Universität Wien

210142 SE M11: Research Practice (2023S)

How Citizens Want to Be Represented in Politics

12.00 ECTS (4.00 SWS), SPL 21 - Politikwissenschaft
Continuous assessment of course work

Eine Anmeldung über u:space innerhalb der Anmeldephase ist erforderlich! Eine nachträgliche Anmeldung ist NICHT möglich.
Studierende, die der ersten Einheit unentschuldigt fern bleiben, verlieren ihren Platz in der Lehrveranstaltung.

Achten Sie auf die Einhaltung der Standards guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis und die korrekte Anwendung der Techniken wissenschaftlichen Arbeitens und Schreibens.
Plagiierte und erschlichene Teilleistungen führen zur Nichtbewertung der Lehrveranstaltung (Eintragung eines 'X' im Sammelzeugnis).
Die Lehrveranstaltungsleitung kann Studierende zu einem notenrelevanten Gespräch über erbrachte Teilleistungen einladen.

Registration/Deregistration

Note: The time of your registration within the registration period has no effect on the allocation of places (no first come, first served).

Details

max. 35 participants
Language: English

Lecturers

Classes (iCal) - next class is marked with N

Students must attend the first session in person.

  • Monday 06.03. 09:45 - 13:00 Hörsaal 2 (H2), NIG 2.Stock
  • Monday 20.03. 09:45 - 13:00 Hörsaal 2 (H2), NIG 2.Stock
  • Monday 27.03. 09:45 - 13:00 Hörsaal 2 (H2), NIG 2.Stock
  • Monday 17.04. 09:45 - 13:00 Hörsaal 2 (H2), NIG 2.Stock
  • Monday 24.04. 09:45 - 13:00 Hörsaal 2 (H2), NIG 2.Stock
  • Monday 08.05. 09:45 - 13:00 Hörsaal 2 (H2), NIG 2.Stock
  • Monday 15.05. 09:45 - 13:00 Hörsaal 2 (H2), NIG 2.Stock
  • Monday 22.05. 09:45 - 13:00 Hörsaal 2 (H2), NIG 2.Stock
  • Monday 05.06. 09:45 - 13:00 Hörsaal 2 (H2), NIG 2.Stock
  • Monday 12.06. 09:45 - 13:00 Hörsaal 2 (H2), NIG 2.Stock
  • Monday 19.06. 09:45 - 13:00 Hörsaal 2 (H2), NIG 2.Stock
  • Monday 26.06. 09:45 - 13:00 Hörsaal 2 (H2), NIG 2.Stock

Information

Aims, contents and method of the course

How do citizens want to be represented in politics? Is it more important for them that politicians share their policy goals (e.g. opinions on taxes, childcare, or immigration) or descriptive characteristics (e.g. being a woman or belonging to an ethnic minority)? Do citizens want politicians to mainly rely on their own judgment and do what they think is “right” for society, or do they prefer representatives that primarily find out what citizens want and follow these wishes closely? Can citizens imagine to be represented by politicians they did not vote for, or even by activists or celebrities that have never run in an election (e.g. Greta Thunberg, U2 singer Bo-no)?

This course provides an introduction to doing research on citizens’ preferences and views on political representation, following the research process from concept definition to analysis. We start by reviewing the concept of political representation and the different aspects that constitute representative practice (e.g. politicians’ policy positions, their socio-demographic background, how they speak, whom they address, how they relate to their party or how much they care about re-election). In a second step, we review the still small but exciting literature on how citizens want to be represented in politics. We will identify questions on which we already have a lot of evidence and knowledge about citizens’ preferences towards representation and questions that we deem important but that have not been tackled sufficiently. While most work in the field is based on surveys of citizens and uses quantitative methods, we will also review qualitative studies using in-depth interviews or focus groups with citizens. In a third step, we will learn more about two types of research designs that allow us to elicit citizens’ preferences towards representation, namely in-depth interviews and survey experiments. We will read key methodological pieces on these designs as well as literature explaining how to practically implement them. Finally, students will conduct and analyze an anonymous in-depth interview about representation with someone from their social network as well as design their own survey experiment on citizens’ representation preferences. We will wrap-up by discussing how our own research during the course has improved our understanding of citizens’ representation preferences compared to what we already knew from the literature.

Upon successful completion of the course, students should be able to:
• Understand and further develop conceptions of citizens’ representation preferences
• Critically engage with literature on how citizens want to be represented in politics
• Independently develop research questions on citizens’ representation preferences that address gaps in the field
• Design, implement and analyze research on citizens’ representation preferences using survey or interview instruments

Assessment and permitted materials

• Active participation and contribution in class (30%).
• Literature report (20%).
• In-depth interview and analysis (25%).
• Survey experiment design (25%).

Attendance of all sessions is mandatory. Students cannot miss more than two sessions and must attend the first session.

Minimum requirements and assessment criteria

Students have to pass each assessment part (see above) to obtain a positive grade for the course. They can obtain up to 100 points on this course. Hence, one point corresponds to 1% of your grade.

Very good: 88-100 points
Good: 75-87 points
Satisfactory: 62-74 points
Sufficient: 50-61 points
Insufficient/fail: 0-49 points

Examination topics

Topics covered in the course and class discussions, the literature on the syllabus and potentially additional materials students decide to engage with for an assessment (e.g. for the in-depth interviews).

Reading list

(Examples from the syllabus. The full syllabus will be announced at the beginning of term.)

Pitkin, Hanna. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Mansbridge, Jane. 2003. “Rethinking Representation.” American Political Science Review 97(4): 515–528.

Rehfeld, Andrew. 2009. “Representation Rethought: On Trustees, Delegates, and Gyroscopes in the Study of Political Representation and Democracy.” American Political Science Review 103(2): 214–213.

Saward, Michael. 2006. “The Representative Claim.” Contemporary Political Theory 5: 297–318.

Wolak, Jennifer. 2017. “Public Expectations of State Legislators.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 42(2): 175–209.

Costa, Mia. 2020. “Ideology, Not Affect: What Americans Want from Political Representation.” American Journal of Political Science 65(2): 342-358.

Bowler, Shaun. 2017. “Trustees, Delegates, and Responsiveness in Comparative Perspective.” Comparative Political Studies 50(6): 766–793.

Bengtsson, Åsa, and Hanna Wass. 2010. “Styles of Political Representation: What Do Voters Expect?” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties 20(1): 55–81.

Harden, Jeffrey J. 2015. “Citizen Demand for the Dimensions of Representation.” In Multidimensional Democracy, p. 50–83.

Hainmueller, Jens, Daniel J Hopkins, and Teppei Yamamoto. 2014. “Causal Inference in Conjoint Analysis: Understanding Multidimensional Choices via Stated Preference Experiments.” Political Analysis 22(1): 1–30.

Hochschild, Jennifer L. 2005. “Conducting Intensive Interviews and Elite Interviews.” In Workshop on Interdisciplinary Standards for Systematic Qualitative Reserach, eds. Michele Lamont and Patricia White. National Science Foundation, 124–27.

Association in the course directory

Last modified: Tu 14.03.2023 12:09