Universität Wien

233046 SE Microbial biopolitics and the global antibiotics crisis (2023S)

Rethinking conservation, innovation and access in global health governance

5.00 ECTS (2.00 SWS), SPL 23 - Soziologie
Continuous assessment of course work

Registration/Deregistration

Note: The time of your registration within the registration period has no effect on the allocation of places (no first come, first served).

Details

max. 25 participants
Language: English

Lecturers

Classes (iCal) - next class is marked with N

Please note: The date 07.06.2023 (11.30-13.30) is a replacement date!

  • Wednesday 01.03. 11:30 - 13:30 Seminarraum STS, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/6. Stock, 1010 Wien (Kickoff Class)
  • Wednesday 15.03. 11:30 - 13:30 Seminarraum STS, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/6. Stock, 1010 Wien
  • Wednesday 22.03. 11:30 - 13:30 Seminarraum STS, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/6. Stock, 1010 Wien
  • Wednesday 29.03. 11:30 - 13:30 Seminarraum STS, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/6. Stock, 1010 Wien
  • Wednesday 19.04. 11:30 - 13:30 Seminarraum STS, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/6. Stock, 1010 Wien
  • Wednesday 26.04. 11:30 - 13:30 Seminarraum STS, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/6. Stock, 1010 Wien
  • Wednesday 03.05. 11:30 - 13:30 Seminarraum STS, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/6. Stock, 1010 Wien
  • Wednesday 17.05. 11:30 - 13:30 Seminarraum STS, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/6. Stock, 1010 Wien
  • Wednesday 24.05. 11:30 - 13:30 Seminarraum STS, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/6. Stock, 1010 Wien
  • Wednesday 07.06. 11:30 - 13:30 Seminarraum STS, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/6. Stock, 1010 Wien
  • Wednesday 14.06. 10:30 - 13:30 Seminarraum STS, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/6. Stock, 1010 Wien

Information

Aims, contents and method of the course

Antibiotics – the ‘magic bullets’ of modern medicine – are losing their therapeutic effectiveness as pathogens (such as bacteria) increasingly develop resistance to drugs. This phenomenon is called “antimicrobial resistance” (AMR) and constitutes one of the most pressing health-related concerns on a global scale (Hoffman et al 2015). The WHO, for instance, considers AMR as the greatest threat to world health, second only to the effects of climate change (WHO 2021). From a social theory angle, AMR puts into question the sociotechnical orders of ‘high modernist’ societies and their decidedly antimicrobial biopolitics (Latour 1993), which have, in the course of the 20th century, become firmly rooted in antibiotics as a vital infrastructure (Chandler 2019) and readily available ‘weapon’ in the ‘war on microbes’ (Walker 2020, Brown and Nettleton 2017).

AMR thus offers several perspectives for scholars of STS to engage with the changing relationships between science, medicine and society against the background of severe global crises – simultaneously, a crisis of health, of sustainability, of innovation, of governance and of imagination.

In this seminar, we will take this global antibiotics crisis as a “keyhole issue” to understand the role of innovation in the governance of pressing global (health) crises. As a specialization seminar in the “politics of innovation”, our overarching ambition is to examine “innovation” as a organizing principle and high-ranking value in contemporary society. As STS scholars have emphasized, “Innovation” has become a veritable political imperative and is deemed a solution for almost every imaginable problem or challenge (Haddad and Benner 2021; Schot & Steinmüller 2019, Pfotenhauer et al 2019). However, the notion of innovation and its meaning are at the same time highly contested. Whilst “innovation” expresses the desire for deliberate change for the better – more often than not articulated and enacted through “new technology” – it is often unclear, what “better” means and for whom, what interests and values are inscribed into particular innovations, and who should design, drive and distribute innovations throughout society in a fair, desirable and effective way.

In the case of AMR, past years have seen several efforts to tackle AMR through “innovation”. Numerous countries have adopted national action plans to promote the prudent and responsible use of antibiotics and to curb excessive overuse; a plethora of initiatives and organizations have formed to make AMR visible, measurable, and controllable, and to support public awareness, behavioral change, and policy action; and several research programs, funds, and public-private partnerships aim to repair the pharmaceutical industry's "broken antibiotics pipeline" and to stimulate the development of new diagnostics and therapies. Throughout these initiatives, "innovation" is invoked as the central formula to "solve" the antibiotics crisis.

In this seminar we will seek to make sense of these developments and pursue the following aims:

- Develop a research specialization in politics of innovation through an in-depth engagement with the antibiotics innovation crisis as a particular field.

- Understand the relationships between social/technological innovation, governance and pressing societal crises.

- Develop a solid basis in medical STS and STS-informed studies of global health governance

- Advance academic research and writing skills by working continuously on a research-based term paper throughout the seminar

Methods:
This seminar is designed as an exploratory learning space that combines different learning modalities, incl. input by the lecturer, in-depth literature study, and student-led independent research tasks. Students are required to work continuously on projects (individually and in groups) and to regularly present the progress of their learning/research experience(handouts, presentations, discussion, etc.)

Assessment and permitted materials

To pass the seminar, students are expected to complete the following tasks:

Research diary (groups-based assignment):
Group-based preparation of individual sessions (1p/session). At the beginning of the semester, students form small groups of about 3-5 students (depending on class size), who continuously read, discuss and reflect on obligatory study/reading materials of each session. These include, e.g. academic publications, media articles, or other web-based learning materials. Before each individual session, a research diary protocol of approx. 1 page must be completed. These protocols should include, at a minimum, a short discussion of what new insights and ideas the group has gained through the engagement with the materials; how these materials adds to the themes, problems and debates of the seminar; as well as 3 well-developed questions the group finds relevant to address during the session. One member of each group has to upload the protocol to the respective Moodle page the day before the seminar.

Case study profile of one antibiotic innovation initiative (individually or in pairs):
Students will be assigned a small research-based task, in which they should examine a particular innovation-driven initiative. This can be a public, private or philanthropic organization, a product development partnership, a (inter-)national research program, or the like. A template of how to map and describe the case study descriptively and conceptually will be provided by the lecturer at the beginning of the seminar. The case study profile will likely have a scope of 1200 words. Also, the lecturer will suggest a list of potential case studies. Students may work in pairs if the scope of the case study justifies teamwork. The individual case study profiles will be collated and made available for all students of the seminar, and will be presented / discussed by students in the final session of the seminar.

Term paper (individual assignment):
The term paper is an individual assignment. The aim of the term paper is to deepen the knowledge gained throughout the seminar. It can be either merely literature-based (discussing key literature along an individually set guiding research question) or involve a small case study (e.g. building on and expanding (!) the analytical profile assignment). It should comprise roughly 8-10 pages (word count approximately 3.500-4.000). It must be handed in via Moodle by the 31st of July 2023 at the latest. It is advisable to discuss the paper title and topic with the lecturer beforehand. The paper must include a cover page, a table of contents, and a full references list. The paper itself should clearly state the chosen question, its relevance to the course, and the conceptual framework (incl. empirical materials/data used) for the analysis. It should also develop a set of conclusions based on the analysis undertaken in the paper.

Active participation in class (based on thorough preparation of learning materials) is expected and required to successfully complete the course.

This course uses the plagiarism-detection service Turnitin for assignments.

Minimum requirements and assessment criteria

A minimum of 50 points is necessary to successfully complete the course. Failure to meet the attendance
regulations, to deliver course assignments on time or to adhere to standards of academic work may result in
a deduction of points. All three assignments must be completed in order to successfully complete the
course.

Grading Scheme:

Research diary: 15 pt.
Case study protocol: 35 pt.
Term paper: 50 pt.

100-89 points Excellent (1)
88-76 points Good (2)
75-63 points Satisfactory (3)
62-50 points Sufficient (4)
49-0 points Unsatisfactory (5) (fail)

Examination topics

Reading list

Obligatory and further literature will be provided through MOODLE at the beginning of the seminar.

References used in this outline include:

Brown, N., & Nettleton, S. (2017). ‘There is worse to come’: the biopolitics of traumatism in antimicrobial resistance (AMR). The Sociological Review, 65(3), 493-508.

Chandler, C. I. (2019). Current accounts of antimicrobial resistance: stabilisation, individualisation and antibiotics as infrastructure. Palgrave communications, 5(1), 1-13.

Haddad, C., & Benner, M. (2021). Situating innovation policy in Mediterranean Arab countries: A research agenda for context sensitivity. Research Policy, 50(7), 104273.

Hoffman, S. J., Caleo, G. M., Daulaire, N., Elbe, S., Matsoso, P., Mossialos, E., ... & Røttingen, J. A. (2015). Strategies for achieving global collective action on antimicrobial resistance. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 93, 867-876.

Latour, B. (1993). The pasteurization of France. Harvard University Press.

Schot, J., & Steinmueller, W. E. (2018). Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change. Research policy, 47(9), 1554-1567.

Pfotenhauer, S. M., Juhl, J., & Aarden, E. (2019). Challenging the “deficit model” of innovation: Framing policy issues under the innovation imperative. Research Policy, 48(4), 895-904.

Walker, I. F. (2020). Beyond the military metaphor. Medicine Anthropology Theory, 7(2), 261-272.

WHO (2021). Antimicrobial resistance – Key facts. URL: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/antimicrobial-resistance

Association in the course directory

Last modified: Th 27.04.2023 13:27