Universität Wien

240512 SE MM3 Toxicity, chemosociality and alterlife (2023W)

Continuous assessment of course work

Participation at first session is obligatory!

The lecturer can invite students to a grade-relevant discussion about partial achievements. Partial achievements that are obtained by fraud or plagiarized result in the non-evaluation of the course (entry 'X' in certificate). The plagiarism software 'Turnitin' will be used.

The use of AI tools (e.g. ChatGPT) for the attainment of partial achievements is only allowed if explicitly requested by the course instructor.

Registration/Deregistration

Note: The time of your registration within the registration period has no effect on the allocation of places (no first come, first served).

Details

max. 25 participants
Language: English

Lecturers

Classes (iCal) - next class is marked with N

Tuesday 03.10. 16:45 - 20:00 Übungsraum (A414) NIG 4. Stock
Tuesday 10.10. 16:45 - 20:00 Übungsraum (A414) NIG 4. Stock
Tuesday 17.10. 16:45 - 20:00 Übungsraum (A414) NIG 4. Stock
Tuesday 24.10. 16:45 - 20:00 Übungsraum (A414) NIG 4. Stock
Tuesday 31.10. 16:45 - 20:00 Übungsraum (A414) NIG 4. Stock
Tuesday 07.11. 16:45 - 20:00 Übungsraum (A414) NIG 4. Stock
Tuesday 14.11. 16:45 - 20:00 Hörsaal C, NIG 4. Stock
Tuesday 21.11. 16:45 - 20:00 Übungsraum (A414) NIG 4. Stock
Tuesday 28.11. 16:45 - 20:00 Übungsraum (A414) NIG 4. Stock

Information

Aims, contents and method of the course

This course explores questions of technologically-induced ecological ruination and health related issues by engaging critically with many toxic materials, imaginaries, and futurities. In so doing, the course aims to examine in which multiple ways many human and more-than-human beings have experienced toxicity and health deteriorated existences in the Anthropocene. The anthropological texts taken into account during the course analyse various perspectives on alternative worlds that could follow from environmental pollution, anthropogenic climate change, radiological contamination, species extinction, the proposed Anthropocene epoch, as well as the dreary futures they call us to envisage. In addition, the course shows how disciplines such as Socio-Cultural Anthropology and Science & Technology can widen our repertoire of modalities for engaging with Anthropocene today and tomorrow as well as how we can conceive of other term to define and frame present and future intertwinements among the environment, humans and more-than-human beings. The texts analyzed during the class will engage critically with socially, historically and politically loaded word such Anthropocene and try to outline post- and de-colonial alternative metaphors and terms to describe our epoch.
The goal of this course is therefore to expand students’ capacities to reckon with near and deep futures during a historical moment of ecological turmoil, as well as to support a sustained reflection on the art of living wisely on a damaged planet. Therefore, students will take toxicity in all its contradictions as both an object and an analytic that helps us ask new questions and gain new perspectives on the materialities of social difference, the politics of evidence, the nature of health, and the nature of nature. The papers in the course will trace how toxicity connects humans to histories, to processes and to other positioned otherwises. In so doing, the topics taken into account will explore how alternative notions and metaphors for describe the Anthropocene and toxicity rely on and unsettle familiar geographies of colonialism and state sovereignty. In this regard, students will engage with various questions and issues. Therefore, they will be able to: (1) critically evaluate debates about environmental justice in various world settings and contexts; (2) understand key features and problems of toxicity in both the Global South and North; (3) relate health environmental toxicity and pollution with health issues and socio-economic and political vulnerability; comprehend the multiple ways that the production of scientific/biomedical expertise entails the management of race, gender, disability, class and other categories of social difference and how such expertise are driven by wider socio-political and economic interests. Finally, students will be able to look at the politics of scientific evidence and the way authoritative knowledge is tied to various forms of discursive practices.

Assessment and permitted materials

Regular participation in class debates/discussion, oral presentation of the results of research on an agreed topic and drafting of a seminar paper of about 3.000 words constitute the course requirements. Course classes can be based on either active and regular participation only or on active and regular participation with a final examination/assignment. The seminar is based on class discussions and analysis of reading materials or other sources, written or oral presentations. Students should also note that no late assignments will be accepted. They are therefore asked to complete all written works on time and make sure to see the lecturer in his office hours with any questions or issues that may arise during seminar classes.

Minimum requirements and assessment criteria

For the grade of this seminar students should try to attend the lessons, take actively part in them and prepare a presentation of about 15 min. plus 10 min. of questions and discussions. Furthermore, the examination modality entails a written assignment of 3000 words. Therefore, 80 % attendance is required. If one session is missed an additional assignment must be completed. The grade is therefore defined as follows: seminar paper 40%, presentation 40%, and contribution to discussion in class 20%. In other words, for the required passing grade of the course, students must:
1. not exceed two absences without an excuse. Exceeding this maximum means that the minimum requirements for a passing grade have not been met;
2. achieve a passing final grade based on their performance.

The points of the individual performances are added together and the total is translated into a grade according to the following grading scale.

Grading scale
91-100 points = 1 (very good)
81-90 points = 2 (good)
71-80 points = 3 (satisfactory)
61-70 points = 4 (sufficient)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
0-60 points = 5 (not sufficient)

Examination topics

The seminar is based on presentations, engagements in discussions and works in small groups. Additionally, students will work out individual seminar papers on topics that are related to their presentation or are of their personal interest.

Reading list

Shapiro, N, and E. Kirksey. 2017. Chemo-Ethnography: An Introduction. Cultural Anthropology 32 (4): 481–93.
Roberts, Elizabeth F. S. 2017. “What Gets Inside: Violent Entanglements and Toxic Boundaries in Mexico City.” Cultural Anthropology 32(4): 592–619.
Vanessa Agard-Jones (2014). Spray Somatosphere.org
http://somatosphere.net/2014/spray.html/
Agard-Jones, Vanessa. 2013. “Bodies in the System.” Small Axe (17)3: 182–92.
Katherine A. Thomas, James R. Elliott & Sergio Chavez (2019). "Community Perceptions of Industrial Risks Before and After a Toxic Flood: The Case of Houston and Hurricane Harvey," Sociological Spectrum 38(6): 371-386.
Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 2009. “The Climate of History: Four Theses.” Critical Inquiry 35(2): 197-222.
Haraway, Donna. 2015. “Anthropocene, Capitalocene, Plantationocene, Chthulucene: Making Kin.” Environmental Humanities 6(1): 159–165.
Hecht, Gabrielle. 2018. “Interscalar Vehicles for an African Anthropocene: On Waste, Temporality, and Violence.” Cultural Anthropology 33(1): 109-141.
Davis, Heather, and Zoe Todd. 2017. “On the Importance of a Date, or, Decolonizing the Anthropocene.” ACME 16, no. 4: 761–80.

Association in the course directory

Last modified: Tu 03.10.2023 16:28