210142 SE M11: Research Practice (2023S)
How Citizens Want to Be Represented in Politics
Continuous assessment of course work
Labels
Eine Anmeldung über u:space innerhalb der Anmeldephase ist erforderlich! Eine nachträgliche Anmeldung ist NICHT möglich.
Studierende, die der ersten Einheit unentschuldigt fern bleiben, verlieren ihren Platz in der Lehrveranstaltung.Achten Sie auf die Einhaltung der Standards guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis und die korrekte Anwendung der Techniken wissenschaftlichen Arbeitens und Schreibens.
Plagiierte und erschlichene Teilleistungen führen zur Nichtbewertung der Lehrveranstaltung (Eintragung eines 'X' im Sammelzeugnis).
Die Lehrveranstaltungsleitung kann Studierende zu einem notenrelevanten Gespräch über erbrachte Teilleistungen einladen.
Studierende, die der ersten Einheit unentschuldigt fern bleiben, verlieren ihren Platz in der Lehrveranstaltung.Achten Sie auf die Einhaltung der Standards guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis und die korrekte Anwendung der Techniken wissenschaftlichen Arbeitens und Schreibens.
Plagiierte und erschlichene Teilleistungen führen zur Nichtbewertung der Lehrveranstaltung (Eintragung eines 'X' im Sammelzeugnis).
Die Lehrveranstaltungsleitung kann Studierende zu einem notenrelevanten Gespräch über erbrachte Teilleistungen einladen.
Registration/Deregistration
Note: The time of your registration within the registration period has no effect on the allocation of places (no first come, first served).
- Registration is open from We 01.02.2023 08:00 to Tu 14.02.2023 08:00
- Registration is open from Th 16.02.2023 11:00 to We 22.02.2023 08:00
- Deregistration possible until Mo 20.03.2023 23:59
Details
max. 35 participants
Language: English
Lecturers
Classes (iCal) - next class is marked with N
Students must attend the first session in person.
- Monday 06.03. 09:45 - 13:00 Hörsaal 2 (H2), NIG 2.Stock
- Monday 20.03. 09:45 - 13:00 Hörsaal 2 (H2), NIG 2.Stock
- Monday 27.03. 09:45 - 13:00 Hörsaal 2 (H2), NIG 2.Stock
- Monday 17.04. 09:45 - 13:00 Hörsaal 2 (H2), NIG 2.Stock
- Monday 24.04. 09:45 - 13:00 Hörsaal 2 (H2), NIG 2.Stock
- Monday 08.05. 09:45 - 13:00 Hörsaal 2 (H2), NIG 2.Stock
- Monday 15.05. 09:45 - 13:00 Hörsaal 2 (H2), NIG 2.Stock
- Monday 22.05. 09:45 - 13:00 Hörsaal 2 (H2), NIG 2.Stock
- Monday 05.06. 09:45 - 13:00 Hörsaal 2 (H2), NIG 2.Stock
- Monday 12.06. 09:45 - 13:00 Hörsaal 2 (H2), NIG 2.Stock
- Monday 19.06. 09:45 - 13:00 Hörsaal 2 (H2), NIG 2.Stock
- Monday 26.06. 09:45 - 13:00 Hörsaal 2 (H2), NIG 2.Stock
Information
Aims, contents and method of the course
Assessment and permitted materials
• Active participation and contribution in class (30%).
• Literature report (20%).
• In-depth interview and analysis (25%).
• Survey experiment design (25%).Attendance of all sessions is mandatory. Students cannot miss more than two sessions and must attend the first session.
• Literature report (20%).
• In-depth interview and analysis (25%).
• Survey experiment design (25%).Attendance of all sessions is mandatory. Students cannot miss more than two sessions and must attend the first session.
Minimum requirements and assessment criteria
Students have to pass each assessment part (see above) to obtain a positive grade for the course. They can obtain up to 100 points on this course. Hence, one point corresponds to 1% of your grade.Very good: 88-100 points
Good: 75-87 points
Satisfactory: 62-74 points
Sufficient: 50-61 points
Insufficient/fail: 0-49 points
Good: 75-87 points
Satisfactory: 62-74 points
Sufficient: 50-61 points
Insufficient/fail: 0-49 points
Examination topics
Topics covered in the course and class discussions, the literature on the syllabus and potentially additional materials students decide to engage with for an assessment (e.g. for the in-depth interviews).
Reading list
(Examples from the syllabus. The full syllabus will be announced at the beginning of term.)Pitkin, Hanna. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Mansbridge, Jane. 2003. “Rethinking Representation.” American Political Science Review 97(4): 515–528.Rehfeld, Andrew. 2009. “Representation Rethought: On Trustees, Delegates, and Gyroscopes in the Study of Political Representation and Democracy.” American Political Science Review 103(2): 214–213.Saward, Michael. 2006. “The Representative Claim.” Contemporary Political Theory 5: 297–318.Wolak, Jennifer. 2017. “Public Expectations of State Legislators.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 42(2): 175–209.Costa, Mia. 2020. “Ideology, Not Affect: What Americans Want from Political Representation.” American Journal of Political Science 65(2): 342-358.Bowler, Shaun. 2017. “Trustees, Delegates, and Responsiveness in Comparative Perspective.” Comparative Political Studies 50(6): 766–793.Bengtsson, Åsa, and Hanna Wass. 2010. “Styles of Political Representation: What Do Voters Expect?” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties 20(1): 55–81.Harden, Jeffrey J. 2015. “Citizen Demand for the Dimensions of Representation.” In Multidimensional Democracy, p. 50–83.Hainmueller, Jens, Daniel J Hopkins, and Teppei Yamamoto. 2014. “Causal Inference in Conjoint Analysis: Understanding Multidimensional Choices via Stated Preference Experiments.” Political Analysis 22(1): 1–30.Hochschild, Jennifer L. 2005. “Conducting Intensive Interviews and Elite Interviews.” In Workshop on Interdisciplinary Standards for Systematic Qualitative Reserach, eds. Michele Lamont and Patricia White. National Science Foundation, 124–27.
Association in the course directory
Last modified: Tu 14.03.2023 12:09
• Understand and further develop conceptions of citizens’ representation preferences
• Critically engage with literature on how citizens want to be represented in politics
• Independently develop research questions on citizens’ representation preferences that address gaps in the field
• Design, implement and analyze research on citizens’ representation preferences using survey or interview instruments