Universität Wien
Warning! The directory is not yet complete and will be amended until the beginning of the term.

233031 KO Discussion Class Politics of Innovation and its Institutional Dimensions (2024W)

1.00 ECTS (1.00 SWS), SPL 23 - Soziologie
Continuous assessment of course work

Registration/Deregistration

Note: The time of your registration within the registration period has no effect on the allocation of places (no first come, first served).

Details

max. 25 participants
Language: English

Lecturers

Classes (iCal) - next class is marked with N

16.10.2024
06.11.2024
27.11.2024
16.11.2024 (please note that the 4th KO is taking place on a MONDAY, 11:30-13:30)
22.01.2025

  • Wednesday 06.11. 09:30 - 11:30 Seminarraum STS, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/6. Stock, 1010 Wien
  • Wednesday 27.11. 09:30 - 11:30 Seminarraum STS, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/6. Stock, 1010 Wien
  • Monday 16.12. 11:30 - 13:30 Seminarraum STS, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/6. Stock, 1010 Wien
  • Wednesday 22.01. 09:30 - 11:30 Seminarraum STS, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/6. Stock, 1010 Wien

Information

Aims, contents and method of the course

Talk of 'innovation' has proliferated in the past decades: it is core to political programmes and economic growth strategies (such as Horizon Europe) as well as firms' marketing efforts and tactics of social movements. It has also entered the core of many academic fields. While today we have gotten used to thinking of innovation as central to societal developments, this is not self-evident in historical perspective. Back in 17th century, innovation had the meaning of political change, reform and revolution and 'novelty' was suspicious (Godin 2014).
This is quite contrary to today’s understanding of innovation as central to creating wealth, well being and (sometimes even) survival. This lecture starts by discussing the very meaning of the notion of innovation, its rise and proliferation, its relation to diverse forms of knowledge generation and exchange, and the many different facets of institutional framework conditions (e.g., for funding, measuring, or owning innovation) that societies have created to foster and stabilize this view. Amongst others, we will explore different attempts to steer innovation to serve societal needs better. Taking into account the broader societal context, we will also address in detail how the dominant understanding of innovation as technological innovation for the market developed and stabilised during the 20th century, e.g. by institutionalising science and innovation statistics and fields like 'innovation studies'. We further discuss how alternative concepts of innovation struggle to gain (political) legitimacy (e.g. 'frugal innovation' or 'social innovation'), the role of (commercial) innovation in the New Space Race, what happens when innovation turns to waste (and who should care) as well as the role of innovation in global politics. Throughout several examples, we will also explore different attempts to steer innovation to better serve social-environmental needs and discuss innovation from de-growth and post-colonial perspectives.
The aim of the course is to engage with innovation from different perspectives and learn to understand it as standing in a co-productive relationship with societal (institutional, political, economic, cultural, etc.) change.
The seperate lecture (VO) does so via talks by the lecturer but also by interactive discussions, brainstorming, or reflections on contemporary representations (e.g., videos) of innovation policies. The discussion class (KO) takes up and reflects the topics of the lecture. It does so through readings of scientific texts and engaging with diverse other forms of input, mostly in the framework of teamwork-based debate.

Assessment and permitted materials

The discussion class engages with the issues of the lecture class through debating texts, policy documents or any other additional material indicated in the handout.
To pass the discussion class, students are expected to:
o read the literature/look at the additional material for the respective discussion workshop,
o participate actively in all the discussions,
o upload 2 discussion questions related to the readings/additional material that you would be interested in discussing in class (questions may be related to core questions of a text, used concepts and terminologies, hypotheses, or other course-related issues, upload deadline: day before discussion class),
o take a leadership role in the discussion at one of the workshops (roles will be distributed at the start of the semester, hand in 3 days before the discussion class a short paper outlining how you plan to organize the discussion), and
o adhere to the general standards of good academic practice.

Minimum requirements and assessment criteria

Grading Scheme:
The grading scheme is based on a total of 100 points. These points will be awarded in relation to students’ performance in meeting the course learning aims in the different obligatory tasks. The maximum number of points to be acquired for each task is:
- Preparation of discussion questions (upload questions at minimum for 4 discussion workshops) (max. 25 points), assessed individually
- Contribution to the discussion in class on the basis of your reading and preparation; engagement in the discussion group; your presence (late coming will impact your grade) (max. 30 points), assessed individually
- Being a lead discussant in a workshop and handing in the concept for the discussion, (max. 45 points), assessed collectively

A minimum of 50 points is necessary to successfully complete the course. Failure to meet the attendance regulations, to deliver course assignments on time or to adhere to standards of academic work may result in a deduction of points. Acceptance of assignment implies compliance with the following requirements:
- Citations are always marked and referred to in the bibliography at the end of a text
- No unauthorized copying or pirating of existing texts; plagiarism will not be tolerated!
- Cover sheet must include course title and number, name, student ID, title of assignment/topic and date
- Style: A4 paper, 11 point font, 1 1⁄2 line spacing, page numbers in footer, author name and text title in header
- Proofreading and language checks before submission of texts

Examination topics

see requirements above

Reading list

see handout

Association in the course directory

MA HPS: M 1.1, M 1.2, M 1.3

Last modified: Mo 02.09.2024 14:46