210123 SE M5: EU and Europeanisation (2021S)
Digital power Europe
Continuous assessment of course work
Labels
REMOTE
Die Lehre wird im SoSe 2021 zu Beginn voraussichtlich digital stattfinden. Je nach Lage wird auf hybride oder Vor-Ort-Lehre umgestellt. Die Lehrenden werden die konkrete Organisationsform und Lehrmethodik auf ufind und Moodle bekannt geben, wobei auch mit kurzfristigen Änderungen gerechnet werden muss.Eine Anmeldung über u:space innerhalb der Anmeldephase ist erforderlich! Eine nachträgliche Anmeldung ist NICHT möglich.
Studierende, die der ersten Einheit unentschuldigt fern bleiben, verlieren ihren Platz in der Lehrveranstaltung.Achten Sie auf die Einhaltung der Standards guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis und die korrekte Anwendung der Techniken wissenschaftlichen Arbeitens und Schreibens.
Plagiierte und erschlichene Teilleistungen führen zur Nichtbewertung der Lehrveranstaltung (Eintragung eines 'X' im Sammelzeugnis).
Die Lehrveranstaltungsleitung kann Studierende zu einem notenrelevanten Gespräch über erbrachte Teilleistungen einladen.
Studierende, die der ersten Einheit unentschuldigt fern bleiben, verlieren ihren Platz in der Lehrveranstaltung.Achten Sie auf die Einhaltung der Standards guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis und die korrekte Anwendung der Techniken wissenschaftlichen Arbeitens und Schreibens.
Plagiierte und erschlichene Teilleistungen führen zur Nichtbewertung der Lehrveranstaltung (Eintragung eines 'X' im Sammelzeugnis).
Die Lehrveranstaltungsleitung kann Studierende zu einem notenrelevanten Gespräch über erbrachte Teilleistungen einladen.
Registration/Deregistration
Note: The time of your registration within the registration period has no effect on the allocation of places (no first come, first served).
- Registration is open from Th 04.02.2021 08:00 to Th 18.02.2021 08:00
- Registration is open from Mo 22.02.2021 08:00 to Mo 01.03.2021 08:00
- Deregistration possible until Mo 22.03.2021 23:59
Details
max. 50 participants
Language: English
Lecturers
Classes (iCal) - next class is marked with N
- Thursday 11.03. 09:45 - 11:15 Hörsaal 41 Gerda-Lerner Hauptgebäude, 1.Stock, Stiege 8
- Thursday 18.03. 09:45 - 11:15 Hörsaal 41 Gerda-Lerner Hauptgebäude, 1.Stock, Stiege 8
- Thursday 25.03. 09:45 - 11:15 Hörsaal 41 Gerda-Lerner Hauptgebäude, 1.Stock, Stiege 8
- Thursday 15.04. 09:45 - 11:15 Hörsaal 41 Gerda-Lerner Hauptgebäude, 1.Stock, Stiege 8
- Thursday 22.04. 09:45 - 11:15 Hörsaal 41 Gerda-Lerner Hauptgebäude, 1.Stock, Stiege 8
- Thursday 29.04. 09:45 - 11:15 Hörsaal 41 Gerda-Lerner Hauptgebäude, 1.Stock, Stiege 8
- Thursday 06.05. 09:45 - 11:15 Hörsaal 41 Gerda-Lerner Hauptgebäude, 1.Stock, Stiege 8
- Thursday 20.05. 09:45 - 11:15 Hörsaal 41 Gerda-Lerner Hauptgebäude, 1.Stock, Stiege 8
- Thursday 27.05. 09:45 - 11:15 Hörsaal 41 Gerda-Lerner Hauptgebäude, 1.Stock, Stiege 8
- Thursday 10.06. 09:45 - 11:15 Hörsaal 41 Gerda-Lerner Hauptgebäude, 1.Stock, Stiege 8
- Thursday 17.06. 09:45 - 11:15 Hörsaal 41 Gerda-Lerner Hauptgebäude, 1.Stock, Stiege 8
- Thursday 24.06. 09:45 - 11:15 Hörsaal 41 Gerda-Lerner Hauptgebäude, 1.Stock, Stiege 8
Information
Aims, contents and method of the course
Assessment and permitted materials
You need to submit all the required assignments to pass the course. Your final grade will be the weighted average of these assignments. What is important to us when it comes to grading are two things. First, stick to the task at hand. If your response paper is meant to end with a question, end with a question. If your presentation is meant to be 5 minutes, make it no more than 6. If your term paper is meant to discuss one question in around 4000 words, don’t try to answer half a dozen in 8000 words. It’s almost a dad thing to say, but these skills are important not just at a university, but in any kind of job. Second, put a bit of effort into it, or at least make it look that way. Have some decent formatting. But also try to be clear and crisp, which is often harder than writing long and convoluted sentences. Try to prepare a presentation that you yourself would like to listen to: short, clear points that highlight anything you found confusing or unclear. You don’t need to understand everything, have read a ton of additional literature, or write in a fancy way to get a very good grade. Just stick to the task and try to make sense.You are required to attend each session, and we encourage you to prepare for and actively participate in them. However, if you really can’t make it, just reach out to us, these things happen once or twice a term.
Minimum requirements and assessment criteria
Students are required to attend classes and come prepared (i.e., having finished and thought about the readings). In addition, there will be three types of assignments that together make up the final grade.
• First, for three sessions of their choosing, students need to write short response papers (half a page) that reflect on the readings and end with a question for the class (25%). And remember, questions end with a question mark.
• Second, they are required to deliver a very short input presentation (around 5-10 minutes) for one session as well as prepare discussion points for the class (e.g., questions, empirical examples) (25%). The former is meant to quickly summarize the main points of the reading(s) and the latter is meant to kick off and organize the discussion.
• Lastly, students need to write a relatively short term paper on a topic related to the course (up to 4000 words) (50%). The paper can be theoretical or empirical and is meant to hone in on one particular question that the students can pick themselves (although they should briefly discuss this with us in advance).
• First, for three sessions of their choosing, students need to write short response papers (half a page) that reflect on the readings and end with a question for the class (25%). And remember, questions end with a question mark.
• Second, they are required to deliver a very short input presentation (around 5-10 minutes) for one session as well as prepare discussion points for the class (e.g., questions, empirical examples) (25%). The former is meant to quickly summarize the main points of the reading(s) and the latter is meant to kick off and organize the discussion.
• Lastly, students need to write a relatively short term paper on a topic related to the course (up to 4000 words) (50%). The paper can be theoretical or empirical and is meant to hone in on one particular question that the students can pick themselves (although they should briefly discuss this with us in advance).
Examination topics
Students need no prior knowledge of academic debates on digitalization to successfully participate in the course. A general interest in the topic, basic English language skills, and a broad familiarity with the European Union are sufficient. In their submissions, students are expected to engage with the academic literature that touches upon central debates in the area of digitalization, particularly the role of the EU.
Reading list
Mayer-Schönberger, V. and Cukier, K. (2013) Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think. (An Eamon Dolan book). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Seoane, M. V. (2020) Normative market Europe?: The contested governance of cyber-surveillance technologies. In Emerging Security Technologies and EU Governance, Routledge.
Srnicek, N. (2017) Platform Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity.
van Dijck, J., Poell, T. and Waal, M. de (2018) The Platform Society: Public values in a connective world. New York: Oxford University Press.
Seoane, M. V. (2020) Normative market Europe?: The contested governance of cyber-surveillance technologies. In Emerging Security Technologies and EU Governance, Routledge.
Srnicek, N. (2017) Platform Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity.
van Dijck, J., Poell, T. and Waal, M. de (2018) The Platform Society: Public values in a connective world. New York: Oxford University Press.
Association in the course directory
Last modified: Tu 02.11.2021 14:28
• identify and describe the main challenges that digitalization poses to advanced capitalist countries in general and to the European Union in particular;
• summarize and critically assess the strengths and weakness of theoretical approaches that try make sense of Europe’s differential success in the areas of technological/economic and regulatory/normative leadership;
• apply the insights they gained from these approaches to their own projects.