 1 provides an overview of the kind of participation I’m hoping for.
In the second part of the course, we will have 1:1 meetings. Writing a Bachelor’s thesis requires independent and committed work, but it also requires good guidance. Therefore, you are required to schedule at least two “Official 1:1 Meetings” with me to discuss your ideas, progress, problems, etc. These official meetings will be graded based on whether you were prepared for these meetings. If you want to have additional 1:1 meetings, you may schedule up to three additional meetings (depending on your needs). These voluntary meetings won’t be graded but obviously, I expect you to be prepared, nonetheless. All 1:1 meetings will be conducted on Zoom.AIMS:
This course has three aims:
1. To develop your knowledge of and ability to critically evaluate theories of and evidence in political science. This includes primarily subfields like public opinion, political behavior, and political psychology.
2. To develop your ability to independently prepare, conduct, and evaluate academic work in political science.
3. To develop your reading, writing, presentation, and social skills. These skills are meant to be useful throughout your career.