233042 SE Microbes on the Mind: Studying and intervening in the promises of microbiome research (2024W)
Continuous assessment of course work
Labels
Registration/Deregistration
Note: The time of your registration within the registration period has no effect on the allocation of places (no first come, first served).
- Registration is open from Su 01.09.2024 09:00 to Su 22.09.2024 23:59
- Deregistration possible until We 27.11.2024 23:59
Details
max. 25 participants
Language: English
Lecturers
Classes (iCal) - next class is marked with N
- N Wednesday 27.11. 11:30 - 14:30 Seminarraum STS, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/6. Stock, 1010 Wien
- Thursday 28.11. 09:00 - 13:30 Seminarraum STS, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/6. Stock, 1010 Wien
- Friday 29.11. 08:30 - 12:30 Seminarraum STS, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/6. Stock, 1010 Wien
- Monday 02.12. 09:00 - 13:30 Seminarraum STS, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/6. Stock, 1010 Wien
- Tuesday 03.12. 09:00 - 13:30 Seminarraum STS, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/6. Stock, 1010 Wien
Information
Aims, contents and method of the course
Until recently, medicine has seen microbes as primarily disease-causing agents; a threat to life and health. In the last twenty years this view has been increasingly challenged, with new research showing the complex and essential roles that microbes have for humans, non-humans, and the environment. In this expanding field of discourse, hype about the promises of probiotics to cure everything from digestive disorders to depression has developed in tandem with fears about the rise of antibiotic resistance. More recently, claims of novelty have been critiqued by highlighting traditional and non-Western practices of fermentation and agriculture. STS informed perspectives on microbiome research are expanding - from Heather Paxson’s description of 'microbiopolitics' to Jamie Lorimer’s description of a 'probiotic turn'. And scholars from sociology, art, and philosophy have used microbes to highlight our collective, multispecies interdependence and issues of equity, whilst warning against ‘individualising’ and commercializing microbiome science. The COVID-19 pandemic brought many of these tensions into sharp relief. As discourses tangle together and slip past each other, how we depict and describe microbes is key representation matters.In this course we will investigate how microbiome research might shift understandings of our bodies, our health, and our situatedness, and unfold the role of communication in these meaning-making processes. In the first session we will survey microbiome research over the last 20 years, and set up a framework for critical science communication and discourse studies. We will then examine a range of discursive themes by pairing communication case studies with academic texts from STS, cultural studies, and science communication studies. Themes will include how microbiome research has been taken to challenge binary categories of nature/culture, human/non-human, and body/environment; promissory language and the potential for ‘cruel optimism’ (from Lauren Berlant); and ‘missing mess’ in depictions of microbes. Case studies will be drawn from popular media, as well as exhibits, artworks, and a podcast produced by Medical Museion the University of Copenhagen’s Museum for the past, present, and future of medicine (www.museion.ku.dk) where the course teacher Louise Whiteley is based.Throughout the course we will reflect on questions about intervention and ethics: If we see problematic representations, should we as researchers attempt to change them? When does description become normative? How can we support the development of the futures we want to see, whilst also being humble about our ability to imagine them? During the second half of the course, students will develop their own proposal for an intervention in microbiome communication, which we will share and discuss on the final day.
Assessment and permitted materials
Course Assessment
To pass the seminar, students are expected to complete the following tasks:
- Write up case study analysis based on class discussions and using paired articles
- Participate in group work developing a proposal for a microbiome communication project
- Present the project orally with the group and submit presentation slides
- Write a reflective essay about the project proposal, their role, and ethical considerations
To pass the seminar, students are expected to complete the following tasks:
- Write up case study analysis based on class discussions and using paired articles
- Participate in group work developing a proposal for a microbiome communication project
- Present the project orally with the group and submit presentation slides
- Write a reflective essay about the project proposal, their role, and ethical considerations
Minimum requirements and assessment criteria
Grading Scheme
The grading scheme is based on a total of 100 points. These points will be awarded in relation to students’ performance in meeting the course learning aims in the different obligatory tasks.
The maximum number of points to be acquired for each task is:
- Write up case study analysis based on class discussions and using paired articles: 40, assessed individually (Students submitting a draft by 12pm on 5th December will receive feedback before the end of the seminar course.)
- Participate in group work developing a proposal for a microbiome communication project: n/a, participation required n/a
- Oral presentation of project proposal and presentation slides: 30, assessed in group, feedback on draft proposal/slides will be offered
- Reflective essay about the project proposal: 30, assessed individually, no feedbackMinimum requirements
A minimum of 50 points is necessary to successfully complete the course. Failure to meet the attendance regulations, to deliver course assignments on time or to adhere to standards of academic work may result in a deduction of points.Grades
100-89 points Excellent (1)
88-76 points Good (2)
75-63 points Satisfactory (3)
62-50 points Sufficient (4)
49-0 points Unsatisfactory (5) (fail)Attendance
Please note: If you miss the first session of the course unexcused, you will be automatically de-registered.
Presence and participation is compulsory.Important Grading Information
If not explicitly noted otherwise, all requirements mentioned in the grading scheme and the attendance regulations must be met.Guidelines for the use of AI tools: If you use AI (e.g., Chat GPT or similar software) as a supporting tool in your assignments, this should be acknowledged openly and clearly, so that the instructor is aware of where and to what extent the AI tool was used.The course uses the plagiarism-detection service Turnitin for larger assignments.
The grading scheme is based on a total of 100 points. These points will be awarded in relation to students’ performance in meeting the course learning aims in the different obligatory tasks.
The maximum number of points to be acquired for each task is:
- Write up case study analysis based on class discussions and using paired articles: 40, assessed individually (Students submitting a draft by 12pm on 5th December will receive feedback before the end of the seminar course.)
- Participate in group work developing a proposal for a microbiome communication project: n/a, participation required n/a
- Oral presentation of project proposal and presentation slides: 30, assessed in group, feedback on draft proposal/slides will be offered
- Reflective essay about the project proposal: 30, assessed individually, no feedbackMinimum requirements
A minimum of 50 points is necessary to successfully complete the course. Failure to meet the attendance regulations, to deliver course assignments on time or to adhere to standards of academic work may result in a deduction of points.Grades
100-89 points Excellent (1)
88-76 points Good (2)
75-63 points Satisfactory (3)
62-50 points Sufficient (4)
49-0 points Unsatisfactory (5) (fail)Attendance
Please note: If you miss the first session of the course unexcused, you will be automatically de-registered.
Presence and participation is compulsory.Important Grading Information
If not explicitly noted otherwise, all requirements mentioned in the grading scheme and the attendance regulations must be met.Guidelines for the use of AI tools: If you use AI (e.g., Chat GPT or similar software) as a supporting tool in your assignments, this should be acknowledged openly and clearly, so that the instructor is aware of where and to what extent the AI tool was used.The course uses the plagiarism-detection service Turnitin for larger assignments.
Examination topics
Reading list
References:
Berlant, L. (2008). Cruel Optimism. Duke University Press.
Lorimer, J. (2019). Hookworms Make Us Human: The Microbiome, Eco-immunology, and a Probiotic Turn in Western Health Care. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 33(1), 60-79.
Paxson, H. (2008). Post-Pasteurian Cultures: The Microbiopolitics of Raw-Milk Cheese in the United States. Cultural Anthropology, 23(1), 15-47.
Berlant, L. (2008). Cruel Optimism. Duke University Press.
Lorimer, J. (2019). Hookworms Make Us Human: The Microbiome, Eco-immunology, and a Probiotic Turn in Western Health Care. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 33(1), 60-79.
Paxson, H. (2008). Post-Pasteurian Cultures: The Microbiopolitics of Raw-Milk Cheese in the United States. Cultural Anthropology, 23(1), 15-47.
Association in the course directory
Last modified: Tu 24.09.2024 13:06