230149 SE Scientific Practice and Knowledge Management (2016W)
Continuous assessment of course work
Labels
Registration/Deregistration
Note: The time of your registration within the registration period has no effect on the allocation of places (no first come, first served).
- Registration is open from We 07.09.2016 09:00 to Su 25.09.2016 23:59
- Deregistration possible until Su 23.10.2016 23:59
Details
max. 25 participants
Language: English
Lecturers
Classes (iCal) - next class is marked with N
20.10.2016 9:45 - 12:30 Lecture & Debates: Metrics, values and evaluation in academic practice --> Albert Schweitzer Haus
25.10.2016 9:30 - 11:30 --> Computer Room- Monday 03.10. 12:00 - 13:30 Seminarraum STS, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/6. Stock, 1010 Wien (Kickoff Class)
- Tuesday 04.10. 09:00 - 12:00 Seminarraum STS, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/6. Stock, 1010 Wien
- Tuesday 11.10. 09:00 - 12:00 Seminarraum STS, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/6. Stock, 1010 Wien
- Tuesday 18.10. 09:00 - 12:00 Seminarraum STS, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/6. Stock, 1010 Wien
- Tuesday 25.10. 09:00 - 12:00 PC-Raum 1 Schenkenstraße 8-10, 1.UG
- Tuesday 08.11. 09:00 - 11:00 Seminarraum STS, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/6. Stock, 1010 Wien
- Tuesday 15.11. 09:00 - 11:00 Seminarraum STS, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/6. Stock, 1010 Wien
- Tuesday 22.11. 09:00 - 11:00 Seminarraum STS, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/6. Stock, 1010 Wien
- Tuesday 29.11. 09:00 - 12:00 Seminarraum STS, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/6. Stock, 1010 Wien
- Tuesday 06.12. 09:00 - 12:00 Seminarraum STS, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/6. Stock, 1010 Wien
- Tuesday 13.12. 09:00 - 11:00 Seminarraum STS, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/6. Stock, 1010 Wien
- Monday 30.01. 13:00 - 16:30 Seminarraum STS, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/6. Stock, 1010 Wien
- Tuesday 31.01. 09:30 - 13:00 Seminarraum STS, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/6. Stock, 1010 Wien
Information
Aims, contents and method of the course
Assessment and permitted materials
- Participate actively during discussions and practical exercises
- Read the mandatory literature
- Hand in all the written assignments, reflections and feedbacks on time
- Contribute to discussions and group work
- Adhere to the general standards of good academic practiceAssignmentsHomework: Researching a case
due 11.10.16 | group work | feedback in class
Each group will be assigned a whiteboard in the STS seminar room that they can use for collecting material and drawing mind-maps during the term. During the next week, start researching your case by collecting material and creating a collage on your topic. You will present your findings at the beginning of the next session.Reflection 1: Assessing personal skills and knowledge
due 09.10.16 | individual work | on demand feedback from lecturer
This reflection should be based on the personality poster you created during the first session. Write 1-2 pages assessing your personal strengths and weaknesses, your (soft)skills and how they are related to your disciplinary background. Also write about what you think your position within a group is and what you can and like to contribute to the group’s work.Assignment a: Starting a Bibliography
due 27.11.16 | group work | feedback from lecturer
Within your group, start engaging with your case study. Search for literature in relevant STS journals and books and try to identify different strands of literature, possible research gaps or interesting questions. During your meeting with the teaching assistants you can discuss your topic and relevant key words for literature research.
Write a first draft (2-3 pages) of your literature review. What are different approaches/strands in regard to the case study within STS? Which of them are dominant, which marginalised? Are there key authors and/or controversies? Which questions were covered and which left out? What possible questions can you identify for your own project?
The assignment should include a bibliography of 5-10 references that you consider relevant for your case. State your reasons for choosing these references. Also devote some space to reflect your research strategies.Assignment b: Reading Card
due 11.12.16 | individual work | peer-to-peer feedback
Choose one text that you identified as essential for your case study and write a reading card. Coordinate within the group so that each group member chooses a different text.
A reading card should include:
The main questions/hypothesis of the text.
A concise summary of the central argument(s) and/or key findings of the text. What is the red thread of the paper, leading from questions to conclusions?
A critical observation of the theoretical and methodological approaches of the text.Feedback on Reading Card of a peer (within group)
due 15.01.2017 | individual work | on demand feedback from peers
Organise within your group who will give feedback to whom. Read your peer’s reading card (Assignment b) carefully and give feedback.Assignment c: Research Exposé
due 22.01.2017 | group work | on demand feedback from lecturer
Over the course of the term you continuously engaged with your case study, searching for relevant literature, applying different theories and concepts and finding appropriate methods for your research interest. Now you need to wrap up your knowledge in an adequate form: a research exposé.Assignment d: Final Presentation
due 30.01.2017 (yellow & green) or 31.01.2017 (blue & red) | group work | feedback in class
This final presentation serves to present the work you accomplished during the semester. Find a form to present your exposé (Assignment c) in an interesting and adequate way. Be creative and use different presentation styles and formats.
For more details, consult the Case Based Learning Approach handoutReflection 2: Working in groups
due 05.02.2017 | individual work | on demand feedback from lecturer
Write a short (1-2 pages) reflection about your experiences with group work during the semester.
- Read the mandatory literature
- Hand in all the written assignments, reflections and feedbacks on time
- Contribute to discussions and group work
- Adhere to the general standards of good academic practiceAssignmentsHomework: Researching a case
due 11.10.16 | group work | feedback in class
Each group will be assigned a whiteboard in the STS seminar room that they can use for collecting material and drawing mind-maps during the term. During the next week, start researching your case by collecting material and creating a collage on your topic. You will present your findings at the beginning of the next session.Reflection 1: Assessing personal skills and knowledge
due 09.10.16 | individual work | on demand feedback from lecturer
This reflection should be based on the personality poster you created during the first session. Write 1-2 pages assessing your personal strengths and weaknesses, your (soft)skills and how they are related to your disciplinary background. Also write about what you think your position within a group is and what you can and like to contribute to the group’s work.Assignment a: Starting a Bibliography
due 27.11.16 | group work | feedback from lecturer
Within your group, start engaging with your case study. Search for literature in relevant STS journals and books and try to identify different strands of literature, possible research gaps or interesting questions. During your meeting with the teaching assistants you can discuss your topic and relevant key words for literature research.
Write a first draft (2-3 pages) of your literature review. What are different approaches/strands in regard to the case study within STS? Which of them are dominant, which marginalised? Are there key authors and/or controversies? Which questions were covered and which left out? What possible questions can you identify for your own project?
The assignment should include a bibliography of 5-10 references that you consider relevant for your case. State your reasons for choosing these references. Also devote some space to reflect your research strategies.Assignment b: Reading Card
due 11.12.16 | individual work | peer-to-peer feedback
Choose one text that you identified as essential for your case study and write a reading card. Coordinate within the group so that each group member chooses a different text.
A reading card should include:
The main questions/hypothesis of the text.
A concise summary of the central argument(s) and/or key findings of the text. What is the red thread of the paper, leading from questions to conclusions?
A critical observation of the theoretical and methodological approaches of the text.Feedback on Reading Card of a peer (within group)
due 15.01.2017 | individual work | on demand feedback from peers
Organise within your group who will give feedback to whom. Read your peer’s reading card (Assignment b) carefully and give feedback.Assignment c: Research Exposé
due 22.01.2017 | group work | on demand feedback from lecturer
Over the course of the term you continuously engaged with your case study, searching for relevant literature, applying different theories and concepts and finding appropriate methods for your research interest. Now you need to wrap up your knowledge in an adequate form: a research exposé.Assignment d: Final Presentation
due 30.01.2017 (yellow & green) or 31.01.2017 (blue & red) | group work | feedback in class
This final presentation serves to present the work you accomplished during the semester. Find a form to present your exposé (Assignment c) in an interesting and adequate way. Be creative and use different presentation styles and formats.
For more details, consult the Case Based Learning Approach handoutReflection 2: Working in groups
due 05.02.2017 | individual work | on demand feedback from lecturer
Write a short (1-2 pages) reflection about your experiences with group work during the semester.
Minimum requirements and assessment criteria
The grading scheme is based on a total of 100 points. These points will be awarded in relation to students’ performance in meeting the course learning aims in the different obligatory tasks.
The maximum number of points to be acquired for each task is:
Participation: 20 points (Preparation and active participation in the discussion of all sessions; Reflections 1 & 2)
Written Individual Work: 15 points (10 points Assignment b, 5 points Feedback)
Group Work: 40 points (5 points Homework, 5 points Assignment a, 25 points Assignment c, 5 points Assignment d)
Midterm Test: 25 pointsA minimum of 50 points is necessary to successfully complete the course. Failure to meet the attendance regulations, to deliver course assignments on time or to adhere to standards of academic work may result in a deduction of points.Grades
100-87 points: Excellent (1)
86-75 points: Good (2)
74-63 points: Satisfactory (3)
62-50 points: Sufficient (4)
49-0 points: Unsatisfactory (5) (fail)Delays and formal issues
Every time a student misses a deadline 5 points will be deducted from their individual account. The only exception to this rule is if there is a major and unpredictable reason for not being able to fulfill the task on time on the student's side. It is the student’s responsibility to communicate this in a timely manner.
After missing a deadline, the lecturer will set a second deadline for handing in the assignment. If this second deadline is again not met, the course may be graded as a 'fail' (5).
Each paper handed in with major formal shortcomings will result in 5 points being deducted from the student’s account. For group work, the same penalties will apply to each member of the respective group.Attendance
Presence and participation is compulsory. Absences of 6 hours at maximum are tolerated, provided that the lecturer is informed about the absence. Absences of up to 8 hours in total may be compensated by either a deduction of grading points or/and extra work agreed with the lecturer. Whether compensation is possible is decided by the lecturer.
Absences of more than 8 hours in total cannot be compensated. In this case, or if the lecturer does not allow a student to compensate absences of more than 4 hours, the course cannot be completed and is graded as a ‘fail’ (5), unless there is a major and unpredictable reason for not being able to fulfil the attendance requirements on the student’s side (e.g. a longer illness). In such a case, the student may be de-registered from the course without grading. It is the student’s responsibility to communicate this in a timely manner. Whether this exception applies is decided by the lecturer.Important Grading Information
If not explicitly noted otherwise, all requirements mentioned in the grading scheme and the attendance regulations must be met. If a required task is not fulfilled, e.g. a required assignment is not handed in or if the student does not meet the attendance requirements, this will be considered as a discontinuation of the course. In that case, the course will be graded as ‘fail’ (5), unless there is a major and unpredictable reason for not being able to fulfill the task on the student's side (e.g. a longer illness). In such a case, the student may be de-registered from the course without grading. It is the student’s responsibility to communicate this in a timely manner, and to provide relevant evidence to their claims if necessary. Whether this exception applies is decided by the lecturer.
If any requirement of the course has been fulfilled by fraudulent means, be it for example by cheating at an exam, plagiarizing parts of a written assignment or by faking signatures on an attendance sheet, the student's participation in the course will be discontinued, the entire course will be graded as ‘not assessed’ and will be entered into the electronic exam record as ‘fraudulently obtained’. Self-plagiarism, particularly re-using own work handed in for other courses, will be treated likewise.
The maximum number of points to be acquired for each task is:
Participation: 20 points (Preparation and active participation in the discussion of all sessions; Reflections 1 & 2)
Written Individual Work: 15 points (10 points Assignment b, 5 points Feedback)
Group Work: 40 points (5 points Homework, 5 points Assignment a, 25 points Assignment c, 5 points Assignment d)
Midterm Test: 25 pointsA minimum of 50 points is necessary to successfully complete the course. Failure to meet the attendance regulations, to deliver course assignments on time or to adhere to standards of academic work may result in a deduction of points.Grades
100-87 points: Excellent (1)
86-75 points: Good (2)
74-63 points: Satisfactory (3)
62-50 points: Sufficient (4)
49-0 points: Unsatisfactory (5) (fail)Delays and formal issues
Every time a student misses a deadline 5 points will be deducted from their individual account. The only exception to this rule is if there is a major and unpredictable reason for not being able to fulfill the task on time on the student's side. It is the student’s responsibility to communicate this in a timely manner.
After missing a deadline, the lecturer will set a second deadline for handing in the assignment. If this second deadline is again not met, the course may be graded as a 'fail' (5).
Each paper handed in with major formal shortcomings will result in 5 points being deducted from the student’s account. For group work, the same penalties will apply to each member of the respective group.Attendance
Presence and participation is compulsory. Absences of 6 hours at maximum are tolerated, provided that the lecturer is informed about the absence. Absences of up to 8 hours in total may be compensated by either a deduction of grading points or/and extra work agreed with the lecturer. Whether compensation is possible is decided by the lecturer.
Absences of more than 8 hours in total cannot be compensated. In this case, or if the lecturer does not allow a student to compensate absences of more than 4 hours, the course cannot be completed and is graded as a ‘fail’ (5), unless there is a major and unpredictable reason for not being able to fulfil the attendance requirements on the student’s side (e.g. a longer illness). In such a case, the student may be de-registered from the course without grading. It is the student’s responsibility to communicate this in a timely manner. Whether this exception applies is decided by the lecturer.Important Grading Information
If not explicitly noted otherwise, all requirements mentioned in the grading scheme and the attendance regulations must be met. If a required task is not fulfilled, e.g. a required assignment is not handed in or if the student does not meet the attendance requirements, this will be considered as a discontinuation of the course. In that case, the course will be graded as ‘fail’ (5), unless there is a major and unpredictable reason for not being able to fulfill the task on the student's side (e.g. a longer illness). In such a case, the student may be de-registered from the course without grading. It is the student’s responsibility to communicate this in a timely manner, and to provide relevant evidence to their claims if necessary. Whether this exception applies is decided by the lecturer.
If any requirement of the course has been fulfilled by fraudulent means, be it for example by cheating at an exam, plagiarizing parts of a written assignment or by faking signatures on an attendance sheet, the student's participation in the course will be discontinued, the entire course will be graded as ‘not assessed’ and will be entered into the electronic exam record as ‘fraudulently obtained’. Self-plagiarism, particularly re-using own work handed in for other courses, will be treated likewise.
Examination topics
Reading list
Association in the course directory
Last modified: Mo 07.09.2020 15:39
You will work individually as well as collaboratively and also assess and reflect upon your personal strengths and contributions while working within a group. This includes being able to give productive but critical feedback to your peers.
In order to introduce you to some of the theoretical considerations of STS in regard to its own knowledge production, we will critically reflect together on the practical consequences of the used tools and techniques and how they might impinge on the output you produce.