210132 SE M11: Research Practice (2021W)
Comparison of constitutional policies
Continuous assessment of course work
Labels
ON-SITE
Eine Anmeldung über u:space innerhalb der Anmeldephase ist erforderlich! Eine nachträgliche Anmeldung ist NICHT möglich.
Studierende, die der ersten Einheit unentschuldigt fernbleiben, verlieren ihren Platz in der Lehrveranstaltung.Achten Sie auf die Einhaltung der Standards guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis und die korrekte Anwendung der Techniken wissenschaftlichen Arbeitens und Schreibens.
Plagiierte und erschlichene Teilleistungen führen zur Nichtbewertung der Lehrveranstaltung (Eintragung eines 'X' im Sammelzeugnis).
Die Lehrveranstaltungsleitung kann Studierende zu einem notenrelevanten Gespräch über erbrachte Teilleistungen einladen.
Studierende, die der ersten Einheit unentschuldigt fernbleiben, verlieren ihren Platz in der Lehrveranstaltung.Achten Sie auf die Einhaltung der Standards guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis und die korrekte Anwendung der Techniken wissenschaftlichen Arbeitens und Schreibens.
Plagiierte und erschlichene Teilleistungen führen zur Nichtbewertung der Lehrveranstaltung (Eintragung eines 'X' im Sammelzeugnis).
Die Lehrveranstaltungsleitung kann Studierende zu einem notenrelevanten Gespräch über erbrachte Teilleistungen einladen.
Registration/Deregistration
Note: The time of your registration within the registration period has no effect on the allocation of places (no first come, first served).
- Registration is open from Mo 06.09.2021 08:00 to Mo 20.09.2021 08:00
- Registration is open from We 22.09.2021 08:00 to We 29.09.2021 08:00
- Deregistration possible until Fr 22.10.2021 23:59
Details
max. 35 participants
Language: German
Lecturers
Classes (iCal) - next class is marked with N
- Monday 04.10. 08:00 - 11:15 Hörsaal 1 (H1), NIG 2.Stock
- Monday 11.10. 08:00 - 11:15 Hörsaal 1 (H1), NIG 2.Stock
- Monday 18.10. 08:00 - 11:15 Hörsaal 1 (H1), NIG 2.Stock
- Monday 25.10. 08:00 - 11:15 Hörsaal 1 (H1), NIG 2.Stock
- Monday 08.11. 08:00 - 11:15 Hörsaal 1 (H1), NIG 2.Stock
- Monday 15.11. 08:00 - 11:15 Hörsaal 1 (H1), NIG 2.Stock
- Monday 22.11. 08:00 - 11:15 Hörsaal 1 (H1), NIG 2.Stock
- Monday 29.11. 08:00 - 11:15 Hörsaal 1 (H1), NIG 2.Stock
- Monday 06.12. 08:00 - 11:15 Hörsaal 1 (H1), NIG 2.Stock
- Monday 13.12. 08:00 - 11:15 Hörsaal 1 (H1), NIG 2.Stock
- Monday 10.01. 08:00 - 11:15 Hörsaal 1 (H1), NIG 2.Stock
- Monday 17.01. 08:00 - 11:15 Hörsaal 1 (H1), NIG 2.Stock
- Monday 24.01. 08:00 - 11:15 Hörsaal 1 (H1), NIG 2.Stock
- Monday 31.01. 08:00 - 11:15 Hörsaal 1 (H1), NIG 2.Stock
Information
Aims, contents and method of the course
Assessment and permitted materials
Active participation in discussion (20%), research tasks (40%), seminar paper (40%)
Minimum requirements and assessment criteria
(1) Regular participation (with a maximum of two missed units), active participation in discussions (precondition is the thorough reading of the class assignments) (20 %)
(2) Successful completion and timely handing-in of research tasks (40 %)
(3) Seminar paper of 7000–8000 words without list of references (40 %)
(2) Successful completion and timely handing-in of research tasks (40 %)
(3) Seminar paper of 7000–8000 words without list of references (40 %)
Examination topics
See Readinglist (Will be completed in the course of the seminar)
Reading list
Readinglist (Selection):
Cope, Kevin L. & Mila Versteeg (2015). Constitutions, in International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Vol. 4, 710-715.
Elster, Jon (1995). Forces and mechanisms in the constitution-making process, Duke Law Journal 45(2): 364–396.
Gavison, Ruth (2002). What belongs in a constitution? Constitutional Political Economy 13(1): 89-105.
Ginsburg, Tom (ed.). Comparative constitutional design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Karlsson, Christer (2016). Explaining constitutional change: making sense of cross-national variation among European Union member states. Journal of European Public, 23(2): 255-275.
Lorenz, Astrid (2008). Verfassungsänderungen in etablierten Demokratien. Motivlagen und Aushandlungsmuster. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Lutz, Donald S. (1994). Toward a theory of constitutional amendment. American Political Science Review, 88(2): 355-370.
Moe, Terry M. (1990). Political institutions. The neglected side of the story. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 6: 213-253.
Stone Sweet, A. (2000). Governing with judges. Constitutional politics in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Vanberg, Georg (2005). The politics of constitutional review in Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vanberg, Georg (2015). Constitutional Courts in comparative perspective: A theoretical assessment. Annual Review of Political Science, 18: 167-185.
Versteeg, Mila & Emily Zackin (2016). Constitutions unentrenched: Towards and alternative theory of constitutional design. American Political Science Review, 110(4): 657-674.
Wheare, K.C. (1960). Modern constitutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 32-51
Wolf-Phillips, Leslie (1972). Comparative constitutions. London/Basingstoke: Macmillan
Cope, Kevin L. & Mila Versteeg (2015). Constitutions, in International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Vol. 4, 710-715.
Elster, Jon (1995). Forces and mechanisms in the constitution-making process, Duke Law Journal 45(2): 364–396.
Gavison, Ruth (2002). What belongs in a constitution? Constitutional Political Economy 13(1): 89-105.
Ginsburg, Tom (ed.). Comparative constitutional design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Karlsson, Christer (2016). Explaining constitutional change: making sense of cross-national variation among European Union member states. Journal of European Public, 23(2): 255-275.
Lorenz, Astrid (2008). Verfassungsänderungen in etablierten Demokratien. Motivlagen und Aushandlungsmuster. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Lutz, Donald S. (1994). Toward a theory of constitutional amendment. American Political Science Review, 88(2): 355-370.
Moe, Terry M. (1990). Political institutions. The neglected side of the story. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 6: 213-253.
Stone Sweet, A. (2000). Governing with judges. Constitutional politics in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Vanberg, Georg (2005). The politics of constitutional review in Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vanberg, Georg (2015). Constitutional Courts in comparative perspective: A theoretical assessment. Annual Review of Political Science, 18: 167-185.
Versteeg, Mila & Emily Zackin (2016). Constitutions unentrenched: Towards and alternative theory of constitutional design. American Political Science Review, 110(4): 657-674.
Wheare, K.C. (1960). Modern constitutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 32-51
Wolf-Phillips, Leslie (1972). Comparative constitutions. London/Basingstoke: Macmillan
Association in the course directory
Last modified: Mo 18.10.2021 14:08
The course (FoP) conveys the theoretical foundations of constitutional politics and guides the students to research topics in that field.Topics:
The course answers the following questions: What are the tasks constitutions ought to fulfil in modern democracies? What are the different traditions of constitutional politics, how do states combine the need to allow for constitutional change with the protective function of the constitution? Which political functions do constitutions have, what are the goals of constitutional framers and reformers? How do constitutions differ in their structures and functions? How do processes of constitutional elaboration and enactment and constitutional reform unfold? What is the role of (constitutional) courts? Modern democracies differ considerably with regard to these issues.Method:
In the course participants will work out how political systems differ with regard to the questions posed. The participants will collect relevant information on one or two states each in weakly research assignments to be discussed in the seminar. The seminar readings and the research assignments constitute the starting base for the course paper.